1
|
Xiao Y, Fulda KG, Young RA, Hendrix ZN, Daniel KM, Chen KY, Zhou Y, Roye JL, Kosmari L, Wilson J, Espinoza AM, Sutcliffe KM, Pitts SI, Arbaje AI, Chui MA, Blair S, Sloan D, Jackson M, Gurses AP. Patient Partnership Tools to Support Medication Safety in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Stepped Wedge Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e57878. [PMID: 38684080 PMCID: PMC11091807 DOI: 10.2196/57878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preventable harms from medications are significant threats to patient safety in community settings, especially among ambulatory older adults on multiple prescription medications. Patients may partner with primary care professionals by taking on active roles in decisions, learning the basics of medication self-management, and working with community resources. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the impact of a set of patient partnership tools that redesign primary care encounters to encourage and empower patients to make more effective use of those encounters to improve medication safety. METHODS The study is a nonrandomized, cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster-controlled trial with 1 private family medicine clinic and 2 public safety-net primary care clinics each composing their own cluster. There are 2 intervention sequences with 1 cluster per sequence and 1 control sequence with 1 cluster. Cross-sectional surveys will be taken immediately at the conclusion of visits to the clinics during 6 time periods of 6 weeks each, with a transition period of no data collection during intervention implementation. The number of visits to be surveyed will vary by period and cluster. We plan to recruit patients and professionals for surveys during 405 visits. In the experimental periods, visits will be conducted with two partnership tools and associated clinic process changes: (1) a 1-page visit preparation guide given to relevant patients by clinic staff before seeing the provider, with the intention to improve communication and shared decision-making, and (2) a library of short educational videos that clinic staff encourage patients to watch on medication safety. In the control periods, visits will be conducted with usual care. The primary outcome will be patients' self-efficacy in medication use. The secondary outcomes are medication-related issues such as duplicate therapies identified by primary care providers and assessment of collaborative work during visits. RESULTS The study was funded in September 2019. Data collection started in April 2023 and ended in December 2023. Data was collected for 405 primary care encounters during that period. As of February 15, 2024, initial descriptive statistics were calculated. Full data analysis is expected to be completed and published in the summer of 2024. CONCLUSIONS This study will assess the impact of patient partnership tools and associated process changes in primary care on medication use self-efficacy and medication-related issues. The study is powered to identify types of patients who may benefit most from patient engagement tools in primary care visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05880368; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05880368. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/57878.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Xiao
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
- College of Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Kimberley G Fulda
- Department of Family Medicine and Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine and North Texas Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network (NorTex), University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Richard A Young
- Family Medicine Residency Program, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Z Noah Hendrix
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Kathryn M Daniel
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Kay Yut Chen
- College of Business, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Yuan Zhou
- College of Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Jennifer L Roye
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Ludmila Kosmari
- College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Joshua Wilson
- College of Liberal Arts, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
| | - Anna M Espinoza
- Department of Family Medicine and Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine and North Texas Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network (NorTex), University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Kathleen M Sutcliffe
- Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Samantha I Pitts
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Alicia I Arbaje
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Michelle A Chui
- School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Somer Blair
- Office of Clinical Research, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Dawn Sloan
- Family Medicine Residency Program, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Masheika Jackson
- Family Medicine Residency Program, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, United States
| | - Ayse P Gurses
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fuzesi P, Broadfoot K, Lennon M, Jacob SA, Macaden L, Smith A, Welsh T, Watson MC. The Burden of Managing Medicines for Older People With Sensory Impairment: An Ethnographic-Informed Study. Gerontol Geriatr Med 2024; 10:23337214241253410. [PMID: 38765919 PMCID: PMC11100380 DOI: 10.1177/23337214241253410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Older age is associated with increased prevalence of sensory impairment and use of medicines. Objectives: To explore the daily "medicine journey" of older people with sensory impairment. Methods: The study used ethnographic-informed methods (using audio-, photo- and video-recordings, diary notes and semi-structured interviews with researchers) and involved community-dwelling adults (aged > 65) in Scotland, with visual and/or hearing impairment and using >4 medicines. Data analysis used the constant comparative method. Results: Fourteen older people with sensory impairment participated and used a mean of 11.0 (SD 5.0) medicines (range 5-22). Participants reported difficulties with medicine ordering, obtaining, storage, administration and disposal. They used elaborate strategies to manage their medicines including bespoke storage systems, fixed routines, simple aids, communication, and assistive technologies. Conclusion: Older people with sensory impairment experience substantial burden, challenges and risk with medicines management. Tailored medicine regimens and assistive technologies could provide greater support to older people with sensory impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Fuzesi
