Diagnosing occupational asthma: use of induced sputum

Identification of true chemical respiratory allergens: Current status, limitations and recommendations

Asthma in the workplace is an important occupational health issue. It comprises various subtypes: occupational asthma (OA; both allergic asthma and irritant-induced asthma) and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). Current regulatory paradigms for the management of OA are not fit for purpose. There is therefore an important unmet need, for the purposes of both effective human health protection and appropriate and proportionate regulation, that sub-types of work-related asthma can be accurately identified and classified, and that chemical respiratory allergens that drive allergic asthma can be differentiated according to potency. In this article presently available strategies for the diagnosis and characterisation of asthma in the workplace are described and critically evaluated. These include human health studies, clinical investigations and experimental approaches (structure-activity relationships, assessments of chemical reactivity, experimental animal studies and in vitro methods). Each of these approaches has limitations with respect to providing a clear discrimination between OA and WEA, and between allergen-induced and irritant-induced asthma. Against this background the needs for improved characterisation of work-related asthma, in the context of more appropriate regulation is discussed.

Inhalation Challenge Tests in Occupational Asthma: Why Are Multiple Tests Needed?

Occupational and environmental lung diseases are on the rise because of the widespread use of various toxic agents in industry. Asthma etiopathogenesis is unclear because of exposure to high and low molecular agents in workplaces. Approximately 15-25% of asthma in adults is reported to be related to occupational exposure. The prevalence of occupational asthma (OA) is predicted to be high. The difficulties in diagnosing OA results in inadequate treatment, permanent airway damage, and medicolegal and social problems. As with other occupational diseases, it is necessary to demonstrate a direct causal relationship between the suspected agent and OA. Spirometry, peak expiratory flow rate, and/or non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness are frequently used to show airway hyperresponsiveness at the workplace and away from work. However, there are some controversies about the specificity and sensitivity of these test methods. Furthermore, these tests do not identify the exposure agent, which could be the causative agent. Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) tests that demonstrate the direct causal relationship are currently the gold standard. However, their positive and negative predictive values have not yet been established; therefore, many low molecular weight agents could cause late or atypical reactions. Therefore, a negative SIC test cannot exclude the disease. This review describes the procedures for the SIC test and discusses the importance of using the combined test methods with the SIC test.

Respiratory health in professional cleaners: Symptoms, lung function, and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Cleaning is associated with an increased risk of asthma symptoms, but few studies have measured functional characteristics of airway disease in cleaners.

AIMS

To assess and characterize respiratory symptoms and lung function in professional cleaners, and determine potential risk factors for adverse respiratory outcomes.

METHODS

Symptoms, pre-/post-bronchodilator lung function, atopy, and cleaning exposures were assessed in 425 cleaners and 281 reference workers in Wellington, New Zealand between 2008 and 2010.

RESULTS

Cleaners had an increased risk of current asthma (past 12 months), defined as: woken by shortness of breath, asthma attack, or asthma medication (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.18-2.85). Despite this, they had similar rates of current wheezing (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.65-1.32) and were less likely to have a doctor diagnosis of asthma ever (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.42-0.92). Cleaners overall had lower lung function (FEV₁ , FVC; P < .05). Asthma in cleaners was associated with less atopy (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.13-0.90), fewer wheezing attacks (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.17-0.97; >3 vs ≤3 times/year), and reduced bronchodilator response (6% vs 9% mean FEV₁ -%-predicted change, P < .05) compared to asthma in reference workers. Cleaning of cafes/restaurants/kitchens and using upholstery sprays or liquid multi-use cleaner was associated with symptoms, whilst several exposures were also associated with lung function deficits (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cleaners are at risk of some asthma-associated symptoms and reduced lung function. However, as it was not strongly associated with wheeze and atopy, and airway obstruction was less reversible, asthma in some cleaners may represent a distinct phenotype.

