Prognostic significance of WT1 expression at diagnosis and end of induction in Egyptian adult acute myeloid leukemia patients

Clinical significance of WT1 in the evaluation of therapeutic effect and prognosis of non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia

To explore the clinical significance and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with WT1 mutations.In total, the clinical data of 269 adult patients with non-M3 AML were considered retrospectively. From these patients, 153 carried WT1 mutation whereas 116 were negative. WT1 mutation positive patients were further divided into WT1 low expression and high expression groups base on the expression level of WT1 by qPCR at diagnosis (cut off: 170500). Survival and therapeutic effect analysis were performed for the above patients with different interfering factors such as co-mutations, the extent of WT1 log reduction and the chemotherapy regimens. Patients with high WT1 expression have higher rate of relapse. We can accurately identify patients with inferior outcomes when we take the following factors into consideration: the WT1 expression level at diagnosis; different prognostic factors including co-mutations (especially NPM1 and FLT3-ITD); the log reduction of WT1 after induction therapy and the risk of stratification. Idarubicin + Cytarabine (IA) regimen could reduce the expression level of WT1 after treatment, and Allo-HSCT played an important role in improving the prognosis of patients with WT1 high expression and patients with WT1 negativity. Among the relapsed patients, there existed a rising trend of WT1-MRD in advance than MFC-MRD and that of patients with continuous complete remission (CR). Different clinical background should be taken into consideration when we judge the prognosis and therapeutic effect of patients with WT1 mutations. In addition, WT1 may be an optional MRD marker, which needs regular monitoring.

Wilms tumor 1 gene expression in acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic significance and usefulness in minimal residual disease monitoring—a case–control study

Background

Minimal residual disease (MRD), which is characterized as leukemic cells at a level below morphologic detection, has been connected to the risk of relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. In 80–90% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, the Wilms tumor (WT1) gene is overexpressed at the mRNA level. In our prospective study, a total of 55 patients were enrolled in the study. Group I involved 40 AML patients and group II involved 15 patients healthy controls. WT1 gene expression was quantified using quantitative real-time PCR on bone marrow samples from AML patients at initial diagnosis and at day 28 after induction chemotherapy, and compared to 15 healthy controls in group II. Follow up of patients for prognosis evaluation was assessed. IBM SPSS software was used to capture and analyses the data.

Results

At diagnosis, the mean WT1 transcript value in AML patients was substantially higher than the expression observed in control patient’s Bone marrow. There was no statistically relevant relationship between the onset of relapse and WT1 expression. Patients with WT1 overexpression at diagnosis had a shorter overall survival than patients with negative WT1 expression.

Conclusions

Wilms tumor 1 gene expression was found to be significantly higher in AML patients than control cases, overall, our results confirmed the prognostic significance of WT1 overexpression in AML patients. Our findings support the application of MRD in AML patients based on WT1 overexpression.

Clinical values of gene alterations as marker of minimal residual disease in non-M3 acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a malignant disease of the hematopoietic system. Residual leukemic cells after treatment are associated with relapse. Thus, detecting minimal residual disease (MRD) is significant. Major techniques for MRD assessment include multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). At a molecular level, AML is the consequence of collaboration of several gene alterations. Some of these gene alterations can also be used as MRD markers to evaluate the level of residual leukemic cells by PCR and NGS. However, when as MRD markers, different gene alterations have different clinical values. This paper aims to summarize the characteristics of various MRD markers, so as to better predict the clinical outcome of AML patients and guide the treatment.

Use of Wilms Tumor 1 Gene Expression as a Reliable Marker for Prognosis and Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Normal Karyotype Patients

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype (AML-NK) represents the largest group of AML patients classified with an intermediate prognosis. A constant need exists to introduce new molecular markers for more precise risk stratification and for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Quantitative assessment of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene transcripts was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. The bone marrow samples were collected at the diagnosis from 104 AML-NK patients and from 34 of these patients during follow-up or disease relapse.

