Is there a rationale for prescription of benzodiazepines in the elderly? Review of the literature

Reducing the use of sleep-inducing drugs during hospitalisation by a multi-faceted intervention: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Many patients receive benzodiazepines or Z-drugs during hospitalisation due to sleeping problems. In a pilot study, we aimed to find out whether, and to what degree, a multi-faceted intervention can reduce the use of these drugs, especially in older patients and those without a psychiatric or neurological disorder. The results of this pilot study should inform the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

In a quasi-experimental design, we implemented the intervention in a German hospital with the support of the hospital director, medical and nursing staff and employee representatives. We compared prescription data for sleep-inducing drugs before and after the intervention by Fisher's exact test and used odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs as a measure of effect size.

RESULTS

The data from 960 patients aged ≥65 years before intervention and 1049 patients after intervention were analysed. Before intervention, 483 (50.3%) of the patients received sleep-inducing drugs at some time during their hospital stay. After the intervention, 381 (36.3%) patients received a sleep-inducing drug, resulting in an OR of 0.56 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.68) (p<0.001). The reduction was particularly pronounced in patients without a psychiatric or neurological disorder (from 45.0% to 28.8%). In particular, the consumption of benzodiazepines declined from 24.3% to 8.5% (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.4) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A multi-faceted intervention to change the practice of the use of sleep-inducing drugs in one hospital was successful in terms of drug reduction, particularly for benzodiazepines. The intervention was effective especially for target persons-that is, those without a psychiatric or neurological disease. Awareness of the magnitude of the change and the role of important stakeholders could help researchers and hospital staff to design a large RCT, including control hospitals, to evaluate the success of a multi-faceted intervention on a scientifically sound basis.

Therapeutic dilemmas with benzodiazepines and Z-drugs: insomnia and anxiety disorders versus increased fall risk: a clinical review

PURPOSE

The aim of this clinical review was to summarise the existing knowledge on fall risk associated with benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs in older people with focus on appropriate prescribing, including deprescribing.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in June 2021 in PubMed and Embase with citation and reference checking. Personal reference libraries and international websites were also used. Keywords for the searches included "benzodiazepines", "Z-drugs", "falls", "deprescribing", "fall-risk-increasing-drugs", "inappropriate prescribing", "older people" and matching synonyms. We discuss use of BZDs and Z-drugs, potential fall-related adverse reactions, alternatives for and deprescribing of BZDs and Z-drugs in older persons.

RESULTS

BZDs and Z-drugs differ in fall-related adverse effect profile. They contribute to fall risk through orthostatic hypotension, dizziness and/or imbalance, sedation, muscular weakness, ataxia, etc. Fall incidents contribute significantly to mortality and morbidity. Therefore, there is a need for appropriate prescribing and use of BZDs and Z-drugs in older people. In practice, this means pertaining to a strict indication, strongly consider to non-pharmacological alternatives, limit use to the lowest dose and the shortest duration possible. Judicious deprescribing should be considered and encouraged as well. Practical resources, tools and algorithms are available to guide and assist clinicians in deprescribing BZDs and Z-drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing BZDs and Z-drugs should be done in a well-considered way in fall-prone older people. A good overview and insight in the fall-related adverse effects of these drugs, as well as the availability of different strategies to increase the appropriate use, including deprescribing initiatives, can assist clinicians in clinical decision-making.

The impact of a pharmacist intervention on post-discharge hypnotic drug discontinuation in geriatric inpatients: a before-after study

BACKGROUND

Chronic use of hypnotic agents is prevalent in older adults, who as a result are at increased risk for certain adverse events, such as day-time drowsiness and falls. Multiple strategies to discontinue hypnotics have been tested in geriatric patients, but evidence remains scarce. Hence, we aimed to investigate a multicomponent intervention to reduce hypnotic drug use in geriatric inpatients.

METHODS

A before-after study was performed on the acute geriatric wards of a teaching hospital. The before group (= control group) received usual care, while intervention patients (= intervention group) were exposed to a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention, comprising education of health care personnel, access to standardized discontinuation regimens, patient education and support of transitional care. The primary outcome was hypnotic drug discontinuation at one month after discharge. Secondary outcomes among others were sleep quality and hypnotic use at one and two weeks after enrolment and at discharge. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) upon inclusion, two weeks after enrolment and one month after discharge. Determinants for the primary outcome were identified using regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients were enrolled, with 70.5% of patients taking benzodiazepines. Average age was 85 years (interquartile range 81-88.5) and 28.3% were male. A higher discontinuation rate at one month after discharge was observed in favour of the intervention (37.7% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.02281). No difference in sleep quality was found between both groups (p = 0.719). The average sleep quality was 8.74 (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.98-9.49) and 8.57 (95% CI: 7.75-9.39) in the control and intervention groups respectively. Determinants for discontinuation at one month were: the intervention (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% CI: 1.14-4.99), fall on admission (OR 2.05; 95% CI: 0.95-4.43), use of a z-drug (OR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.23-1.22), PSQI score on admission (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.97-1.19) and discontinuation prior to discharge (OR 4.71, 95% CI: 2.26-10.17).

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacist-led intervention in geriatric inpatients was associated with a reduction of hypnotic drug use one month after discharge, without any loss in sleep quality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05521971 (retrospectively registered on 29^th of August 2022).

Trends in the use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists among working-age adults in Belgium from 2004 to 2018

Introduction

The use of psychotropics, such as benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BzRAs), among working-age adults in Belgium has shown educational differences. However, it is unclear how work status plays a role in this relationship. Therefore, this research aims to investigate whether work status explains observed educational differences in BzRA use. In addition, considering medicalisation processes, where non-medical factors, such as work status, are increasingly associated with medical mental health care-seeking behavior, this research also aims to investigate whether work status explains observed educational differences in BzRA use, regardless of mental health status.

Methods

Data are obtained from the Belgian Health Interview Survey (BHIS). Four successive waves are covered: 2004, 2008, 2013, and 2018. The weighted data represent a sample of 18,547 Belgian respondents aged 18 to 65 years old. Poisson regression models are used to analyze the research aims. Time evolutions are plotted using marginal means postestimation.