Other asthma considerations

Asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome of cough, wheeze, dyspnea, and chest tightness. However, in a subset of patients, these symptoms may indicate a different underlying disease process with variable responsiveness to classic asthma therapies. Disease may progress while practitioners attempt conventional asthma therapy. Additionally, some types of asthma may require alternative approaches to relieve symptoms successfully. This article describes the differential diagnosis of asthma and discusses some of the more common asthma variants and asthma mimickers.

Diagnostic approach in cases with suspected work-related asthma

Background

Work-related asthma (WRA) is a major cause of respiratory disease in modern societies. The diagnosis and consequently an opportunity for prevention are often missed in practice.

Methods

Based on recent studies and systematic reviews of the literature methods for detection of WRA and identification of specific causes of allergic WRA are discussed.

Results and Conclusions

All workers should be asked whether symptoms improve on days away from work or on holidays. Positive answers should lead to further investigation. Spirometry and non-specific bronchial responsiveness should be measured, but carefully performed and validly analysed serial peak expiratory flow or forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) measurements are more specific and confirm occupational asthma in about 82% of those still exposed to the causative agent. Skin prick testing or specific immunoglobulin E assays are useful to document allergy to high molecular weight allergens. Specific inhalational challenge tests come closest to a gold standard test, but lack standardisation, availability and sensitivity. Supervised workplace challenges can be used when specific challenges are unavailable or the results non-diagnostic, but methodology lacks standardisation. Finally, if the diagnosis remains unclear a follow-up with serial measurements of FEV₁ and non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness should detect those likely to develop permanent impairment from their occupational exposures.

A kit to facilitate and standardize the processing of sputum for measurement of airway inflammation

BACKGROUND

The use of inflammometry has been shown to be effective for managing asthma. However, sputum processing can be time consuming. Furthermore, methods of sputum processing can vary among facilities. To help with standardization and to simplify the procedure for laboratory staff, a novel, commercially available processing device (Accufilter, Cellometrics Inc, Canada) has been developed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of the Accufilter device and kit for recovery of treated specimens, and for quantitative sputum inflammatory cell counts by comparing intrasample measurements with those using the same procedure without the Accufilter device and kit.

METHODS

The present study was a wet laboratory comparison of induced sputum cell counts obtained from sputum processed with versus without the device and kit. Comparisons of each sputum specimen were performed by the same technologist in random order.

RESULTS

A total of 39 samples were processed using both the standard method and the Accufilter device. The intraclass correlation coefficients were high for the weight of the filtrate, and for eosinophil and neutrophil differential counts.

CONCLUSION

A good degree of agreement of results was apparent when the two methods were compared. The differences noted between both methods were minimal and did not modify clinical interpretation. The use of the Accufilter device and kit can be used in place of the standard method for sputum quantitative analysis, especially in centres with large sample loads.

Distinct temporal patterns of immediate asthmatic reactions due to high- and low-molecular-weight agents

BACKGROUND

Exposure to occupational agents can cause immediate asthmatic reactions.

OBJECTIVE

It can be hypothesized that the pattern of immediate reactions is different for high (HMW)- and low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents. To test this, we studied the temporal features of reactions in workers who underwent specific inhalation challenges for possible occupational asthma.

METHODS

We examined 467 immediate reactions due to HMW (n = 248, 53%) and LWW (n = 219, 47%) agents in regards to timing of the maximum reaction and recovery.

RESULTS

The median duration of exposure to elicit significant immediate reactions was comparable for HMW and LMW agents (15 min). The median maximum fall in FEV (1) occurred after 20 min for LMW by comparison with 10 min for HMW agents (P < 0.001). The median timing of recovery of FEV (1) to 10% baseline was shorter for HMW (60 min) than for LMW (90 min) agents (P < 0.01), and significantly more subjects recovered to 10% baseline (89.5%) for HMW than for LMW agents (72.6%) (P < 0.001). Confounding variables such as age, atopy, baseline airway calibre and the maximum fall in FEV (1) at the time of the immediate reaction did not alter the significant effect of the nature of the agent per se. Immediate reactions were followed by a late asthmatic reaction more often in the case of LMW (37.3%) than HMW (26.2%) agents (P < 0.05). Significant changes in non-specific bronchial responsiveness were significantly (P = 0.02) more frequent after reactions to LMW (31.9%) than to HMW (21.4%) agents. We found similar trends by comparing reactions to flour (n = 113), the principal cause of reactions to HMW agents, and diisocyanates (n = 111), the principal LMW agent.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows distinct patterns for immediate reactions due to occupational agents. These results can provide useful guidelines for performing specific inhalation challenges and improve the safety of the procedure.

