Index case of acute myeloid leukemia in a family harboring a novel CEBPA germ line mutation

Clinical features and management of germline CEBPA-mutated carriers

Familial acute myeloid leukemia (AML) pedigrees with germline CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-α (CEBPA) mutation have been rarely reported due to insufficient knowledge of their clinical features. Here, we report two Chinese families with multiple AML cases carrying germline CEBPA mutations, one of which had 11 cases spanning four consecutive generations. Additionally, we collected clinical data of 57 AML patients from 22 families with germline CEBPA mutations, with 58.3% of them harboring double CEBPA mutations. The first mutation frequently occurred at the N-terminal of CEBP/α (78.6%), resulting in an exclusive expression of p30 of CEBPA (CEBPAp30). The second mutation was mostly found at the C-terminal of CEBP/α (CEBPAothers). Germline CEBPAp30 carriers had higher incidences of AML (80.36% vs. 42.86%) and earlier onset of AML (18 vs. 38.5 years old) compared to germline CEBPAothers carriers. Despite the high rates of relapse, most familial AML cases exhibited favorable overall survival (OS), with germline CEBPAp30 carriers having better survival outcomes (>25 years vs. 11 years for CEBPAothers carriers). Among the 27 healthy germline CEBPA-mutated carriers, we detected a pre-leukemia clone harboring a pathogenic IDH2 variant (R140Q)in one individual. These findings should aid in the genetic counseling and management of AML patients and healthy carriers with germline CEBPA mutations.

Sporadic and Familial Acute Myeloid Leukemia with CEBPA Mutations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

CCAAT enhancer binding protein A (CEBPA) gene mutation is one of the common genetic alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which can be associated with sporadic and familial AML.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to the recent advances in molecular testing and the prognostic role of CEBPA mutation in AML, the definition for AML with CEBPA mutation (AML-CEBPA) has significantly changed. This review provides the rationale for the updates on classifications, and the impacts on laboratory evaluation and clinical management for sporadic and familial AML-CEBPA patients. In addition, minimal residual disease assessment post therapy to stratify disease risk and stem cell transplant in selected AML-CEBPA patients are discussed. Taken together, the recent progresses have shifted the definition, identification, and management of patients with AML-CEBPA.

[Management of genetic predisposition to hematologic malignancies in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT): Guidelines from the SFGM-TC]

The advent of new technologies has made it possible to identify genetic predispositions to myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute leukemias (AL) more frequently. The most frequent and best characterized at present are mutations in CEBPA, RUNX1, GATA2, ETV6 and DDX41 and, either in the presence of one of these mutations with a high allelic frequency, or in the case of a personal or family history suggestive of blood abnormalities such as non-immune thrombocytopenia, it is recommended to look for the possibility of a hereditary hematological malignancy (HHM). Indeed, early recognition of these HHMs allows better adaptation of the management of patients and their relatives, as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is very often proposed for these pathologies. According to current data, with the exception of the GATA2 mutation, the constitutional or somatic nature of the mutations does not seem to influence the prognosis of hematological diseases. Therefore, the indication for an allograft will be determined according to the usual criteria. However, when searching for a family donor, it is important to ensure that there is no hereditary disease in the donor. In order to guarantee the possibility of performing the HSC allograft within a short period of time, it may be necessary to initiate a parallel procedure to find an unrelated donor. Given the limited information on the modalities of HSC transplantation in this setting, it is important to assess the benefit/risk of the disease and the procedure to decide on the type of conditioning (myeloablative or reduced intensity). In view of the limited experience with the risk of secondary cancers in the medium and long-term, it may be appropriate to recommend reduced intensity conditioning, as in the case of better characterized syndromic hematological diseases such as Fanconi anemia or telomere diseases. In summary, it seems important to evoke HHM more frequently, particularly in the presence of a family history, certain mutations or persistent blood abnormalities, in order to discuss the specific modalities of HSC allografting, particularly with regard to the search for a donor and the evaluation of certain modalities of the procedure, such as conditioning. It should be noted that the discovery of HHM, especially if the indication of an allogeneic HSC transplant is retained, will raise ethical and psychological considerations not only for the patient, but also for his family. A multidisciplinary approach involving molecular biologists, geneticists, hematologists and psychologists is essential.