Results

The average use of BzRAs shows a slight decline over the waves studied (2004 = 5.99, 2008 = 5.88, 2013 = 5.33, 2018 = 4.31). Educational and work status differences in BzRA use are observed, regardless of mental health status. Individuals with longer education report lower use compared to individuals with shorter education, and individuals who are unemployed, (pre-)retired, or sick or disabled report higher use compared to employed individuals. Furthermore, work status acts as a mediator, partially explaining educational differences in BzRA use, regardless of mental health status.

Discussion

Work-related uncertainty leads to increased prescribing and medication use, regardless of mental health. Medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation processes detach social problems from their social roots and treat them as personal failures. The marginalization of the social roots of unemployment, sick leave and involuntary (pre-)retirement has led to a personalization of responsibility. Negative feelings arising from such work statuses may cause isolated, non-specific symptoms for which medical treatment is sought.

Current practice in benzodiazepine receptor agonists deprescribing on acute geriatric wards: a cohort study

Background

Benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) use is highly prevalent in hospitalised older people although these drugs are associated with numerous and serious adverse events. Deprescribing can reduce risks associated with chronic BZRA use. The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of, and factors associated with, BZRA deprescribing in acute geriatric units.

Methods

During a one-year period, this multicentre retrospective study included patients aged ≥70 years, hospitalised in acute geriatric units, and using ≥1 BZRA on admission. BZRA deprescribing at discharge was defined as: ≥25% decrease in lorazepam-equivalent admission dose; discontinuation of all BZRAs; or cessation of a rescue prescription at discharge. BZRA cessation was defined as discontinuation of all BZRAs at discharge. We identified social, medical, geriatric and medication factors associated with BZRA deprescribing using logistic regression.

Results

In total, 561 patients were included (mean age: 85.3±5.9 years, 70% of women). BZRA deprescribing occurred in 240 (42.8%), including 85 with BZRA cessation (15.2%). Deprescribing occurred more frequently in patients with a BZRA-related adverse event on admission or during hospital stay (odds ratio (OR) 4.5; 95% confidence interval [2.6; 7.9]), with an antidepressant (1.6 [1.1; 2.4]) and a higher lorazepam-equivalent dosage on admission (OR 1.2 [1; 1.4]), and less frequently in patients with antipsychotic drug (OR 0.5 [0.3; 0.8]). BZRA cessation was more likely in patients with a BZRA-related adverse event (OR 2.2 [1.2; 4.3]) and a lower lorazepam-equivalent dosage on admission (OR 0.5 [0.3; 0.6]).

Conclusions

During hospitalisation in the acute geriatric units of our hospital, BZRA deprescribing occurred in 42.8% of the patients. Identification of an BZRA-related adverse event by the treating physician appears to be a major factor: this reactive deprescribing accounted for 74% of cases in our study. Further prospective studies are needed to measure long-term persistence of in-hospital deprescribing and encourage proactive management.

Regulatory Framework Implementation for the Prescription of Zolpidem in France, What Impact in the Older People?

Background: Zolpidem is one of the most prescribed hypnotic drugs. In 2001, the World Health Organization alerted a risk of pharmacodependence associated with zolpidem. The French health authority decided in 2017 to enforce security on the prescription of zolpidem to reduce those risks. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of regulatory framework implementation, secure prescription pad, on the prevalence and incidence of prescriptions of zolpidem according to the age. Methods: This study was based on an observational study using the French healthcare data system. Two age categories were defined: “younger” and “older” (<65 years, ≥65 years); in order to study the evolution of prevalence and incidence of zolpidem use in our two groups, two periods were defined, before and after the implementation of the measure. Results: The prevalence decreased in the younger population by 51% (4012 vs. 7948 consumers), while that of the older population decreased by 42% (4151 vs. 7282). This difference in our two groups, with a greater decrease in the younger people, is statistically significant compared to the older people. Conclusion: Our study showed that regulatory framework implementation and mandatory secure prescription pad is more effective for decreasing prevalence of zolpidem prescription for younger people compared to older people.

Benzodiazepine withdrawal in older people: what is the prevalence, what are the signs, and which patients?

PURPOSE

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) and related drugs (Z-drugs) are mainly taken chronically, and older people are much more likely to take them on a chronic basis despite recommendations. Withdrawal symptoms could be an obstacle to stopping BZD/Z-drug administration. The main objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of withdrawal symptoms in patients aged 65 years and older who have experience a stop of BZD/Z-drug. The secondary objectives are to describe the withdrawal symptoms and identify factors associated.

METHOD

This ancillary study was based on a national observational study in patients with chronic BZD/Z-drug consumption. Patients who made at least one BZD/Z-drug stop experience were selected. Withdrawal symptoms are described, and a logistic regression was carried out to identify the variables most associated with withdrawal symptoms.

RESULTS

In total, 697 patients were selected: 78% experienced at least one withdrawal symptom after a stop administering BZDs or Z-drugs; most of the withdrawal symptoms were psychological disorders.

CONCLUSION

Our study identifies a specific population experiencing withdrawal symptoms and who cannot stop administering BZD/Z-drug. We assume that withdrawal symptoms in patients with chronic use play an essential role in the nonstop use of BZD/Z-drugs.

Novel Therapeutic Approach for the Management of Mood Disorders: In Vivo and In Vitro Effect of a Combination of L-Theanine, Melissa officinalis L. and Magnolia officinalis Rehder & E.H. Wilson

Mood disorders represent one of the most prevalent and costly psychiatric diseases worldwide. The current therapies are generally characterized by several well-known side effects which limit their prolonged use. The use of herbal medicine for the management of several psychiatric conditions is becoming more established, as it is considered a safer support to conventional pharmacotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible anxiolytic and antidepressant activity of a fixed combination of L-theanine, Magnolia officinalis, and Melissa officinalis (TMM) in an attempt to evaluate how the multiple modulations of different physiological systems may contribute to reducing mood disorders. TMM showed an anxiolytic-like and antidepressant-like activity in vivo, which was related to a neuroprotective effect in an in vitro model of excitotoxicity. The effect of TMM was not altered by the presence of flumazenil, thus suggesting a non-benzodiazepine-like mechanism of action. On the contrary, a significant reduction in the effect was observed in animals and neuronal cells co-treated with AM251, a cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) antagonist, suggesting that the endocannabinoid system may be involved in the TMM mechanism of action. In conclusion, TMM may represent a useful and safe candidate for the management of mood disorders with an innovative mechanism of action, particularly as an adjuvant to conventional therapies.

