The trigemino-cervical reflex in patients with trigeminal neuralgia

Technical Aspects of Eliciting Trigeminocervical and Trigeminospinal Reflexes in Humans: A Scoping Review

SUMMARY

This scoping review aims to summarize the technical strategies for obtaining trigeminocervical reflex (TCR) and trigeminospinal reflex (TSR) responses. Studies published on TCR or TSR elicitation in humans through electrical stimulation of trigeminal nerve branches were eligible for this scoping review. The data of interest included stimulation parameters, site of stimulation, recording parameters, and the feasibility of TCR and TSR elicitation, in healthy participants. Short-latency TCR responses were regularly obtained in both anterior and posterior neck muscles after electrical stimulation of the supraorbital and infraorbital nerves under voluntary muscle activation. However, without voluntary muscle activation, we found evidence of elicitation of short-latency TCR components only in the posterior neck muscles after supraorbital or infraorbital nerve stimulation. Long-latency TCR responses were regularly obtained in the anterior and posterior neck muscles in studies that evaluated this technique, regardless of the trigeminal branch stimulation or muscle activation status. Short-latency TSR components were not obtained in the included studies, whereas long-latency TSR responses were regularly recorded in proximal upper limb muscles. This scoping review revealed key heterogeneity in the techniques used for TCR and TSR elicitation. By summarizing all the methodological procedures used for TCR and TSR elicitation, this scoping review can guide researchers in defining optimized technical approaches for different research and clinical scenarios.

Long latency trigemino-cervical reflex in restless legs syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The trigemino-cervical complex (TCC) seems under dopaminergic inhibitory control and the abnormalities of trigemino-cervical reflex (TCR) have been reported in disorders associated with the dopaminergic system and various pain disorders. If the inhibitory response in TCC is likely dopaminergic, we hypothesized that TCR, which has never been evaluated in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients before, would be also abnormal.

METHODS

TCR was recorded from bilateral sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis muscles in consecutive 15 drug-naive RLS patients and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. The right and left infraorbital branches of the trigeminal nerve were stimulated by percutaneous electrical stimulation separately. The presence rates, onset latencies, amplitudes, and durations of responses were measured and compared between patients with RLS and controls.

RESULTS

The presence rates, onset latencies and amplitudes of TCR responses were similar between RLS patients and controls, however, the durations of responses were bilaterally longer in RLS patients compared to healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperexcitability of TCR suggests defective sensory processing in the brainstem probably due to impairment of descending inhibitory dopaminergic system in RLS. The sensitization of TCC in RLS patients may also be a possible factor that might explain the association of RLS and pain disorders.