Quality of life in SSc-ILD patients: Understanding the impact of the ILD and the needs of the SSc-ILD patients and their need for caregivers in France

Contribution of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction to Survival and Breathlessness in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), and to investigate SSc-specific associations and clinical correlates of LVDD.

METHODS

There were 102 Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study participants with definite SSc and radiographic ILD included. Diastolic function was classified as normal, indeterminate, or abnormal according to 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines for assessment of LV diastolic function. Associations between clinical features and patient- and physician-reported dyspnea were evaluated using logistic regression. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

LVDD was identified in 26% of participants, whereas 19% had indeterminate and 55% had normal diastolic function. Those with ILD and LVDD had increased mortality (hazard ratio 2.4, 95% CI 1.0-5.7; P = 0.05). After adjusting for age and sex, those with ILD and LVDD were more likely to have severe dyspnea on the Borg Dyspnoea Scale (odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.0-6.6; P = 0.05) and numerically more likely to record World Health Organization Function Class II or higher dyspnea (OR 4.2, 95% CI 0.9-20.0; P = 0.08). Older age (95% CI 1.0-6.4; P = 0.05), hypertension (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.8-13.8; P < 0.01), and ischemic heart disease (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5-15.7; P < 0.01) were all associated with LVDD, as was proximal muscle atrophy (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.9-13.6; P < 0.01) and multimorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ≥ 4, OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.7; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

LVDD in SSc-ILD is more strongly associated with traditional LVDD risk factors than SSc-specific factors. LVDD is associated with worse dyspnea and survival in those with SSc-ILD.

A comparative study of modulatory interaction between cytokines and apoptotic proteins among Scleroderma patients with and without pulmonary involvement

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are the most eminent forms of pulmonary involvement in Scleroderma. In this study we investigate the interaction between cytokines and apoptotic proteins in treatment naive Scleroderma (SSc) patients with and without pulmonary involvement.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed treatment naïve Scleroderma (SSc) patients (n = 100) and healthy controls (n = 100) were enrolled. Patients were classified as ILD-SSc, PAH-SSc and non-pulmonary SSc (np-SSc). Study variables like mRSS score, autoantibody profile, serum cytokines, serum TGF-β (1,2,3) and apoptotic proteins were assessed for these patients.

RESULTS

Scleroderma patients showed elevated levels of serum cytokines, but significantly lower IL-22 and TGF- β1 when compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). Apoptotic proteins were significantly elevated among Scleroderma patients, but the patient groups also showed significant lower caspase 1/3/9 levels when compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). ILD-SSc patients reported higher mRSS score (p = 0.0436) when compared with PAH-SSc and np-SSc. In ILD-SSc patients, finger tightening (p = 0.0481) and calcinosis/lesions (p = 0.0481) were significant clinical presentations whereas, digital ulcers were significantly prominent in np-SSc patients (p = 0.0132). Elevated TGF-β3 levels (p = 0.02) in SSC-ILD and reduced IL-4 levels (p = 0.02) in SSC-PAH were significant cytokines as compared to np-SSc. Significant correlations were obtained among serum cytokines and apoptotic proteins in Scleroderma patients with and without pulmonary involvement. (p < 0.05) CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the correlation between mRSS score, cytokines and apoptotic proteins in SSc patients with pulmonary involvement. A longitudinal follow up in these patients with assessment of these immunological parameters may be helpful in monitoring the disease.

Differences in symptom experience among patients with systemic sclerosis: a cluster analytic approach to identifying subgroups

OBJECTIVES

Symptoms of people who have SSc are heterogeneous and difficult to address clinically. Because diverse symptoms often co-occur and may share common underlying mechanisms, identifying symptoms that cluster together may better target treatment approaches. We sought to identify and characterize patient subgroups based on symptom experience.

