Long-term effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic airway obstruction

Exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life 6 months after exercise-based rehabilitation in patients with persistent dyspnea following pulmonary embolism

Background

Exercise is safe and effective in the short-term following pulmonary embolism. To date, little is known about the long-term effects.

Objectives

The aim of the study was to investigate whether the effects of exercise-based rehabilitation are maintained 6 months after completion in patients with persistent dyspnea following pulmonary embolism when compared with usual care.

Methods

A 2-center, randomized controlled trial compared 8 weeks of exercise-based rehabilitation with usual care. Patients were reassessed postintervention and 6 months later. Exercise capacity was measured with the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT). Dyspnea was assessed with the Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, and health-related quality of life was assessed with disease-specific (Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life Questionnaire) and generic questionnaires.

Results

In total, 159 of 211 randomized patients attended follow-up 6 months postintervention. The significant improvement on the ISWT in the rehabilitation group was maintained at the 6-month follow-up (96 m; SE: 15 m; 95% CI: 66, 127). There were no changes on the ISWT in the control group at either time point. From postintervention to 6×-month follow-up, the rehabilitation group had further improvements in dyspnea compared with the control group (-3 points; SE: 1.4; 95% CI: -6, -1; P = .02). Health-related quality of life improved in both groups although superior improvements were seen in the rehabilitation group.

Conclusion

The improvement in exercise capacity after 8 weeks of exercise-based rehabilitation in patients with pulmonary embolism and persistent dyspnea was maintained at the 6-month follow-up, while no improvement was observed in the control group, highlighting the relevance of offering rehabilitation to these patients.

[Psychosocial traits associated with maintenance of physical activity 12months after a pulmonary rehabilitation program - An exploratory study]

INTRODUCTION

After a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program, 30 to 70% of patients fail to pursue maintenance of physical activity. This study aimed to identify psychosocial markers associated with MPA subsequent to an initial outpatient PR course (≥10 sessions).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in an exploratory quantitative monocentric retrospective study. Clinical data were extracted from the PR center database. Psychosocial data were collected by a postal questionnaire. A telephone interview assessed maintenance of physical activity at 12months, which was defined as self-reported physical activity≥30min,≥2 times per week.

RESULTS

Among 134 patients (age 67years [31-88], 88% COPD, FEV1 55% [25-103]), 95 (71%) reported maintenance of physical activity at 12months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that compared with subjects without maintenance of physical activity, those with the latter: (1) reported greater self-efficacy and internal locus of control, (2) considered their health status as less severe and (3) resided closer to the PR center.

CONCLUSION

Patient-declared self-efficacy and locus of control internalization were independently associated with maintenance of physical activity 12months after an initial PR program.

Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplant candidates with pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) guidelines support the efficacy and safety of supervised exercise training in mild-moderate pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, the exercise training response and safety of PR in PAH lung transplant (LTx) candidates has not been described.

OBJECTIVES

(1) characterize the clinical characteristics and illness trajectory of adult patients with severe PAH listed for LTx and participating in PR; (2) evaluate the change in exercise capacity, aerobic and resistance training volumes; (3) assess PR safety.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective cohort study of PAH LTx candidates listed January 2014-December 2018 attending a supervised, facility-based outpatient program three times per week. Functional capacity was evaluated using 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Aerobic and muscle training volumes were evaluated with paired comparisons.

RESULTS

40 PAH LTx candidates (age 50 ± 12 years, 73% females, mean pulmonary artery pressure 53 ± 16 mmHg) were included. The median listing duration was 91 [IQR 43-232] days. Sixteen patients (40%) had ≥1 admission pre-transplant. Nine patients (56%) were discharged home and resumed outpatient PR. Baseline 6MWD was 330 ± 119 metres (n = 40) with the final 6MWD pre-LTx increasing by 18 metres 95% CI (-18 to 56), p-value = 0.31, n = 25) over a median duration of 225 [IQR 70-311] days. Modest gains were observed in aerobic and resistance training volumes in PR with no adverse safety events.

CONCLUSION

Despite progressive and severe disease in PAH LTx candidates, patients safely participated in PR and maintained exercise capacity. Given frequent admissions, physiotherapy during hospitalization should focus on preserving functional capacity and facilitating re-integration into outpatient PR post-discharge.

Insights into Digital MedicRehApp Maintenance Model for Pulmonary Telerehabilitation: Observational Study

Maintenance strategies after center-based pulmonary rehabilitation (CBPR) are currently needed. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effect on the quality of life of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) program delivered by a digital app. As secondary objectives, the patients' adherence, symptoms, effort tolerance changes, and safety were evaluated. This was a single-arm prospective observational monocentric study on 30 patients referred for chronic respiratory diseases. The prescription and evaluations of the HBPR programs performed at the pulmonary facility and delivery of structured exercise and counselling by the digital health tool were achieved under the supervision of a respiratory therapist. Digital capabilities included aerobic, strength, and respiratory exercises, which were monitored with a fitness tracker. The engagement rate of the HBPR after the CBPR was 1:10. The EuroQoL VAS score increased from 66.2 ± 16.28 to 75.60 ± 16.07 (p < 0.001), mainly in younger subjects. No patient was lost during the HBPR program. The global adherence session rate was 94%. The Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (MRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) improved from admission into the pulmonary unit to the end of the HBPR program. Between the beginning and end of the CBPR, the CAT score decreased from 14.4 ± 6.39 to 8.50 ± 5.39 (p < 0.001), the MRC decreased from 1.87 ± 0.9 to 1.17 ± 0.83 (p < 0.001), and the 6MWT increased from 451 ± 93 to 473 ± 115 m (p < 0.05). The average Technology Acceptance Model score for usability was high (145 ± 12.1) and no adverse events occurred during the HBPR program. This HBPR model seemed to be feasible and well-accepted by patients, leading to improvements in quality of life, symptoms, and functional capacity.

Sustaining training effects through physical activity coaching (STEP): a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs improve physical fitness, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of patients with COPD. However, improved physical activity (PA) is not guaranteed after PR and the clinical benefits fade off after PR discharge. We aimed to investigate whether a 9 months PA-telecoaching program is able to improve PA of patients with COPD, after 3 months of PR and if this leads to maintenance of PR-acquired benefits.

METHODS

Patients with COPD enrolled in a 6-month PR program were randomized to a (semi-automated) PA-telecoaching program or usual care, 3 months after PR initiation. The intervention consisted of a smartphone application with individual targets and feedback (for 6 months) and self-monitoring with a step counter (for 9 months). Patients were followed up for 9 months after randomization. Primary outcome was PA (daily step count by accelerometery), secondary outcomes were exercise tolerance, quadriceps force, dyspnea and QoL.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included (mean ± SD: 65 ± 7 years, FEV1 49 ± 19%, 6MWD 506 ± 75 m, PA 5225 ± 2646 steps/day). The intervention group presented a significant improvement in steps/day at every visit compared to usual care (between-group differences mean ± SE: 1431 ± 555 steps/day at 9 months after randomization, p = 0.01). Secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The semi-automated PA-telecoaching program implemented after 3 months of PR was effective to improve the amount of PA (steps/day) during PR and after follow-up. However, this was not accompanied by the maintenance of other PR-acquired benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02702791. Retrospectively registered on March 9, 2016. Start study October 2015. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02702791?term=NCT02702791&draw=2&rank=1 .

Long-term efficiency of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, and asthma: Does it differ?