Work-exacerbated asthma and occupational asthma: do they really differ?

BACKGROUND

Although work-exacerbated asthma (WEA) is a prevalent condition likely to have an important societal burden, there are limited data on this condition.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were (1) to compare the clinical, functional, and inflammatory characteristics of workers with WEA and occupational asthma (OA) and (2) compare health care use and related costs between workers with WEA and OA, as well as between workers with work-related asthma (WRA; ie, WEA plus OA) and those with non-work-related asthma (NWRA) in a prospective study.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of workers with and without WRA with a 2-year follow-up. The diagnosis of OA and WEA was based on the positivity and negativity of results on specific inhalation challenges, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four subjects were enrolled: 53 with WEA, 68 with OA, and 33 control asthmatic subjects (NWRA). WEA was associated with more frequent prescriptions of inhaled corticosteroids (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% CI, 1.4-13.6; P = .009), a noneosinophilic phenotype (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9; P = .04), a trend toward a lower FEV1 (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9-1.0; P = .06), and a higher proportion of smokers (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 0.96-9.7; P = .06) than the diagnosis of OA. The health care use of WRA and related costs were 10-fold higher than those of NWRA.

CONCLUSION

Workers with WEA appeared to have features of greater asthma severity than workers with OA. In contrast with OA, WEA was associated with a noneosinophilic phenotype. Both OA and WEA were associated with greater health care use and 10-fold higher direct costs than NWRA.

EAACI consensus statement for investigation of work-related asthma in non-specialized centres

Work-related asthma (WRA) is a relevant problem in several countries, is cause of disability and socioeconomic consequences for both the patient and the society and is probably still underdiagnosed. A correct diagnosis is extremely important to reduce or limit the consequences of the disease. This consensus document was prepared by a EAACI Task Force consisting of an expert panel of allergologists, pneumologists and occupational physicians from different European countries. This document is not intended to address in detail the full diagnostic work-up of WRA, nor to be a formal evidence-based guideline. It is written to provide an operative protocol to allergologists and physicians dealing with asthma useful for identifying the subjects suspected of having WRA to address them to in-depth investigations in a specialized centre. No evidence-based system could be used because of the low grade of evidence of published studies in this area, and instead, 'key messages' or 'suggestions' are provided based on consensus of the expert panel members.

Diagnostic utility of exhaled breath condensate analysis in conjunction with specific inhalation challenge in individuals with suspected work-related asthma

BACKGROUND

Establishing the role of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) analysis in work-related asthma (WRA), and more specifically, in conjunction with specific inhalation challenge (SIC), is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

To measure EBC pH, and nitrite/nitrate concentrations before and after SIC in individuals with suspected WRA exposed to either high-molecular-weight (HMW) or low-molecular-weight (LMW) agents and evaluate whether these changes are useful to distinguish between occupational asthma (OA) and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA).

METHODS

One hundred twenty-five consecutive workers undergoing SIC were enrolled. Exhaled breath condensate was collected at the end of the baseline day and 24 hours after exposure to the offending agent. In all EBC samples, pH was measured, and nitrite and nitrate concentrations were determined.

RESULTS

Specific inhalation challenge was positive in 66 individuals, who were then diagnosed with OA. Work-exacerbated asthma was diagnosed in 14, and in 45 patients establishing a direct relationship between the symptoms and work exposure was not possible. In patients with WEA, EBC pH values after SIC were significantly lower than those before SIC (P = .0047). Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we found that an EBC pH decrease of greater than 0.4 units after SIC achieved the most satisfactory sensitivity 79% (confidence interval [CI]: 49-94) and specificity of 100% (CI: 68-100), considering only patients with asthma and without OA. A decrease in EBC pH of 0.4 or more common in those exposed to HMW agents (8/19, 42%) than in those exposed to LMW agents (7/47, 15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Exhaled breath condensate pH in conjunction with SIC may be useful for diagnosing WEA.