The association between benzodiazepine use and falls, and the impact of sleep quality on this association: data from the TILDA study

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines (BZD) are associated with adverse effects, particularly in older adults.

AIM

This study assesses the association between BZD use and falls, and the impact of sleep quality on this association, in community dwelling adults aged over 50.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of data from wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing.

METHODS

Participants were classed as BZD users or non-users and asked if they had fallen in the last year, and whether any falls were unexplained. Sleep quality was assessed via self-reported trouble falling asleep, daytime somnolence and early-rising. Logistic regression assessed for an association between BZD use and falls, and the impact of sleep quality on this association was assessed by categorizing based on BZD use and sleep quality variables.

RESULTS

Of 8175 individuals, 302 (3.69%) reported taking BZDs. BZD use was associated with falls, controlling for confounders [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.40; 1.08, 1.82; P-value 0.012]. There was no significant association between BZDs and unexplained falls, controlling for confounders [OR 1.41; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.95, 2.10; P-value 0.09]. Participants who use BZDs and report daytime somnolence (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.12, 3.31; P-value 0.017), early-rising (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.20, 3.11; P-value 0.007) or trouble falling asleep (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.12, 2.97; P-value 0.015), have an increased odds of unexplained falls.

CONCLUSION

BZD use is associated with falls, with larger effect size in those reporting poor sleep quality in community dwelling older adults. Appropriate prescription of medications such as BZDs is an important public health issue.

Emergency Department Visits for Psychotropic-Related Adverse Drug Events in Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease, 2013-2014

Background: More than 1.3 million emergency department visits have been associated with adverse drug events (ADEs) in older adults. Increasing Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevalence in the geriatric population poses an additive risk of ADEs because of the array of psychotropic medications prescribed for AD patients. Scant research has been conducted at a nationwide level on psychotropic-related ADEs in this population. Objective: This study aimed to determine the incidence and economic burden of psychotropic ADEs in the geriatric AD population compared with the non-AD geriatric population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of geriatric AD patients who visited the ED in 2013 with a psychotropic-related ADE to determine the incidence and resource utilization of these events. The relationship between presence of AD and an ADE was analyzed using multiple logistic regression. Results: There were 427 969 Alzheimer's ED visits compared with 20 492 554 ED visits without. Of the AD cases, 1.04% were associated with at least 1 adverse event. AD cases more frequently were admitted as inpatients (64.90% vs 34.92%, P < 0.01). Common drug classes associated with AD-related ADEs were benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and autonomic nervous system-affecting agents (adrenergic agonists, antimuscarinic agents, anticholinergic agents). There was a significantly higher likelihood for Alzheimer's cases to experience any psychotropic-related adverse event (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.20, 1.82). Conclusion and Relevance: Alzheimer's patients more frequently experienced psychotropic-related adverse events and related adverse outcomes than older adults without Alzheimer's. Application of these findings should be implemented in protocol development to reduce future psychotropic-related adverse outcomes for this population.

Deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Long-term sedative use is prevalent and associated with significant morbidity, including adverse events such as falls, cognitive impairment, and sedation. The development of dependence can pose significant challenges when discontinuation is attempted as withdrawal symptoms often develop. We conducted a scoping review to map and characterize the literature and determine opportunities for future research regarding deprescribing strategies for long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drug (zopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon) use in community-dwelling adults.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TRIP, and JBI Ovid databases and conducted a grey literature search. Articles discussing methods for deprescribing benzodiazepines or Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults were selected.

RESULTS

Following removal of duplicates, 2797 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Of these, 367 were retrieved for full-text assessment and 139 were subsequently included for review. Seventy-four (53%) articles were original research, predominantly randomized controlled trials (n = 52 [37%]), whereas 58 (42%) were narrative reviews and seven (5%) were guidelines. Amongst original studies, pharmacologic strategies were the most commonly studied intervention (n = 42 [57%]). Additional deprescribing strategies included psychological therapies (n = 10 [14%]), mixed interventions (n = 12 [16%]), and others (n = 10 [14%]). Behaviour change interventions were commonly combined and included enablement (n = 56 [76%]), education (n = 36 [47%]), and training (n = 29 [39%]). Gradual dose reduction was frequently a component of studies, reviews, and guidelines, but methods varied widely.

CONCLUSIONS

Approaches proposed for deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs are numerous and heterogeneous. Current research in this area using methods such as randomized trials and meta-analyses may too narrowly encompass potential strategies available to target this phenomenon. Realist synthesis methods would be well suited to understand the mechanisms by which deprescribing interventions work and why they fail.

Use of Benzodiazepines in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are frequently prescribed in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Unfortunately, studies evaluating their benefits and risks in these patients are limited.

METHODS

Clinical trials focusing on the effect of benzodiazepines on cognitive functions, disease progression, behavioral symptoms, sleep disturbances, and the general frequency of benzodiazepine use were included in this review. Published articles from January 1983 to January 2015 were identified using specific search terms in MEDLINE and PubMed Library according to the recommendations of The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology initiative.

RESULTS

Of the 657 articles found, 18 articles met predefined selection criteria and were included in this review (8 on frequency, 5 on cognitive functions, 5 on behavioral and sleep disturbances). The frequency of benzodiazepine use ranged from 8.5% to 20%. Five studies reported accelerated cognitive deterioration in association with benzodiazepine use. Two studies reported clinical efficacy for lorazepam and alprazolam to reduce agitation in Alzheimer's disease patients. No evidence was found for an improvement of sleep quality using benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows a relatively high prevalence of benzodiazepine use but limited evidence for clinical efficacy in Alzheimer's disease patients. However, there is a paucity of methodologically high quality controlled clinical trials. Our results underscore a need for randomized controlled trials in this area.

Utilization of potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India

Aim:

To evaluate the use of potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly inpatients in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective analysis was performed for cases of elderly patients admitted between January 2010 and December 2010. Data on age, gender, diagnosis, duration of hospital stay, treatment, and outcome were collected. Prescriptions were assessed for the use of potentially inappropriate medications in geriatric patients by using American Geriatric Society Beer's criteria (2012) and PRISCUS list (2010).