BACKGROUND

The long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and maintenance programs in obstructive pulmonary diseases have not been sufficiently investigated, particularly in diseases other than COPD. This retrospective study aimed to examine the long-term results of individualized comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHODS

This study is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Between 2010 and 2019, 269 patients with chronic airway obstruction were treated in our multidisciplinary PR center at a tertiary training and research hospital, and they were divided into three groups based on their diagnosis: COPD, bronchiectasis, and asthma. Patients' perceptions of dyspnea, exercise capacity, inspiratory and peripheral muscle strength, body composition, quality of life, and psychosocial status were compared at the beginning, end, and 12th and 24th months of PR.

RESULTS

Improvements in dyspnea perception remained longer in asthmatics than in the other two groups. The increases in exercisecapacity in the bronchiectasis and asthma groups lasted two years. All groups maintained their respiratory muscle strength gains at the end of the second year. Improvements in hand grip strength in the COPD and bronchiectasis groups have been sustained for two years, but in the asthma group, enhancements were lost in the second year. Even after the second year, quality of life was still better than the baseline in all groups, despite a worsening in the first year. However, groups anxiety and depression improvements were not sustained after the first year.

DISCUSSION

The long-term effectiveness of PR in patients with bronchiectasis and asthma was similar to that of COPD patients. Therefore,multidisciplinary, comprehensive PR programs should be integrated into the management of patients with bronchiectasis and asthma. We also recommend structured follow-up programs to maintain gains and to detect the need for rerehabilitation.

[The role of the physiotherapist in the assessment and management of dyspnea]

The role of the physiotherapist in the assessment and management of dyspnea. Dyspnea is the most common symptom in cardio-respiratory diseases. Recently improved comprehension of dyspnea mechanisms have underlined the need for three-faceted assessment. The three key aspects correspond to the "breathing, thinking, functioning" clinical model, which proposes a multidimensional - respiratory, emotional and functional - approach. Before initiating treatment, it is essential for several reasons to assess each specific case, determining the type of dyspnea affecting the patient, appraising the impact of shortness of breath, and estimating the effectiveness of the treatment applied. The physiotherapist has a major role to assume in the care of dyspneic patients, not only in assessment followed by treatment but also as a major collaborator in a multidisciplinary team, especially with regard to pulmonary rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to inventory the existing assessment tools and the possible physiotherapies for dyspnea, using a holistic approach designed to facilitate the choice of techniques and to improve quality of care by fully addressing the patient's needs.

Physical training in adults with asthma: An integrative approach on strategies, mechanisms, and benefits

Asthma is a chronic airway disease characterized by airflow limitation and respiratory symptoms associated with chronic airway and systemic inflammation, bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Asthma is a heterogeneous disease classified according to distinct airway and systemic inflammation. Patients commonly present with several comorbidities, including anxiety, depression, poor sleep quality, and reduced physical activity levels. Individuals with moderate to severe asthma often have more symptoms and difficulty achieving adequate clinical control, which is associated with poor quality of life, despite proper pharmacological treatment. Physical training has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy for asthma. Initially, it was suggested that the effect of physical training might be attributed to the improved oxidative capacity and reduced production of exercise metabolites. However, in the last decade, there has been evidence that aerobic physical training promotes anti-inflammatory effects in asthma patients. Physical training improves BHR and EIB, asthma symptoms, clinical control, anxiety, and depression levels, sleep quality, lung function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea perception. Furthermore, physical training reduces medication consumption. The most commonly used exercise strategies are moderate aerobic and breathing exercises; however, other techniques, such as high-intensity interval training, have shown promising effects. In the present study, we reviewed the strategies and beneficial effects of exercise on clinical and pathophysiological asthma outcomes.

Frailty Impact during and after Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Frailty is a condition of reduced physiologic reserve common in COPD candidates to pulmonary rehabilitation, however no study has investigated whether frailty impacts the decline that a great part of COPD patients face after the completion of the rehabilitation program. Study objectives are to verify frailty impact on pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes during and after the program. This is a secondary analysis of a longitudinal study. Stable COPD patients GOLD I-III were randomized to a three-month endurance versus endurance and resistance training. Participants performed a multidimensional assessment at baseline, at the end of the rehabilitation program and after six months. Frailty was defined using a two-step approach including PRISMA-7 and Timed "Up and Go" test. Frailty interaction with time was evaluated using generalized least-squared regression models for repeated measures, correcting for potential confounders. Of the 53 participants with a mean age of 73 (SD:8) years 38 (72%) were frail. The mean 6MWD and V'O2_peak increased in frail and no frail patients during pulmonary rehabilitation and declined after its completion, while CAT score showed a steep decline during the training, and a mild decline later. Frailty showed a significant interaction with time in terms of 6MWD variation during (β adj:43.6 meters, p-value:0.01) and after (β adj:-47 meters, p-value:0.02) pulmonary rehabilitation; no significant interaction was found in terms of V'O2_peak and CAT score variation. In conclusion, frail COPD patients have a higher potential to benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation, but a higher risk to have a steeper decline later.Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2021.1967915 .

Secondary and Tertiary Prevention: Medical Rehabilitation

Allergies are a major public health burden, and targeted measures are required in terms of prevention and treatment. The most common allergic conditions encompass atopic dermatitis (AD), food allergy (FA), allergic asthma (AA), and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (AR). Primary prevention aims at preventing the onset of allergic disease, before the disease process begins. Secondary prevention aims at preventing progression and exacerbation of allergic disease whereas tertiary prevention aims at reducing disease burden in patients with established disease, by allergen immunotherapy (AIT) or medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation programs are used for treatment of AA and AD and usually consist of extensive patient assessment, optimization of treatment management, patient education, and behavioral interventions, ideally involving a multidisciplinary treatment team and sometimes provided in a specific climate, usually alpine or maritime. Similarly, prevention of occupational skin diseases requires interdisciplinary approaches on the level of secondary and tertiary preventive intervention; if this is provided, then prevention programs have proven highly (cost-) effective. Unfortunately, the recently published Minimal Standards of Prevention of these dermatoses, underlining especially the importance of meticulous allergological diagnosis and subsequent multidisciplinary patient education, are so far being adhered to only in very few European countries.

Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with interstitial lung diseases: Correlates of success

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD) have been reported. The aim of this large multicenter study was to identify the success predictors of pulmonary rehabilitation in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Data of 240 in-patients (110 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 106 ILD other than IPF and 24 undetermined ILD) undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation in a 10-year period were retrospectively evaluated. Six minute walking distance (6MWT), body weight-walking distance product tests, dyspnoea and arterial blood gases were assessed at admission and discharge. Differences in post rehabilitation changes in outcome measures as function of baseline characteristics were evaluated.

RESULTS

After rehabilitation, patients showed improvements in all outcome measures (p < 0.05), regardless of the underlying diagnosis or disease severity. Patients needing oxygen therapy at rest showed reduced benefits. Baseline 6MWD inversely correlated with its changes at discharge. Non-significant greater benefits after rehabilitation were found in IPF patients under antifibrotic therapy. In a subset of 50 patients assessed on average 10.3 ± 3.5 months after discharge, the benefits in 6MWD were not maintained (312.9 ± 139.4, 369.7 ± 122.5 and 310.8 ± 139.6 m at admission, discharge and follow up respectively: p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary rehabilitation may improve dyspnoea, exercise capacity and fatigue in patients with ILD of different aethiologies and level of severity. The long-term effects need to be established.

