1
|
Kersten BE, Lemmers JMJ, Vanhaecke A, Velauthapillai A, van den Hombergh WMT, van den Hoogen FHJ, van den Ende CHM, Smith V, Vonk MC. Efficacy of methylprednisolone in very early systemic sclerosis: results of the 'Hit Hard and Early' randomized controlled trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2025; 64:1261-1269. [PMID: 38552324 PMCID: PMC11879336 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that glucocorticoids would induce remission in very early systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients by inhibition of inflammation driving the disease. We examined the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone in very early SSc. METHODS In this trial adults with puffy fingers for less than 3 years, specific auto-antibodies and meeting the Very Early Diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis criteria were randomly assigned (2:1) to methylprednisolone 1000 mg i.v. or placebo for three consecutive days three times with monthly intervals. The primary end point was nailfold capillary density at week 12. Capillary density at 52 weeks, number of megacapillaries and patient-reported outcomes were secondary outcomes. In addition, we assessed disease progression and lung function decline over 52 weeks. We used linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline values and stratification variables to estimate differences between groups. RESULTS Between February 2017 and February 2021, 87 patients were screened, of whom 30 (70% female, median [interquartile range, IQR] age 52.9 [40.8-60.8] years, median [IQR] disease duration 11.4 [4.6-18.6] months) were randomly assigned to methylprednisolone (n = 21) or placebo (n = 9). We found no difference in nailfold capillary density at 12 weeks (-0.5 [95% CI: -1.1, 0.2]) nor in any of the secondary outcomes. Eleven (37%) patients showed disease progression during 1 year follow-up, and seven (23%) patients had a relevant pulmonary function decline. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION No clinically relevant effect of short-term methylprednisolone in patients with very early SSc was observed. A substantial proportion of patients showed disease progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03059979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigit E Kersten
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline M J Lemmers
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Amber Vanhaecke
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Arthiha Velauthapillai
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Vanessa Smith
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Madelon C Vonk
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Griffiths-Jones DJ, Garcia YS, Ryder WD, Pauling JD, Hall F, Lanyon P, Bhat S, Douglas K, Gunawardena H, Akil M, Anderson M, Griffiths B, Del Galdo F, Youssef H, Madhok R, Arthurs B, Buch M, Fligelstone K, Zubair M, Mason JC, Denton CP, Herrick AL. A Phase II randomized controlled trial of oral prednisolone in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (PRedSS). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3133-3138. [PMID: 36637209 PMCID: PMC10473191 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although the painful and disabling features of early diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc) have an inflammatory basis and could respond to corticosteroids, corticosteroids are a risk factor for scleroderma renal crisis. Whether or not they should be prescribed is therefore highly contentious. Our aim was to examine safety and efficacy of moderate-dose prednisolone in early dcSSc. METHODS PRedSS set out as a Phase II, multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial, converted to open-label during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients were randomized to receive either prednisolone (∼0.3 mg/kg) or matching placebo (or no treatment during open-label) for 6 months. Co-primary endpoints were the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) at 3 months. Over 20 secondary endpoints included patient reported outcome measures reflecting pain, itch, fatigue, anxiety and depression, and helplessness. Target recruitment was 72 patients. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were randomized (17 prednisolone, 18 placebo/control). The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups at 3 months in HAQ-DI score was -0.10 (97.5% CI: -0.29, 0.10), P = 0.254, and in mRSS -3.90 (97.5% CI: -8.83, 1.03), P = 0.070, both favouring prednisolone but not significantly. Patients in the prednisolone group experienced significantly less pain (P = 0.027), anxiety (P = 0.018) and helplessness (P = 0.040) than control patients at 3 months. There were no renal crises, but sample size was small. CONCLUSION PRedSS was terminated early primarily due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and so was underpowered. Therefore, interpretation must be cautious and results considered inconclusive, indicating the need for a further randomized trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03708718.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Griffiths-Jones
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - W David Ryder
- Manchester Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - John D Pauling
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Frances Hall
- Department of Rheumatology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Peter Lanyon
- Department of Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, and Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Smita Bhat
- Department of Rheumatology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Karen Douglas
- Department of Rheumatology, Dudley Group NHSFT, Dudley, UK
| | - Harsha Gunawardena
- Rheumatology Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, and Academic Rheumatology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mohammed Akil
- Department of Rheumatology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marina Anderson
- Lancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Griffiths
- Department of Rheumatology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Del Galdo
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hazem Youssef
- Department of Rheumatology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Rajan Madhok
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Barbara Arthurs
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maya Buch
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Mohammed Zubair
- Research Governance and Integrity, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Justin C Mason
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Christopher P Denton
- Centre for Rheumatology, UCL Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, London, UK
| | - Ariane L Herrick
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herrick AL, Assassi S, Denton CP. Skin involvement in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an unmet clinical need. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2022; 18:276-285. [PMID: 35292731 PMCID: PMC8922394 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-022-00765-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) is associated with high mortality resulting from early internal-organ involvement. Clinicians therefore tend to focus on early diagnosis and treatment of potentially life-threatening cardiorespiratory and renal disease. However, the rapidly progressive painful, itchy skin tightening that characterizes dcSSc is the symptom that has the greatest effect on patients' quality of life, and there is currently no effective disease-modifying treatment for it. Considerable advances have been made in predicting the extent and rate of skin-disease progression (which vary between patients), including the development of techniques such as molecular analysis of skin biopsy samples. Risk stratification for progressive skin disease is especially relevant now that haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is a treatment option, because stratification will inform the balance of risk versus benefit for each patient. Measurement of skin disease is a major challenge. Results from clinical trials have highlighted limitations of the modified Rodnan skin score (the current gold standard). Alternative patient-reported and other potential outcome measures have been and are being developed. Patients with early dcSSc should be referred to specialist centres to ensure best-practice management, including the management of their skin disease, and to maximize opportunities for inclusion in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane L Herrick
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - Shervin Assassi
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herrick AL. Advances in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022. [DOI: 10.17925/rmd.2022.1.2.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Although systemic sclerosis (SSc) is currently incurable, there have been recent advances in treatment. This review article begins by providing a brief background to SSc in terms of disease subtyping and autoantibodies, because both predict disease trajectory and help clinicians to select appropriate monitoring and treatment protocols. Broad principles of management are then described: ‘disease-modifying’ therapies and therapies directed at reducing disease burden and/or progression of SSc-related digital vascular disease and of internal organ involvement. Next, advances in the management of digital vasculopathy, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and early diffuse cutaneous SSc are discussed in turn, for example: (a) increased use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists for digital vasculopathy; (b) early recognition and treatment of PAH, including with combination therapies; (c) increased use of mycophenolate mofetil and of nintedanib in ILD; and (d) immunosuppression now as standard practice in early diffuse cutaneous SSc, and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for highly selected patients with progressive diffuse disease. Finally, future challenges are discussed, including ensuring that all patients with SSc are monitored and treated according to best practice guidelines, and whenever possible giving patients the opportunity to participate in clinical trials.
Collapse
|