BM is preferred over PBSCs in transplantation from an HLA-matched related female donor to a male recipient

Superiority of BM over PBSC for recipients with pre-transplant lung dysfunction in HLA-matched allogeneic HCT

BACKGROUND AIMS

Pre-transplant lung dysfunction is known to be a risk factor for non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). It is unclear which cell source gives better outcomes for patients with pulmonary dysfunction.

METHODS

We analyzed 3289 adult patients with standard-risk disease who had received HLA-matched allo-HCT, and compared outcomes between those who received peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) vs. bone marrow (BM) in two cohorts based on the presence of a lung score by the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI): the Lung-scored (LS) and non-LS cohorts.

RESULTS

In the LS cohort, the 2-year overall survival (OS) in the BM group tended to be higher than that in the PBSC group (72.4% vs. 61.4%; P = 0.044). In the non-LS cohort, there was no significant difference between the two groups (71.7% vs. 73.2%; P = 0.13). Multivariate analyses confirmed that PBSC was significantly associated with inferior OS in the LS cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.54; P = 0.019). On the other hand, the cell source did not affect OS in the non-LS cohort (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.12; P = 0.41). We found that PBSC was associated with an increased risk of NRM in the LS cohort (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.16-4.05; P = 0.016), while the cell source did not significantly affect NRM in the non-LS cohort. PBSC was not identified as a risk factor for relapse in either cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that BM might be beneficial for recipients with lung dysfunction in HLA-matched allo-HCT.

Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematological malignancies in 6064 adults from 2003 to 2020: different impacts on survival according to time period

BACKGROUND

Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003-2008, 2009-2014, or 2015-2020).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020.

RESULTS

The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003-2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001) and the middle period of 2009-2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P < 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015-2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.13; P = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period.

CONCLUSIONS

PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015-2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.

Role of Endoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Complications of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Review of the Literature

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) implies that a donor and a recipient are not genetically identical. Allo-SCT is used to cure a variety of conditions, including hematologic malignancies using the graft versus tumor effect, nonmalignant hematologic, immune deficiencies, and, more recently, genetic disorders and inborn errors of metabolism. Given the immunosuppressive and myeloablative nature of some of the conditioning chemotherapy regimens used during the Allo-SCT, patients are often at high risk of infection, including viral infections affecting the gastrointestinal tract, following the transplant. Furthermore, other complications such as hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) or graft-versus-host disease may occur post-transplant and may require endoscopy to assist in the diagnosis. This review will provide newer insights into the importance of endoscopic techniques in the diagnosis of post-Allo-SCT complications with a focus on safety and timing.

[Unrelated donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

The selection of a donor is an essential element in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the absence of an HLA-matched related donor, the selection of an unrelated donor is considered, and is currently the most common type of allogenic donor used in practice. Many criteria are considered for the selection when multiple donors are available, particularly in case of partial match. The aim of this workshop is to assist in the selection of an unrelated donor, in keeping with recent data from the literature.

Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia: a propensity score analysis of a nationwide database

Bone marrow (BM) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are used as grafts from HLA-identical-related donors for adults with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). To assess the impact of graft sources on post-transplant outcomes in MDS patients, we conducted a retrospective analysis of a nationwide database. A total of 247 and 280 patients underwent transplantation with BM and PBSC, respectively. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methods revealed that overall survival (OS) was comparable between BM and PBSC (P = .129), but PBSC transplantation was associated with worse graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) (hazard rate [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.00-1.53; P = 0.049) and chronic GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (CRFS) (HR, 1.29; 95% CIs, 1.13-1.73; P = 0.002) than BM transplantation. In the propensity score matched cohort (BM, n = 216; PBSC, n = 216), no significant differences were observed in OS and relapse; 3-year OS rates were 64.7% and 60.0% (P = 0.107), while 3-year relapse rates were 27.1% and 23.5% (P = 0.255) in BM and PBSC, respectively. Three-year GRFS rates (36.6% vs. 29.2%; P = 0.006), CRFS rate (37.7% vs. 32.5%; P = 0.003), and non-relapse mortality rates (13.9% vs. 21.1%; P = 0.020) were better in BM than in PBSC. The present study showed that BM transplantation provides a comparable survival benefit with PBSC transplantation and did not identify an enhanced graft-versus-MDS effect to reduce the incidence of relapse in PBSC transplantation.