Results:

A total of 676 geriatric patients (52.12% females) were admitted in the medicine ward. The average age of geriatric patients was 72.69 years. According to Beer's criteria, at least one inappropriate medicine was prescribed in 590 (87.3%) patients. Metoclopramide (54.3%), alprazolam (9%), diazepam (8%), digoxin > 0.125 mg/day (5%), and diclofenac (3.7%) were the commonly used inappropriate medications. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in heart and renal failure patients was the commonly identified drug–disease interaction. According to PRISCUS list, at least one inappropriate medication was prescribed in 210 (31.06%) patients.

Conclusion:

Use of inappropriate medicines is highly prevalent in elderly patients.

Inappropriate use of psychotropic drugs in older individuals: implications for practice

Frailty at old age and institutionalization in nursing homes are often associated with multiple chronic diseases (multimorbidity) requiring multiple medications (polypharmacy). Among these chronic conditions, mental health problems (e.g., dementia, depression and insomnia) are common. Psychotropic drugs are frequently used as a treatment approach for these conditions, and the prevalence of their use is high among community-dwelling older adults, but even higher in nursing homes. Furthermore, within the problem of polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing, psychotropic drugs (defined in this article as antipsychotics, benzodiazepines and antidepressants) constitute a significant proportion. The use of psychotropics in older adults remains controversial given the risk of adverse effects, in contrast to the limited effectiveness. Guidelines advise a thorough risk–benefit analysis before the initiation of psychotropics, in addition to time-limited use and discontinuation. In the future, serious efforts should be undertaken to tackle the burden of inappropriate psychotropic prescribing in older adults by incorporating a multidisciplinary approach and by offering credible alternatives.

Change in healthcare utilization and costs following initiation of benzodiazepine therapy for long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and benzodiazepine anxiolytics are used in the US to treat generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). While benzodiazepines typically provide rapid symptomatic relief, long-term use is not recommended due to risks of dependency, sedation, falls, and accidents.

METHODS

Using a US health insurance database, we identified all persons with GAD (ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 300.02) who began a long-term course of treatment (≥ 90 days) with a benzodiazepine anxiolytic between 1/1/2003 and 12/31/2007, We compared healthcare utilization and costs over the six-month periods preceding and following the date of treatment initiation ("pretreatment" and "post-treatment", respectively), and focused attention on accident-related encounters (e.g., for treatment of fractures) and care received for other reasons possibly related benzodiazepine use (e.g., sedation, dizziness).

RESULTS

A total of 866 patients met all study entry criteria; 25% of patients began treatment on an add-on basis (i.e., adjunctive to escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine), while 75% of patients did not receive concomitant therapy. Mean total healthcare costs increased by $2334 between the pretreatment and post-treatment periods (from $4637 [SD=$9840] to $6971 [$17,002]; p<0.01); costs of accident-related encounters and other care that was possibly related to use of benzodiazepines increased by an average of $1099 ($1757 [$7656] vs $2856 [$14,836]; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare costs increase in patients with GAD beginning long-term (≥ 90 days) treatment with a benzodiazepine anxiolytic; a substantial proportion of this increase is attributable to care associated with accidents and other known sequelae of long-term benzodiazepine use.

Psychotropic drug-induced falls in older people: a review of interventions aimed at reducing the problem

Falls are a common health problem for older people, and psychotropic medications have been identified as an important independent fall risk factor. The objective of this paper was to review the literature relating to the effect of psychotropic medications on falls in older people, with a particular focus on evidence supporting minimization of their use to reduce risk of falls. A literature search identified 18 randomized trials meeting the inclusion criteria for the review of effectiveness of psychotropic medication withdrawal studies, including four with falls outcomes. One of these, which targeted reduced psychotropic medication use in the community, reported a 66% reduction in falls, while the other studies demonstrated some success in reducing psychotropic medication use but with mixed effects on falls. Other randomized trials evaluated various approaches to reducing psychotropic medications generally or specific classes of psychotropic medications (e.g. benzodiazepines), but did not report fall-related outcomes. Overall, these studies reported moderate success in reducing psychotropic medication use, and a number reported no or limited worsening of key outcomes such as sleep quality or behavioural difficulties associated with withdrawal of psychotropic medication use. Reduced prescription of psychotropic medications (e.g. seeking non-pharmacological alternatives to their use in place of prescription in the first place or, for those patients for whom these medications are deemed necessary, regular monitoring and efforts to cease use or wean off use over time) needs to be a strong focus in clinical practice for three reasons. Firstly, psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed for older people, both in the community and especially in the residential care setting, and their effectiveness in a number of clinical groups has been questioned. Secondly, there is strong evidence of an association between substantially increased risk of falls and use of a number of psychotropic medications, including benzodiazepines (particularly, the long-acting agents), antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs. Finally, the largest effect of any randomized trial of falls prevention to date was achieved with a single intervention consisting of weaning psychotropic drug users off their medications.

Évaluation de l’usage à risque des benzodiazépines chez les personnes âgées : facteurs de risque et impacts

L’usage à risque de la benzodiazépine (BZD), fréquent chez les aînés, est un problème souvent sous-estimé. Cet article présente une recension des écrits qui explore ce profil de consommation problématique sur les plans biologique, psychologique et environnemental. Les auteurs constatent qu’il y un manque de consensus et de validité quant à la description du phénomène. Ils discutent de certains facteurs qui contribuent à l’usage à risque des BZD chez les aînés : des habitudes de prescriptions et des attitudes parfois laxistes des médecins ; les attitudes des aînés envers la maladie mentale et la façon dont se manifestent leurs symptômes ; les difficultés dans l’évaluation de l’anxiété et de la dépression des aînés. En conclusion, les auteurs proposent que la recherche s’intéresse à des méthodes intégratives pour l’évaluation de l’usage à risque de la BZD chez les aînés.

Benzodiazepine and Z-drug Prescribing for Elderly People in a General Hospital: A Complete Audit Cycle

BACKGROUND

Use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in the elderly is associated with adverse outcomes such as increased risk of falls and fractures and cognitive impairment. We aimed to assess the prescribing practice of benzodiazepine and Z-drugs in those aged over 65 years in a general hospital against evidence based standards and to examine the effects of multidisciplinary feedback, as well as determine the prevalence of usage.