Laboratory evaluation and prognostication among adults and children with CEBPA-mutant acute myeloid leukemia

CEBPA-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) encompasses clinically and biologically distinct subtypes of AML in both adults and children. CEBPA-mutant AML may occur with monoallelic (moCEBPA) or biallelic (biCEBPA) mutations, which can be somatic or germline, with each entity impacting prognosis in unique ways. BiCEBPA AML is broadly associated with a favorable prognosis, but differences in the type and location of CEBPA mutations as well as the presence of additional leukemogenic mutations can lead to heterogeneity in survival. Concurrent FLT3-ITD mutations have a well-documented negative effect on survival in adult biCEBPA AML, whereas support for a negative prognostic effect of mutations in TET2, DNMT3A, WT1, CSF3R, ASXL1, and KIT is mixed. NPM1 and GATA2 mutations may have a positive prognostic impact. MoCEBPA AML has similar survival outcomes compared to AML with wild-type CEBPA, and risk stratification is determined by other cytogenetic and molecular findings. Germline CEBPA mutations may lead to familial biCEBPA AML after acquisition of second somatic CEBPA mutation, with variable penetrance and age. BiCEBPA AML in children is likely a favorable-risk diagnosis as it is in adults, but the role of a single CEBPA mutation and the impact of concurrent leukemogenic mutations are not clear in this population. Laboratory evaluation of the CEBPA gene includes PCR-based fragment-length analysis, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing. Phenotypic analysis using multiparameter flow cytometry can also provide additional data in evaluating CEBPA, helping to assess for the likelihood of mutation presence.

Novel insights of acute myeloid leukemia with CEBPA deregulation: Heterogeneity dissection and re-stratification

Acute myeloid leukemia with bi-allelic CEBPA mutation was categorized as an independent disease entity with favorable prognosis, however, recent researches have revealed huge heterogeneity within this disease group, and for some patients, relapse remained a major cause of treatment failure. Further risk stratification is essentially needed. Here by reviewing the latest literature, we summarized the characteristics of CEBPA mutation profiles and clinical features, with a special intention of dissecting the heterogeneity within the seemingly homogeneous AML with bi-allelic CEBPA mutations. Specifically, non-classical CEBPA mutation, miscellaneous companion genetic aberrations and the presence of germline CEBPA mutation are three major sources of heterogeneity. Identifying these factors can help us predict patients at a higher risk of relapse, for whom aggressive treatment may be recommended. Novel therapeutic approaches regarding manipulating potentially druggable targets as well as the debate over post remission consolidation regimens has also been discussed.

Two Novel CEBPA Mutations in a Turkish Patient with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was first categorized in 1976 by French, American and British researchers, and divided into eight subgroups (M0 to M7), depending on the cytochemical or histological changes in the leukemic cells. The gene mutations of FLT3-ITD, CEBPA and NPM1 are the most common that cooperate together in the prognosis of AML. The CEBPA gene that is a hematopoietic transcription factor, is located on chromosome 19q13.11, and its prevalence is between 5.0 and 14.0% in AML. The patient was referred to our clinic suffering from menorrhagia, unplanned weight loss in a month and low platelet levels, and was diagnosed with AML on clinical and laboratory examination. Here, we report a patient carrying two novel pathogenic mutations that create a frameshift mutation on the CEBPA gene, c.940_941insCCGTCG TGGAGACGA CGAAGG and c.221_222delAC by Sanger sequencing methodology.

Secondary leukemia in patients with germline transcription factor mutations (RUNX1, GATA2, CEBPA)

Recognition that germline mutations can predispose individuals to blood cancers, often presenting as secondary leukemias, has largely been driven in the last 20 years by studies of families with inherited mutations in the myeloid transcription factors (TFs) RUNX1, GATA2, and CEBPA. As a result, in 2016, classification of myeloid neoplasms with germline predisposition for each of these and other genes was added to the World Health Organization guidelines. The incidence of germline mutation carriers in the general population or in various clinically presenting patient groups remains poorly defined for reasons including that somatic mutations in these genes are common in blood cancers, and our ability to distinguish germline (inherited or de novo) and somatic mutations is often limited by the laboratory analyses. Knowledge of the regulation of these TFs and their mutant alleles, their interaction with other genes and proteins and the environment, and how these alter the clinical presentation of patients and their leukemias is also incomplete. Outstanding questions that remain for patients with these germline mutations or their treating clinicians include: What is the natural course of the disease? What other symptoms may I develop and when? Can you predict them? Can I prevent them? and What is the best treatment? The resolution of many of the remaining clinical and biological questions and effective evidence-based treatment of patients with these inherited mutations will depend on worldwide partnerships among patients, clinicians, diagnosticians, and researchers to aggregate sufficient longitudinal clinical and laboratory data and integrate these data with model systems.