Scoping Review of the Role of Shared Decision Making in Dental Implant Consultations

Do patient and surgical factors predict postoperative discomfort in implant dentistry?

DATA SOURCES

The study utilized records from the Department of Oral Implantology at Wuhan University (May 2020 to April 2021). A total of 366 participants with missing teeth requiring implant-supported rehabilitation were included. Records detailed patient demographics, clinical procedures, and postoperative experiences. Data were collected through telephonic follow-ups and questionnaires assessing pain, anxiety, discomfort, and adverse events.

STUDY SELECTION

Participants were selected based on the need for dental implant placement and/or bone augmentation. Inclusion criteria included being over 18 years old, possessing basic communication skills, and providing consent. Patients with systemic diseases, acute oral infections, or contraindications to implant therapy were excluded. Secondary-stage surgeries and sites with prior augmentation or implant failure were also excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Variables such as age, gender, alcohol consumption, smoking status, periodontal status, surgical procedures, and postoperative complications were collected. Perception of pain, anxiety, and discomfort was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Logistic regression identified predictors of discomfort severity and duration.

RESULTS

Most participants reported mild or no pain (78.7%) and anxiety (89.7%) during surgery. Discomfort decreased significantly over time, with 57.7% reporting discomfort on day 1, 36.1% on day 3, and 0% by day 14.

CONCLUSION

Alcohol consumption, pain perception during surgery, age, and bone augmentation procedures were key predictors of discomfort. Tailored care is recommended to enhance outcomes.

Shared decision-making implementation status among dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics: a cross-sectional study in China

Objective

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process in which patients and healthcare providers jointly make a medical decision. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify the implementation status of shared decision-making among dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics in China and to identify factors associated with the good practice of SDM among them.

Methods

From January to June 2023, a total of 1,287 dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics in China were recruited and completed the online interviews about their implementation of SDM based on the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire for Doctors (SDM-Q-Doc). Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to explore factors associated with the higher SDM score achievement among dermatologists with medical esthetic practice.

Results

The median value of the total SDM score was 39, and 48% (621/1278) of dermatologists with medical esthetic practice achieved at least 40 out of 45 scores. Logistic regression indicated that dermatologists aged 40-49 or ≥ 50 years and those engaging in medical esthetic practice for ≥5 years were more likely to achieve at least 40 out of 45 scores compared to dermatologists aged <30 years with less than 5 years of medical esthetic practice. The ORs were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.13-3.12), 1.94 (95% CI: 1.13-3.61), and 1.76 (95% CI: 1.34-2.31), respectively.

Conclusion

The SDM implementation level among Chinese dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics is high, especially for those who are older age and have more years of practice. Hence, it is highly recommended to promote and enhance SDM practice among younger dermatologists engaging in medical esthetics with less working experience.

Patient and clinician perspectives on implant dentistry decision aid content: Results from an enhanced Delphi study

PURPOSE

To investigate patient and clinician perspectives on what is considered important to include in a decision aid for replacement of a missing tooth with an implant.

METHODS

An online modified Delphi method with pair comparisons technique was used to survey participants (66 patients, 48 prosthodontists, 46 periodontists, and 31 oral surgeons) in Ontario, Canada from November 2020 to April 2021 regarding the importance of information provided during an implant consultation. Round one included 19 items derived from the literature and informed consent protocols. The decision to retain an item was based on group consensus, defined as at least 75% of participants identifying the item as "important" or "highly important." After analysis of round one results, a second-round survey was sent to all participants to rank the relative importance of the consensus items. Statistical testing was completed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test and post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests with a significance level set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

The first and second surveys had response rates of 77.0% and 45.6%, respectively. In round one, all items except purpose of steps reached group consensus. In round two, the highest group ranked items were patient responsibilities for treatment success and follow-ups after treatment. The lowest group ranked items were cost factors and restorative steps. Significant differences between the stakeholder groups were found on several items, including diagnosis (p ≤ 0.00), non-implant options (p ≤ 0.00), and cost (p ≤ 0.01). In general, patients' opinions were significantly different than clinicians' opinions on the relative importance of items.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and patients feel that multiple items are important to include in a decision aid for implant therapy; however, differences exist between patients and clinicians on the relative importance of items.

Evaluation of complacency about dental implants with shared decision making and satisfaction scores: A cross-sectional study

Background

The dentist-patient relationship is delicate. Engaging the patient in the dental treatment planning especially for lengthy procedures as dental implants improves the relation as well as treatment outcomes including patient satisfaction. We aimed at evaluating the importance of Shared Decision making (SDM) and level of satisfaction among dental implant patients by employing SDM and satisfaction scores.