Randomized controlled trial of community-based, post-rehabilitation exercise in COPD

PURPOSE

Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves function in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a community-based exercise program may be necessary to maintain functional capacity. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of a post-rehabilitation, community-based maintenance program on exercise tolerance, functional capacity and quality of life.

METHODS

Patients with COPD who completed PR were randomized to receive a community-based maintenance program (intervention) or usual care (control). The primary outcome was 6-min walk distance (6MWD), measured immediately post-PR, 6 months and 12 months later. Secondary outcomes included self-reported functional capacity, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, program cost, and lower extremity muscle strength.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients (69 ± 9 years) were enrolled. There was a non-significant trend of an intervention effect on 6MWD over time (β = 42, 95% CI: 0.06 to 83.93, p = 0.053). There was no significant impact of group on any of the secondary outcomes. Restricting the analysis to those who attended ≥50% of the exercise sessions showed a significant intervention effect for 6MWD (β = 69.19, 95% CI = 10.16 to 128.22, p = 0.03). The cost of participating in the community maintenance program for the intervention group was $374.77 (SD 142.12) and membership renewal was highest at community centres offering twice weekly, supervised exercise classes.

CONCLUSIONS

A post rehabilitation, community-based exercise program, will maintain exercise capacity in people with COPD who attend at least 50% of available sessions over one year. An increased focus on factors that determine adherence would help inform improvements in maintenance program design.

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological COPD management on health-related quality of life - a systematic review

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of mortality worldwide. The chronic progressive disease is accompanied by a high loss of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The available drugs usually only have symptomatic effects; therefore, non-pharmacological therapies are essential too.Areas covered: This systematic review examines non-pharmacological interventions consisting of pulmonary rehabilitation, physical activity, and training versus usual care or no intervention in COPD using at least one of the following HRQoL measuring instruments: St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, Clinical COPD Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and EuroQol-5D. Of 1532 identified records from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, 15 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs were investigated in nine studies, education and counseling-based training programs in three studies, and breathing exercises in three studies. Ten studies were found that investigated non-pharmacological treatment programs that led to a significant and clinically relevant improvement in HRQoL compared with usual care or no treatment.Expert opinion: Non-pharmacological interventions consisting of pulmonary rehabilitation, education and counseling-based training programs, and breathing exercises can improve the HRQoL of COPD patients.

Are the Effects of High-Intensity Exercise Training Different in Patients with COPD Versus COPD+Asthma Overlap?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presenting asthma overlap (ACO) benefit similarly in comparison to patients with only COPD after a 12-week high-intensity exercise training (ET) program.

METHODS

Subjects with a diagnosis of COPD alone or ACO were evaluated and compared before and after a high-intensity ET program composed of walking and cycling plus strengthening exercises of the upper and lower limbs (3 days/week, 3 months, 36 sessions). Assessments included spirometry, bioelectrical impedance, 6-min walk test (6MWT), London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL), Hospital anxiety and depression Scale, modified Medical Research Council Scale (mMRC), Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength [manovacuometry and 1-repetition maximum test (quadriceps femoris, biceps and triceps brachialis), respectively]. ACO was defined according to Sin et al. (Eur Respir J 48(3):664-673, 2016).

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 74 subjects (57% male, age 67 ± 8 years, BMI 26 (21-32) kg/m², FEV₁ 47 ± 17%predicted), and 12 (16%) of them were classified as presenting ACO. Both groups improved pulmonary function, 6MWT, peripheral and inspiratory muscle strength, LCADL, and SGRQ after ET (p < 0.005 for all). There were no significant interactions between ACO and COPD on ET effects (p > 0.05 for all). Likewise, there was no difference in the proportion of patients achieving the minimum clinical important difference for 6MWT and mMRC.

CONCLUSION

High-intensity exercise training generates similar benefits in patients with COPD regardless of whether presenting asthma overlap or not.

[Assessment of the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on sexual activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects life quality, and also sexual activity. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a helpful treatment in COPD patients. The aim of this study is to assess sexual activity on COPD patients, and the effect of PR over it.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single cohort prospective study over male COPD candidates to PR. Clinical, respiratory and biochemical assessment (FSH, LH, T, and progesterone) was performed. Patients were asked to fill baseline International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and 6 months after PR. A descriptive initial analysis compared respiratory values between patients with and without sexual activity. Changes in IIEF results were assessed after PR, and satisfaction with treatment using Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS).

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2016, 62 male COPD patients enlisted. Mean age: 66.5 years (SD 7.2). 52 Ex-smokers. 10 declared being sexually active (16.1%). No hormonal levels alterations. No significant differences on respiratory parameters between sexually active and non-active patients (FEV1, 6-minutes walking test, number of exacerbations, CAT score). Baseline mean IIEF values: Erectile function 8, orgasmic function 4, sexual desire 5.6, intercourse satisfaction 5.3, and overall satisfaction 4.5. After PR, significant increase in mean IIEF value: 6.1 (CI95% 1.9-10.3). Improvement was found in all domains, with statistical significance on intercourse satisfaction 0.9 (CI95% 0.2-1.6). Moderate satisfaction with treatment was achieved according to EDITS.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a low percentage of COPD males included in PR is sexually active. No pulmonary differences were found between sexually active and non-active patients. PR improves sexual function, particularly intercourse satisfaction domain.

In Which the Gain is more from Pulmonary Rehabilitation? Asthma or COPD?

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is useful for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but not clear for patients with asthma. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PR in patients with asthma by comparing patients with COPD. The study was designed as a retrospective case series. We recruited patients with COPD and asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographics, respiratory symptoms, medications, smoking history, comorbidities, exercise capacity, respiratory function tests, and quality of life (QOL) were recorded. Exercise capacity was evaluated by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), QOL with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with asthma and 25 COPD who completed PR were included in the study. There was no difference in terms of age and sex between the groups (p=0.100 and p=0.365, respectively); however, body mass index was higher in the asthmatic group (p=0.007). Partial oxygen pressure (pO₂) difference and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO₂) difference were significantly higher in the COPD group than in the asthma group after PR (p<0.05). When the patients were compared before and after PR in both groups, a significant increase was detected in exercise capacity and QOL (6MWT, HADa, SGRQ, and SF-36 in all domains) (p<0.05). When two groups are contrasted according to the difference between pre- and post-PR of variables, there was no significant difference except pO₂, SpO₂, and Medical Research Council (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Physicians refer patients with COPD to PR; however, patients with asthma are not generally referred to the same frequency. We would like to emphasize that PR may be as effective as COPD in asthma.

Effects of physical exercise training on nocturnal symptoms in asthma: Systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Nocturnal worsening of asthma symptoms is a common feature of asthma. Physical exercise training improves general asthma control; however, there is no evidence showing the effects of physical exercise on nocturnal asthma symptoms. Indeed, asthma patients with daytime and nighttime symptoms are physiologically different, and thus the effects of physical exercise on asthma may also be different in these two groups. The objective of this systematic review is to explore the effects of physical exercise on nocturnal asthma symptoms.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and SPORTdiscus (last search on November 2017). Authors from studies that did not report nocturnal symptoms but used questionnaires and/or diaries were contacted for detailed information. Studies that provided results on nocturnal symptoms before and after physical activity intervention were included. Prevalence of nocturnal symptoms was calculated for each study from the percentage of study participants with nocturnal symptoms before and after intervention.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included (5 with children and 6 with adults). The prevalence of nocturnal symptoms at baseline ranged from 0% to 63% among children and from 50-73% among adults. In children and adults with nocturnal asthma, aerobic physical exercise reduced the prevalence and frequency of nocturnal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Aerobic physical exercise improves nocturnal asthma in children and adults by reducing the prevalence and frequency of nocturnal symptoms. Physical exercise training could be used with conventional treatments to improve quality of life and asthma control in patients with nocturnal worsening of asthma.

