Mitoxantrone plus vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Is a Feasible Treatment Option for Breast Cancer with Liver-predominant Metastatic Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with liver metastasis from breast cancer (LMBC) are usually offered systemic therapy. However, for those with progressive liver disease and limited extra-hepatic conditions, local liver management becomes an option. Herein we present our experience with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1999 to 2018, 42 patients with LMBC, who had progressive liver metastasis after systemic therapy, were treated with HAIC. A catheter was placed angiographically into the hepatic artery and remained there for 5 consecutive days. One cycle of chemotherapy consisted of mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and cisplatin. This treatment was repeated at monthly intervals. The medical records were reviewed and analyzed for hepatic tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Complete response was observed in two patients (5%), partial response in 18 patients (43%) and stable disease in eight patients (19%). Fourteen patients (33%) had progressive disease after HAIC. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.4 and 19.3 months, respectively. There was no death related to HAIC. The patients with response to the treatment had a significant survival benefit (p<0.005).

CONCLUSION

HAIC can be an option for those with progressive liver disease who are heavily pretreated while their extra-hepatic conditions are minimal or stable.

A comparison of laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation versus systemic therapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer metastasis to the liver

OBJECTIVES

There is controversy about the roles of locoregional therapies in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer (LMBC). The aim of this study was to analyse survival after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of LMBC and to compare this with survival in patients receiving systemic therapy (ST) alone.

METHODS

During 1996-2011, 24 patients who had failed to respond or had shown an incomplete response to ST underwent laparoscopic RFA for LMBC. Outcomes in these patients were compared with those in 32 patients with LMBC matched by tumour size and number, but treated with ST alone. Clinical parameters and overall survival were compared using t-tests, chi-squared tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The groups were similar in hormone receptor status and chemotherapy exposure. In the laparoscopic RFA and ST groups, respectively, the mean ± standard deviation size of the dominant liver tumour and the number of tumours per patient were 3.7 ± 0.4 cm and 2.4 ± 0.4 cm, and 2.6 ± 0.4 tumours and 3.3 ± 0.4 tumours, respectively. These differences were not significant. At a median follow-up of 20 months in the laparoscopic RFA group, 42% of patients were found to have developed local liver recurrence, 63% had developed new liver disease and 38% had developed extrahepatic disease. Overall survival after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 47 months in the laparoscopic RFA group and 9 months in the ST-only group (P = 0.0001). Five-year survival after the diagnosis of liver metastasis was 29% in the RFA group and 0% in the ST-only group.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to compare outcomes in RFA and ST, respectively, in LMBC. The results show that survival after laparoscopic RFA plus ST is better than that after ST alone.

Optimal outcomes for liver-dominant metastatic breast cancer with transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads loaded with doxorubicin

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of image-guided delivery of locoregional chemotherapy to breast cancer hepatic metastases using doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads (DEBDOX). An IRB-approved multi-center, prospective, open, non-controlled repeat treatment registry to investigate the safety and efficacy of doxorubicin microspheres in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastasis from breast cancer was reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed with differences of P < 0.05 considered significant. About 40 patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to the liver underwent a total of 75 image-guided procedures with hepatic arterial drug-eluting beads loaded with doxorubicin (DEBDOX). Treatment was well tolerated with a total of eight patients sustaining 13 adverse events within the 30 days of each treatment session. All adverse events were either a grade I or grade II in toxicity. After a median follow-up of 12 months in all patients, the hepatic progression-free survival was a median of 26 months and overall survival was a median of 47 months. The treatment of hepatic metastasis from MBC using DEBDOX is an effective local therapy with very high response rates and a very safe toxicity profile. In comparison to chemotherapy alone, consideration of hepatic-directed therapy is warranted in patients with liver-dominant metastatic disease.

Synthesis and biological analysis of prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted anticancer prodrugs

Ligand-targeted therapeutics have increased in prominence because of their potential for improved potency and reduced toxicity. However, with the advent of personalized medicine, a need for greater versatility in ligand-targeted drug design has emerged, where each tumor-targeting ligand should be capable of delivering a variety of therapeutic agents to the same tumor, each therapeutic agent being selected for its activity on a specific patient's cancer. In this report, we describe the use of a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting ligand to deliver multiple unrelated cytotoxic drugs to human prostate cancer (LNCaP) cells. We demonstrate that the PSMA-specific ligand, 2-[3-(1, 3-dicarboxy propyl)ureido] pentanedioic acid, is capable of mediating the targeted killing of LNCaP cells with many different therapeutic warheads. These results suggest that flexibility can be designed into ligand-targeted therapeutics, enabling adaptation of a single targeting ligand for the treatment of patients with different sensitivities to different chemotherapies.

Etoposide, mitomycin, and methotrexate combination in heavily treated breast cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Since 2004, metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine have been treated in our institution with a combination of mitomycin C, methotrexate, and VP-16 (VMM). We report in this study a retrospective analysis of the activity and safety of the VMM combination.

METHODS

Patients were treated with a combination of VP-16 (100 mg/m2 on day 1), mitomycin C (MMC, 10 mg/m2 on day 1), and methotrexate (MTX, 12.5 mg/m2 twice a day on day 2 and 3) in a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were treated. Median age was 48 years. A total of 256 cycles were administered. Median relative dose intensities were 0.87, 0.87, and 0.95 for VP-16, MMC, and MTX, respectively. Objective response rate was 31%, with a clinical benefit rate of 47%. Median response duration was 5.8 months. Median disease stabilization duration was 9.1 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months with a 14% 1-year PFS rate. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months, with a 25% 1-year OS rate. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. The most commonly reported extra-hematological adverse event (AE) was fatigue. Emesis and alopecia were rarely reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination appears to be effective and well tolerated in this heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer population.

Dose-dense temozolomide regimen for the treatment of brain metastases from melanoma, breast cancer, or lung cancer not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery: a multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases reduce survival because therapeutic options are limited. This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of single-agent therapy with alternating weekly, dose-dense temozolomide in pretreated patients with brain metastases prospectively stratified by primary tumor type.

METHODS

Eligible patients had bidimensionally measurable brain metastases from histologically/cytologically confirmed melanoma, breast cancer (BC), or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were allowed. Patients received temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/day (days 1-7 and 15-21 every 28- or 35-day cycle).

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat population (N = 157; 53 melanoma, 51 BC, and 53 NSCLC), one patient had complete response, nine (6%) had partial responses, and 31 (20%) had stable disease in the brain. Median progression-free survival was 56, 58, and 66 days for melanoma, BC, and NSCLC, respectively. Median overall survival was 100 days for melanoma, 172 days for NSCLC, and not evaluable in the BC group. Thrombocytopenia was the most common adverse event causing dose modification or treatment discontinuation. Grade 4 toxic effects were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

This alternating weekly, dose-dense temozolomide regimen was well tolerated and clinically active in heavily pretreated patients with brain metastases, particularly in patients with melanoma. Combining temozolomide with WBRT or other agents may improve clinical outcomes.