METHODS

An exploratory hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis was conducted to identify subgroups from a large SSc cohort from a single US academic medical centre. Patient-reported symptoms of pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, dyspnoea, depression and anxiety were used for clustering. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to examine the relative contribution of each variable across subgroups. Analyses of variance were performed to determine participant characteristics based on subgroup assignment. Presence of symptom clusters were tallied within subgroup.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 587; 84% female, 41% diffuse cutaneous subtype, 59% early disease) divided into three subgroups via cluster analysis based on symptom severity: (i) no/minimal, (ii) mild, and (iii) moderate. Participants in mild and moderate symptoms subgroups had similar disease severity, but different symptom presentation. In the mild symptoms subgroup, pain, fatigue and sleep disturbance was the main symptom cluster. Participants in the moderate symptoms subgroup were characterized by co-occurring pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Identification of distinct symptom clusters, particularly among SSc patients who experience mild and moderate symptoms, suggests potential differences in treatment approach and in mechanisms underlying symptom experience that require further study.

Scleromyositis: A distinct novel entity within the systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis spectrum. Implications for care and pathogenesis

Systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis are both associated with decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Their prognosis and management largely depend on the disease subgroups. Indeed, systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease, the two predominant forms of the disease being limited and diffuse scleroderma. Autoimmune myositis is also a heterogeneous group of myopathies that classically encompass necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. Recent data revealed that an additional disease subset, denominated "scleromyositis", should be recognized within both the systemic sclerosis and the autoimmune myositis spectrum. We performed an in-depth review of the literature with the aim of better delineating scleromyositis. Our review highlights that this concept is supported by recent clinical, serological and histopathological findings that have important implications for patient management and understanding of the disease pathophysiology. As compared with other subsets of systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis, scleromyositis patients can present with a characteristic pattern of muscle involvement (i.e. distribution of muscle weakness) along with multisystemic involvement, and some of these extra-muscular complications are associated with poor prognosis. Several autoantibodies have been specifically associated with scleromyositis, but they are not currently integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis. Finally, striking vasculopathic lesions at muscle biopsy have been shown to be hallmarks of scleromyositis, providing a strong anatomopathological substratum for the concept of scleromyositis. These findings bring new insights into the pathogenesis of scleromyositis and help to diagnose this condition, in patients with subtle SSc features and/or no autoantibodies (i.e. "seronegative" scleromyositis). No guidelines are available for the management of these patients, but recent data are showing the way towards a new therapeutic approach dedicated to these patients.

Health-related quality of life in a multiracial Asian interstitial lung disease cohort

Background

Understanding health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) provides insight into disease burden and treatment effects on patients' well-being. We examined HRQL in a multiracial Asian ILD cohort using the King's brief ILD (K-BILD) and EuroQol 5-dimension-3-level (EQ5D-3L) questionnaires and their associations with several clinical variables.

Methods

This was a single-centre cross-sectional study of ILD patients in a university-affiliated tertiary public hospital in Singapore. All patients completed two self-administered HRQL questionnaires upon study entry, and their clinical information was retrieved from electronic medical records.

Results

Ninety-nine patients (56% male, 75% Chinese) were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 63 (54-72) years. The most common ILD diagnosis was connective tissue disease-related ILD (n=51, 52%), followed by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n=27, 27%). The mean (standard deviation) scores for the EQ5D-3L utility value, EQ5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and K-BILD total were 0.806 (0.284), 75.1 (12.8) and 63.9 (14.3), respectively. A moderate correlation was found between the EQ5D-3L and K-BILD total and domain scores. The HRQL scores also correlate moderately with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (mMRC) scores. There was a weak-to-moderate correlation between HRQL and forced vital capacity (FVC), carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and Charlson comorbidity index. Multiple linear regression showed a significant association of K-BILD total [beta coefficient 0.244, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.075-0.414; P=0.005], K-BILD 'breathlessness and activities' (beta coefficient 0.448, 95% CI: 0.192-0.703; P=0.001), and the 'psychological' domain (beta coefficient 0.256, 95% CI: 0.024-0.488; P=0.031) with DLCO %pred after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, race, smoking history, comorbidities, FVC %pred and ILD diagnosis. Non-Chinese race was a predictor of better K-BILD 'psychological' domain (beta coefficient 8.680, 95% CI: 0.656-16.704; P=0.034) after adjustment.

Conclusions

HRQL is significantly impaired in ILD patients, and low DLCO is a strong predictor of this impairment.