Novel agents and strategies in transplant-eligible patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

Long-Term Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Multi-center Experience from Turkey

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on survival and safety in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A total of 110 patients with R/R HL or NHL who underwent allo-HSCT between July 2007 and October 2022 at 7 adult stem cell transplant centers were evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS), graft versus host disease-free survival (GRFS), and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, and NRM was the secondary endpoint. Forty-one (37.3%) of the total patients were diagnosed with HL, 69 (62.7%) with NHL. The median age at the time of allo-HCT was 39.5 years (16-67), of which 66 (60%) were male. The median follow-up was 67.5 ± 8.1 months, and the rates of 5-year OS, PFS, and GRFS were 38.4%, 37%, and 34.8%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, CR/PR disease status after allo-HCT was significantly associated with longer PFS (HR: 13.47, 95% CI: 5.80-31.26, p = 0.000) and OS (HR: 5.23, 95% CI: 2.93-9.34, p = 0.000). CR/PR disease status after allo-HCT (HR: 5.79, 95% CI: 3.22-10.40, p = 0.000) and grade 1-2 acute GvHD (HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.25-4.35, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with longer GRFS. The 5-year cumulative incidence of NRM was 24.8% (95% CI, 12.5-36.7). The most common conditioning regimen was reduced intensity. Transplant outcomes are not influenced by disease subtype. However, the achievement of a CR/PR response after allo-HCT significantly prolongs OS, PFS and GRFS. In addition, the presence of acute grade 1-2 GvHD was found to be another factor prolonging GRFS. These results support the feasibility of allo-HCT, especially in heavily treated patients.

Modern approaches in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: literature review and own experience

An advance of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) diagnostic and treatment protocols promoted between fatal and high-curative disease. Modern treatment programs can reach many-year survival rate in 8097% even in patients with advanced (IIIIV) HL stages and unfavorable prognostic factors pre- sence. Nevertheless, relapses and refractory (r/r) HL appears in 830% patients and depend on treatment scheme, prognostic factors and comorbi- dity. Second-line therapy (ViGePP and ICE) is a common platform for r/r HL treatment in pediatric patients, but results of 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) not to exceed 7075%. For increase RFS rate in patients with r/r HL as combinatorial partners to schemes ViGePP and ICE add monoclonal antibodies (brentuximab vedotine) and immune chekpoint inhibitors (nivolumab), cell (auto-/allogenic stem cell transplantation) and genetically engineered (CAR-T) products. In the current issue literature and own experience in r/r HL treatment presented. It is showed, that inclusion a brentuximab vedotine in ViGePP scheme increased 3-year RFS up to 8311.2%.

Real-world outcomes of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma in the era of novel therapies: a Canadian perspective

BACKGROUND

Despite high cure rates with frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), about 30% of patients will relapse or have primary refractory disease (R/r). Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the standard of care for R/r disease and alloHSCT is a curative option for patients in second relapse. Novel agents are being incorporated for the treatment of R/r HL, such that the optimal timing of transplant is currently being challenged. Additionally, because access to these new agents varies amongst transplant centers, we sought to offer a Canadian perspective to the treatment of R/r HL and demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of both AHSCT and alloHSCT for the treatment of R/r HL.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study examined outcomes in 89 consecutive patients with R/r HL treated with AHSCT between January 2007 and December 2019. A total of 17 patients underwent alloHSCT either as a tandem auto-allo approach or as salvage therapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 5.0 years, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS for patients undergoing AHSCT were 57.5% (95% CI 45.2-68.0) and 81.3% (95% CI 70.0-88.8), respectively. Corresponding figures for patients who underwent alloHSCT were 76.5% (95% CI 48.8-90.4) and 82.4% (95% CI 54.7-93.9). NRM at 100 days and 5 years was 0% and 9.4% post AHSCT and 0% and 5.9% post alloHSCT. Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute GVHD at day +100 was 35.3% (95% CI 17.7 - 62.3) and CI of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 23.5% (95% CI 6.9 - 45.8).

CONCLUSIONS

AHSCT and alloHSCT can both provide robust and prolonged disease control and new agents should be used as a bridge to improve the curative potential of these definitive cellular therapies.

Improving outcomes after autologous transplantation in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a European expert perspective

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established approach to treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) recommended by both the European Society for Medical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network based on the results from randomized controlled studies. However, a considerable number of patients who receive ASCT will progress/relapse and display suboptimal post-transplant outcomes. Over recent years, a number of different strategies have been assessed to improve post-ASCT outcomes and augment HL cure rates. These include use of pre- and post-ASCT salvage therapies and post-ASCT consolidative therapy, with the greatest benefits demonstrated by targeted therapies, such as brentuximab vedotin. However, adoption of these new approaches has been inconsistent across different centers and regions. In this article, we provide a European perspective on the available treatment options and likely future developments in the salvage and consolidation settings, with the aim to improve management of patients with HL who have a high risk of post-ASCT failure. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that early intervention with post-ASCT consolidation improves outcomes in patients with R/R HL who require ASCT. Future approvals of targeted agents are expected to further improve outcomes and provide additional treatment options in the coming age of personalized medicine.