May the reduction of exposure to specific sensitizers be an alternative to work cessation in occupational asthma? Results from a follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Few data are reported on the effects of a reduction of exposure to specific sensitizers in occupational asthma (OA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of subjects with OA, comparing the effect of a reduction with that of the persistence or cessation of occupational exposure to the specific sensitizer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-one subjects with OA due to different sensitizers were diagnosed via a specific inhalation challenge. After a follow-up interval of 3.5 years, subjects were reexamined by clinical assessment, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BH) and induced sputum.

RESULTS

At follow-up, subjects who had reduced occupational exposure (n = 22) showed a significant improvement in BH and a nonsignificant improvement in sputum eosinophilia (from 5.3 to 1.1%, n.s.), while subjects still exposed (n = 10) showed a significant decrease in FEV(1). Subjects who ceased work (n = 9) showed a trend of improvement in BH and sputum eosinophilia. Logistic analysis showed that the major determinant of improvement in BH at follow-up was the severity of BH at diagnosis, with a minimal contribution from the duration of exposure and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids during follow-up; reduction of work exposure did not enter into any model.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of occupational exposure could not be considered to be as effective as work cessation, which remained the best treatment for OA. However, it was not associated with a deterioration of FEV(1) as observed in subjects with persistent exposure.

An official american thoracic society statement: work-exacerbated asthma

RATIONALE

Occupational exposures can contribute to the exacerbation as well as the onset of asthma. However, work-exacerbated asthma (WEA) has received less attention than occupational asthma (OA) that is caused by work.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this Statement is to summarize current knowledge about the descriptive epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management and treatment of WEA; propose a case definition for WEA; and discuss needs for prevention and research.

METHODS

Information about WEA was identified primarily by systematic searches of the medical literature. Statements about prevention and research needs were reached by consensus.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

WEA is defined as the worsening of asthma due to conditions at work. WEA is common, with a median prevalence of 21.5% among adults with asthma. Different types of agents or conditions at work may exacerbate asthma. WEA cases with persistent work-related symptoms can have clinical characteristics (level of severity, medication needs) and adverse socioeconomic outcomes (unemployment, reduction in income) similar to those of OA cases. Compared with adults with asthma unrelated to work, WEA cases report more days with symptoms, seek more medical care, and have a lower quality of life. WEA should be considered in any patient with asthma that is getting worse or who has work-related symptoms. Management of WEA should focus on reducing work exposures and optimizing standard medical management, with a change in jobs only if these measures are not successful.

CONCLUSIONS

WEA is a common and underrecognized adverse outcome resulting from conditions at work. Additional research is needed to improve the understanding of the risk factors for, and mechanisms and outcomes of, WEA, and to inform and evaluate preventive interventions.

Comparison between Airway Responses to High versus Low Molecular Weight Compounds in Occupational Asthma

Occupational asthma (OA) is a heterogeneous disease, and the characteristics of the sensitizer responsible for OA may induce different clinical, functional, and biological manifestations. We examined the characteristics of 74 patients with OA induced by low molecular weight compounds (LMWC) or by high molecular weight compounds (HMWC) and diagnosed by specific inhalation challenge (SIC). Patients with OA induced by LMWC had a longer occupational exposure before the beginning of symptoms, a lower sputum eosinophilia, and a higher prevalence of late airway response (LAR), in comparison with patients with OA induced by HMWC. Pulmonary function tended to be poorer and atopy tended to be less frequent in LMWC-induced OA than in HMWC-induced OA. These data confirm and extend previous observations showing that the characteristics of the specific sensitizer inducing OA may determine different clinical, functional, and biological features, probably related to the difference pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these different types of OA.