METHODS

All case-notes and medication charts of patients over the age of sixty five on surgical and medical wards in Sligo General Hospital (SGH) were retrieved and analysed over a two-day period in 2008. Data was collected in relation to benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing. We followed up on this initial data collection by screening discharge summaries at six weeks to assess benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing on discharge. Audit results were disseminated together with consensus guidelines on the prescribing of these medications in older adult population to all general practitioners in County Sligo. Educational sessions were held for both doctors and nurses in SGH. The audit cycle was completed by a re-audit of benzodiazepine and Z-drug prescribing six months from original study using identical methods.

RESULTS

We found a high prevalence of benzodiazepine and Z-drug use in original audit, 54% (38/70) of the group audited. The prevalence fell to 46% (32/70) at the re-audit post intervention. This result was not statistically significant. The percentage of patients commenced on benzodiazepine and Z-drugs prior to admission fell from 36% (25/70) at the initial audit to 23% (16/70) at the re-audit.

CONCLUSION

Prescribing practices were not in keeping with consensus guidelines as highlighted by this relatively basic audit cycle. Multidisciplinary feedback and letters to GPs resulted in some reduction in the number of patients prescribed benzodiazepines and Z-drugs. Ongoing educational strategies aimed at relevant health care workers with regular audit of medication use within the general hospital setting is pertinent to further improve prescribing practice.

Benzodiazepine use in Belgian nursing homes: a closer look into indications and dosages

AIM

(1) To describe the prevalence of benzodiazepine use in Belgian nursing homes, with specific attention to indications and dosages. (2) To compare actual and recommended dosages of benzodiazepines for anxiety and insomnia. (3) To explore the risk profile for chronic benzodiazepine use in institutionalised older adults.

METHODS

Medication charts of 1,730 residents from 76 nursing homes in Belgium were collected and analysed, using the ATC classification. Drug name, indication and daily dosage were recorded. From authoritative international sources, we extracted for each drug and each indication a daily dosage recommended not to be exceeded in older adults for comparison with observed actual dosages.

RESULTS

Among the chronic benzodiazepine or z-drug (BZD/Z) users (50% of the residents), the leading indication was 'insomnia' (59% of the users) followed by 'anxiety' (17%) and 'unrest' (10%). In the chronic prescriptions of BZD/Zs indicated for insomnia, the actual daily dose exceeded the geriatric upper limit in 95% of lormetazepam prescriptions, 82% of zolpidem, 78% of zopiclone and 35% of lorazepam prescriptions. For anxiety, daily doses also exceeded the limit but not to the same extent. Multivariate analysis showed BZD/Z use was positively associated with pain (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.97), constipation (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.76) and depression (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.35-2.08). Residents with dementia were less likely to receive a BZD/Z (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.74).

CONCLUSION

Efforts to reduce the use of BZD/Zs in nursing homes should concentrate on insomnia, with interventions aimed at reducing too high prevalence of chronic use and too high daily dosages in this indication.

Benzodiazepine use among adults residing in the urban settlements of Karachi, Pakistan: a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

There are hardly any studies carried out in Pakistan on the usage of benzodiazepines at the level of community. This research was aimed to determine the frequency of benzodiazepine use, along with its associations with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics among community dwelling adults, residing in two urban settlements of Karachi, Pakistan.

METHODS

We performed a cross sectional study from August 2008 to December 2009, in 2 areas of Karachi, namely Garden and Sultanabad. We followed the systematic sampling strategy to randomly select the households, with an adult of either sex and of age 18 years or more. Data collection was carried out through interview, using a pre-tested questionnaire, with items on socio-demographic position, medical history and benzodiazepine use. Student's t-test and χ2 test was employed to determine the associations between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and their relationship with benzodiazepine use was determined using applied logistic regression.

RESULTS

The overall percentage of benzodiazepine consumption was estimated to be 14%. There were significantly more benzodiazepine users in the peri-urban Sultanabad community to the urban community of Garden (p-value = 0.001). The mean age (± SD) for users was 51.3 (± 15.6) years compared to 37.1 (± 14.4) years among non-users. Bromazepam was the most widely used benzodiazepine (29%); followed by diazepam, with a median duration on primary use being 144 weeks (IQR = 48-240). The adjusted logistic regression model revealed that increasing age, location, female sex, unemployment and psychiatric consultation were associated with increased likelihood of benzodiazepine use.

CONCLUSION

We believe the unregulated over-the-counter sales of benzodiazepines and social conditions might be playing a role in this high consumption of benzodiazepines in the community.

The use of hypnosedative drugs in a university hospital: has anything changed in 10 years?

AIM

Our goal was to investigate the use of hypnosedatives (HSs) before and during hospitalization, explore the relationship between their use and various demographic and clinical variables, and compare the results with data from a similar 2000 study with particular interest in adherence to hospital formulary guidelines.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational survey of 326 hospitalized patients recruited from ten wards of the Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium, with a patient interview and by evaluating medical and nursing files.

RESULTS

In 30.7% of patients, the use of a HS before admission was reported. According to the patient interview, 33.1% used a HS during hospitalization. However, according to medical and nursing files, use of HSs in the hospital was 10% higher (43.3%). In 19.4% of patients who took HSs before admission, their use was discontinued in the hospital. In 15.6% of patients who took no HS before admission, a HS was started in the hospital, according to the formulary guidelines (data from files). There was a positive correlation between HS use in the hospital and older age, longer hospitalization, not coming from home, higher number of HSs taken before hospitalization, sleeping problems emerging during hospitalization, and central nervous system (CNS) disorders. In comparison with 2000, we registered a slight decrease in HS use during hospitalization and a decrease in the number of newly started patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HS use in our university hospital is high, mostly as a result of continuation of HSs started before admission, as there seems to be no general policy of active cessation. Compared with the survey performed 10 years ago, fewer hospitalized patients are newly started on HSs, and when this is the case, the formulary guidelines are followed.

Can we say that seniors are addicted to benzodiazepines?