Additive effect on pulmonary function and disability of intensive pulmonary rehabilitation following bronchoscopy lung volume reduction (BLVR) for severe emphysema

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is mandatory before bronchoscopy lung volume reduction (BLVR); there is scant information about its efficacy post-BLVR. We retrospectively evaluated pulmonary function (PF) and disability in patients pre/post-BLVR and its additive effect on an intensive PR program post-BLVR vs matched non-BLVR controls. We analyzed changes within BLVR patients according to presence or not of atelectasis.

METHODS

We compared PF and exercise tolerance (6-min walk test, 6MWT) in 39 BLVR patients (FEV₁% pred. 28.9 ± 1.5; RV% pred. 236.1 ± 7.7) pre-/post-BLVR, and vs. 32 controls (FEV₁% pred. 32.7 ± 1.5; RV % pred. 217.8 ± 8.3) before and after PR.

RESULTS

BLVR patients showed a greater improvement than controls in PF (difference between groups: 3.8 for FEV₁% pred., p = 0.043; -20.5 for RV % pred., p = 0.02) and 6MWT response rate (12/39 vs. 1/39 subjects, p = 0.003). Both groups further improved significantly 6MWT after PR without a significant difference between groups. Atelectasis after BLVR mainly accounted for the improvement in FEV₁% pred, RV% pred. and 6MWT compared to both BLVR without atelectasis and controls.

CONCLUSION

BLVR improves PF (particularly RV) and exercise tolerance, patients with lobar exclusion being the best improvers. PR following BLVR yields a further improvement in exercise tolerance in both (atelectasis and non-atelectasis) subgroups.

Physiotherapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

Physiotherapy is an essential for the treatment of patients with chronic respiratory non-inflammatory diseases especially for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

AIM

To assess the effect of six months physiotherapy (PT) program on functional status in patients with COPD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of the disease. Group A included 33 patients (mean age 68.6 ± 7.3; GOLD II - III stages). Group B included 32 patients (mean age 71.7 ± 6.9; GOLD I -II). They were referred to supervised PT program performed three times weekly for a half a year. All the patients were on standard medical care. At entry and after PT, six minutes walking test (6 MWT), Borg scale and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale were assessed.

RESULTS

Significant changes in 6 MWT (p < 0.001) and mMRC scale (p < 0.001) were found after applied physical therapy program in patients of group A. Exertional dyspnoea decreased significantly in patients with group A (p < 0.001). Positive changes were found in physical tolerance in the patients of group B (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study revealed the positive effect of six months physiotherapy in physical tolerance and dyspnoea in patients with COPD at different stages of the disease.

Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with asthma: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (EPRA)

BACKGROUND

Asthma patients are enrolled in multimodal pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs. However, available data for the effectiveness of PR in asthma are sparse. Therefore, the primary aim of this randomized control trial (RCT) is to evaluate short-term (end of rehabilitation) and intermediate-term effectiveness (3 months after rehabilitation) of PR for patients with asthma regarding asthma control (primary outcome) and other outcomes. Secondly, moderator effects of gender, age, baseline asthma control, quality of life, and anxiety will be examined. Thirdly, a longitudinal follow-up study will explore the course of the outcomes over one year and the annual costs.

METHODS

The EPRA study is a single-center randomized controlled waiting-list trial in the Bad Reichenhall Clinic. Inclusion criteria include a referral diagnosis for uncontrolled asthma, no cognitive impairment and no very severe co-morbidities that indicate significantly greater illness morbidity than asthma alone. In the intervention group (IG), participants will start PR within 4 weeks after randomization; participants of the control group (CG) will start PR 20 weeks after randomization. Data will be assessed at randomization (T0), after 4 weeks (T1; IG: begin of PR), 7 weeks (T2; IG: end of PR), and 20 weeks (T3, CG: begin of PR). The primary outcome is asthma control at T2/T3. Secondary outcomes are health-related quality of life, functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, anxiety, depression, subjective self-management skills, illness perceptions, sick leave and subjective work ability. Outcomes will be analyzed with analysis of covariance, including baseline values of the respective outcomes as covariates. Healthcare costs will be analyzed with a gamma model with a log-link. A longitudinal follow-up study will generate additional data at 3/6/9/12 months after PR for both IG and CG. Latent change models will be used to analyze the course of the primary and secondary outcomes. Annual cost differences before and after rehabilitation will be compared by paired t-test.

DISCUSSION

This RCT will determine the effectiveness of a complex inpatient PR for asthma patients concerning asthma control. Furthermore, important medical and economic information regarding the effectiveness of PR as part of the long-term management of patients with uncontrolled asthma will be generated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00007740 , May 15, 2015). Protocol version: 1.0 (December, 23, 2016).

A Patient-Centered Walking Program for COPD

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs improve dyspnea and health status associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but benefits wane when patients return to a sedentary lifestyle. This study tested a simple, low-resource, low-cost home walking program. Methods: In this single center, 3-month study, 115 COPD patients were randomized to a control cohort or a goal setting cohort. Each patient met with study staff and received 5 telephone calls at 2-week intervals. During these contacts, the Goal group was assisted by a wellness coach who helped them set personal activity goals. All patients wore a pedometer to record daily steps, the primary study outcome. Results: Over the 12-week interval, the average step-per-days was 36% higher for the Goal cohort patients (Week 12 mean = 4390) than for Control patients (mean = 3790). No group differences emerged on the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the COPD Assessment Test, or the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Secondary analyses indicated that even patients with greater disease severity, including those with an mMRC score >2 or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) % predicted below 50%, increased their walking relative to Control patients. Almost half (48%) of Goal patients successfully reached at least one personal goal such as increasing stamina and activity, or decreasing shortness of breath or weight. Conclusions: A relatively low-resource wellness coaching, goal-setting intervention resulted in a small improvement in the activity level of COPD patients over a 12-week period including those with marked pulmonary impairment. Further investigation should be directed at understanding the optimal blend of in person and remote coaching needed to produce the greatest cost-to-benefit ratio.

Efficacy of an mHealth intervention to stimulate physical activity in COPD patients after pulmonary rehabilitation

Physical inactivity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with poor health status and increased disease burden. The present study aims to test the efficacy of a previously developed mobile (m)Health intervention to improve or maintain physical activity in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation.

A randomised controlled trial was performed in 32 physiotherapy practices in the Netherlands. COPD patients were randomised into intervention or usual care groups. The intervention consisted of a smartphone application for the patients and a monitoring website for the physiotherapists. Measurements were performed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months. Physical activity, functional exercise capacity, lung function, health-related quality of life and body mass index were assessed.

157 patients started the study and 121 completed it. There were no significant positive effects of the intervention on physical activity (at 0 months: intervention 5824±3418 steps per weekday, usual care 5717±2870 steps per weekday; at 12 months: intervention 4819±2526 steps per weekday, usual care 4950±2634 steps per weekday; p=0.811) or on the secondary end-points. There was a significant decrease over time in physical activity (p<0.001), lung function (p<0.001) and mastery (p=0.017), but not in functional exercise capacity (p=0.585).

