Patient-Reported Roles in Decision-Making Among Asian Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicountry Study

What are the barriers and facilitators to advance care planning with older people in long-term care facilities? A qualitative study

AIM

To explore the views and preferences for advance care planning from the perspectives of residents, family members and healthcare professionals in long-term care facilities.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 residents of long-term care facilities, 10 family members and 14 healthcare professionals. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The social ecological model was used to develop implementation recommendations.

RESULTS

We constructed a conceptual model of barriers and facilitators to advance care planning in long-term care facilities, drawing upon four dominant themes from the qualitative analysis: (1) The absence of discourse on end-of-life care: a lack of cultural climate to talk about death, the unspoken agreement to avoid conversations about death, and poor awareness of palliative care may hinder advance care planning initiation; (2) Relational decision-making process is a dual factor affecting advance care planning engagement; (3) Low trust and 'unsafe' cultures: a lack of honest information sharing, risks of violating social expectations and damaging social relationships, and risks of legal consequences may hinder willingness to engage in advance care planning; (4) Meeting and respecting residents' psychosocial needs: these can be addressed by readiness assessment, initiating advance care planning in an informal and equal manner and involving social workers.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that residents' voices were not being heard. It is necessary to identify residents' spontaneous conversation triggers, articulate the value of advance care planning in light of the family's values and preferences, and respect residents' psychosocial needs to promote advance care planning in long-term care facilities. Advance care planning may alleviate the decision-making burden of offspring in nuclear families.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The evidence-based recommendations in this study will inform the implementation of context-specific advance care planning in Asia-Pacific regions.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients and caregivers contributed to the interview pilot and data collection.

What affects how Chinese patients wish to be involved in health care delivery? Perspectives of the Chinese policy and institutional contexts

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of involving patients and carers include improving health outcomes and safety, reducing costs and enhancing an open, accountable and equitable relationship between service providers and users. However, the willingness for involvement and participation is largely affected by a range of factors, including those at the micro, meso and macro levels. As the previous studies have given much attention to the factors at the individual level, it is worthwhile to explore the factors at the broader levels of the policy and institutional contexts. The objective of the research is to understand how the policy and institutional contexts in China affect how patients wish to be involved in their health care delivery.

METHODS

An abductive research strategy was used to generate emergent hypotheses in the first stage of data construction. In the second stage of fieldwork, hypotheses were tested using the deductive approach. Three local hospitals in Shandong Province, China, were selected. The case study method was designed with qualitative methods of policy documents and interviews. Interviews included health professionals, health board managers, local administrators and service users. Thematic analysis and framework analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Four policy and institutional contexts were identified: insufficient policy support, the current institutional design of involving users, the heterogeneity of organisational autonomy and resources, as well as the demography of the population of service users.

CONCLUSIONS

As a policy strategy at the state level, there is a lack of policy support for patient involvement and participation in the Chinese health system. The heterogeneity of the institutional context of health facilities plays a key role in affecting how patients wish to be involved in health care delivery.

Quality of life and its predictors among patients with metastatic cancer in Bangladesh: the APPROACH survey

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (physical, functional, emotional, social, spiritual) and psychological (anxiety and depression) well-being and their associations with patient characteristics among patients with metastatic cancer in Bangladesh.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 386 Bangladeshi patients with stage IV solid cancers was recruited from a palliative care outpatient department and an inpatient palliative center. Dependent variables included the physical, functional, emotional, social, and overall scores of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-being (FACIT-SP) scale, the anxiety, depression, and overall scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) scale. Linear regressions examined the association between dependent variables and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

A substantial proportion of Bangladeshi patients reported anxiety (59% of outpatients and 55% of inpatients) and depression (60% of outpatients and 73% of inpatients) symptoms. Generally, greater financial difficulty and symptom burden scores were associated with worse health outcomes. Older patients reported poorer functional and spiritual well-being but better anxiety scores. Females reported worse anxiety and depressive symptoms and physical well-being but better spiritual outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional efforts must be directed at improving the HRQOL of patients with metastatic cancer in Bangladesh. Furthermore, assistance should be made more accessible to vulnerable groups, including women, the elderly, and those with financial difficulty.

Role Preferences in Medical Decision Making: Relevance and Implications for Health Preference Research

Health preference research (HPR) is being increasingly conducted to better understand patient preferences for medical decisions. However, patients vary in their desire to play an active role in medical decisions. Until now, few studies have considered patients' preferred roles in decision making. In this opinion paper, we advocate for HPR researchers to assess and account for role preferences in their studies, to increase the relevance of their work for medical and shared decision making. We provide recommendations on how role preferences can be elicited and integrated with health preferences: (1) in formative research prior to a health preference study that aims to inform medical decisions or decision makers, (2a) in the development of health preference instruments, for instance by incorporating a role preference instrument and (2b) by clarifying the respondent's role in the decision prior to the preference elicitation task or by including role preferences as an attribute in the task itself, and (3) in statistical analysis by including random parameters or latent classes to raise awareness of heterogeneity in role preferences and how it relates to health preferences. Finally, we suggest redefining the decision process as a model that integrates the role and health preferences of the different parties that are involved. We believe that the field of HPR would benefit from learning more about the extent to which role preferences relate to health preferences, within the context of medical and shared decision making.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Medical Decision-Making Roles and Their Associations with Patient Characteristics and Patient-Reported Outcomes among Patients with Heart Failure

OBJECTIVE

Among patients with heart failure (HF), we examined 1) the evolution of patient involvement in decision making over 2 y, 2) the association of patient characteristics with decision-making roles, and 3) the association of decision-making roles with distress, spiritual well-being, and quality of physician communication.