INTRODUCTION

The elderly are the biggest consumers of Benzodiazepines (BZD) and/or BZD equivalents. However, the risks of developing addiction in this age group are often underestimated.

METHOD

This study describes the nature and extent of addiction in the elderly using DSM IV items.

RESULTS

We noted a high prevalence of addiction in our population and identified a two-factor profile in subjects of 65 years of age and older addicted to BZD/equivalents.

CONCLUSION

This profile led us to reconsider anew the definition of addiction, the approach to addiction in this age group, and the way to prescribe treatment by BZD/equivalents in this population.

Management of generalized anxiety disorder in primary care: identifying the challenges and unmet needs

BACKGROUND

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders in primary care, although it is often underrecognized and undertreated. GAD is chronic, disabling, and associated with other health problems. Treatment response is often unsatisfactory, but the clinical evidence base for new treatments has expanded substantially in the past decade and suggests a growing range of options for reducing the burden of GAD. The objective of this article was to review current literature on GAD and its management to provide an overview of the clinical importance of GAD in primary care and available treatments.

DATA SOURCES

Recent studies (ie, over the past decade) on the epidemiology and treatment of GAD were identified by searching Medline using the term generalized anxiety disorder only and in combination with the terms epidemiology and treatment and for each drug class (benzodiazepines, azapirones, antidepressants, antihistamines, alpha-2-delta ligands, and antipsychotics) and for named drugs (buspirone, venlafaxine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, escitalopram, olanzapine, paroxetine, pregabalin, quetiapine, and risperidone in addition to psychological therapies and cognitive-behavioral therapy. The literature search was conducted in August 2008 for the period 1987-2009.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if judged to be relevant to a review of the epidemiology and management of GAD. Articles were excluded if they were not written in English or were published more than 10 years before the literature search was conducted. A few older studies were included for which more recent research evidence was not available. Recent national and international guidelines for the management of GAD were also reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS

Most currently available interventions have similar overall efficacy, and treatment choices should reflect the situation of individual patients. Important unmet needs exist for treatments (1) that work rapidly, with (2) broad spectrum benefits, (3) that can improve rates of remission and well-being, (4) are devoid of risk for withdrawal symptoms, and (5) have few if any adverse interactions with other drugs. Additional needs include (6) safer drugs for the elderly, (7) safe and effective drugs for children with GAD, (8) further evaluation of psychotherapy, and (9) understanding the appropriate circumstances for, and optimal choices of, drug combination.

CONCLUSION

While the development of novel treatments evolves, current management approaches can focus on improving identification and defining optimal use of available therapies for GAD.

Insomnia in older people

Insomnia is a prevalent sleep complaint amongst older people, affecting physical and mental health as well as many aspects of life quality and well-being. For the lack of explicit guidelines for the assessment and treatment of insomnia in older people, this summary of available information represents the best evidence to inform current practice. Clinicians need to be more aware of their patients’ sleep and conduct formal assessments as appropriate. Despite past practice trends, non-pharmacological treatments should be considered first for chronic insomnia as a means to reduce dependency, adverse effects, and polypharmacy. Behavioural treatment methods such as stimulus control and sleep restriction are especially beneficial for older insomniacs as they target maladaptive sleep habits. Pharmacological treatment should be employed only if insomnia persists, involving the careful patient-specific consideration of the lowest effective dose, best intermittence of dosing, shortest effective duration, best gradual discontinuation scheme, and most effective elimination half-life.

A proposal for a pharmacokinetic interaction significance classification system (PISCS) based on predicted drug exposure changes and its potential application to alert classifications in product labelling

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are one of the major causes of adverse events in pharmacotherapy, and systematic prediction of the clinical relevance of DDIs is an issue of significant clinical importance. In a previous study, total exposure changes of many substrate drugs of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 caused by coadministration of inhibitor drugs were successfully predicted by using in vivo information. In order to exploit these predictions in daily pharmacotherapy, the clinical significance of the pharmacokinetic changes needs to be carefully evaluated. The aim of the present study was to construct a pharmacokinetic interaction significance classification system (PISCS) in which the clinical significance of DDIs was considered with pharmacokinetic changes in a systematic manner. Furthermore, the classifications proposed by PISCS were compared in a detailed manner with current alert classifications in the product labelling or the summary of product characteristics used in Japan, the US and the UK.

METHODS

A matrix table was composed by stratifying two basic parameters of the prediction: the contribution ratio of CYP3A4 to the oral clearance of substrates (CR), and the inhibition ratio of inhibitors (IR). The total exposure increase was estimated for each cell in the table by associating CR and IR values, and the cells were categorized into nine zones according to the magnitude of the exposure increase. Then, correspondences between the DDI significance and the zones were determined for each drug group considering the observed exposure changes and the current classification in the product labelling. Substrate drugs of CYP3A4 selected from three therapeutic groups, i.e. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), calcium-channel antagonists/blockers (CCBs) and benzodiazepines (BZPs), were analysed as representative examples. The product labelling descriptions of drugs in Japan, US and UK were obtained from the websites of each regulatory body.

RESULTS

Among 220 combinations of drugs investigated, estimated exposure changes were more than 5-fold for 41 combinations in which ten combinations were not alerted in the product labelling at least in one country; these involved buspirone, nisoldipine and felodipine as substrates, and ketoconazole, voriconazole, telithromycin, clarithromycin and nefazodone as inhibitors. For those drug combinations, the alert classifications were anticipated as potentially inappropriate. In the current product labelling, many inter-country differences were also noted. Considering the relationships between previously observed exposure changes and the current alert classifications, the boundaries between 'contraindication' and 'warning/caution' were determined as a 7-fold exposure increase for statins and CCBs, and as a 4-fold increase for BZPs. PISCS clearly discriminated these drug combinations in accordance with the determined boundaries. Classifications by PISCS were expected to be valid even for future drugs because the classifications were made by zones, not by designating individual drugs.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis suggested that many current alert classifications were potentially inappropriate especially for drug combinations where pharmacokinetics had not been evaluated. It is expected that PISCS would contribute to constructing a leak-less alerting system for a broad range of pharmacokinetic DDIs. Further validation of PISCS is required in clinical studies with key drug combinations, and its extension to other CYP and metabolizing enzymes remains to be achieved.