Although functional exercise capacity did not deteriorate, our mHealth intervention did not improve or maintain physical activity in patients with COPD after a period of pulmonary rehabilitation.

Effectiveness of Repeated Courses of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Functional Exercise Capacity in Patients With COPD

PURPOSE

To determine whether an as-needed repeated pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) intervention produces a clinically important improvement in exercise capacity.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective analysis of characteristics and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who completed PR at 2 centers. Data were abstracted from all patients with COPD completing 2 courses of rehabilitation and those of randomly sampled patients completing only 1 course of PR.

RESULTS

We identified 37 repeaters and selected 69 nonrepeaters for analysis. No significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to age, FEV1 percent predicted, gender, initial 6MWD, improvement in 6MWD, and the percentage of patients achieving the minimal important difference (MID) of ≥ 35 m were observed with the completion of the first rehabilitation. The time between the first and second PR interventions was a mean of 45 ± 24 months. Repeating patients had a decrease of 90 ± 76 m in 6MWD at the beginning of the second rehabilitation course compared with the end of the first intervention (P = .001). Twenty-four (65%) of repeating patients achieved the MID in 6MWD at the end of the second course of PR. Those who achieved the MID in 6MWD during the second course of rehabilitation also tended to have attained greater improvement in this outcome during the first course (P = .07).

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of patients with COPD undergoing repeat PR experienced significant improvement in exercise capacity. Offering PR to patients with COPD on an as-needed basis appears to be beneficial even after a prolonged period of time between the interventions.

Outcomes associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder requiring hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (AECOPD) are known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality and have a significant socioeconomic impact. The factors that determine frequent hospital readmissions for AECOPD are poorly understood. The present study was done to ascertain failures rates following AECOPD and to evaluate factors associated with frequent readmissions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective study among 186 patients with COPD with one or more admissions for acute exacerbations in a tertiary care hospital. Frequency of previous re-admissions for AECOPD in the past year, and clinical characteristics, including spirometry were ascertained in the stable state both before discharge and at 6-month post-discharge. Failure rates following treatment were ascertained during the follow-up period. All the patients were followed up for a period of 2 years after discharge to evaluate re-admissions for the AECOPD.

RESULTS

Of 186 COPD patients admitted for AECOPD, 54% had one or more readmission, and another 45% had two or more readmissions over a period of 2 years. There was a high prevalence of current or ex-heavy smokers, associated co-morbidity, underweight patients, low vaccination prevalence and use of domiciliary oxygen therapy among COPD patients. A total of 12% mortality was observed in the present study. Immediate failure rates after first exacerbation was observed to be 34.8%. Multivariate analysis showed that duration >20 years (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.10-0.86), use of Tiotropium (OR = 2.29; 95% CI: 1.12-4.69) and use of co-amoxiclav during first admission (OR = 2.41; 95% CI: 1.21-4.79) were significantly associated with higher immediate failure rates. The multivariate analysis for repeated admissions revealed that disease duration >10 years (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27-0.93), low usage of inhaled ICS + LABA (OR = 2.21; 95% CI: 1.08-4.54), and MRC dyspnea grade >3 (OR = 2.51; 95% CI: 1.08-5.82) were independently associated with frequent re-admissions for AECOPD.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of patients admitted for an acute exacerbation of COPD were poor. The major factors influencing frequency of repeated COPD exacerbations were disease duration, low usage of inhaled ICS + LABA, and MRC dyspnea grade >3.

Role of maximal inspiratory presure in the evaluetion of respiratory muscle strength in asthmatics - Systematic review

Asthma is a chronic illness of the airways that can reduce respiratory muscle strength due to the resulting hyperinflation or treatment with corticosteroids. One of the ways to evaluate this respiratory muscular weakness is the Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (PImax).

METHODS

A systematic review of the databases PUBMED/MEDLINE, LILACS and SCIELO was carried through, using the key words: Asthma, respiratory muscle and muscle strength.

RESULTS

Fifty were found and six articles that evaluated the PImax in asthmatics, from these, thirty were excluded, making a total of twenty six articles.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

Through the present revision we show the effectiveness of PImax in evaluating respiratory muscle strength in asthmatics. More studies are needed, however, fot better understanding of the asthmatic individual. Rev Port Pneumol 2010; XVI (3): 463-470.

Value of systematic intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a regional Japanese city based on case detection rate and medical cost

OBJECTIVE

We established a COPD taskforce for early detection, diagnosis, treatment, and intervention. We implemented a pilot intervention with a prospective and longitudinal design in a regional city. This study evaluates the usefulness of the COPD taskforce and intervention based on COPD case detection rate and per capita medical costs.

METHOD

We distributed a questionnaire to all 8,878 inhabitants aged 50-89 years, resident in Matsuura, Nagasaki Prefecture in 2006. Potentially COPD-positive persons received a pulmonary function test and diagnosis. We implemented ongoing detection, examination, education, and treatment interventions, performed follow-up examinations or respiratory lessons yearly, and supported the health maintenance of each patient. We compared COPD medical costs in Matsuura and in the rest of Nagasaki Prefecture using data from 2004 to 2013 recorded by the association of Nagasaki National Health Insurance Organization, assessing 10-year means and annual change.

RESULTS

As of 2014, 256 people have received a definitive diagnosis of COPD; representing 31% of the estimated total number of COPD patients. Of the cases detected, 87.5% were mild or moderate in severity. COPD medical costs per patient in Matsuura were significantly lower than the rest of Nagasaki Prefecture, as was rate of increase in cost over time.

CONCLUSION

The COPD program in Matsuura enabled early detection and treatment of COPD patients and helped to lower the associated burden of medical costs. The success of this program suggests that a similar program could reduce the economic and human costs of COPD morbidity throughout Japan.

Maintaining Gains Following Pulmonary Rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an accepted intervention for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Despite initial improvements following PR, many patients eventually return to baseline function or decline even further. The aim of this study is to look at long-term (>1 year) outcomes following PR.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of patients who had completed PR. Participants were invited for an assessment consisting of participant interviews and clinical assessments using standardised instruments.

RESULTS

129 patients between 2003 and 2012 completed rehabilitation and were eligible. 88 patients were included in the analysis. The mean time of the long-term assessment was 22 months following PR. The mean age was 71 years. Mean FEV1 was 46%. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in the incremental shuttle walk test distance of 29.0 m following PR but this gain was lost at the long-term reassessment. Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) scores showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase in all four domains but only the domains of dyspnoea and fatigue remained statistically significant (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively) at the long-term reassessment. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores reduced following rehabilitation but only the anxiety component was statistically significant (p < 0.01). These improvements persisted at the long-term reassessment but were not statically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that many of the functional gains achieved in PR are lost in the longer term. Regular surveillance or monitoring of these patients post-PR is important to identify those requiring further intervention.