RESULTS

We found that overexpression of the WT1 gene (WT1^high status), present in 25.5% of patients, was an independent unfavorable factor for achieving complete remission. WT1^high status was also associated with resistance to therapy and shorter disease-free survival and overall survival. Assessment of the log reduction value of WT1 expression, measured in paired diagnosis/complete remission samples, revealed that patients with a log reduction of < 2 had a tendency toward shorter disease-free survival and overall survival and a greater incidence of disease relapse. Combining WT1 gene expression status with NPM1 and FLT3-ITD mutational status, we found that the tumor behavior of intermediate patients (FLT3-ITD^-/NPM1^- double negative) with WT1^high status is almost the same as the tumor behavior of the adverse risk group.

CONCLUSION

WT1 expression status represents a good molecular marker of prognosis, response to treatment, and MRD monitoring. Above all, the usage of the WT1 expression level as an additional marker for more precise risk stratification of AML-NK patients could lead to more adapted, personalized treatment protocols.

Clinical Impact of Overexpression of FOXP3 and WT1 on Disease Outcome in Egyptian Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Background:

In the last decade, it has become clear that change of gene expression may alter the hematopoietic cell quiescent state and consequently play a major role in leukemogenesis. WT1 is known to be a player in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and FOXP3 has a crucial role in regulating the immune response.

Objectives:

To evaluate the impact of overexpression of WT1and FOXP3 genes on clinical course in adult and pediatric AML patients in Egypt.

Patients and methods:

Bone marrow and peripheral blood samples were obtained from 97 de novo non M3 AML patients (63 adult and 34 pediatric). Real-time quantitative PCR was used to detect overexpression WT1 and FOXP3 genes. Patient follow up ranged from 0.2 to 39.0 months with a median of 5 months.

Results:

In the pediatric group; WT1 was significantly expressed with a high total leukocyte count median 50X109/L (p=0.018). In the adult group, WT1 had an adverse impact on complete remission induction, disease-free survival and overall survival (p=0.02, p=0.035, p=0.019 respectively). FOXP3 overexpression was associated with FAB subtypes AML M0 +M1 vs. M2, M4+M5 (p =0.039) and the presence of hepatomegaly (p=0.005).

Conclusions:

WT1 and FOXP3 overexpression has an adverse impact on clinical presentation, treatment response and survival of pediatric and adult Egyptian AML patients.

WT1 Expression in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Assessing its Presence, Magnitude and Temporal Changes as Prognostic Factors

Expression of the gene Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) has been suggested as a marker of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but literature data are not without controversy. Our aim was to assess the presence, magnitude and temporal changes of WT1 expression as prognostic factors. 60 AML patients were followed until death or the end of the 6-year observation period. Blood samples were taken at diagnosis, post-induction, during remission and in case of a relapse. Using quantitative real-time PCR, we determined WT1 expression from each sample, normalized it against the endogenous control gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and classified samples as negative, moderately positive or highly positive. We divided the patients into groups based on detected WT1 expression values, illustrated overall and disease-free survival on Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared differences between each group by the logrank test. Disappearance of WT1-positivity during chemotherapy had a favorable effect on survival. Interestingly, no difference was seen between the survivals of WT1-positive subgroups that expressed moderate or high levels of WT1 mRNA. A 1-log decrease in WT1 expression without becoming negative did not affect prognosis, either. Our results suggest that defining a cut-off value for WT1-positivity, rather than just using logarithmic figures of changes in gene expression, might have prognostic use in post-induction AML patients. We encourage further, larger-scale studies.

New methods for assessing response in acute myeloid leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia typically are monitored with bone marrow biopsy 7-10 days after completion of induction therapy. However, this test has relatively poor sensitivity and specificity for classifying patients likely to have long-term cure or even patients who will need additional therapy to achieve complete remission. Several new methods of assessing response are being studied and are summarized in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many new methods are being used to evaluate response assessment. Emerging data suggest that various types of clinical, chemical, and imaging biomarkers, as well as more sensitive techniques to measure minimal residual disease, can all help provide more accurate response assessment and prognostic information.

SUMMARY

New techniques will improve the way we assess response to acute myeloid leukemia therapy. Larger confirmatory studies utilizing these novel markers of response to change treatment and to improve clinical outcomes are urgently needed.