- University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | | | - Sabrina Anne Jacob
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Annetta Smith
- University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, Scotland, UK
| | - Tomas Welsh
- Research Institute for the Care of Older People, Bath, UK
- Royal United Hospitals Bath, UK
- University of Bristol, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holmqvist M, Johansson L, Lindenfalk B, Thor J, Ros A. Older Persons' and Health Care Professionals' Design Choices When Co-Designing a Medication Plan Aiming to Promote Patient Safety: Case Study. JMIR Aging 2023; 6:e49154. [PMID: 37796569 PMCID: PMC10587803 DOI: 10.2196/49154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Harm from medications is a major patient safety challenge among older persons. Adverse drug events tend to arise when prescribing or evaluating medications; therefore, interventions targeting these may promote patient safety. Guidelines highlight the value of a joint plan for continued treatment. If such a plan includes medications, a medication plan promoting patient safety is advised. There is growing evidence for the benefits of including patients and health care professionals in initiatives for improving health care products and services through co-design. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify participants' needs and requirements for a medication plan and explore their reasoning for different design choices. METHODS Using a case study design, we collected and analyzed qualitative and quantitative data and compared them side by side. We explored the needs and requirements for a medication plan expressed by 14 participants (older persons, nurses, and physicians) during a co-design initiative in a regional health system in Sweden. We performed a directed content analysis of qualitative data gathered from co-design sessions and interviews. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data from survey answers. RESULTS A medication plan must provide an added everyday value related to safety, effort, and engagement. The physicians addressed challenges in setting aside time to apply a medication plan, whereas the older persons raised the potential for increased patient involvement. According to the participants, a medication plan needs to support communication, continuity, and interaction. The nurses specifically addressed the need for a plan that was easy to gain an overview of. Important function requirements included providing instant access, automation, and attention. Content requirements included providing detailed information about the medication treatment. Having the plan linked to the medication list and instantly obtainable information was also requested. CONCLUSIONS After discussing the needs and requirements for a medication plan, the participants agreed on an iteratively developed medication plan prototype linked to the medication list within the existing electronic health record. According to the participants, the medication plan prototype may promote patient safety and enable patient engagement, but concerns were raised about its use in daily clinical practice. The last step in the co-design framework is testing the intervention to explore how it works and connects with users. Therefore, testing the medication plan prototype in clinical practice would be a future step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Holmqvist
- Department of Public Health and Healthcare, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden
- School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Linda Johansson
- Institute of Gerontology, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Bertil Lindenfalk
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Johan Thor
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Axel Ros
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
- Futurum, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiao Y, Miller K, Werner N, Smith K, Hendrix N, Hemmelgarn C. Co-Design with Patients for Improving Patient Safety: Strategies, Barriers and pitfalls. PROCEEDINGS OF THE HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY ... ANNUAL MEETING. HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY. ANNUAL MEETING 2023; 67:633-638. [PMID: 38213999 PMCID: PMC10782182 DOI: 10.1177/21695067231192416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
What happens when "frontline" workers are patients and family members performing health-related tasks? As more and more complex healthcare tasks are performed by patients and family members, and more emphasis is placed on patient- and family-centered care, strategies are needed to engage patients and family members in co-design "work systems" and patient-professional collaborative work. Human factors professionals are well-equipped to apply participatory ergonomics to patient and collaborative tasks. However, there are a number of barriers and pitfalls in engaging patients in design. Moving from tokenism to meaningful engagement in research requires patience, constant reflection, and a commitment to codesign. Our panel will explore the continuum of engagement and strategies to move from tokenism to partnership to cocreation in patient safety research, ranging from ambulatory medication safety to diagnosis in the emergency department. Strategies and barriers are presented as a starting point to discuss how to achieve effective work system designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Xiao
- University of Texas at Arlington,
Arlington, Texas, USA
| | - Kristen Miller
- MedStar Health and Georgetown
University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Nicole Werner
- Indiana University Bloomington,
Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Noah Hendrix
- University of Texas at Arlington,
Arlington, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|