Implementation of antibiotic management teams in Belgian hospitals

Development and validation of potential structure indicators for evaluating antimicrobial stewardship programmes in European hospitals

This study describes the development of structure indicators for hospital antimicrobial stewardship programmes and pilot validation across European hospitals. A multi-disciplinary panel from four European countries developed structure indicators in three steps: identification and listing of indicators, remote ranking of indicators using multi-criteria scoring, selection of indicators in a face-to-face consensus meeting. Additionally, the top-ten indicators were identified as a minimal set of key indicators. A survey was sent to the directors of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in European hospitals. The yes/no answers for the indicators were transformed into numbers in order to calculate the total scores. A list of 58 indicators was selected and categorised into the following topics: antimicrobial stewardship services (12 items), tools (16 items), human resources and mandate (6 items), health care personnel development (4 items), basic diagnostic capabilities (6 items), microbiological rapid tests (2 items), evaluation of microbiological drug resistance data (3 items), antibiotic consumption control (5 items) and drug use monitoring (4 items). The indicator scores, reported by 11 pilot hospitals from five European countries, ranged from 32 to 50 (maximum score = 58) and from 5 to 10 points (maximum score = 10) for, respectively, the complete and the top-ten list. An international panel selected 58 potential structure indicators, among which was a minimal set of ten key structure indicators, that could be useful for assessment of the comprehensiveness and resource-intensity of antimicrobial stewardship programmes. There was significant heterogeneity among participating centres with regard to their score for structural components of effective antimicrobial stewardship.

[Programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics (PROA) in Spanish hospitals: GEIH-SEIMC, SEFH and SEMPSPH consensus document]

The antimicrobial agents are unique drugs for several reasons. First, their efficacy is higher than other drugs in terms of reduction of morbidity and mortality. Also, antibiotics are the only group of drugs associated with ecological effects, because their administration may contribute to the emergence and spread of microbial resistance. Finally, they are used by almost all medical specialties. Appropriate use of antimicrobials is very complex because of the important advances in the management of infectious diseases and the spread of antibiotic resistance. Thus, the implementation of programs for optimizing the use of antibiotics in hospitals (called PROA in this document) is necessary. This consensus document defines the objectives of the PROA (namely, to improve the clinical results of patients with infections, to minimise the adverse events associated to the use of antimicrobials including the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance, and to ensure the use of the most cost-efficacious treatments), and provides recommendations for the implementation of these programs in Spanish hospitals. The key aspects of the recommendations are as follows. Multidisciplinary antibiotic teams should be formed, under the auspices of the Infection Committees. The PROA need to be considered as part of institutional programs and the strategic objectives of the hospital. The PROA should include specific objectives based on measurable indicators, and activities aimed at improving the use of antimicrobials, mainly through educational activities and interventions based more on training activities directed to prescribers than just on restrictive measures.

Antibiotic stewardship programmes: legal framework and structure and process indicator in Southwestern French hospitals, 2005-2008

French hospitals are required to implement antibiotic stewardship programmes (ABS) to improve antibiotic use. We analysed the legal framework on ABS and assessed its impact on hospitals' ABS development in Southwestern France. For each official text, required measures, date of issue, means of control and incentives were analysed. Annual retrospective surveys were conducted in 84 hospitals from 2005 to 2008 to monitor implementation of ABS components: organisation, resources and actions. Evolution of individual measures and of a structure and process indicator (SPI) reflecting ABS was described for each hospital. From 2002, official texts issued by health authorities set out requirements on ABS, based on previous professional guidelines. Incentives and means of control were reinforced in 2006 and in 2007 with mandatory reporting of SPI for public disclosure. ABS implementation improved during the course of the study period. In 2008, at least 98% of hospitals had implemented formularies, antibiotic committees, surgical prophylaxis guidelines, and monitored antibiotic use; antibiotic advisors were appointed in 85% of hospitals. Little progress was made regarding time dedicated by pharmacists to antibiotic management and restrictive dispensation using stop-orders. Computerised tools, continuing education and audits remained under-used. SPI values were higher in private hospitals and rehabilitation centres than in others. Official texts and the SPI public disclosure increased professionals' and hospital managers' commitment to develop ABS, resulting in improvements. However, some actions still need to be reinforced. It appears crucial to monitor practical implementation to better approach ABS effectiveness and to adapt requirements.

Nationwide implementation of antibiotic management teams in Belgian hospitals: a self-reporting survey

OBJECTIVES

Antibiotic management teams (AMTs) have been advocated to optimize the use of antimicrobials in hospitals. Since 2002, the Belgian Antibiotic Policy Coordination Committee (BAPCOC) has supported the development of AMTs in Belgian hospitals with policy guidance and federal funding for antibiotic managers. We performed a national, self-reporting survey to assess the level of AMT activities in 2007.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire survey was performed on the composition, organization and service activities of the AMT in all acute care and larger chronic care hospitals in the country in 2007. Descriptive statistics were stratified by duration of AMT funding.

RESULTS

Completed questionnaires were provided by 112 of 116 hospitals (response rate, 96.6%). Mutidisciplinary AMTs varied in size (mean 10, range 2-28 members). Antibiotic stewardship tools used by AMTs included: hospital antibiotic formulary (96.3% of hospitals); practice guidelines for antibiotic therapy and surgical prophylaxis (91.6% and 96.3%, respectively); list of 'restricted' antimicrobial agents (75.9%); concurrent review of antibiotic therapies (64.2%); de-escalation of therapy after a few days (63.9%); sequential intravenous/oral therapy for antibiotics with equivalent bioavailability (78.7%); dedicated antimicrobial order forms (36.1%); automatic stop of delivery (43.5%); analysis of antibiotic consumption data (96.2%); and analysis of microbial resistance data (89.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate a well-developed structure of AMTs in Belgian hospitals and the broad range of services provided. Technical and financial support by healthcare authorities was key to the extensive implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes across the national hospital care system.