Time to adapt exercise training regimens in pulmonary rehabilitation--a review of the literature

Exercise intolerance, exertional dyspnea, reduced health-related quality of life, and acute exacerbations are features characteristic of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD often report comorbidities and other secondary manifestations, which diversifies the clinical presentation. Pulmonary rehabilitation that includes whole body exercise training is a critical part of management, and core programs involve endurance and resistance training for the upper and lower limbs. Improvement in maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, dyspnea, fatigue, health-related quality of life, and psychological symptoms are outcomes associated with exercise training in pulmonary rehabilitation, irrespective of the clinical state in which it is commenced. There may be benefits for the health care system as well as the individual patient, with fewer exacerbations and subsequent hospitalization reported with exercise training. The varying clinical profile of COPD may direct the need for modification to traditional training strategies for some patients. Interval training, one-legged cycling (partitioning) and non-linear periodized training appear to be equally or more effective than continuous training. Inspiratory muscle training may have a role as an adjunct to whole body training in selected patients. The benefits of balance training are also emerging. Strategies to ensure that health enhancing behaviors are adopted and maintained are essential. These may include training for an extended duration, alternative environments to undertake the initial program, maintenance programs following initial exercise training, program repetition, and incorporation of approaches to address behavioral change. This may be complemented by methods designed to maximize uptake and completion of a pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Is Telerehabilitation a Safe and Viable Option for Patients with COPD? A Feasibility Study

In patients with COPD non-naïve to rehabilitation we tested the feasibility, adherence and satisfaction of a home-based reinforcement telerehabilitation program (TRP). Outcomes were compared with a standard outpatient rehabilitation program (ORP). Then 18 TRP patients underwent 28 sessions of strength exercises (60 min) and cycle training (40 min) using a satellite platform provided telemonitoring, tele-prescription, video-assistance and phone-calls, patients were equipped with an oximeter, steps-counter, bicycle, remote control and interactive TV software. 18 matched ORP, retrospectively identified from our hospital ORP database, were used as controls. At baseline and end of program, the 6-min walking test (6MWT), Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were administered. In TRP only, we assessed platform use, incremental exercise, steps walked/day and patient satisfaction. TRP patients completed all sessions without side effects, used the remote control 1,394 ± 2,329 times being in the 84% of the cases satisfied with the service. In 22% of the cases patients found the technology unfriendly. Each health-professional performed 46 ± 65 actions, 14.6 ± 2.12 phone calls and 1 ± 1.67 videoconference sessions per patient. TRP patients increased physical activity (3,412 vs. 1,863 steps/day, p = 0.0002). Both programs produced significant (all, p < 0.01) gains in 6MWT [meters, TRP +34.22 ± 50.79; ORP +33.61 ± 39.25], dyspnea [TRP - 0.72 ± 0.89; ORP - 0.94 ± 0.53] and SGRQ [TRP - 6.9 ± 9.96, ORP - 9.9 ± 12.92] without between-group differences. In conclusion, TRP is feasible and well accepted by patients, although sometimes technology was perceived as difficult. It seems to improve walking capacity, dyspnea, quality of life and daily physical activity. Future RCTs will demonstrate cost-effectiveness.

Effects of exercise training on airway hyperreactivity in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although physical exercise is recommended for asthmatics, evidence on the effects of exercise on clinical key factors is still missing.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of exercise training (EXT) on quality of life (QoL), bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), lung function and exercise capacity, plus the factors affecting changes in QoL and exercise capacity in asthmatics after a period of EXT.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (last search on 15 November 2012), without language restriction, and references of original studies and reviews were searched for further relevant studies.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent investigators screened full-text studies with asthmatic subjects undertaking EXT (defined as training for ≥7 days, ≥2 times per week, ≥5 training sessions in total) that assessed at least one of the following outcomes: QoL, airway hyperreactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), peak expiratory flow (PEF), inflammatory parameters, exercise capacity, or exercise endurance. Potentially relevant studies were excluded if only respiratory muscle training, breathing exercises or yoga was performed, if asthmatic subjects with co-morbidities were investigated, if only data of mixed patient groups without separate results for asthmatics were presented, if training regimens were not sufficiently specified, if no numerical outcome data were presented, and if new long-term medication was introduced in addition to physical training. Of 500 potentially relevant articles, 13.4 % (67 studies including 2,059 subjects) met the eligibility criteria and were included for further analyses.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to determine the effect of EXT on asthma symptoms, BHR, EIB, FEV₁, exercise capacity and exercise endurance compared with control training. In addition, relative pre/post changes were analysed in all RCTs and controlled trials. Finally, multiple linear regression models were used to identify effects of relative changes in airway hyperreactivity (BHR or EIB), lung function (FEV₁ or PEF) and training hours on QoL and exercise performance.

RESULTS

In a total of 17 studies including 599 subjects, meta-analyses showed a significant improvement in days without asthma symptoms, FEV1 and exercise capacity while BHR only tended to improve. The analysis of relative within-group changes after EXT showed, however, significant improvements in QoL (17 %), BHR (53 %), EIB (9 %), and FEV1 (3 %) compared with control conditions. Multiple linear regression models revealed that changes in airway hyperreactivity and lung function significantly contributed to the change in QoL, while mainly the changes in airway hyperreactivity contributed to the change in exercise capacity.

CONCLUSION

EXT was shown to improve asthma symptoms, QoL, exercise capacity, BHR, EIB, and FEV1 in asthmatics and improvements in BHR explained part of the improvement in QoL and exercise capacity. Thus, physical activity should be recommended as a supplementary therapy to medication. However, more well controlled studies should be performed assessing the relationship of physical activity, QoL, airway hyperreactivity, lung function and especially airway inflammation as well as medication intake.

Home-based respiratory rehabilitation in adult patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

We assessed retrospectively the feasibility of a home-based respiratory rehabilitation (RR) program for asthmatics under optimal pharmacological treatment, as this type of care can reduce costs and offer a more patient-friendly approach for subjects with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with persistent asthma were recruited to the RR program (20 males, 32 females, 54 ± 11 (SD) years, forced expiratory volume in one second 71 ± 33% of predicted mean value, BMI 29.9 ± 7.9 kg/m(2)). This two-month protocol comprised education sessions, respiratory physiotherapy and an exercise training program at home and in groups supervised by an adapted physical activity instructor.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients completed the whole RR program, i.e. 25% dropout. The dropout rate was significantly higher with respect to younger patients in employment. The number of exacerbations decreased significantly during the year following the program, regardless of whether the patients had dropped out (p < 0.02) or not (p < 0.001). The distance walked during a 6-min walking test increased by 33 m (p < 0.001). Several indices measured during a cycle ergometer test increased significantly after RR: peak oxygen uptake (10%), oxygen uptake at ventilatory threshold (12%) and maximum load (19%), all at a similar maximum heart rate. Concerning quality of life assessment, the Short-Form-36 Item Health Survey revealed a non-significant improvement in the "health change" item after RR (p < 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the potential of a home-based program in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with asthma. Both functional and physiologic indices improved during the follow-up period.

Systematic review of supervised exercise programs after pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals with COPD

BACKGROUND

The success of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is established, but how to sustain benefits over the long term is less clear. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effect of supervised exercise programs after primary PR on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in individuals with COPD.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials of postrehabilitation supervised exercise programs vs usual care for individuals with COPD were identified after searches of six databases and reference lists of appropriate studies. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a fixed-effect model for measures of exercise capacity and HRQL.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials, with a total of 619 individuals with moderate to severe COPD, met the inclusion criteria. At 6-month follow-up there was a significant difference in exercise capacity in favor of the postrehabilitation interventions (SMD, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.01), which was not sustained at 12 months (SMD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.29 to 0.11). There was no difference between postrehabilitation interventions and usual care with respect to HRQL at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Supervised exercise programs after primary PR appear to be more effective than usual care for preserving exercise capacity in the medium term but not in the long term. In this review, there was no effect on HRQL. The small number of studies precludes a definitive conclusion as to the impact of postrehabilitation exercise maintenance on longer-term benefits in individuals with COPD.