METHODS

We administered the survey every 4 mo over 24 mo to patients with New York Heart Association class 3/4 symptoms recruited from inpatient clinics. The decision-making roles were categorized as no patient involvement, physician/family-led, joint (with family and/or physicians), patient-led, or patient-alone decision making. The associations between patient characteristics and decision-making roles were assessed using a mixed-effects ordered logistic regression, whereas those between patient outcomes and decision-making roles were investigated using mixed-effects linear regressions.

RESULTS

Of the 557 patients invited, 251 participated in the study. The most common roles in decision making at baseline assessment were "no involvement" (27.53%) and "patient-alone decision making" (25.10%). The proportions of different decision-making roles did not change over 2 y (P = 0.37). Older age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97; P = 0.003) and being married (OR = 0.63; P = 0.035) were associated with lower involvement in decision making. Chinese ethnicity (OR = 1.91; P = 0.003), higher education (OR = 1.87; P = 0.003), awareness of terminal condition (OR = 2.00; P < 0.001), and adequate self-care confidence (OR = 1.74; P < 0.001) were associated with greater involvement. Compared with no patient involvement, joint (β = -0.58; P = 0.026) and patient-led (β = -0.59; P = 0.014) decision making were associated with lower distress, while family/physician-led (β = 4.37; P = 0.001), joint (β = 3.86; P < 0.001), patient-led (β = 3.46; P < 0.001), and patient-alone (β = 3.99; P < 0.001) decision making were associated with better spiritual well-being.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of patients was not involved in decision making. Patients should be encouraged to participate in decision making since it is associated with lower distress and better spiritual well-being.

HIGHLIGHTS

The level of involvement in medical decision making did not change over time among patients with heart failure. A substantial proportion of patients were not involved in decision making throughout the 24-mo study period.Patients' involvement in decision making varied by age, ethnicity, education level, marital status, awareness of the terminal condition, and confidence in self-care.Compared with no patient involvement in decision making, joint and patient-led decision making were associated with lower distress, and any level of patient involvement in decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being.

Weighing the necessities and concerns of deprescribing among older ambulatory patients and primary care trainees: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Deprescribing can be a challenging and complex process, particularly for early career doctors such as primary care trainees. To date, there is limited data from patients' and doctors' perspectives regarding the deprescribing of medications in older persons, particularly from developing countries. This study aimed to explore the necessities and concerns of deprescribing in older persons among older ambulatory patients and primary care trainees.

METHODS

A qualitative study was conducted among patients and primary care trainees (known henceforth as doctors). Patients aged ≥ 60 years, having ≥ 1 chronic disease and prescribed ≥ 5 medications and could communicate in either English or Malay were recruited. Doctors and patients were purposively sampled based on their stage of training as family medicine specialists and ethnicity, respectively. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic approach was used to analyse data.

RESULTS

Twenty-four in-depth interviews (IDIs) with patients and four focus group discussions (FGDs) with 23 doctors were conducted. Four themes emerged: understanding the concept of deprescribing, the necessity to perform deprescribing, concerns regarding deprescribing and factors influencing deprescribing. Patients were receptive to the idea of deprescribing when the term was explained to them, whilst doctors had a good understanding of deprescribing. Both patients and doctors would deprescribe when the necessity outweighed their concerns. Factors that influenced deprescribing were doctor-patient rapport, health literacy among patients, external influences from carers and social media, and system challenges.

CONCLUSION

Deprescribing was deemed necessary by both patients and doctors when there was a reason to do so. However, both doctors and patients were afraid to deprescribe as they 'didn't want to rock the boat'. Early-career doctors were reluctant to deprescribe as they felt compelled to continue medications that were initiated by another specialist. Doctors requested more training on how to deprescribe medications.

A prospective cohort study of decision-making role preferences of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine (1) the evolution of patients-caregiver dyad decision-making role preferences over 3 years and the predictors of these preferences; and (2) discordance in decision-making role preferences among dyads.

