Multicenter phase II trial of combination chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric carcinoma

Nanoparticle Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Nanoparticle polymeric micellar paclitaxel (NPMP) is a novel Cremophor EL (CrEL)-free nanoparticle micellar formulation of paclitaxel. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of NPMP in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed AGC in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital were retrospectively collected and divided into two groups. Patients in group A received NPMP at a total dose of 360 mg/m2 each cycle, and patients in group B were given paclitaxel at a dose of 210 mg/m2 each cycle. In addition, all patients received 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 0.75 g/m2 on days 1-4 and leucovorin at a dose of 200 mg/m2 on days 1-4 for at least 2 cycles.

RESULTS

From January 2021 to May 2023, 63 patients (32 in group A and 31 in group B) could be evaluated for treatment response. A marked disparity in the overall response was observed between groups A and B, indicating statistical significance. The overall response rate was 31% in group A (10/32) and 10% in group B (3/31) (P = 0.034). Disease control rate was 91% in group A (29/32) and 81% in group B (25/31) (P = 0.440). No statistically significant difference in adverse reactions was observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of anemia, leucopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, liver dysfunction, and allergy in group A was notably lower than that in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

NPMP combined chemotherapy offers a new, active, and safe treatment for patients with AGC.

Retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer with docetaxel and oxaliplatin

The incidence rate of gastric cancer is highest in China, where 5 in 10 new cases of stomach cancer across the world are diagnosed. Even though surgical management is the treatment of choice, it is not significantly effective due to advanced stage of the disease at diagnosis and the increased chances of primary tumor recurrence and metastasis to secondary organs. First-line chemotherapy of advanced gastric cancer patients recommend oxaliplatin and docetaxel; however, not much is known about their usage in Chinese patients. Therefore we retrospectively analyzed 199 cases of advanced gastric cancer (intestinal, diffuse, and mixed types) receiving either docetaxel or oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. The end-points determined were objective response rate (ORR, sum of complete and partial responses), disease control rate (DCR, sum of complete response, partial response, and stable disease), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (OS) time. Both docetaxel and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy exhibited improved ORR and DCR; however, the comparison of short-term objective efficacy (ORR and DCR) was not statistically significant (p > .05) between the two groups. Our results indicated that PFS and OS of intestinal-type gastric cancer were extended compared with diffuse-type and mixed-type gastric cancer. Adverse reactions were within the control range and after symptomatic treatment were significantly ameliorated. Both docetaxel and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy thus had a robust treatment outcome and can prospectively be used as one of the effective chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer patients in China.

The efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel plus S-1 compared with paclitaxel plus 5-FU for advanced gastric cancer: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still a matter of debate. The chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 has been used to treat AGC or metastatic gastric cancer.We conducted a meta-analysis to compare oral S-1 and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to determine which agent was more efficacious and less toxic in combination with PTX. A systematic review with a meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, EmBase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PTX plus S-1 and PTX plus 5-FU in patients with AGC.Three RCTs were eligible and 352 patients were analyzed. PTX plus S-1 increased the disease control rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.30, P = 0.04) and reduced the progressive disease rate (RR = 0.62, 95% CI] = 0.39-0.98, P = 0.04) compared with PTX plus 5-FU. There was a significant decrease in nausea (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.82, P = 0.001) and vomiting (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.33-0.91, P = 0.02) in patients treated with PTX plus S-1.PTX plus S-1 was associated with almost equivalent safety and a lower progressive disease rate compared with PTX plus 5-FU. PTX plus S-1 is a good alternative strategy for patients who cannot tolerate a continuous intravenous infusion.

A randomized phase-II trial comparing sequential and concurrent paclitaxel with oral or parenteral fluorinated pyrimidines for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to compare S-1 with infusional 5-fluorouracil (FU) to determine which would be a better partner of paclitaxel (PTX), and (2) to compare a concurrent strategy with a sequential one, the latter strategy being the one that is widely used in Japanese general practice.

METHODS

The 161 eligible patients were randomized into four arms to receive the following regimens: A (sequential), intravenous 5-FU at 800 mg/m(2) for 5 days every 4 weeks followed by weekly PTX at 80 mg/m(2); B (sequential), S-1 at 80 mg/m(2) for 4 weeks and 2-week rest followed by PTX; C (concurrent), intravenous 5-FU at 600 mg/m(2) for 5 days and weekly PTX at 80 mg/m(2) every 4 weeks; and D (concurrent), S-1 for 14 days and PTX at 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS) rate at 10 months.