Pulmonary rehabilitation and COPD: providing patients a good environment for optimizing therapy

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an obstructive and progressive airway disease associated with an important reduction in daily physical activity and psychological problems that contribute to the patient's disability and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Nowadays, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) plays an essential role in the management of symptomatic patients with COPD, by breaking the vicious circle of dyspnea-decreased activity-deconditioning-isolation. Indeed the main benefits of comprehensive PR programs for patients with COPD include a decrease in symptoms (dyspnea and fatigue), improvements in exercise tolerance and HRQoL, reduction of health care utilization (particularly bed-days), as well as an increase in physical activity. Several randomized studies and meta-analyses greatly established the benefits of PR, which additionally, is recommended in a number of influential guidelines. This review aimed to highlight the impact of PR on COPD patients, focusing on the clinical usefulness of PR, which provides patients a good support for change.

Clinically important differences in the intensity of chronic refractory breathlessness

CONTEXT

Clinically important differences in chronic refractory breathlessness are ill defined but important in clinical practice and trial design.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the clinical relevance of differences in breathlessness intensity using distribution and patient anchor methods.

METHODS

This was a retrospective data analysis from 213 datasets from four clinical trials for refractory breathlessness. Linear regression was used to explore the relationship between study effect size and change in breathlessness score (0-100mm visual analogue scale) and to estimate the change in score equivalent to small, moderate, and large effect sizes. Pooled individual blinded patient preference data from three randomized controlled trials were analyzed. The difference between the mean change in Day 4 minus baseline scores between preferred and non-preferred arms was calculated.

RESULTS

There was a strong relationship between change in score and effect size (P = 0.001; R(2) = 0.98). Values for small, moderate, and large effects were -5.5, -11.3, and -18.2mm. The participant preference change in score was -9mm (95% CI, -15.8, -2.1) (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

This larger dataset supports a clinically important difference of 10mm. Studies should be powered to detect this difference.

Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: respiratory disease

The 2 most common respiratory diseases are chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. Growing evidence supports the benefits of exercise for all patients with these diseases. Due to the etiology of COPD and the pathophysiology of asthma, there may be some additional risks of exercise for these patients, and hence accurate risk assessment and clearance is needed before patients start exercising. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the available literature regarding the risks of exercise for patients with respiratory disease and provide evidence-based recommendations to guide the screening process. A systematic review of 4 databases was performed. The literature was searched to identify adverse events specific to exercise. For COPD, 102 randomized controlled trials that involved an exercise intervention were included (n = 6938). No study directly assessed the risk of exercise, and only 15 commented on exercise-related adverse events. For asthma, 30 studies of mixed methodologies were included (n = 1278). One study directly assessed the risk of exercise, and 15 commented on exercise-related adverse events. No exercise-related fatalities were reported. The majority of adverse events in COPD patients were musculoskeletal or cardiovascular in nature. In asthma patients, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and (or) asthma symptoms were the primary adverse events. There is no direct evidence regarding the risk of exercise for patients with COPD or asthma. However, based on the available literature, it would appear that with adequate screening and optimal medical therapy, the risk of exercise for these respiratory patients is low.

Improving physical activity in patients with COPD with urban walking circuits

BACKGROUND

Even after a rehabilitation program, levels of physical activity in COPD progressively decrease unless strategies to encourage activity are implemented. We analyzed the effects of the implementation of urban walking circuits on levels of physical activity and exercise capacity of patients with severe and very severe COPD after a rehabilitation program.

METHOD

A total of 83 patients were randomized to either urban circuits group (UCG) or usual care in the non-circuit group (NCG), after completing a 2-week rehabilitation program. Results were evaluated 9 months after completion of the rehabilitation program and were compared with a control group of 54 patients not enrolled in the rehabilitation program.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, UCG patients increased their physical activity by a mean of 32.4 (SE = 5.9) min per day and 1.09 (SE = 0.22) days walked per week; 33.9 (SE = 5.6) min per day and 1.12 (SE = 0.24) days per week more compared to the NCG (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the results of the 6-min walking test and minutes walked per day in the UCG (r(2) = 0.52, p < 0.05) but not in the NCG (r(2) = 0.094, p > 0.05). Controls showed a significant decrease in exercise capacity and physical activity over the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Urban circuits are an easy, inexpensive strategy, which demonstrated to be useful to stimulate physical activity in our population of severe and very severe COPD patients and resulted in increased exercise capacity even 9 months after completion of a rehabilitation program.

Efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary Rehabilitation for moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in primary care could improve patients' quality of life.

METHODS

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 3-month Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) program with a further 9 months of maintenance (RHBM group) compared with both PR for 3 months without further maintenance (RHB group) and usual care in improving the quality of life of patients with moderate COPD.We conducted a parallel-group, randomized clinical trial in Majorca primary health care in which 97 patients with moderate COPD were assigned to the 3 groups. Health outcomes were quality of life, exercise capacity, pulmonary function and exacerbations.

RESULTS

We found statistically and clinically significant differences in the three groups at 3 months in the emotion dimension (0.53; 95%CI0.06-1.01) in the usual care group, (0.72; 95%CI0.26-1.18) the RHB group (0.87; 95%CI 0.44-1.30) and the RHBM group as well as in fatigue (0.47; 95%CI 0.17-0.78) in the RHBM group. After 1 year, these differences favored the long-term rehabilitation group in the domains of fatigue (0.56; 95%CI 0.22-0.91), mastery (0.79; 95%CI 0.03-1.55) and emotion (0.75; 95%CI 0.17-1.33). Between-group analysis only showed statistically and clinically significant differences between the RHB group and control group in the dyspnea dimension (0.79 95%CI 0.05-1.52). No differences were found for exacerbations, pulmonary function or exercise capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients with moderate COPD and low level of impairment did not show meaningful changes in QoL, exercise tolerance, pulmonary function or exacerbation after a one-year, community based rehabilitation program. However, long-term improvements in the emotional, fatigue and mastery dimensions (within intervention groups) were identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN94514482.

A pilot survey on the quality of life in respiratory rehabilitation carried out in COPD patients with severe respiratory failure: preliminary data of a novel Inpatient Respiratory Rehabilitation Questionnaire (IRRQ)

BACKGROUND

Measuring the state of health is a method for quantifying the impact of an illness on the day-to-day life, health and wellbeing of a patient, providing a quantitative measure of an individual's quality of life (QoL). QoL expresses patient point of view by a subjective dimension and can express the results of medical intervention. Pulmonary rehabilitation is an essential component in the management of COPD patients, and measuring QoL has become a central focus in the study of this disease.Although nowadays several questionnaires for measuring the QoL in COPD patients are available, there are no questionnaires specifically developed for evaluating QoL in COPD patients undergoing respiratory rehabilitation.The aim of this study was to develop a novel questionnaire for the QoL quantification in COPD patients undergoing in-patient pulmonary rehabilitation program.

METHODS

The questionnaire, administered to COPD patients undergoing long-term oxygen therapy into a respiratory rehabilitation ward, was developed by a simple and graphic layout to be administered to elderly patients. It included one form for admission and another for discharge. It included only tips related to the subjective components of QoL that would be relevant for patient, although likely not strictly related to the respiratory function.A descriptive analysis was performed for the socio-demographic characteristics and both the non-parametric Wilcoxon T-test and the Cronbach's alpha index were calculated for evaluating the sensitivity of the questionnaire to the effects of respiratory rehabilitation and for identifying its consistency.