METHODS

A total of 311 patients with advanced solid cancer and their caregivers in Singapore reported their preferences for decision-making roles every 3 months. The predictors for decision-making role preferences among dyads were identified via the actor-partner interdependence framework using a mixed-effect ordered logistic model.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients and caregivers preferring patient-led decision-making was higher at the end of third year compared to baseline (patients: 40% vs. 20%, p value <.01; caregivers: 33% vs. 21%, p value = .03). Patients with female (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; p value <.01) and older (1-year OR, 1.02; p value <.01) caregivers and younger patients (1-year OR, 0.97; p value <.01) preferred higher involvement in decision-making. Caregivers with tertiary education (vs. lower education) (OR, 1.59; p value = .02) and those who accurately understood patients' treatment goals (OR, 1.37; p value = .01) preferred greater patient involvement in decision-making. Conversely, caregivers of female patients (OR, 0.68; p value = .03) and younger patients (1-year OR, 0.98; p value <.01) preferred lesser patient involvement in decision-making. The proportion of patient-caregiver dyads with discordance in preferred decision-making was lower at the end of the third year (51%) compared to baseline (68%) (p value <.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite a reduction in the proportion of dyads with discordance toward the end-of-life, the percentage with discordance remained high throughout the illness trajectory. Interventions facilitating open communication between dyads should be pursued in efforts to decrease dyadic discordance.

Variation in Patient-Reported Decision-Making Roles in the Last Year of Life among Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the variation in patient-reported decision-making roles in the past year of life among patients with metastatic solid cancer and the associations of these roles with patient quality of life and perceived quality of care.

METHODS

We used the last year of life data of 393 deceased patients from a prospective cohort study. Patients reported their decision-making roles, quality of life (emotional well-being, spiritual well-being, and psychological distress) and perceived quality of care (care coordination and physician communication) every 3 months until death. We used mixed effects linear regressions to investigate the associations of decision-making roles with patients' quality of life and perceived quality of care.

RESULTS

The most reported roles, on average, were patient-led (37.9%) and joint (23.4%; with physicians and/or family caregivers) decision making, followed by no patient involvement (14.8%), physician/family-led (12.9%), and patient alone (11.0%) decision making. Patient level of involvement in decision making decreased slightly as death approached (P < 0.05). Compared with no patient involvement, joint decision making was associated with better emotional well-being (β [95% confidence interval] = 1.02 [0.24, 1.81]), better spiritual well-being (1.48 [0.01, 2.95]), lower psychological distress (-1.99 (-3.21, -0.77]), higher perceived quality of care coordination (5.04 [1.24, 8.85]), and physician communication (5.43 [1.27, 9.59]). Patient-led decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being (1.69 [0.24, 3.14]) and higher perceived quality of care coordination (6.87 [3.17, 10.58]) and physician communication (6.21 [2.15, 10.27]).

CONCLUSION

Joint and patient-led decision-making styles were reported by 61% of the patients and were associated with better quality of life and quality of care. A decrease in the level of patient involvement over time indicates reliance on family and physicians as death approached.

HIGHLIGHTS

Among patients with metastatic cancer, the level of patient involvement in decision making decreased slightly as death approached.Joint decision making of patients with their physicians and/or family caregivers and patient-led decision making were associated with better quality of life and perceived quality of care.Patients with metastatic cancer should be encouraged to be involved in decision making together with their physicians and/or family caregivers to potentially improve their end-of-life experience.

Exploration of shared decision making in oncology within the United States: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Shared decision making (SDM) among the oncology population is highly important due to complex screening and treatment decisions. SDM among patients with cancer, caregivers, and clinicians has gained more attention and importance, yet few articles have systematically examined SDM, specifically in the adult oncology population. This review aims to explore SDM within the oncology literature and help identify major gaps and concerns, with the goal to provide guidance in the development of clear SDM definitions and interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley approach along with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. A systematic search was conducted in four databases that included publications since 2016.

RESULTS

Of the 364 initial articles, eleven publications met the inclusion criteria. We included articles that were original research, cancer related, and focused on shared decision making. Most studies were limited in defining SDM and operationalizing a model of SDM. There were several concerns revealed related to SDM: (1) racial inequality, (2) quality and preference of the patient, caregiver, and clinician communication is important, and (3) the use of a decision-making aid or tool provides value to the patient experience.

CONCLUSION

Inconsistencies regarding the meaning and operationalization of SDM and inequality of the SDM process among patients from different racial/ethnic backgrounds impact the health and quality of care patients receive. Future studies should clearly and consistently define the meaning of SDM and develop decision aids that incorporate bidirectional, interactive communication between patients, caregivers, and clinicians that account for the diversity of racial, ethnic, and sociocultural backgrounds and preferences.

Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools

The integration of face-to-face communication and online processes to provide access to information and self-assessment tools may improve shared decision-making (SDM) processes. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of implementing an online SDM process with topics and content developed through a participatory design approach. We analyzed the triggered and completed SDM cases with responses from participants at a medical center in Taiwan. Data were retrieved from the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database of the hospital for analysis. Each team developed web-based patient decision aids (PDA) with empirical evidence in a multi-digitized manner, allowing patients to scan QR codes on a leaflet using their mobile phones and then read the PDA content online. From July 2019 to December 2020, 48 web-based SDM topics were implemented in the 24 clinical departments of this hospital. The results showed that using the REDCap system improved SDM efficiency and quality. Implementing an online SDM process integrated with face-to-face communication enhanced the practice and effectiveness of SDM, possibly through the flexibility of accessing information, self-assessment, and feedback evaluation.