Non-vascular ATP-sensitive potassium channel activation does not trigger migraine attacks: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of NN414, a selective KATP channel opener for the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel subtype found in neurons and β-pancreatic cells, in inducing migraine attacks in individuals with migraine without aura.

METHODS

Thirteen participants were randomly allocated to receive NN414 and placebo on two days separated by at least one week. The primary endpoint was the difference in the incidence of migraine attacks after NN414 compared with placebo. The secondary endpoints were the difference in the area under the curve for headache intensity scores, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (VMCA), superficial temporal artery diameter, heart rate and mean arterial pressure.

RESULTS

Twelve participants completed the study, with two (16.6%) reporting migraine attacks after NN414 compared to one (8.3%) after placebo (p = 0.53). The area under the curve for headache intensity, VMCA, superficial temporal artery diameter, heart rate and mean arterial pressure did not differ between NN414 and placebo (p > 0.05, all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

The lack of migraine induction upon activation of the Kir6.2/SUR1 channel subtype suggests it may not contribute to migraine pathogenesis. Our findings point to KATP channel blockers that target the Kir6.1/SUR2B subtype, found in cerebral vasculature, as potential candidates for innovative antimigraine treatments.Registration number: NCT04744129.

Glibenclamide Posttreatment Does Not Inhibit Levcromakalim Induced Headache in Healthy Participants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Intravenous infusion of ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) opener levcromakalim causes headache in humans and implicates KATP channels in headache pathophysiology. Whether KATP channel blocker glibenclamide inhibits levcromakalim-induced headache has not yet been elucidated. We aimed to investigate the effect of posttreatment with glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy participants. In a double blind, randomized, three-arm, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 20 healthy participants were randomized to receive 20 mL of levcromakalim (0.05 mg/min (50 mg/mL)) or 20 mL placebo (isotonic saline) intravenously over 20 min followed by oral administration of 10 mg glibenclamide or placebo. Fifteen participants completed all three study days. The primary endpoint was the difference in incidence of headache (0-12 h) between glibenclamide and placebo. More participants developed headache on levcromakalim-placebo day (15/15, 100%) (P = 0.013) and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (13/15, 86%) compared to placebo-placebo day (7/15, 46%) (P = 0.041). We found no difference in headache incidence between levcromakalim-placebo day and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (P = 0.479). The AUC0-12 h for headache intensity was significantly larger in levcromakalim-placebo day and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day compared to placebo-placebo day (106.3 ± 215.8) (P < 0.01). There was no difference in the AUC0-12 h for headache intensity between the levcromakalim-placebo day (494 ± 336.6) and the levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (417 ± 371.6) (P = 0.836). We conclude that non-specific KATP channel inhibitor glibenclamide did not attenuate levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers. Future studies should clarify the involvement of the distinct isoforms of sulfonylurea receptor subunits of KATP channels in the pathogenesis of headache and migraine.

The role of high-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel in headache and migraine pathophysiology

Migraine is a common, neurovascular headache disorder with a complex molecular interplay. The involvement of ion channels in the pathogenesis of migraine gathered considerable attention with the findings that different ion channels subfamilies are expressed in trigeminovascular system, the physiological substrate of migraine pain, and several ion channel openers investigated in clinical trials with diverse primary endpoints caused headache as a frequent side effect. High-conductance (big) calcium-activated potassium (BK_Ca ) channel is expressed in the cranial arteries and the trigeminal pain pathway. Recent clinical research revealed that infusion of BK_Ca channel opener MaxiPost caused vasodilation, headache and migraine attack. Thus, BK_Ca channel is involved in pathophysiological mechanisms underlying headache and migraine, and targeting BK_Ca channel presents a new potential strategy for migraine treatment.

Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on PACAP38-induced headache and hemodynamic

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether glibenclamide, a non-selective adenosine 5'-triphosphate-sensitive K⁺ (K_ATP) channel blocker, attenuates pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP38)-induced headache and vascular changes in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled and crossover design, 22 healthy volunteers were assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of 10 picomole/kg/min pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 over 20 minutes followed by oral administration of 10 mg glibenclamide or placebo. The primary endpoint was the difference in incidence of headache (0-12 hours) between glibenclamide and placebo. The secondary endpoints were a difference in area under the curve for headache intensity scores, middle cerebral artery velocity (V_meanMCA), superficial temporal artery diameter, radial artery diameter, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and facial skin blood flow between the two study days.

