Surgery for constipation in patients with prior spinal cord injury: the Department of Veterans Affairs experience

Stoma reversal in functional bowel disease: managing patient choice

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to assess the rate of stoma reversal in patients who have undergone stoma formation with permanent intent for functional bowel disorder. We also assessed the incidence of malignancy in defunctioned bowel.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of patients undergoing planned permanent stoma formation for functional bowel disorder over a 10-year period at a single tertiary centre.

RESULTS

Of 92 patients included in the study, 11 (12%) requested and underwent stoma reversal following stoma formation for functional bowel disorder. Of 84 patients with defunctioned bowel left in situ, two (2%) developed bowel malignancy during our study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Stoma formation may be necessary for patients with incontinence and constipation when conservative treatments fail. Some patients have very firm views about the need for a stoma, but a significant proportion of patients do not cope with a stoma and request reversal, therefore patient selection and pre-procedure counselling are important. The risk of developing malignant disease in the defunctioned colon is potentially significant, and consideration should be given to appropriate surveillance in this group of patients. Evidence for stoma formation in functional gastrointestinal disorders is lacking; this study reports outcomes in a large cohort of patients over a long period, and highlights areas where further research and practice guidelines are needed. If large numbers of patients are undergoing stoma reversal posing significant mortality and morbidity risks, this suggests that patient selection and preoperative counselling need refinement.

[The paraplegic patient-Characteristics of diagnostics and treatment in visceral surgery]

BACKGROUND

Patients with paraplegia develop syndrome-specific complications relevant to visceral surgery, which occur in the context of the acute spinal shock or as a consequence of the progressive neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) with the formation of an elongated colon and/or megacolon. Moreover, acute abdominal emergencies, such as acute appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis and ileus images, pose particular challenges for the clinician when the clinical signs are atypical or even absent. The expansion of indications for obesity surgery to include patients with a paraplegic syndrome, whose independence and quality of life can be impaired due to the restricted mobility, especially by obesity, is becoming increasingly more important.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of the special requirements and aspects in the treatment of this special patient collective and to show the evidence of paraplegia-specific visceral surgery treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Targeted literature search in Medline and Cochrane library (German and English, 1985-2020).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The clinical treatment of paraplegic patients requires in-depth knowledge of the pathophysiological changes at the different height of the paraplegia (upper versus lower motor neuron) and the phase of the disease (spinal shock versus long-term course). Missing or atypical clinical symptoms of acute diseases delay a quick diagnosis and make early diagnosis essential. The evidence for surgical treatment of the acute and chronic consequences of NBD is based on small retrospective series and case reports, as is that for special indications such as obesity surgery.

Treatments in neurogenic bowel dysfunctions: evidence reviews and clinical recommendations in adults

INTRODUCTION

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) is an impairment of defecation control due to any nervous system lesion negatively affecting physical health status and quality of life. We aimed at systematically assessing all available evidence on NBD treatment in adults and providing clinical management guidance and recommendations.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PICOs and questions (N.=7) were identified by an expert panel. We searched for and retrieved evidence from the PUBMED and EMBASE databases, limited to the English language and the Western countries context, related to any type of setting and published from 2009 to 2019. Health effects, patient values, preferences and resource use were assessed. Of all, only RCTs, observational studies and systematic reviews on adult population (≥18 years) were analyzed. The study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane recommendations. The effect size, if possible, was calculated for the interpretation of the outcomes, and evidence was assessed through the GRADE method.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thirty-one studies were included in our qualitative synthesis. Evidence is generally scarce. Most of the outcomes are narratively described and therefore defined by imprecision. Besides, most of the included studies are affected by risk of bias. Digital stimulation was found to be effective in short term follow-up. The pharmacological treatment choice, combined or alone, needs to be balanced case by case considering clinical history, setting of use and bowel management protocol. According to only one RCT supporting evidence mainly in persons affected by spinal cord injury (SCI), trans-anal irrigation (TAI) improves QoL and patient independency with a significant reduction of time spent for defecation and daily bowel program. History of urinary infections predicts the choice of using TAI. Patient-reported efficacy of colostomy alone or in combination with other surgeries appears evident in terms of patient's satisfaction and QoL over time. Nonetheless, perioperative and late complications can occur and may result in reduced acceptability over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is somehow weak and mainly reported in SCI. The systematic use of assistive interventions does not reduce the need of conservative or invasive approaches. Studies are needed on the role of bowel management in protecting patients from complications secondary to NBD in long term follow-ups.

Colostomy and quality of life after spinal cord injury: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. The aim of this review was to determine whether colostomy formation improves QoL in patients with SCI.

METHODS

The Cochrane Register, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched using medical subject headings. The search was extended to the reference lists of identified studies, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. All clinical trials that included spinal injury and QoL, time spent on bowel care, and patient satisfaction with stoma were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were found (including 488 patients with a stoma), of which 13 were retrospective cross-sectional studies and two were case-control studies, one of which was prospective research. Nine of 11 studies focusing on QoL reported that patients' QoL was improved by the stoma, whereas the remaining two studies found no difference. Time spent on bowel care was significantly reduced in all 13 studies that considered this outcome, with patients reducing the average time spent on bowel care from more than 1 h to less than 15 min per day. All 12 studies assessing patient satisfaction with their stoma reported high patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Stoma formation improves QoL, reduces time spent on bowel care, and increases independence. Stoma is an option that could be discussed and offered to patients with spinal cord injury.

Early elective colostomy following spinal cord injury

Elective colostomy is an accepted method of bowel management for patients who have had a spinal cord injury (SCI). Approximately 2.4% of patients with SCI have a colostomy, and traditionally it is performed as a last resort several years after injury, and only if bowel complications persist when all other methods have failed. This is despite evidence that patients find a colostomy easier to manage and frequently report wishing it had been performed earlier. It was noticed in the author's spinal unit that increasing numbers of patients were requesting colostomy formation during inpatient rehabilitation following SCI. No supporting literature was found for this; it appears to be an emerging and untested practice. This article explores colostomy formation as a method of bowel management in patients with SCI, considers the optimal time for colostomy formation after injury and examines issues for health professionals.

Optimal Colostomy Placement in Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Barring unusual circumstances, sigmoid colostomy is the optimal technique for management of defecation in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We sought to provide evidence that a sigmoid colostomy is not difficult to perform in SCI patients and has better long-term results. The St. Louis Department of Veterans Affairs has a Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF)–approved SCI Unit. We reviewed the operative notes on all SCI patients who received a colostomy for fecal management by three ASCRS-certified colorectal surgeons at the St. Louis Department of Veterans Affairs from January 1,2007 to November 26, 2012. There were 27 operations for which the recorded indication for surgery suggested that the primary disorder was SCI. Fourteen had traumatic SCI of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine and were evaluable. Of these 14 patients, 12 had laparoscopic sigmoid colostomy and two had open sigmoid colostomy. We encountered one evaluable patient with a remarkably large amount of retroperitoneal bony debris who successfully underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colostomy. In conclusion, sigmoid colostomy is the consensus optimal procedure for fecal management in SCI patients. Laparoscopic procedures are preferred. Care providers should specify sigmoid colostomy when contacting a surgeon.