Allo-HSCT in transplant-naïve patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-arm, multicenter study

We evaluated the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in transplant-naïve patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) who failed to attain metabolic complete response (mCR) to 1 to 2 lines of salvage chemotherapyThose with residual but nonprogressive disease assessed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanning were eligible. An additional 1 to 2 cycles of salvage therapy were permissible in those with progressive disease or when required to bridge to allo-HSCT, with additional imaging at baseline before transplantation. Conditioning consisted of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab. Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) were administered for mixed chimerism or residual or relapsed disease. Eleven patients had sibling donors, 13 had HLA-matched unrelated donors, and 7 had HLA-mismatched unrelated donors. There were no graft failures, and no episodes of grade 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); only 19.4% of patients had grade 2 to 3 GVHD, and 22.2% had extensive chronic GVHD. The non-relapse mortality rate was 16.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1%-34.5%). Relapse incidence was 18.7% (95% CI, 8.2%-39.2%). The study met its primary objective, with a 3-year progression-free survival of 67.7% (95% CI, 48.4%-81.2%). Survival outcomes were equivalent in those with residual metabolically active disease immediately before transplantation (n = 24 [70.8%; 95% CI, 17.2%-83.7%]). Two of the 5 patients who relapsed received DLI and remained in mCR at latest follow-up, with a 3-year overall survival of 80.7% (95% CI, 61.9%-90.8%). We demonstrate encouraging results that establish a potential role for allo-HSCT in selected high-risk patients with HL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00908180.

Re-defining Prognosis of Hematological Malignancies by Dynamic Response Assessment Methods: Lessons Learnt in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma

Risk-stratification is an essential management tool in defining prognosis of haematological neoplasms, both from patient and physician perspective. We define a new prognostic term "Dynamic Response Assessment Method(s) (DRAM)" as "method(s) used for re-stratifying disease prognosis at fixed intervals during the treatment course". The risk stratification is done after a fixed duration of treatment or chemotherapy cycles using sensitive techniques. The information obtained then can be used for further therapeutic decisions and prognostication. Currently, there is enough evidence that response to treatment improves the prognostic value of baseline disease variables in the management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin lymphoma, Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma, and Multiple Myeloma. Through this review, we discuss the current evidence based application of "DRAM" to guide therapeutic decisions in these malignancies. We also discuss how the results of "DRAM" can be incorporated for redefining prognosis and counselling the patients with these selected hematologic malignancies.

Hodgkin's lymphoma: post- autologous transplantation consolidation therapy

A first-line chemotherapy program based on the ABVD regimen is currently considered the golden standard by most hematologists, being able to achieve a cure without any need of subsequent therapies in >70% of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). To increase this percentage, efforts in recent decades focused on the development of new therapeutic strategies. A first major effort was the introduction of the BEACOPP chemotherapy regimen, which is able to increase the response rate and to reduce the need of salvage therapies. However, this result did not demonstrate an advantage in terms of overall survival compared to ABVD, mainly due to an excess of non lymphoma-related events in the follow-up phase. Here we describe three clinical cases of young HL patients who had relapsed/refractory disease after the induction chemotherapy. These three clinical cases provide practical and real world evidence in favor of the use of BV in monotherapy as consolidation treatment after autologous stem cells transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory HL.

Optimizing outcomes in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a review of current and forthcoming therapeutic strategies

The outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (rr-cHL) has improved considerably in recent years owing to the approval of highly active novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin and Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Although no randomized trials have been conducted to provide formal proof, it is almost undisputable that the survival of these patients has been prolonged. As autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT) remains the standard of care for second-line therapy of most patients with rr-cHL, optimization of second-line regimens with the use of brentuximab vedotin, or, in the future, checkpoint inhibitors, is promising to increase both the eligibility rate for transplant and the final outcome. The need for subsequent therapy, and especially allogeneic SCT, can be reduced with brentuximab vedotin consolidation for 1 year, while pembrolizumab is also being tested in this setting. Several other drug categories appear to be active in rr-cHL, but their development has been delayed by the appearance of brentuximab vedotin, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, which have dominated the field of rr-cHL treatment in the last 5 years. Combinations of active drugs in chemo-free approaches may further increase efficacy and hopefully reduce toxicity in rr-cHL, but are still under development.

