1
|
Friend R, Atrash S. Fragile Warriors: Navigating the Delicate Dance of Frailty and CAR-T cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:253-254. [PMID: 38485337 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Reed Friend
- Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.
| | - Shebli Atrash
- Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders, Levine Cancer Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DuMontier C, La J, Bihn J, Corrigan J, Yildirim C, Dharne M, Hassan H, Yellapragada S, Abel GA, Gaziano JM, Do NV, Brophy M, Kim DH, Munshi NC, Fillmore NR, Driver JA. More intensive therapy as more effective treatment for frail patients with multiple myeloma [corrected]. Blood Adv 2023; 7:6275-6284. [PMID: 37582048 PMCID: PMC10589796 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Although randomized controlled trial data suggest that the more intensive triplet bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd) is superior to the less intensive doublet lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), guidelines have historically recommended Rd over VRd for patients who are frail and may not tolerate a triplet. We identified 2573 patients (median age, 69.7 years) newly diagnosed with MM who were initiated on VRd (990) or Rd (1583) in the national US Veterans Affairs health care System from 2004 to 2020. We measured frailty using the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index. To reduce imbalance in confounding, we matched patients for MM stage and 1:1 based on a propensity score. Patients who were moderate-severely frail had a higher prevalence of stage III MM and myeloma-related frailty deficits than patients who were not frail. VRd vs Rd was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.94) in the overall matched population. Patients who were moderate-severely frail demonstrated the strongest association (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97), whereas the association weakened in those who were mildly frail (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61-1.05) and nonfrail (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.10). VRd vs Rd was associated with a modestly higher incidence of hospitalizations in the overall population, but this association weakened in patients who were moderate-severely frail. Our findings confirm the benefit of VRd over Rd in US veterans and further suggest that this benefit is strongest in patients with the highest levels of frailty, arguing that more intensive treatment of myeloma may be more effective treatment of frailty itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark DuMontier
- New England Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer La
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - John Bihn
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - June Corrigan
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Cenk Yildirim
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Mayuri Dharne
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Hamza Hassan
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Sarvari Yellapragada
- Debakey VA Medical Center and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Gregory A. Abel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Nhan V. Do
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Brophy
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Dae H. Kim
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Hebrew SeniorLife and Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA
| | - Nikhil C. Munshi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Veterans Affairs, Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Nathanael R. Fillmore
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jane A. Driver
- New England Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mian O, Puts M, McCurdy A, Wildes TM, Fiala MA, Kang M, Salib M, Alibhai S, Mian H. Decision-making factors for an autologous stem cell transplant for older adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A qualitative analysis. Front Oncol 2023; 12:974038. [PMID: 36776355 PMCID: PMC9911655 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.974038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose A utologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard of care among older adults (aged ≥65) with multiple myeloma (MM). However, heterogeneity in the eligibility and utilization of ASCT remains. We identified decision-making factors that influence ASCT eligibility and utilization among older adults with MM. Methods A qualitative study across two academic and two community centres in Ontario was conducted between July 2019-July 2020. Older adults with MM (newly diagnosed MM aged 65-75 in whom a decision had been made about ASCT in <12 months) and treating oncologists completed a baseline survey and a subsequent interview, which was analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Eighteen patients completed the survey and 9 follow-up interviews were conducted. Patients were happy with their treatment decision with "trust in their oncologist" and "wanting the best treatment" as the most important to proceed with ASCT. "Afraid of side effects" was the most common reason for declining ASCT. Fifteen oncologists completed the survey and 10 follow-up interviews were conducted. Most relied on the 'eye-ball' test for ASCT eligibility over geriatric screening tools. The lack of both high-quality evidence and local guidelines impacted decision-making. Both oncologists and patients felt that chronological age alone should not affect ASCT eligibility. Conclusion While decision-making factors regarding ASCT can be variable, both oncologists and patients indicated that chronological age alone should not represent a barrier for ASCT among older adults. Future simplification and incorporation of ASCT eligibility geriatric assessment tools in studies as well as the inclusion of these tools in local guidelines may further improve ASCT decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owais Mian
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arleigh McCurdy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Tanya M. Wildes
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Mark A. Fiala
- College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, United States,Department of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Matthew Kang
- Department of Oncology, Joseph Brant Hospital, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Salib
- Department of Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre St. Catherine’s General Hospital, St. Catherine, ON, Canada
| | - Shabbir Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network & University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hira Mian
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada,*Correspondence: Hira Mian,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hanamura I. Multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics and its treatment approach. Int J Hematol 2022; 115:762-777. [PMID: 35534749 PMCID: PMC9160142 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03353-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in anti-myeloma treatments, early recurrence and death remain an issue in certain subpopulations. Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) are the most widely accepted predictors for poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM), such as t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain/amp(1q21), del(1p), and del(17p). Co-existing high-risk CAs (HRCAs) tend to be associated with an even worse prognosis. Achievement of sustained minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity has recently emerged as a surrogate for longer survival, regardless of cytogenetic risk. Information from newer clinical trials suggests that extended intensified treatment can help achieve MRD-negativity in patients with HRCAs, which may lead to improved outcomes. Therapy should be considered to include a 3- or 4-drug induction regimen (PI/IMiD/Dex or PI/IMiD/Dex/anti-CD38 antibody), auto-transplantation, and consolidation/maintenance with lenalidomide ± a PI. Results from ongoing clinical trials for enriched high-risk populations will reveal the precise efficacy of the investigated regimens. Genetic abnormalities of MM cells are intrinsic critical factors determining tumor characteristics, which reflect the natural course and drug sensitivity of the disease. This paper reviews the clinicopathological features of genomic abnormalities related to adverse prognosis, focusing on HRCAs that are the most relevant in clinical practice, and outline current optimal therapeutic approaches for newly diagnosed MM with HRCAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ichiro Hanamura
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, 1 Karimata, Yazako, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|