Evaluation of impulse oscillation system: comparison with forced oscillation technique and body plethysmography

The application of impulse oscillometry system based on machine learning algorithm in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Objective. Diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using impulse oscillometry (IOS) is challenging due to the high level of clinical expertise it demands from doctors, which limits the clinical application of IOS in screening. The primary aim of this study is to develop a COPD diagnostic model based on machine learning algorithms using IOS test results.Approach. Feature selection was conducted to identify the optimal subset of features from the original feature set, which significantly enhanced the classifier's performance. Additionally, secondary features area of reactance (AX) were derived from the original features based on clinical theory, further enhancing the performance of the classifier. The performance of the model was analyzed and validated using various classifiers and hyperparameter settings to identify the optimal classifier. We collected 528 clinical data examples from the China-Japan Friendship Hospital for training and validating the model.Main results. The proposed model achieved reasonably accurate diagnostic results in the clinical data (accuracy = 0.920, specificity = 0.941, precision = 0.875, recall = 0.875).Significance. The results of this study demonstrate that the proposed classifier model, feature selection method, and derived secondary feature AX provide significant auxiliary support in reducing the requirement for clinical experience in COPD diagnosis using IOS.

Effect of Doxofylline on Reducing the Inflammatory Response in Mechanically Ventilated Rats with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Objective

To evaluate the effect of doxofylline on reducing the inflammatory response in mechanically ventilated rats with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

A total of 40 eight-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups of 10 rats each: a control group (group C), a model group (group M), a model + natural saline group (group N), and a doxofylline group (group D). Then mechanical ventilation, drug intervention, and the extraction of the experimental material were performed in each group. Pulmonary tissue samples were taken after 120 minutes of mechanical ventilation and the pulmonary histopathological changes and the wet/dry (W/D) weight ratio of the pulmonary tissue were identified. The levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 10 (IL-10) were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the expression levels of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (p-JNK) were detected using immunohistochemistry.

Results

Compared with group C, the pulmonary histopathology in groups M, N, and D showed typical changes associated with COPD. Furthermore, the W/D weight ratio and levels of TNF-α, JNK, and p-JNK in the pulmonary tissue increased in groups M, N, and D (P < 0.05), while the levels of IL-10 decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with group M, no statistically significant changes in the above indicators were detected in the pulmonary tissue of group N (P > 0.05). Compared with group N, the W/D weight ratio and levels of TNF-α, JNK, and p-JNK in the pulmonary tissue decreased in group D (P < 0.05), while the levels of IL-10 increased (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Doxofylline might attenuate pulmonary inflammatory responses in mechanically ventilated rats with COPD, and the JNK/stress-activated protein kinase signaling pathway is involved in doxofylline’s inhibition of inflammatory responses in the pulmonary tissue of rats with COPD.

Impulse oscillometry and spirometry exhibit different features of lung function in bronchodilation

OBJECTIVE

Bronchodilator responses (BDRs) from impulse oscillometry (IOS) are not interchangeable with those from spirometry. We aimed to identify the characteristics of children with small airway hyperresponsiveness and to determine whether BDR from IOS provides an important supplement to BDR from spirometry.

METHODS

The records of 592 children with asthma or suspected asthma who underwent spirometric and oscillometric BDRs were retrospectively reviewed. Oscillometric BDR was defined as positive when relative or absolute changes of Rrs₅ or Xrs₅ were beyond two standard deviations and spirometric BDR as positive when absolute change of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) was ≥12%. Subjects were classified as positive for spirometric BDR only, positive for oscillometric BDR only, positive for both BDRs, or negative for both BDRs.

RESULTS

The results indicated that 101 (17.6%) subjects were positive for spirometric BDR only, 49 (8.5%) positive for oscillometric BDR only, 48 (8.3%) positive for both BDRs, and 377 (65.6%) negative for both BDRs. The agreement between spirometric and oscillometric BDRs was poor. Baseline FEV₁, Rrs₅, and Xrs₅ values strongly influenced the BDRs. Subjects positive for oscillometric BDR only were found to be younger than those positive for spirometric BDR only (P < 0.001). Subjects positive for both BDRs were more likely to have asthma, atopic dermatitis, wheezing apart from cold, or decreased baseline lung function relative to those positive in either test (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a low concordance between spirometric and oscillometric BDRs. Use of IOS to detect small airway hyperresponsiveness may add more information about a clinical profile of subjects with asthma.