Comparison of Myeloablative (CyTBI, BuCy) versus Reduced-Intensity (FluBu2TBI400) Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Pretransplant Low WT1 Expression

Relapse is a major concern with reduced-intensity conditioning. We analyzed 257 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and fulfilled the following criteria: intermediate- or poor-risk disease by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (2017, version 3), in first complete remission (CR1) at SCT, received either myeloablative conditioning (MAC; busulfan plus cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; FluBu2TBI400) peripheral blood SCT from 8/8 matched sibling or unrelated donor, and having bone marrow Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) expression results before transplant. We and other groups serially published a predictive value for pretransplant WT1 expression in patients with AML to identify patients at higher risk of relapse. Among the total 257 patients, 191 (74.3%) and 66 (25.7%) patients received MAC and RIC transplants, respectively. WT1 ≥250 copies/104ABL was defined as WT1high. WT1high before SCT was found to be an independent prognostic factor for inferior overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). There were 201 patients with WT1 low expression based upon pretransplant analysis. There was no significant difference in OS, DFS, CIR, and nonrelapse mortality between MAC and RIC patients. To conclude, post-transplant survival or relapse was not different by conditioning intensity in AML CR1 patients whose WT1 level was below 250 copies per 104ABL at transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation efficacy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukemia (Ph+ AML) confers a dismal prognosis when treated with chemotherapy alone. Data on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) outcomes are limited. We retrospectively analyzed 4649 AML patients who received allo-HCT and were in complete remission. Outcomes of Ph+ AML (n = 30), intermediate-risk, and poor-risk AML patients were compared. The 3-year overall survival after allo-HCT was similar in intermediate-risk (62.7%; 95% CI: 61.0-64.3%) and Ph+ AML (73.3%; 95% CI: 51.5-86.4%) groups (P = 0.42); however, it differed significantly between the poor-risk (49.7%; 95% CI: 45.9-53.4%) and Ph+ AML (73.3%; 95% CI: 51.5-86.4%) groups (P = 0.049). Disease-free survival in Ph+ AML patients was comparable to that in intermediate-risk patients but better than that in poor-risk patients. Relapse rates were significantly lower in Ph+ AML patients than in other groups. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were similar among groups. Multivariate analysis showed that Ph+ AML was not a significant predictor of poor prognosis in terms of overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse, and NRM. Our data showed better post-transplant outcomes for Ph+ AML patients than for those with poor-risk AML. Hence, allo-HCT could be a feasible treatment option for Ph+ AML patients.

Sex and Gender Influences on Cancer Immunotherapy Response

The global burden of cancer is growing and a wide disparity in the incidence, malignancy and mortality of different types of cancer between each sex has been demonstrated. The sex specificity of cancer appears to be a relevant issue in the management of the disease, and studies investigating the role of sex and gender are becoming extremely urgent. Sex hormones are presumably the leading actors of sex differences in cancer, especially estrogens. They modulate gene expression, alter molecules and generate disparities in effectiveness and side effects of anticancer therapies. Recently immunotherapy aims to improve anticancer treatment strategies reducing off-target effects of chemotherapy and direct cancer cells killing. It is recognized as a fruitful strategy to treat and possible to cure cancer. Immunotherapeutic agents are used to activate or boost the activation of the immune system to fight cancer cells through physiological mechanisms often evaded in the offensive march of the disease. These therapeutic strategies have allowed new successes, but also have serious adverse effects including non-specific inflammation and autoimmunity. Sex and gender issues are of primary importance in this field, due to their recognized role in inflammation, immunity and cancer, and the clarification and understanding of these aspects is a necessary step to increase the responses and to diminish the adverse effects of immunotherapy. This review describes the available knowledge on the role of sex and gender in cancer immunotherapy, and will offer insights to stimulate the attention and practice of clinicians and researchers in a gender perspective of new cancer treatment strategies.