Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Concomitant Vancomycin with Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime; a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Nephrotoxicity remains a significant concern in the management of critically ill patients receiving antibiotic therapy. The combination of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam (VPT) is frequently employed to combat multidrug-resistant infections. However, emerging evidence suggests a potential increase in the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with this combination. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the nephrotoxic risk of the VPT combination in comparison to Vancomycin with Cefepime (VC) combination therapy. Methodology: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in databases including PubMed and Google Scholar for studies published until 2024. Studies that reported AKI incidence in patients treated with VPT, or VC were included. The data were analyzed using random-effects models to estimate pooled incidence rates of AKI. Subgroup analyses were performed based on patient demographics and baseline renal function. Results: A total of six studies involving 23 794 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled incidence of AKI in the VPT group was found to be 29.9% (95% CI: 25.3%-38.4%), significantly higher than that of the VC (22.7%) (P < .05). A comparative analysis demonstrated a significantly higher risk of AKI in patients on VPT compared to VC (1.503; 95% CI: 1.221-1.849 P < .001). Conclusion: The findings of this study underscore a significant increase in the risk of AKI associated with the Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam combination in critically ill patients. Clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing this combination, particularly for patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction.

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Patient safety outcomes for continuous infusion vancomycin as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

BACKGROUND

Administration of vancomycin as a continuous infusion has been associated with reduced nephrotoxicity. Given limited published experience with continuous infusion vancomycin in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs, we reviewed outcomes from our center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of adult patients receiving vancomycin OPAT as continuous or intermittent infusion for an intended treatment duration of at least 7 days. The primary outcome was time to nephrotoxicity with continuous versus intermittent infusion vancomycin while on OPAT; additional outcomes included time to any vancomycin-associated adverse event, time to 60-day death or readmission, and time to 60-day emergency department encounter. Proportional hazards modeling was used to identify variables independently associated with outcomes, as well as assess the strength of association of continuous infusion with each outcome.

RESULTS

Four-hundred ninety-two patients were included: 118 treated with continuous and 374 with intermittent vancomycin infusion. Continuous infusion was not associated with lower rates of nephrotoxicity compared to intermittent infusion (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.72, 95% CI: 0.35-1.50). There were no advantages of continuous over intermittent infusion in the rates of any adverse event (aHR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.56-1.53), 60-day death or readmission (aHR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.68-1.61), or 60-day emergency department encounter (aHR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.68-1.99). Vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) at discharge was the only modifiable factor identified that was independently associated with patient safety outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There was no appreciable benefit of continuous infusion vancomycin on outpatient safety outcomes. AUC-centered dosing approaches warrant further investigation as strategies to improve vancomycin safety in OPAT programs.

Usefulness of Routine Laboratory Tests for Follow up of Patients Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Run by Infectious Diseases Fellows

BACKGROUND

The infectious disease society of America (IDSA) recommends routine laboratory tests for all patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) to monitor for adverse events. There are no data to support how often patients should take monitoring laboratory tests. In addition, the relevance of different laboratory tests commonly used for OPAT follow up is not clearly known.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study over a 7-year study interval (1 January 2014 to 31 December 2021). Clinical data were obtained to identify the risk factors associated with abnormal laboratory tests and determine if abnormal laboratory tests led to antibiotic change or hospital readmission.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. In our multivariate analysis, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0-4 (aOR 0.39, 95%Cl 0.18-0.86), the use of ceftriaxone without vancomycin (aOR 0.47, 95%Cl 0.24-0.91) and an OPAT duration of 2-4 weeks (aOR 0.47, 95%Cl 0.24-0.91) were associated with a lower risk of OPAT complications. A CCI of 5 or more (aOR 2.5, 95%Cl (1.1-5.7)) and an OPAT duration of 5 or more weeks (aOR 2.7, 95% Cl 1.3-5.6) were associated with a higher risk of OPAT complications. An abnormal complete metabolic panel or vancomycin levels, but not an abnormal complete blood count, were associated with antibiotic change or readmission.

CONCLUSION

Patients with fewer comorbidities, ceftriaxone and short OPAT durations are at lower risk for OPAT complications. These patients could be followed with less frequent laboratory monitoring.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin Continuous Infusion in Patients Treated at Home in an Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Program

Vancomycin is commonly used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) of Gram-positive infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring and adverse event monitoring pose a challenge. Outcome data of vancomycin in OPAT (vOPAT) are limited. The study aim was to report the safety and efficacy of a structured vOPAT program implemented in the University Hospitals Leuven. The program provides continuous elastomeric infusion of vancomycin at home with biweekly follow-up at the outpatient clinic. Demographics, clinical, biochemical and treatment parameters, target attainment parameters and clinical outcomes were recorded. An e-survey was conducted to assess patient satisfaction. Thirty-five vOPAT episodes in 32 patients were included. During 206 follow-up consultations, 203 plasma concentration measurements were registered with a median vancomycin plasma concentration of 22.5 mg/L (range 6.6–32.0). The majority of concentrations (68.5%) were within the therapeutic range (20.0–25.0 mg/L). Adverse event rates, including drug- (5.7%) and catheter-related (5.7%) events, were low. For 32 vOPAT episodes, a clinical cure rate of 100% was observed. All patients who completed the e-survey were satisfied with their vOPAT course. These findings show that a structured vOPAT program with rigorous follow-up provides safe and effective ambulatory treatment of patients with vancomycin in continuous infusion.