RESULTS

The physical and psychological condition of the 34 COPD patients improved after the rehabilitative treatment and this finding was detected by the questionnaire (overall improvement: 14.2±2.5%), as confirmed by the non-parametric Wilcoxon test (p<0.01). The consistency detected by the Cronbach's alpha was good for both the questionnaire at admission and at discharge (0.789±0.084 and 0.784±0.145, respectively), although some items did not adequately measure the intended outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This proposed questionnaire represents a substantial innovation compared to previous methods for evaluating the QoL, since it has been specifically designed for hospitalized COPD patients undergoing respiratory rehabilitation with serious respiratory deficiency, allowing to effectively determining the QoL in these patients.

Long-term efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation: a state-of-the-art review

PURPOSE

While the short-term efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well documented, less is known about its sustainability and long-term effects in non-COPD patients, as well as secondary effects on exacerbation rates and the use of health care resources.

METHODS

We conducted a MEDLINE literature search on studies of pulmonary rehabilitation from the years 2000 to 2010. For each study, design, modalities, and outcomes were tabulated.

RESULTS

Design, group size, and duration of followup varied considerably between studies. Fifteen studies assessed physical performance, quality of life, or dyspnea in patients with COPD up to 24 months after rehabilitation. Six studies conducted followup evaluations in patients with interstitial lung disease, and 1 study considered asthma. Exacerbation rates and the use of health care resources were assessed in 20 studies in COPD and in 1 study in asthma. Results indicated the maintenance of the primary effects up to 1 year after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD, while such effects were less pronounced in patients with interstitial lung disease. Secondary improvements regarding exacerbation rates and the use of health care resources were not consistent throughout studies and diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary rehabilitation has positive short- and long-term functional effects in COPD and more recent research supports improvements of exacerbation rates and the use of health care resources as secondary outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation. Additional research on long-term efficacy regarding secondary effects and non-COPD patients is essential.

Optimal duration of pulmonary rehabilitation for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a systematic review

The purpose of this review was to determine the impact of duration of pulmonary rehabilitation on measures of health-related quality of life and exercise tolerance in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different lengths of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD were identified after searches of six electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database [PEDro] and the Cochrane Library of clinical trials) and reference lists of pertinent articles. Two reviewers performed the searches and assessed trial quality using PEDro and Jadad scales. Five RCTs met inclusion criteria. The mean PEDro score was 6 (range 3-8) and mean Jadad was 2 (range 1-3). Three trials reported a difference in health-related quality of life in favour of the longer duration program; two trials reported a benefit in exercise capacity in favour of longer programs. A meta-analysis of results was not possible due to considerable heterogeneity in program duration and outcomes. Longer duration pulmonary rehabilitation programs appear to have a more favourable effect on health-related quality of life in individuals with COPD; results for exercise capacity are less clear. The limited literature prevents a more definitive conclusion on optimal duration of rehabilitation.

State of the art: how to set up a pulmonary rehabilitation program

Pulmonary rehabilitation plays an essential role in the management of symptomatic patients with COPD. The benefits of rehabilitation include a decrease in dyspnoea and fatigue, and improvements in exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life. Importantly, rehabilitation reduces hospitalization for acute exacerbations and is cost-effective. Although most of the evidence for pulmonary rehabilitation has been obtained in patients with COPD, symptomatic individuals with other respiratory diseases have been shown to benefit. In this review we outline a stepwise approach to establish, deliver and evaluate a pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) that would be feasible in most settings. Throughout the review we have specified the minimum requirements for a PRP to facilitate the establishment of programs using limited resources. Recommendations for staffing and other resources required for a PRP are presented in the first section. Exercise training is a focus of the section on program delivery as this is the component of rehabilitation that has the strongest level of evidence for benefit. Program considerations for patients with respiratory conditions other than COPD are described. Different approaches for delivering the education component of a PRP are outlined and recommendations are made regarding topics for group and individual sessions. The problems commonly encountered in pulmonary rehabilitation, together with recommendations to avoid these problems and strategies to assist in their resolution, are discussed. The review concludes with recommendations for evaluating a PRP.

Six-minute walk test in pulmonary rehabilitation: do all patients need a practice test?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as an outcome measure in pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRP). A learning effect for the test has been reported in COPD; however, limited data exist in patients with other respiratory diagnoses. The objectives of this study were to: (i) report the magnitude of change in 6MWD with test repetition in patients referred to an outpatient PRP, and (ii) compare the magnitude of change in 6MWD with test repetition in patients with COPD, interstitial lung disease (ILD), bronchiectasis and asthma.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 349 patients with stable COPD (n = 245), ILD (n = 21), bronchiectasis (n = 33) or asthma (n = 50) who performed two 6MWT at enrollment into a PRP.

RESULTS

6MWD increased in all groups on the second test (all P < 0.001). At least 80% of patients in each diagnostic group walked further on their second 6MWT. The magnitude of change (mean, 95% CI) was greater (P < 0.05) in the COPD (37 m, 95% CI: 33-41 m) and ILD (41 m, 95% CI: 27-55 m) cohorts compared with the bronchiectasis (22 m, 95% CI: 14-31 m) and asthma (19 m, 95% CI: 11-27 m) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory diagnosis influences the magnitude of the learning effect for the 6MWT. The findings support the recommendation of a practice 6MWT at baseline assessment in order to provide an accurate measure of the effects of rehabilitation on 6MWD.

Exercise intervention to improve exercise capacity and health related quality of life for patients with Non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

CONTEXT

The role of exercise intervention for patients with Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been systematically reviewed to date.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, evaluate and synthesize the evidence examining (1) the effect of exercise intervention on exercise capacity, health related quality of life (HRQoL), physical activity levels, cancer symptoms and mortality for patients with NSCLC; and (2) the safety and feasibility of exercise intervention for a population with NSCLC.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of articles using the electronic databases MEDLINE (1950-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), EMBASE (1980-2010), TRIP (1997-2010), Science Direct (1994-2010), PubMed (1949-2010), Cochrane Library (2010), Expanded Academic ASAP (1994-2010), Meditext Informit (1995-2010), PEDRO (1999-2010) and DARE (2010). Additional studies were identified by manually cross referencing all full text reports and personal files were searched. No publication date restrictions were imposed. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies and case series assessing exercise intervention to improve exercise capacity, HRQoL, level of daily physical activity, cancer symptoms or mortality of patients with NSCLC were included. Only articles available in English and published in a peer reviewed journal were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

A data collection form was developed by one reviewer and data extracted. Data extraction was cross checked by a second reviewer. RESULTS AND DATA SYNTHESIS: 16 studies on 13 unique patient groups totalling 675 patients with NSCLC met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were case series (n=9) and two RCTs were included. Studies exercising participants pre-operatively reported improvements in exercise capacity but no change in HRQoL immediately post exercise intervention. Studies exercising participants post-treatment (surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy) demonstrated improvements in exercise capacity but conflicting results with respect to the impact on HRQoL immediately post exercise intervention. Heterogeneity among studies was observed and a meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate. PRISMA guidelines were followed in reporting this systematic review.

CONCLUSION

Exercise intervention for patients with NSCLC is safe before and after cancer treatment. Interventions pre-operatively or post-cancer treatment are associated with positive benefits on exercise capacity, symptoms and some domains of HRQoL. The majority of studies are small case series therefore results should be viewed with caution until larger RCTs are completed. Further research is required to establish the effect of exercise during and after cancer treatment and in the advanced stage of disease, the optimum type of exercise training and the optimum setting for delivery.