Factors associated with benzodiazepine dependence among community-dwelling seniors

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine (BZD) dependence among seniors is an understudied problem.

OBJECTIVE

Identify the factors associated with BZD dependence.

METHOD

Face-to-face computer-assisted interviews were conducted in the homes of 2,785 persons aged 65 years or older, randomly selected.

RESULTS

Nine-and-a-half percent of BZD users met DSM-IV-TR criteria for BZD dependence. Factors associated with BZD dependence are being a woman, and having cognitive impairment, panic disorders, suicidal ideations, and a degree of embarrassment in obtaining help for emotional problem.

DISCUSSION

Nurses should be better positioned to identify those elderly users of BZDs who are more likely to be dependent and to address the problem through BZD withdrawal program.

Magnitude of potentially inappropriate prescribing in Germany among older patients with generalized anxiety disorder

Background

Several medications commonly used to treat generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) have been designated "potentially inappropriate" for use in patients aged ≥65 years because their risks may outweigh their potential benefits. The actual extent of use of these agents in clinical practice is unknown, however.

Methods

Using a database with information from encounters with general practitioners (GP) in Germany, we identified all patients, aged ≥65 years, with any GP office visits or dispensed prescriptions with a diagnosis of GAD (ICD-10 diagnosis code F41.1) between 10/1/2003 and 9/30/2004 ("GAD patients"). Among GAD-related medications (including benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants [TCAs], selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, venlafaxine, hydroxyzine, buspirone, pregabalin, and trifluoperazine), long-acting benzodiazepines, selected short-acting benzodiazepines at relatively high dosages, selected TCAs, and hydroxyzine were designated "potentially inappropriate" for use in patients aged ≥ 65 years, based on published criteria.

Results

A total of 975 elderly patients with GAD were identified. Mean age was 75 years, and 72% were women; 29% had diagnoses of comorbid depression. Forty percent of study subjects received potentially inappropriate agents – most commonly, bromazepam (10% of all subjects), diazepam (9%), doxepin (7%), amitriptyline (5%), and lorazepam (5%). Twenty-three percent of study subjects received long-acting benzodiazepines, 10% received short-acting benzodiazepines at relatively high doses, and 12% received TCAs designated as potentially inappropriate.

Conclusion

GPs in Germany often prescribe medications that have been designated as potentially inappropriate to their elderly patients with GAD – especially those with comorbid depressive disorders. Further research is needed to ascertain whether there are specific subgoups of elderly patients with GAD for whom the benefits of these medications outweigh their risks.

Perceptions of nurses in nursing homes on the usage of benzodiazepines

AIM

This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study on how nurses perceive their own role in the use of benzodiazepines in nursing homes and to identify the factors that have an impact on the nurses' role in the use of benzodiazepines.

BACKGROUND

The use of benzodiazepines in nursing homes is of particular concern, as nursing-home residents receive considerably more benzodiazepines than non-institutionalised older persons. Evidence of their long-term effectiveness is lacking. Nurses are important partners in the decision-making process of starting and discontinuation of benzodiazepines.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive.

METHOD

Three focus group interviews and 10 additional semi-structured interviews were used with 33 registered nurses. The interviews were thematically analysed.

FINDINGS

Nurses' main concern is to work towards the comfort of the patient. Benzodiazepines are an easy option with not too many side effects and administration of benzodiazepines is experienced as a routine action. When prescribed they will almost automatically lead to chronic usage as there is no evaluation of their effect. There are three aspects that have an impact on nurse's perceptions of their role in benzodiazepine usage: their own individual attitude and perceptions, their knowledge and organisational factors.

CONCLUSION

Nurses do not see benzodiazepines as a problem drug and once a prescription is initiated it will almost automatically lead to chronic usage. Nurses should work towards a pro-active promotion of addressing sleeping problems and they can play a key role in non-pharmacological interventions.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses can play a key role in suggesting non-pharmacological alternatives. Education to provide more insight into the problems of insomnia and anxiety may positively influence their attitudes and behaviour. All caregivers in nursing homes should be informed about the relevance of this issue.

Implementation of a discontinuation letter to reduce long-term benzodiazepine use--a cluster randomized trial

RATIONALE

Although it is recommended to restrict long-term use of benzodiazepines, and considerable attention has been paid to this, long-term use continues to be a problem. An informative discontinuation letter for patients has been shown to reduce long-term benzodiazepine use in general practice. However, little is known about its wide scale implementation in primary care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of an intensive support programme for community pharmacies to send discontinuation letters to patients in cooperation with GPs.

METHODS

In a cluster randomized trial, 43 control pharmacies received a written manual and 47 experimental pharmacies received an intensive support programme. Primary outcome measures were the percentage of GPs who reviewed and returned lists of eligible patients and the percentage of long-term users who were sent a discontinuation letter within 4 months.

RESULTS

The outcomes did not differ for the experimental versus control groups: 38% and 31% of the GPs, respectively, returned the patient lists; 14% and 10% of all long-term users in the two groups, respectively, received the discontinuation letter within 4 months. Substantially more pharmacies in the experimental group than in the control group finally managed to send discontinuation letters (70% vs. 40%).

CONCLUSION

About one third of the pharmacies in the control group and two thirds of the pharmacies in the intervention group finally implemented the discontinuation letter. However, this difference was not apparent in the primary outcome measures. It seems crucial to involve GPs more effectively in implementation of the discontinuation letter.

Prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics associated with benzodiazepines use among community dwelling older adults: the Bambuí Health and Aging Study (BHAS)

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics associated with benzodiazepine use among community-dwelling older adults. METHOD: 1606 subjects, aged > 60 years, corresponding to 92% of the residents of Bambuí city, participated in this study. The information about medication use was obtained by means of a standard interview and the review of medication packaging. Substances were classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Index. RESULTS: The prevalence of benzodiazepine current use was 21.7% (26.7% among females and 14.0% among males). From these, 68.7% had been taking the medication for over one year, 31.3% for over five years and 53.2% were using long half-life benzodiazepines. The medication most frequently used was bromazepam (35.6%), followed by diazepam (22.5%), clonazepam (12.6%) and lorazepam (7.8%). After adjustment for confounders, female gender (RP = 1.93; CI95% = 1.51-2.46) was the only sociodemographic characteristic found to be independently associated with substance consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of benzodiazepine use in the study population was high, but within the variation observed in developed countries. Chronic use of benzodiazepines and long half-life medications predominated.

