Application of Bayesian Active Learning to the Estimation of Auditory Filter Shapes Using the Notched-Noise Method

Multispecies initial numerical validation of an efficient algorithm prototype for auditory brainstem response hearing threshold estimation

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) can be used to evaluate hearing sensitivity of animals. However, typical measurement protocols are time-consuming. Here, an adaptive algorithm is proposed for efficient ABR threshold estimation. The algorithm relies on the update of the predicted hearing threshold from a Gaussian process model as ABR data are collected using iteratively optimized stimuli. To validate the algorithm, ABR threshold estimation is simulated by adaptively subsampling pre-collected ABR datasets. The simulated experiment is performed on 5 datasets of mouse, budgerigar, gerbil, and guinea pig ABRs (27 ears). The datasets contain 68-106 stimuli conditions, and the adaptive algorithm is configured to terminate after 20 stimuli conditions. The algorithm threshold estimate is compared against human rater estimates who visually inspected the full waveform stacks. The algorithm threshold matches the human estimates within 10 dB, averaged over frequency, for 15 of the 27 ears while reducing the number of stimuli conditions by a factor of 3-5 compared to standard practice. The intraclass correlation coefficient is 0.81 with 95% upper and lower bounds at 0.74 and 0.86, indicating moderate to good reliability between human and algorithm threshold estimates. The results demonstrate the feasibility of a Bayesian adaptive procedure for rapid ABR threshold estimation.

Toward parametric Bayesian adaptive procedures for multi-frequency categorical loudness scaling

A series of Bayesian adaptive procedures to estimate loudness growth across a wide frequency range from individual listeners was developed, and these procedures were compared. Simulation experiments were conducted based on multinomial psychometric functions for categorical loudness scaling across ten test frequencies estimated from 61 listeners with normal hearing and 87 listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Adaptive procedures that optimized the stimulus selection based on the interim estimates of two types of category-boundary models were tested. The first type of model was a phenomenological model of category boundaries adopted from previous research studies, while the other type was a data-driven model derived from a previously collected set of categorical loudness scaling data. An adaptive procedure without Bayesian active learning was also implemented. Results showed that all adaptive procedures provided convergent estimates of the loudness category boundaries and equal-loudness contours between 250 and 8000 Hz. Performing post hoc model fitting, using the data-driven model, on the collected data led to satisfactory accuracies, such that all adaptive procedures tested in the current study, independent of modeling approach and stimulus-selection rules, were able to provide estimates of the equal-loudness-level contours between 20 and 100 phons with root-mean-square errors typically under 6 dB after 100 trials.

Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity assessment in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

OBJECTIVE

The ear's spectral resolution or frequency selectivity (FS) is a fundamental aspect of hearing but is not routinely measured in clinical practice. This study evaluated a simplified FS testing procedure for clinical use by replacing the time-consuming two-interval forced choice (2IFC) method with method of limits (MOL) carried out using a custom-made software and consumer-grade equipment.

DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE

Study 1 compared the FS measure obtained with MOL and 2IFC procedure at two centre frequencies (CFs) (1 and 4 kHz) in 21 normal-hearing listeners. Study 2 determined the FS measure using MOL at five CFs (0.5-8 kHz) in 32 normal-hearing and nine sensorineural hearing loss listeners and compared them with their thresholds in quiet.

RESULTS

FS measurements with MOL and 2IFC methods were highly correlated and had statistically comparable intra-subject test-retest reliability. FS measures determined with MOL were reduced in the hearing-impaired compared to normal-hearing listeners at the CF corresponding to their hearing loss. Linear regression analysis showed significant relationship between FS deterioration and quiet threshold loss (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified and affordable FS testing method can be used alongside audiometry to provide additional information about the cochlear function.

Test-retest evaluation of a notched-noise test using consumer-grade mobile audio equipment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether consumer-grade mobile audio equipment can be reliably used as a platform for the notched-noise test, including when the test is conducted outside the laboratory.

DESIGN

Two studies were conducted: Study 1 was a notched-noise masking experiment with three different setups: in a psychoacoustic test booth with a standard laboratory PC; in a psychoacoustic test booth with a mobile device; and in a quiet office room with a mobile device. Study 2 employed the same task as Study 1, but compared circumaural headphones to insert earphones.

STUDY SAMPLE

Nine and ten young, normal-hearing participants completed studies 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

The test-retest accuracy of the notched-noise test on the mobile implementation did not differ from that for the laboratory setup. A possible effect of the earphone design was identified in Study 1, which was corroborated by Study 2, where test-retest variability was smallest when comparing results from experiments conducted using identical acoustic transducers.

CONCLUSIONS

Results and test-retest repeatability comparable to standard laboratory settings for the notched-noise test can be obtained with mobile equipment outside the laboratory.