Induced sputum as a method for detection of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease

Inducted sputum (IS) is a non-invasive procedure that can be used for collection of airway secretions. The aim of our study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of IS for detection of airway inflammation in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Bronchoalveolar lavage and IS were performed to 20 patients with SSc. Eighteen patients who were referred to pulmonary medicine for bronchoalveolar lavage due to other reasons were also recruited for cell counts comparisons. Spirometry, echocardiography and thorax CT (HRCT) imaging were also performed to all patients. Mean macrophage and lymphocyte counts were found to be increased in IS of SSc patients compared with that of control (58.4 ± 14.5% vs. 31.3 ± 16.3%, 30.2 ± 15.4% vs. 15.0 ± 11.5% P < 0.001), whereas mean neutrophil count was lower in the SSc patients (4.1 ± 4.5% vs. 17.2 ± 13.1%, P < 0.05). Significant correlations were noted between BAL and IS findings for macrophage (r = 0.55, P = 0.02) lymphocyte (r = 0.65, P < 0.01) and total cell counts (r = 0.45, P = 0.06). IS is an easy and reliable method for the detection of alveolitis and can be used for early detection of lung involvement in scleroderma.

Occupational and work-exacerbated asthma: similarities and differences

Over the years, there have been tremendous efforts to improve the understanding of occupational asthma (OA), whereas work-exacerbated asthma (WEA) has been somewhat overlooked. The aim of this work is to review the literature, comparing the prevalence of OA and WEA, their clinical and inflammatory characteristics, as well as the work environment of those suffering from OA and WEA. We performed a PubMed search up to September 2006 using the keywords: work-related asthma, WEA, work-aggravated asthma and OA. Only studies in English were included for consideration. We found that OA and WEA are prevalent conditions. The characteristics of subjects with OA and WEA vary according to the type of studies undertaken to describe these conditions. Many sensitizing agents have been reported to cause OA, whereas exposures to irritant agents seem to be associated with the occurrence of WEA. The inflammatory profile may differ between these two conditions, but the data are too limited and sometimes too contradictory to allow a firm conclusion to be drawn. The socioeconomic outcome of these conditions seems similar. Therefore, further studies investigating the prevalence of WEA, as well as its clinical, functional and inflammatory characteristics, are needed to improve the management of the workers with WEA.

Occupational asthma: risk factors, diagnosis and preventive measures

In adulthood, new or recurrent asthma is caused by work in approximately 10% of cases. The term occupational asthma is reserved for those cases arising from respiratory hypersensitivity to a specific workplace agent; in others (work-exacerbated asthma) the mechanism is of nonspecific airway irritation on a background of bronchial hyper-reactivity. Some 300 workplace agents are capable of inducing asthma de novo; fortunately, most cases are attributed to a much smaller number to which exposure occurs in a few high-risk occupations. Exposure level is the most important remediable risk factor; the factors governing individual susceptibility are poorly understood. Diagnosis is generally straightforward. Management is rarely pharmacologic and often difficult since the diagnosis incurs important employment and other social consequences.

Serum eosinophilic cationic protein: is there a role in respiratory disorders?

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) has been widely investigated in the clinical practice as a potential biomarker for asthma. However, there are conflicting data concerning its validity in other respiratory disorders.

METHODS

Serum ECP levels were retrospectively analyzed in 441 patients (227 males and 214 females) suffering from respiratory disease and visited for the first time, and in 33 healthy subjects (17 males and 16 females).

RESULTS

The mean of ECP was significantly higher (p = .0001) in patients compared with healthy volunteers. No correlation was found between serum ECP value and peripheral eosinophil absolute number (p = .881; r = .007). The predictive model was significant only for asthma, with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 74% (efficiency 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that serum ECP may be considered a marker for identifying only asthmatic patients with an efficiency of 73% and is not useful for the differentiation of other respiratory disorders.