RESULTS

Twenty participants completed the study. We found no difference in the incidence of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38-induced headache after glibenclamide (19/20, 95%) compared to placebo (18/20, 90%) (P = 0.698). The area under the curve for headache intensity, middle cerebral artery velocity, superficial temporal artery diameter, radial artery diameter, facial skin blood flow, heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure did not differ between pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38-glibenclamide day compared to pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38-placebo day (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Posttreatment with 5'-triphosphate-sensitive K₊ channel inhibitor glibenclamide did not attenuate pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38-induced headache and hemodynamic changes in healthy volunteers. We suggest that pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38-triggered signaling pathway could be mediated by specific isoforms of sulfonylurea receptor subunits of 5'-triphosphate-sensitive K₊ channels and other types of potassium channels.

The Effect of K ATP Channel Blocker Glibenclamide on CGRP-Induced Headache and Hemodynamic in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) dilates cranial arteries and triggers headache. The CGRP signaling pathway is partly dependent on activation of ATP-sensitive potassium (K ATP ) channels. Here, we investigated the effect of the K ATP channel blocker glibenclamide on CGRP-induced headache and vascular changes in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 20 healthy volunteers aged 18-27 years were randomly allocated to receive an intravenous infusion of 1.5 μg/min CGRP after oral pretreatment with glibenclamide (glibenclamide-CGRP day) or placebo (placebo-CGRP day). The primary endpoints were the difference in incidence of headache and the difference in area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity scores (0-14 h) between glibenclamide and placebo. The secondary endpoints were the difference in AUC for middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (V MCA ), superficial temporal artery (STA) and radial artery (RA) diameter, facial flushing, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (0-4 h) between glibenclamide and placebo.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference in the incidence of headache between glibenclamide-CGRP day (14/20, 70%) and placebo-CGRP day (19/20, 95%) (P = 0.06). The AUC for headache intensity, V MCA , STA, RA, facial skin blood flow, HR, and MAP did not differ between glibenclamide-CGRP day compared to placebo-CGRP day (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with a non-selective K ATP channel inhibitor glibenclamide did not attenuate CGRP-induced headache and hemodynamic changes in healthy volunteers. We suggest that CGRP-induced responses could be mediated via activation of specific isoforms of sulfonylurea receptor subunits of K ATP channel.

Effect of KATP channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache

INTRODUCTION

Administration of ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener levcromakalim triggers headache in healthy volunteers and migraine attacks in migraine patients. Here, we investigated the effect of ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over study, 15 healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years were randomly allocated to receive glibenclamide and levcromakalim (day 1), glibenclamide and placebo (day 2), and placebo and placebo (day 3) on three different days separated by at least 1 week. The primary endpoints were the difference in incidence of headache and the difference in area under the curve for headache intensity scores (0-12 hours) between the days.

RESULTS

Fifteen healthy volunteers completed the 3 days of the study. More participants (12/15, 80%) developed headache on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (5/15, 33%) (p = 0.01; mean difference 47%; 95% confidence interval 18-75%) and compared to the placebo-placebo day (1/15, 7%) (p = 0.001; mean difference 73%; 95% confidence interval 48-99%). We found no difference in headache incidence between glibenclamide-placebo day and placebo-placebo day (p = 0.12; mean difference 27%; 95% confidence interval 1.3-52%). The area under the curve for headache intensity was significantly larger on the glibenclamide-levcromakalim day compared to the glibenclamide-placebo day (p = 0.003); and compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.001). We found no difference in the area under the curve between the glibenclamide-placebo day compared to the placebo-placebo day (p = 0.07). The median time to onset for headache after levcromakalim infusion with glibenclamide pretreatment was delayed (180 min) compared to levcromakalim without pretreatment (30 min) from a previously published study.

CONCLUSION

Glibenclamide administration did not cause headache, and glibenclamide pretreatment did not prevent levcromakalim-induced headache. However, glibenclamide delayed the onset of levcromakalim-induced headache. More selective blockers are needed to further elucidate the role of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel in headache initiation.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03886922.