RESULTS

The ten-month OS rates in arms A, B, C, and D were 63, 65, 61, and 73%, respectively. The OS was best in the concurrent S-1/PTX arm, with a mean survival time of 15.4 months, but no significant difference was observed between the four arms. Response rates were higher in the concurrent arms than in the sequential arms.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not show sufficient prolongation of survival with the concurrent strategy to proceed to a phase-III trial; however, the sequential arms showed survival comparable to that in the concurrent arms, with less toxicity. In patients who are ineligible for cisplatin (CDDP), sequential treatment starting with S-1 and proceeding to PTX would be a good alternative strategy, considering quality of life (QOL) and the cost-benefits of an oral agent as first-line treatment.

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Our previous phase I study provided evidence that weekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, and bolus 5-fluorouracil (weekly PCF) was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of weekly PCF.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria were as follows: pathological confirmation; measurable lesion(s); and no history of treatment with taxanes, platinum-based compounds, or intravenous 5-fluorouracil (1 regimen of pre-treatment with oral 5-fluorouracil agents was allowed). Paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2), 1 h), cisplatin (25 mg/m(2), 2 h), and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2), bolus) were administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Between March 2006 and May 2009, 46 patients were enrolled and 45 were assessed. Eighteen had a history of pre-treatment with oral 5-fluorouracil agents. The response rate was 56% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41-70%]. Median progression-free survival was 160 days (95% CI 145-214 days). Median overall survival was 552 days (95% CI 350-843 days). Grade 3-4 major adverse reactions observed were neutropenia (76%), leucopenia (38%), anaemia (27%), febrile neutropenia (22%), exacerbation of performance status (16%), and anorexia (13%).

CONCLUSION

A weekly PCF regimen is promising for advanced gastric cancer, although it is associated with moderate hematological and minimal non-hematological toxicities.

Paclitaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer

A comprehensive review of phase I and phase II clinical trials of paclitaxel and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer was performed. Response rates, median progression-free survivals, and median overall survivals were examined, together with the treatment regimens and the numbers of patients registered in each trial. Although paclitaxel monotherapy produced considerable improvement in tumor response and prognosis, combination doublet or triplet chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and/or platinum compounds showed better results than the paclitaxel monotherapy. With regard to the schedule of paclitaxel administration, weekly injection seemed to show less toxicity and better results than administration every 3 weeks. Adjuvant therapies, chemoradiation therapies, and paclitaxel treatment for gastric ascites were also investigated and are discussed.

The domain structure of the EORTC QLQ-STO22 supported by Japanese validation data

This paper evaluates the scale structure of the EORTC QLQ-STO22 gastric cancer module using Japanese validation data. We additionally tested two single items regarding dumping syndrome. Of 246 patients who participated in phase II clinical trials of chemotherapy to treat advanced gastric cancer, we analyzed 206 who completed the pretreatment questionnaire. The factor analysis supported the scale structure hypothesized for the initial development phase conducted by the EORTC Quality of Life Group, not the alternations made in the final psychometric testing phase. The elicited scales exhibited high internal consistency and high clinical validity. Our data suggest that there is no need to examine the dumping syndrome items. This study revealed a slightly different scale structure of the QLQ-STO22 from that obtained in the European study. Extensive discussions with the EORTC Group are needed from both cross-cultural and clinical perspectives in order to establish a consensus on the various language versions of the QLQ-STO22.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in China

AIM

To assess the economics of various chemotherapeutic regimens for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and to select the best cost-effective regimen for the common Chinese patients.

METHODS

Data source used in this study was the Chinese Biomedical Disk Database. Patients were diagnosed as AGC and any regimen was eligible. Outcome measures included median survival time (MST) and percentage of complete and partial response (CR+PR). Economic statistics was per capita direct medical cost (DMC) of a single cycle. TreeAge Pro Healthcare 2007 software was used to carry out cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. Sensitivity analyses were applied by altering willingness-to-pay and annual discount rate, and also re-analyzed by excluding the studies with apparent heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective economics studies on 760 patients were included. 5-fluorouracil-based regimens were universal, and also some new agents were involved, such as docetaxel, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin. By processing analysis, we could recommend etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ELF) regimen as preference, with a DMC/MST ratio of 2543 RBM/11.7 mo and a DMC/CR+PR ratio of 2543 RMB/53.3%. Uracil-tegafur, etoposide and cisplatin (FEP) or 5-fluorouracil, adrimycin/epirubin and mitomycin (FAM) regimens could be regarded as optional first-line chemotherapy for AGC in common Chinese patients. With no regard for willingness-to-pay, the docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen could be chosen as either a first- or a second-line chemotherapy, with a DMC/CR+PR ratio of 9979 RMB/56.3%.

CONCLUSION

5-fluorouracial regimens are still considered the mainstream for AGC, while new agents such as taxanes are optional. More randomized clinical trials are required before any mandatory recommendation of certain regimens for patients with AGC in China is made.