Brentuximab vedotin and ESHAP is highly effective as second-line therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma patients (long-term results of a trial by the Spanish GELTAMO Group)

BACKGROUND

In this work, we assessed the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ESHAP (BRESHAP) as second-line therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RRHL) to improve the results before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, phase I-II trial of patients with RRHL after first-line chemotherapy. Treatment had three 21-day cycles of etoposide, solumedrol, high-dose AraC, and cisplatin. BV was administered at three dose levels (0.9, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/kg) intravenous on day ‒1 to 3 + 3 cohorts of patients. Final BV dose was 1.8 mg/kg. Responding patients proceeded to ASCT, followed by three BV courses (1.8 mg/kg, every 21 days). Main end points for evaluation were maximum tolerable dose and overall and complete response (CR) before ASCT.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were recruited (median age 36 years; range 18-66): 40 were primary refractory, 16 early relapse and 10 late relapse. There were 39 severe adverse events were reported in 22 patients, most frequently fever (n = 25, 35% neutropenic), including 3 deaths. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity presented in 28 cases: neutropenia (n = 21), thrombocytopenia (n = 14), and anemia (n = 7). Grade ≥3-4 extrahematological adverse events (≥5%) were non-neutropenic fever (n = 13) and hypomagnesaemia (n = 3). Sixty-four patients underwent stem-cell mobilization; all collected >2×10e6/kg CD34+ cells (median 5.75; range 2.12-33.4). Overall response before transplant was 91% (CI 84% to 98%), including 70% (CRs 95% CI 59% to 81%). 60 patients were transplanted with no failure engraftments. Post-transplant response was CR in 49 patients (82% CI 73% to 91%) and partial responses in six (10% CI 5% to 15%). After a mean follow-up of 27 months, the 30-month time to treatment to failure was 74% (95% CI 68% to 80%), progression-free survival 71% (95% CI 65% to 77%), and overall survival 91% (CI 84% to 98%).

CONCLUSION

BRESHAP looks a safe and effective pre-transplant induction regimen, does not jeopardize transplant and allows long-term remissions and survival.

Transplant strategies in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

The majority of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are cured with initial therapy. However, high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) allows for the cure of an additional portion of patients with relapsed or primary refractory disease. Positron emission tomography-negative complete remission before AHCT is critical for long-term disease control. Several salvage options are available with comparable response rates, and the choice can be dependent of comorbidities and logistics. Radiation therapy can also improve the remission rate and is an important therapeutic option for selected patients. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) maintenance after AHCT is beneficial in patients at high risk for relapse, especially those with more than 1 risk factor, but can have the possibility of significant side effects, primarily neuropathy. Newer agents with novel mechanisms of action are under investigation to improve response rates for patients with subsequent relapse, although are not curative alone. BV and the checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab are very effective with limited side effects and can bridge patients to curative allogeneic transplants (allo-HCT). Consideration for immune-mediated toxicities, timing of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant based on response, and the potential for increased graft-versus-host disease remain important. Overall, prospective investigations continue to improve outcomes and minimize toxicity for relapsed or primary refractory HL patients.

Should all patients with HL who relapse after ASCT be considered for allogeneic SCT? A consult, yes; a transplant, not necessarily

This article has a companion Point by Peggs.

A phase II study of the oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib in advanced relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

JAK2 constitutive activation/overexpression is common in classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and several cytokines stimulate Hodgkin lymphoma cells by recognizing JAK1-/JAK2-bound receptors. JAK blockade may thus be therapeutically beneficial in Hodgkin lymphoma. In this phase II study we assessed the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib, an oral JAK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. The primary objective was overall response rate according to the International Harmonization Project 2007 criteria. Thirty-three patients with advanced disease (median number of prior lines of treatment: 5; refractory: 82%) were included; nine (27.3%) received at least six cycles of ruxolitinib and six (18.2%) received more than six cycles. The overall response rate after six cycles was 9.4% (3/32 patients). All three responders had partial responses; another 11 patients had transient stable disease. Best overall response rate was 18.8% (6/32 patients). Rapid alleviation of B-symptoms was common. The median duration of response was 7.7 months, median progression-free survival 3.5 months (95% CI: 1.9–4.6), and the median overall survival 27.1 months (95% CI: 14.4–27.1). Forty adverse events were reported in 14/33 patients (42.4%). One event led to treatment discontinuation, while 87.5% of patients recovered without sequelae. Twenty-five adverse events were grade 3 or higher. These events were mostly anemia (n=11), all considered related to ruxolitinib. Other main causes of grade 3 or higher adverse events included lymphopenia and infections. Of note, no cases of grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia were observed. Ruxolitinib shows signs of activity, albeit short-lived, beyond a simple anti-inflammatory effect. Its limited toxicity suggests that it has the potential to be combined with other therapeutic modalities. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01877005