Effects of combination therapy indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium on moderate to severe COPD: evaluation of impulse oscillometry and exacerbation rate

BACKGROUND

Small airways are considered the major site of airflow limitation in COPD. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a forced oscillation technique, which provides passive measurement of lung mechanics. It can differentiate small airway from large airway obstruction and is more sensitive than spirometry for peripheral airway disease. In this study the efficacy of the combination of Indacaterol/Glycopirronium (IND/GLY) versus Tiotropium on airway resistance (R5, R20, R5-20), lung reactance (X) and resonant frequency in moderate to severe COPD patients has been evaluated. We also evaluated inspiratory capacity (IC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), exacerbation rate and quality of life.

METHODS

Forty patients were monitored with forced oscillation technique and spirometry. Patients were randomized in 2 groups: 20 received fixed dose once daily Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium (Group A) and 20 received single Tiotropium (Group B). The oscillometry parameters were the measure of resistance in the airways at 5 Hz (R5), at 20 Hz (R20) and the lung reactance (X).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between pre-dosing at V₁ and at follow up visits in R₅, R₂₀ and X values in patients receiving dual bronchodilation but not in control group. Pre-dosing IC value at follow up visits in patients receiving dual bronchodilation had a statistical significant variation.

CONCLUSIONS

The "new" bronchodilator combination LABA/LAMA significantly reduces bronchial obstruction in small airways too. The oscillometry demonstrated greater sensitivity compared with spirometry for monitoring outcome measures of airway obstruction and the effect of long-term therapy.

Comparison of changes in lung function measured by plethymography and IOS after bronchoprovocation

AIM

Lung function tests are essential for the diagnosis and management of bronchial asthma. Impulse oscillation (IOS) system is an alternative way to measure lung mechanics for some patients. We investigated the relative sensitivities of IOS, body plethysmography and spirometry in detecting allergen- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHOD

Twenty-two subjects had single allergen inhalation and 8 subjects had 3 methacholine challenges. The tests were stopped when FEV1 fell by 20%. Lung function was measured using IOS (R5, R20, R5-R20, X5, AX, fres), plethysmography (sRaw, sGaw, FRC, lung volumes) and spirometry (FEV1, FVC, PEF, FEF50%) during inhalation challenges, and expressed as percent change from pre-challenge baseline.

RESULTS

All subjects were non-smoking adults with mild allergic asthma. Following allergen challenges, the most sensitive IOS index was R5-R20 and the most sensitive plethysmography and spirometry measurements were sRaw, sGaw and FEF50%. Following methacholine challenge the most sensitive IOS index was AX, the most sensitive plethysmography measurement was sRaw. Overall, IOS (R5-R20, AX, X5Hz) proved to be more sensitive than plethysmography and spirometry measurements following allergen-induced and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.

CONCLUSION

Our result shows that IOS is more sensitive than other lung function tests following allergen and methacholine challenge. In addition, IOS can act as an alternative measurement technique of airway resistance and obstruction in patients where manoeuvres involved in plethysmography and spirometry prove difficult to perform.

Comparison of bronchodilator response in patients with asthma and healthy subjects using spirometry and oscillometry

BACKGROUND

Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is an effort-independent and patient-friendly pulmonary function technique, but limited data are available that correlate the bronchodilator response using spirometry and IOS in adult asthmatic and healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare spirometry and IOS in ongoing bronchodilator response.

METHODS

The study was a prospective evaluation of patients with asthma and healthy subjects attending screening at a research unit in a university teaching hospital. Reversibility testing was carried out using standardized American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria after administering 400 μg salbutamol by AccuhalerTM. Impulse oscillometry measurements (resistance at 5 Hz [R5], resistance at 20 Hz [R20], reactance at 5 Hz [X5]) and spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)], forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory flow from 25% to 75% of vital capacity [FEF(25-75)]) were recorded pre and postbronchodilator.