Materials & Methods

The present cross-sectional study was pursued between April 2019 to September 2019, among dental implant patients (n = 144) who have completed their prosthetic part of implant treatment with at least 3 months of post-restoration evaluation. Demographic and implant data were collected from electronic filing system (Salud) as well as measurement of SDM score. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0 version statistical software.

Results

The mean satisfaction score was higher for implant placement with Periodontists (31.9%). However, among surgical specialist the mean satisfaction score was found to be higher for oral surgeons who had 1–5 years of experience (46.5%). Patients reported that their decision making was greatly influenced by the treating dentist. A statistical significance was found where (64.6%) of Implant patients would like to undergo the procedure again (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Shared decision-making and patient satisfaction enables the treatment delivery to be more effective and ethical, in addition to being patient-centered care.

Microbial Biofilm Decontamination on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Mini Review

Introduction

After insertion into the bone, implants osseointegrate, which is required for their long-term success. However, inflammation and infection around the implants may lead to implant failure leading to peri-implantitis and loss of supporting bone, which may eventually lead to failure of implant. Surface chemistry of the implant and lack of cleanliness on the part of the patient are related to peri-implantitis. The only way to get rid of this infection is decontamination of dental implants.

Objective

This systematic review intended to study decontamination of microbial biofilm methods on titanium implant surfaces used in dentistry.

Methods

The electronic databases Springer Link, Science Direct, and PubMed were explored from their inception until December 2020 to identify relevant studies. Studies included had to evaluate the efficiency of new strategies either to prevent formation of biofilm or to treat matured biofilm on dental implant surfaces.

Results and Discussion

In this systematic review, 17 different groups of decontamination methods were summarized from 116 studies. The decontamination methods included coating materials, mechanical cleaning, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy, air polishing, anodizing treatment, radiation, sonication, thermal treatment, ultrasound treatment, chemical treatment, electrochemical treatment, antimicrobial drugs, argon treatment, and probiotics.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that most of the decontamination methods were effective in preventing the formation of biofilm and in decontaminating established biofilm on dental implants. This narrative review provides a summary of methods for future research in the development of new dental implants and decontamination techniques.

Shared decision-making (SDM) in dentistry: A concise narrative review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to evaluate the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) in dentistry and the roles of informed consent and patient decision-making aids (PDAs) as part of this process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of pertinent literature was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE to determine the current position of the application of SDM in dentistry and the influence of informed consent and PDAs on this process.

RESULTS

Limited number of published studies on the implementation of SDM in dental practice is available. These studies demonstrated that SDM is influenced by many factors. Informed consent intertwines with the SDM process and begins with providing high quality information to patients and employing PDAs. PDAs have been developed for some dental fields to facilitate the SDM process.

CONCLUSIONS

SDM is applied in dentistry and is influenced by many factors. Informed consent is an important part of this process. PDAs in more dental fields need to be further developed, in order to ensure a satisfactory integration of patients in the SDM process.

Can the current hypodontia care pathway promote shared decision-making?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent to which the current care pathway in hypodontia promotes shared decision-making (SDM).

DESIGN

Exploratory cross-sectional study using qualitative methods.

SETTING

Orthodontic department of two NHS teaching hospitals in Yorkshire.

PARTICIPANTS

Young people aged 12-16 years with hypodontia of any severity and at any stage of treatment, and their parents and guardians.

METHODS

(1) Observation and audio-recording of interdisciplinary consultation in hypodontia clinics (n = 5) without any researcher interference; (2) short, structured interviews with young people with hypodontia (n = 8) and their parent (n = 8) using a topic guide to explore themes around decision-making. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework.

RESULTS

Consultations were used as an opportunity for interdisciplinary discussion, information provision and treatment planning. Evidence of good communication was observed but patient engagement was low. The decision to be made was usually stated and treatment options discussed, but time constraints limited the scope for adequate information exchange and assessment of understanding. No methods were used to establish patient and family preferences or values. Interviews suggested parents expect the dental team to make decisions and young people rely on parental advocacy. Despite little evidence of SDM, participants reported satisfaction with their treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The current care pathway for hypodontia does not support clinicians in the steps of SDM. Recommendations for improving SDM processes include support to identify preference-based decisions, greater access to comprehensive and accessible patient information to enable preparation for consultation, alternative methods for effective communication of complex information and use of preference elicitation tools to aid value-driven decision-making.