Environmental control: an idea whose time has come

Environmental factors relevant to difficult asthma

Symptom persistence in difficult asthmatics may be related to their home environment. If sensitised asthmatics are to benefit from indoor allergen avoidance measures, these must be rigorous and drug adherence satisfactory. This is difficult for many families. The relationship between traffic pollution, asthma diagnosis and symptom severity is persuasive but requires objective validation. Overall, it seems that house dust mite control and tobacco smoke avoidance are important for asthmatics and advice about how to avoid these adverse factors must be given. Whether these measures are effective in difficult asthmatics and whether moving house makes any difference is unknown.

Is primary prevention of asthma possible?

The increased prevalence of asthma over the past quarter century has become a major public health problem for the industrialized world. Asthma is a disease process which has a strong heritable component which is impacted by multiple environmental factors. Given the rapid increase in asthma prevalence, it is difficult to ascribe the change to a genetic alteration. Therefore, the focus for understanding the changing prevalence of asthma must be on environmental factors. This article reviews factors which may contribute, in whole or in part, to the development of the disease process. In questioning whether it is possible to prevent development of a disease (primary prevention), it is critical to understand these factors. The environment may even have an impact on the fetus during intrauterine life. There does appear to be a "window of opportunity" in early life where a variety of factors, including food and inhalant allergen exposure, exposure to pollutants, and infection with both viral and bacterial agents, may be important in initiating the development of asthma and allergy. Potential approaches to primary prevention of asthma and allergy must consider each of these important factors. Given that asthma is a multifactorial disease with both complex genetic and environmental components, it is unlikely that any single intervention will significantly decrease the prevalence of asthma.

Methods and effectiveness of environmental control

In recent years the role of allergen exposure and atopy, and the interaction between them in the clinical expression of allergic disease, has been examined in a quantitative manner in epidemiologic studies. Such analyses suggest that avoidance of exposure to domestic allergens is a critical element in integrated strategies for both the prevention and the management of asthma. The promise of primary intervention in high-risk infants, as shown in the Isle of White study, has been confirmed in a recent study in Japan, and at least 4 similar trials are in progress. Applying these principles to the management of symptoms in patients with chronic asthma has proved more difficult, and it is likely that many earlier studies were poorly designed to test the hypothesis that allergen avoidance was clinically useful. Recent studies with patients moved to high altitudes during seasonal reductions in mite exposure and randomized controlled interventions in houses have all shown improvements in clinical manifestations of asthma. These recent trials have also demonstrated something that was less certain-that massive reductions in domestic allergen exposure can be achieved and that people will adopt the significant changes to their domestic environment and lifestyles if the risks and benefits are known. In the future, it seems likely that better study designs, as well as improvements in methods to monitor exposure and clinical outcomes, will provide further support for the role of allergen avoidance in the prevention and management of asthma.