Helicobacter pyloriInfection: A Global Occupational Risk for Healthcare Workers?

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among healthcare workers in Aswan University Hospital

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the major pathogen causing upper alimentary tract diseases and has various routes of transmission. It is considered a public health concern owing to its high prevalence. Therefore, proper investigations should be conducted and early treatment modalities developed to avoid its hazardous complications. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of H. pylori infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Aswan University Hospital, Aswan Governorate, Egypt.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted between June and November 2021 and included 200 HCWs who completed a predesigned questionnaire. A serological test was employed to screen for H. pylori infection, followed by a stool antigen test for those with positive serology for direction to the associated clinic for therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 200 HCWs included in the study, 86 (43 %) were men and 114 (57 %) were women. Their age was 18-58 years. The participants consisted of doctors (31.5 %), nurses (53 %), and workers (15.5 %). The overall prevalence was (58.5 %) of the study participants were seropositive for H. pylori with higher prevalence in women (56.4 %) with no statistical difference (p = 0.841).The age of the participants and work duration exhibited a weak positive correlation with positivity for H. pylori infection (p = 0.033 and p = 0.049, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HCWs are considered to be at a high risk of developing H. pylori infection. Age and work duration were found to contribute to the acquisition of infection. Preventive hospital measures, such as universal precaution, frequent handwashing, and wearing of gloves and a mask/face guard, should be taken to prevent occupational infection.

Total worker health® based Helicobacter pylori public health prevention strategy

Purpose of review

This review aims to explore the public health approach for Helicobacter pylori Infection Prevention within the Total Worker Health (TWH) framework strategy.

Recent findings

The review identifies certain occupations considered high-risk groups for H. pylori infection. It underscores primary, secondary, and tertiary public health preventive measures align with the TWH approach. Within this framework, the role of raising awareness, emphasizing infection control, worker hygiene, risk assessment, and ensuring healthcare accessibility is emphasized. The importance of early detection, treatment, eradication, and a TWH approach emerges as a central theme. The TWH approach offers a holistic perspective, intertwining occupation-related health risks with overall health and well being.

Summary

Adopting the TWH approach, coupled with household-based infection control and eradication strategies, can significantly reduce H. pylori prevalence, fostering a healthier workforce and diminishing long-term healthcare costs. The review underscores the importance of recognizing H. pylori as an occupational disease. It calls for further research into the "one-health" perspective on H. pylori transmission dynamics.

The occupational risk of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in specific occupational groups and to compare them with the general population.

METHODS

We searched PubMed® to identify original studies reporting the prevalence of H. pylori infection in occupational groups. The differences between occupational groups and the general population were analyzed taking into account the direction and statistical significance of the differences observed when comparing each occupational group with a reference group (either recruited in the same study or using an external comparator).

RESULTS

A total of 98 studies addressing the prevalence of H. pylori infection in occupational groups were included in the systematic review. Overall, health professionals showed a significantly higher prevalence of H. pylori infection than the general population, especially among those working at gastrointestinal units. Similar results were found in subjects involved in agricultural, forestry and fishery, as well as in sewage workers, miners, and workers at institutions for the intellectually disabled, although differences were less pronounced.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show an occupational risk of H. pylori infection supporting the role of oral-oral, fecal-oral, and zoonotic transmission. Studies comparing specific occupational groups with adequate comparators may contribute to better identify groups at higher risk of infection. The recognition of this infection as an occupational disease would result in early detection and treatment, as well as prevention and control of its transmission in workplaces.

The prevalence and incidence of Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease and upper gastrointestinal bleeding throughout the world

Due to heightened awareness regarding testing for and eradication of infection, the prevalence and incidence of H pylori infection (and by extension the prevalence and incidence of peptic ulcer disease) appear to have declined in recent years. However, antimicrobial resistance is mounting and traditional clarithromycin- or metronidazole-containing triple therapies may no longer be highly effective at eradicating the infection. Combined bismuth- and metronidazole-containing quadruple therapy or sequential 4-drug therapy may be better choices for first-line treatment against this unique pathogen that is ideally suited to survive in the human stomach.

The occupational risk of Helicobacter pylori infection among gastroenterologists and their assistants

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori is a widely spread bacterium that mainly inhabits the gastric mucosa and can lead to serious illnesses such as peptic ulcer disease, gastric carcinoma and gastric MALT lymphoma. The oral-oral route seems to be the main transmission route. The fact that endoscopes are contaminated after being used to perform a gastroscopy leads one to question whether gastroenterologists and endoscopy nurses and assistants run a higher risk of infection.

METHODS

A systematic search for literature was conducted in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and further publications were found in reference lists of relevant articles. Epidemiological studies on the occupational exposure of endoscopy personnel were collected and their quality was assessed. Pooled effect estimates were identified in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 24 studies included in the analysis, 15 were considered to be methodologically good. Of these 15 studies, eight single studies showed a statistically significant increased risk of infection for gastroenterologists, and five for their assistants. Meta-analysis across all methodologically good studies found a statistically significant risk of 1.6 (95%CI 1.3-2.0) for doctors. The pooled effect estimates also indicated a statistically significant risk of Helicobacter pylori infection (RR 1.4; 95%CI 1.1-1.8) for assistants too.When studies are stratified by medical and non-medical control groups, statistically significant risks can only be recognised in the comparison with non-medical controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our results demonstrated an increased risk of Helicobacter pylori infection among gastroenterological personnel. However, the choice of control group is important for making a valid assessment of occupational exposure risks.

Helicobacter pylori infection: further evidence for the role of feco-oral transmission

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is recognized as a major cause of chronic digestive diseases with a major public health impact, yet the knowledge of transmission pathways is limited. We studied the transmission in employees taking care of institutionalized persons with mental disabilities with a documented high prevalence of H. pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six hundred and seventy-one health-care workers were screened for H. pylori serology. For each employee, information was collected on age, sex, father's and mother's education level, number of household members and number of children sleeping in the same bedroom during childhood, as well as lifestyle factors such as smoking and tropical journeys and occupational exposure data such as type of contact with inhabitants (changing napkins with stools, washing inhabitants, feeding inhabitants, personal contact) and seniority in the institution.

RESULTS

Seroprevalence for H. pylori increased significantly with age. In univariate analysis, risk factors for H. pylori positivity were (age-adjusted): father's education, mean length of employment, smoking, contact with fecal materials of inhabitants, washing and feeding of inhabitants. Controlling for confounders, in multiple logistic regression analysis, only fecal contact remained as a significant risk factor for H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSIONS

In health-care workers caring for a population with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection, there is an association with fecal transmission. This, however, does not rule out the possibility of other ways of transmission.