General Practitioners reduced benzodiazepine prescriptions in an intervention study: a multilevel application

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effects of general practitioner, patient, and prescription characteristics on the reduction of long-term benzodiazepine prescribing by sending a letter to chronic users. The data were analyzed with a method respecting the hierarchical data structure.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Data were obtained from 8,170 chronic users nested in 147 general practices. One thousand two hundred fifty-six chronic users in 19 general practices received a letter with the advice to reduce or stop the use of benzodiazepines after the general practitioners had attended a course on benzodiazepine use. In a three-level random intercept multilevel regression model, long-term prescribing of benzodiazepines was the dependent variable.

RESULTS

The reduction in benzodiazepine prescribing was significantly larger in the intervention than in the control group: 16% after 6 months and 14% after 12 months, respectively. The age of the patient, gender, and the interaction between age and gender were significant. The combination of the duration (long acting or short acting) with the type of benzodiazepine (anxiolytic or hypnotic) was an important pharmacological baseline covariate.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction of benzodiazepine prescribing was mainly explained by the letter intervention and individual patient characteristics. Multilevel analysis was a worthwhile method for application in this study with its unbalanced design.

Fact: antidepressants and anxiolytics are not safe during pregnancy

Psychotropic medication is used by a growing number of women of reproductive age. Although necessary in some cases, in many others non-pharmacological treatments offer valid alternatives for the pregnant woman. The noxious effects of antidepressants and anxiolytics urge the physician to look for other solutions. The efficacy of alternative treatment is enhanced by early detection that requires monitoring for mood disorders from the earliest stages of pregnancy, and multidisciplinary professional care.

The outcome of anxiety disorders in older people at 6-year follow-up: results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam

OBJECTIVE

To examine long-term outcome of late-life anxiety disorders and utilization of mental health care services.

METHOD

A cohort of subjects (aged > or = 55 years) with an anxiety disorder (n = 112) was identified in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (n = 3107). At 6 year follow-up, the rate of persistence and prognostic factors for persistence of anxiety were established.

RESULTS

Six years after baseline 23% of our sample met the criteria for an anxiety disorder. Another 47% suffered from subclinical anxiety symptoms. Persistence of anxiety was associated with a high score on neuroticism at baseline. Use of benzodiazepines was high (43%), while use of mental health care facilities (14%) and anti-depressants (7%) remained low in those with persistent anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that those high in neuroticism are at greater risk for persistence of anxiety. Efforts to enhance appropriate referral of anxious older adults do not seem to have had the desired effect.

Insomnia in General Practice

Insomnia is an extremely common condition with major social and economic consequences worldwide. Two large epidemiological studies (Morfeo 1 and Morfeo 2) recently performed in Italy provided much-needed novel data on the impact of insomnia in patients whose primary healthcare is provided by general practitioners (GPs). These studies found that insomnia is managed relatively well by GPs in Italy, although diagnosis and treatment can be compromised because of the lack of standardised criteria. Although a number of consensus reports on insomnia have been published, these are mainly highly specific documents that are difficult to implement in general practice. To address this, a consensus group involving 695 GPs and over 60 specialists from the Italian Association of Sleep Medicine was established. The major objectives of the consensus study were to establish basic knowledge for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia, and to produce guidelines for the management of insomnia by GPs. This is the first time that GPs have been directly involved in producing insomnia guidelines of this type, and this approach reflects their pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of this condition. Participants were carefully selected to ensure adequate representation of sleep specialists and GPs, with the group being headed by a steering committee and an advisory board. Guideline statements were selected following careful literature review and were voted on using formalised consensus procedures. This review describes current views on the diagnosis and management of insomnia from the perspective of the GP. In addition, the results of the consensus study are presented. They include recognition of the following principles: (i) insomnia is a genuine pathology that must be appropriately diagnosed and treated; (ii) when concomitant pathologies are present, additional significance should be given to treatment of insomnia since it can influence prognosis of coexistent disorders; (iii) appropriate treatment should consider the cause of insomnia as well as the characteristics of available pharmacological agents; (iv) with regard to hypnotic drugs, preference should be given to medications with a short half-life in order to limit residual effects; (v) non-benzodiazepine hypnotics are preferred to classic benzodiazepines as they have higher selectivity and present a lower risk of undesirable effects; (vi) tablets are preferable to liquid preparations as they are less likely to lead to dependence and to overdosing by the patient; and (vi) once treatment has been initiated, insomnia patients should be carefully followed up. These statements provide much needed criteria for better management of insomnia by GPs in Italy.

Use of potentially inappropriate pain-related medications in older adults with painful neuropathic disorders

BACKGROUND

Although older adults with painful neuropathic disorders (PNDs) would appear to be at elevated risk for receiving potentially inappropriate pain-related medications, the extent of such drug use in this population is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the use of potentially inappropriate pain-related medications among patients with PNDs aged >or=65 years.

METHODS

Using a large, integrated US health insurance database, we identified all persons aged >or=65 years with >or=2 medical encounters involving diagnoses of PNDs during calendar year 2000. Patients with <30 days of continuous eligibility for health benefits during the study year were excluded from the sample. Use of potentially inappropriate pain-related medications (as defined by the 1997 Beers criteria) was then examined based on information contained in paid pharmacy claims for all remaining patients.

RESULTS

We identified 22,668 patients with PNDs aged >or=65 years (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [6.0] years; 58.6% female). Almost one half (11,233 [49.6%]) of patients received >or=1 potentially inappropriate pain-related medication, including propoxyphene (26.7%) and amitriptyline (10.2%). Women were more likely than men to receive these medications (54.2% vs 43.0%, respectively; P<0.01), and use increased with age (47.6%, 51.8%, and 52.8% in those aged 65-74 years, 75-84 years, and >or=85 years, respectively; overall comparison, P<0.01). Among patients with only 1 PND, the use of potentially inappropriate medications was highest among those with postherpetic neuralgia (70.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of potentially inappropriate pain-related medications among older adults with PNDs is common. Further research is needed to ascertain whether the benefits of these agents outweigh their risks in this population.