Noninvasive methods for assessment of airway inflammation in occupational settings

The present document is a consensus statement reached by a panel of experts on noninvasive methods for assessment of airway inflammation in the investigation of occupational respiratory diseases, such as occupational rhinitis, occupational asthma, and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis. Both the upper and the lower airway inflammation have been reviewed and appraised reinforcing the concept of 'united airway disease' in the occupational settings. The most widely used noninvasive methods to assess bronchial inflammation are covered: induced sputum, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) concentration, and exhaled breath condensate. Nasal inflammation may be assessed by noninvasive approaches such as nasal cytology and nasal lavage, which provide information on different aspects of inflammatory processes (cellular vs mediators). Key messages and suggestions on the use of noninvasive methods for assessment of airway inflammation in the investigation and diagnosis of occupational airway diseases are issued.

Occupational and environmental lung disease: occupational asthma

Occupational exposures cause 10-15% of new-onset asthma in adults, and that represents a considerable health and economic burden. Exposure to many causative agents is now well controlled but workplace practices are constantly evolving and new hazards being introduced. Overall, there is no good evidence that the incidence of occupational asthma is decreasing. Evidence-based guidelines such as those published by the British Occupational Health research Foundation and Standards of Care documents should help raise awareness of the problem and improve management. Key targets include the control of occupational exposures, a high index of suspicion in any adult with new onset asthma, and early detailed investigation.

Sputum eosinophilia: an early marker of bronchial response to occupational agents

BACKGROUND

False-negative responses to specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with occupational agents may occur. We explored whether assessing changes in sputum cell counts would help improve the identification of bronchial reactivity to occupational agents during SICs.

METHODS

The predictive value of the changes in sputum cell counts after a negative FEV(1) response to a first challenge exposure to an occupational agent was determined using the changes in airway calibre observed during repeated challenges as the 'gold standard'. The study included 68 subjects investigated for work-related asthma in a tertiary centre. After a control day, the subjects were challenged with the suspected occupational agent(s) for up to 2 h. All subjects who did not show an asthmatic reaction were re-challenged on the following day. Additional challenges were proposed to those who demonstrated a > or = 2% increase in sputum eosinophils or an increase in nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to histamine after the second challenge day.

RESULTS

Six of the 35 subjects without changes in FEV(1) on the first challenge developed an asthmatic reaction on subsequent challenges. ROC analysis revealed that a >3% increase in sputum eosinophils at the end of the first challenge day was the most accurate parameter for predicting the development of an asthmatic response on subsequent challenges with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in sputum eosinophils is an early marker of specific bronchial reactivity to occupational agents, which may help to identify subjects who will develop an asthmatic reaction only after repeated exposure.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels after specific inahalatory challenge test in subjects with diagnosed occupational asthma

OBJECTIVES

Measuring exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a useful method for the assessment of bronchial inflammation in asthmatic subjects. The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in eNO level in the subjects with suspected occupational asthma (OA) after a specific inhalation test (SIT) with occupational agents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty two patients, including 17 farmers, 15 bakers and 10 health care workers had a physical examination, skin prick tests with common and occupational allergens, total serum IgE level, specific anti-allergen IgE determinations, spirometry and SIT. Also, morphological changes in induced sputum (ISP) and nasal lavage fluid (NLF) were analysed and eNO measurements were performed.

RESULTS

SIT revealed a significant increase in the proportion of eosinophils in NLF and in ISP in the cases with diagnosed OA. Moreover, these cases showed significantly increased eNO levels only 24 h after SIT, compared to the measurements before SIT. We also found a significant correlation between eNO level at 24 h after SIT and the percentage of eosinophils in NLF before, and 4 and 24 h after SIT, as well as in ISP before and 24 h after SIT in all subjects with diagnosed OA.

CONCLUSION

The findings may confirm the usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide measurements for diagnosing OA.

Exhaled nitric oxide and breath condensate ph in asthmatic reactions induced by isocyanates

BACKGROUND

We investigated the usefulness of measurements of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and pH of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) for monitoring airway response after specific inhalation challenges with isocyanates in sensitized subjects.

METHODS

Lung function (FEV(1)), FeNO, and pH in argon-deaerated EBC were measured before and at intervals up to 30 days after a specific inhalation challenge in 15 subjects with isocyanate asthma, in 24 not sensitized control subjects exposed to isocyanates, and in 3 nonasthmatic subjects with rhinitis induced by isocyanate. Induced sputum was collected before and 24 h after isocyanate exposure.