RESULTS

Ninety-five asthmatic and 61 healthy subjects underwent screening. Mean percent (standard error of the mean [SEM]) baseline prebronchodilator FEV(1) was 83.99 (2.23) for patients with asthma, and 99.25 (1.72) for healthy subjects. Baseline percent predicted IOS indices in the group with asthma were 162.22 (7.5) for R5; 154.73 (4.71) for R20; and 441.72 (173.86) for X5. In healthy volunteers, corresponding values were 111.01 (3.96), 127.75 (4.12), and -229.80 (125.75). R5 was the only IOS measure that showed correlation with spirometry (FEV(1)) in both groups. The mean percent (SEM) predicted postbronchodilator change in FEV(1) and R5 in patients with asthma was 6.35 (0.65) and -33.78 (4.43); correspondingly in healthy subjects it was 2.24 (0.32) and -14.91 (2.48). A negative correlation was demonstrated (r = -0.40, P < .001 between the 2 indices in patients with asthma. Linear regression modeling demonstrated that 1 unit change in %FEV(1) corresponds to a 2.5% change in %R5.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-frequency IOS as R5 and spirometry as FEV(1) correlate in patients with asthma and healthy subjects, with changes that can be predicted by linear regression.

A comparison of plethysmography, spirometry and oscillometry for assessing the pulmonary effects of inhaled ipratropium bromide in healthy subjects and patients with asthma

AIMS

We have compared the ability of plethysmography (sGaw), impulse oscillometry (IOS) and spirometry (FEV(1), MMEF) to detect bronchodilation in response to an anticholinergic.

METHODS

IOS (R5, R20, X5, RF), sGaw and spirometry were measured in 12 healthy subjects and 12 asthmatics. Variability was assessed by performing two measurements, 30 min apart and the effect of increasing the number of readings for each sGaw measurement was also studied. Ipratropium bromide (IB) 10, 20, 100 and 200 microg was administered and the sensitivity of the methods compared by determining the lowest dose that caused changes greater than variability.

RESULTS

In healthy subjects significant changes (P < or = 0.05) occurred at 10 microg for FEV(1) (mean [95% CI]; 1.3%[0.3-2.3]), R5 (mean [95% CI]; -7.9%, [-13.2-2.6]) and R20 (mean [95% CI], -6.4%, [-11.4-1.4]). No significant change was detected when the mean of 3 sGaw readings was used, but with 10 readings significant change was observed at 20 microg; (mean increase [95% CI] 15.2%[8.3-22.1]). In asthmatics significant changes (P < or = 0.05) occurred with IB 10 microg for sGaw (mean [95% CI] 25.6%[11.1-40.1]), R5 (mean [95% CI]-11.3%, [-15.5-7.2]), RF (mean [95% CI] 11.7%[6.1-16.3]), FEV(1) (mean [95% CI] 5.1%[2.6-7.7]) and MMEF (mean [95% CI] 12.3%[2.3-22.2]).

CONCLUSION

IOS and spirometry are more sensitive than sGaw in healthy subjects, but the sensitivity of sGaw improved when the number of readings was increased. The most sensitive method for assessing bronchodilation in asthmatics was sGaw.

A comparison of lung function methods for assessing dose-response effects of salbutamol

Pulmonary function methods which are able to detect small pharmacological effects may be useful for assessing the full dose-response curve of bronchodilatators. We compared the ability of impulse oscillometry (R5, R20, X5, RF), plethysmography (sGaw) and spirometry [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), maximal mid expiratory flow rate (MMEF)] to measure the dose-response effects of salbutamol in 12 healthy subjects, 12 mild asthmatics (mean FEV(1) 96% predicted) and 12 moderate asthmatics (mean FEV(1) 63% predicted). The techniques were performed twice to assess variability. Then salbutamol 10, 20, 100, 200 and 800 microg was administered. The sensitivity of the methods were compared by determining the lowest dose that caused changes greater than variability. In healthy subjects significant changes (p < or = 0.05) were observed only in FEV(1) (4.1%) and MMEF (14.6%) at 100 microg and sGaw (25.6%) and R20 (8.3%) at 200 microg. In mild asthmatics significant changes were observed in sGaw (15.9%) at 10 microg, X5 (23%), RF (20.3%) and MMEF (15.7%) at 20 microg, R5 (13.9%) and R20 (9.4%) at 100 microg and FEV(1) (7.1%) at 200 microg. All measurements except R20 demonstrated significant changes at 10 micro g in moderate asthmatics. The most sensitive test for assessing bronchodilatation is different in healthy subjects and asthmatics, and varies with severity of airflow obstruction.