Effects of Anti-Pseudomonal Agents, Individually and in Combination, With or Without Clarithromycin, on Growth and Biofilm Formation by Antibiotic-Susceptible and -Resistant Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the Impact of Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Condensate

Background/Objectives:Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa) can circumvent antimicrobial chemotherapy, an ability enhanced by cigarette smoking (CS). This study probed potential benefits of combinations of anti-pseudomonal agents, and potential augmentation by a macrolide, in the absence or presence of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC). Methods: Two susceptible (WT: wild-type and DS: drug-sensitive) and one multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of Psa were treated with amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, individually and in combination, and with and without clarithromycin, followed by the measurement of planktonic growth and biofilm formation by spectrophotometry. Antibiotic interactions were determined using the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) method. Effects on preformed biofilm density were measured following the addition of antibiotics: all procedures were performed in the absence and presence of CSC. Results: The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the three agents ranged from 0.125 mg/L to 1 mg/L (WT and DS strains) and 16 mg/L to 64 mg/L (MDR strain), with all resistant to clarithromycin (125 mg/L). MIC values closely correlated with the antibiotic concentrations required to inhibit biofilm formation. FICI revealed synergism between most combinations, with augmentation by clarithromycin. Amikacin had the greatest effect on biofilm density, which was potentiated by combination with the other antibiotics, particularly clarithromycin. Exposure to CSC had variable, albeit modest, effects on bacterial growth and biofilm formation, but low concentrations increased biofilm mass and attenuated synergistic antimicrobial interactions and effects on biofilm density. Conclusions: Amikacin, cefepime, and ciprofloxacin, especially with clarithromycin, exhibit synergistic anti-pseudomonal activity and decrease preformed biofilm density. CSC attenuated these effects, illustrating the pro-infective potential of CS.

The use of combination therapy for the improvement of colistin activity against bacterial biofilm

Colistin is used as a last resort for the management of infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, the use of this antibiotic could lead to different side effects, such as nephrotoxicity, in most patients, and the high prevalence of colistin-resistant strains restricts the use of colistin in the clinical setting. Additionally, colistin could induce resistance through the increased formation of biofilm; biofilm-embedded cells are highly resistant to antibiotics, and as with other antibiotics, colistin is impaired by bacteria in the biofilm community. In this regard, the researchers used combination therapy for the enhancement of colistin activity against bacterial biofilm, especially MDR bacteria. Different antibacterial agents, such as antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages, natural compounds, antibiotics from different families, N-acetylcysteine, and quorum-sensing inhibitors, showed promising results when combined with colistin. Additionally, the use of different drug platforms could also boost the efficacy of this antibiotic against biofilm. The mentioned colistin-based combination therapy not only could suppress the formation of biofilm but also could destroy the established biofilm. These kinds of treatments also avoided the emergence of colistin-resistant subpopulations, reduced the required dosage of colistin for inhibition of biofilm, and finally enhanced the dosage of this antibiotic at the site of infection. However, the exact interaction of colistin with other antibacterial agents has not been elucidated yet; therefore, further studies are required to identify the precise mechanism underlying the efficient removal of biofilms by colistin-based combination therapy.

Recent Advances in the Control of Clinically Important Biofilms

Biofilms are complex structures formed by bacteria, fungi, or even viruses on biotic and abiotic surfaces, and they can be found in almost any part of the human body. The prevalence of biofilm-associated diseases has increased in recent years, mainly because of the frequent use of indwelling medical devices that create opportunities for clinically important bacteria and fungi to form biofilms either on the device or on the neighboring tissues. As a result of their resistance to antibiotics and host immunity factors, biofilms have been associated with the development or persistence of several clinically important diseases. The inability to completely eradicate biofilms drastically increases the burden of disease on both the patient and the healthcare system. Therefore, it is crucial to develop innovative ways to tackle the growth and development of biofilms. This review focuses on dental- and implant-associated biofilm infections, their prevalence in humans, and potential therapeutic intervention strategies, including the recent advances in pharmacology and biomedical engineering. It lists current strategies used to control the formation of clinically important biofilms, including novel antibiotics and their carriers, antiseptics and disinfectants, small molecule anti-biofilm agents, surface treatment strategies, and nanostructure functionalization, as well as multifunctional coatings particularly suitable for providing antibacterial effects to the surface of implants, to treat either dental- or implant-related bacterial infections.

Clinical Impact of Antibiotics for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infections

Bacterial biofilms are highly recalcitrant to antibiotic therapies due to multiple tolerance mechanisms. The involvement of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a wide range of biofilm-related infections often leads to treatment failures. Indeed, few current antimicrobial molecules are still effective on tolerant sessile cells. In contrast, studies increasingly showed that conventional antibiotics can, at low concentrations, induce a phenotype change in bacteria and consequently, the biofilm formation. Understanding the clinical effects of antimicrobials on biofilm establishment is essential to avoid the use of inappropriate treatments in the case of biofilm infections. This article reviews the current knowledge about bacterial growth within a biofilm and the preventive or inducer impact of standard antimicrobials on its formation by P. aeruginosa. The effect of antibiotics used to treat biofilms of other bacterial species, as Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli, was also briefly mentioned. Finally, it describes two in vitro devices which could potentially be used as antibiotic susceptibility testing for adherent bacteria.

AMPs as Anti-biofilm Agents for Human Therapy and Prophylaxis

Microbial cells show a strong natural tendency to adhere to surfaces and to colonize them by forming complex communities called biofilms. In this growth mode, biofilm-forming cells encase themselves inside a dense matrix which efficiently protects them against antimicrobial agents and effectors of the immune system. Moreover, at the physiological level, biofilms contain a very heterogeneous cell population including metabolically inactive organisms and persisters, which are highly tolerant to antibiotics. The majority of human infectious diseases are caused by biofilm-forming microorganisms which are responsible for pathologies such as cystic fibrosis, infective endocarditis, pneumonia, wound infections, dental caries, infections of indwelling devices, etc. AMPs are well suited to combat biofilms because of their potent bactericidal activity of broad spectrum (including resting cells and persisters) and their ability to first penetrate and then to disorganize these structures. In addition, AMPs frequently synergize with antimicrobial compounds and were recently reported to repress the molecular pathways leading to biofilm formation. Finally, there is a very active research to develop AMP-containing coatings that can prevent biofilm formation by killing microbial cells on contact or by locally releasing their active principle. In this chapter we will describe these strategies and discuss the perspectives of the use of AMPs as anti-biofilm agents for human therapy and prophylaxis.