RESULTS

Isocyanate-induced asthmatic reactions were associated with a rise in sputum eosinophil levels at 24 h (p < 0.01), and an increase in FeNO at 24 h (p < 0.05) and 48 h (p < 0.005), whereas FeNO level did not vary with isocyanate exposure in subjects with rhinitis and in control subjects. FeNO changes at 24 h positively correlated with corresponding sputum eosinophil changes (rho = 0.66, p < 0.001). A rise in pH was observed in the afternoon samples of EBC, irrespective of the occurrence of isocyanate-induced asthmatic reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that isocyanate-induced asthmatic reactions are associated with a consistent delayed increase in FeNO but not with the acidification of EBC.

Assessing and treating work-related asthma

Work-related asthma is asthma that is caused or exacerbated by exposures at work. It is the most common form of occupational lung disease in developed countries. It has important impacts on the health and well-being of the affected individual, as well as consequences for society because of unemployment issues and workers' compensation claims. With ongoing exposure, occupational asthma can result in persistent airway hyperresponsiveness and, possibly, permanent disability for the individual. Thus, it is important for the clinician to be able to diagnose this disorder as quickly and accurately as possible. The evaluation of a patient with work-related asthma can be extensive. It includes obtaining a consistent history, identifying the cause in the workplace, and confirming the diagnosis with objective tests. After a diagnosis has been made, treatment must sometimes go beyond the medications used for nonoccupational asthma and include interventions to minimize or completely remove the individual from exposure to the causal agent if he or she has sensitizer-induced occupational asthma. In addition, once an individual has been identified with occupational asthma, steps should be taken to prevent the development of this disorder in other workers. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature and provide the clinician with a stepwise approach to the diagnosis and management of a patient with work-related asthma.

Diagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College Of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement

BACKGROUND

A previous American College of Chest Physicians Consensus Statement on asthma in the workplace was published in 1995. The current Consensus Statement updates the previous one based on additional research that has been published since then, including findings relevant to preventive measures and work-exacerbated asthma (WEA).

METHODS

A panel of experts, including allergists, pulmonologists, and occupational medicine physicians, was convened to develop this Consensus Document on the diagnosis and management of work-related asthma (WRA), based in part on a systematic review, that was performed by the University of Alberta/Capital Health Evidence-Based Practice and was supplemented by additional published studies to 2007.

RESULTS

The Consensus Document defined WRA to include occupational asthma (ie, asthma induced by sensitizer or irritant work exposures) and WEA (ie, preexisting or concurrent asthma worsened by work factors). The Consensus Document focuses on the diagnosis and management of WRA (including diagnostic tests, and work and compensation issues), as well as preventive measures. WRA should be considered in all individuals with new-onset or worsening asthma, and a careful occupational history should be obtained. Diagnostic tests such as serial peak flow recordings, methacholine challenge tests, immunologic tests, and specific inhalation challenge tests (if available), can increase diagnostic certainty. Since the prognosis is better with early diagnosis and appropriate intervention, effective preventive measures for other workers with exposure should be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial prevalence of WRA supports consideration of the diagnosis in all who present with new-onset or worsening asthma, followed by appropriate investigations and intervention including consideration of other exposed workers.

Cost-effectiveness of various diagnostic approaches for occupational asthma

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA) by specific inhalation challenge (SIC) can be costly and is not always available. The use of sputum testing to avoid this in some patients may be a more cost-effective alternative.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the cost-effectiveness of SIC with serial measurements of sputum cell counts (sputum testing) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring.

METHODS

Clinical data and testing costs for OA in 49 patients were collected during a previously published trial, modelled and compared using TreeAge Pro. Clinical outcome was the percentage of accurately diagnosed patients, using SIC as the gold standard. The PEF approach used the most accurate assessment of five experts who were blinded to SIC results. Differences in the proportion of eosinophils during periods on and off work were used for the sputum testing approach and in PEF/sputum for the combined approach. Unit costs were estimated from charges in Canadian hospitals. Data were analyzed by one-way and two-way analyses, and by probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation technique.

RESULTS

The PEF approach had an estimated accuracy of 52% and cost $365 per patient tested. Compared with PEF monitoring, sputum testing was more accurate and cost an estimated $255 for each additional OA patient correctly diagnosed. SIC costs per additional correct diagnosis were $11,032 compared with sputum testing and $6,458 compared with PEF monitoring. The combined PEF/sputum testing approach was not cost-effective in the base case analysis, but cannot be excluded according to probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SIC remains the reference test to diagnose OA, when this test is not available, sputum testing is a cost-effective alternative to PEF for diagnosis of OA.

Blood eosinophils in workers with aluminum potroom asthma are increased to higher levels in non-smokers than in smokers

BACKGROUND

Aluminum potroom asthma (PA) has been described in several reports. This study aimed to investigate the association between blood eosinophils and PA.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 338 workers were examined as follows: spirometry, blood eosinophils, skin prick test, and work exposure measurements. They also completed a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms, smoking, allergy, and duration of work exposure.

RESULTS

The odds ratio for PA was 4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.5-9.7) for workers with eosinophils > or =400 x 10(6) cells/L compared with workers with eosinophils <200 x 10(6) cells/L. In non-smokers, the number of eosinophils was 177 x 10(6) cells/L (P < 0.001) higher among workers with PA than asymptomatic workers, whereas the corresponding difference among current smokers was only 63 x 10(6) cells/L (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of PA was positively associated with blood eosinophils. An attenuation of the blood eosinophil increase was observed in smoking asthmatics, suggesting an immune-modulating effect of smoking.

Induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide as noninvasive markers of airway inflammation from work exposures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Noninvasive measures of airway inflammation are increasingly used in the investigation and management of asthma. Their role in the investigation of occupational lung diseases, however, is not as clearly established. The present article reviews the use of noninvasive methods - induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide - in the assessment of airway inflammation during the investigation of occupational asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis, and reviews studies investigating the effect of exposure to various occupational agents on airway inflammation in healthy individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of studies have confirmed the association between exposure to occupational agents and the presence of eosinophilic airway inflammation after that exposure in individuals with occupational asthma. Individuals with positive specific inhalation challenges to occupational agents seem to show a greater increase in exhaled nitric oxide than those with negative specific inhalation challenges. Exposure to various agents associated with an increase in exhaled nitric oxide mainly induced a neutrophilic inflammation.

SUMMARY

Increasing evidence supports the use of induced sputum as an additional tool in the investigation of occupational asthma. The role of exhaled nitric oxide in the investigation of occupational asthma needs to be clarified due to conflicting evidence reported in the literature.

New insights into occupational asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine recent publications on the types of agents involved in occupational asthma, the mechanisms by which they induce asthma, and how best to evaluate and treat workers suspected of this respiratory condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

High rates of occupational asthma and inhalation accidents were found in workers in crafts and related occupations in the manufacturing industries, and in plant and machine operatives; cleaners and construction workers may also be at risk. Further data support a role for CD4 T cells in low-molecular-weight agent-induced asthma, such as with isocyanates, and neurogenic mechanisms may also be involved. The use of noninvasive measures of airway inflammation in the diagnosis and management of occupational asthma such as sputum eosinophils monitoring is promising, although this is less obvious for exhaled nitric oxide. Finally, the persistence of troublesome asthma even after withdrawal from relevant exposure has been re-emphasized and surveillance programs have been proposed.

SUMMARY

Further data have been gathered on the prevalence of occupational asthma in various working populations, its mechanisms of development, the contribution of noninvasive measures of airway inflammation in the diagnosis and management of this condition, and its management and prevention.

The role of induced sputum in amiodarone-associated interstitial lung diseases

Amiodarone, a highly effective medication for suppressing cardiac rhythm disturbances, may cause pulmonary injury, such as chronic interstitial lung diseases, in 5-15% of the patients who take it. We applied induced sputum (IS), a non-invasive technique, for diagnosing amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity. Four patients with interstitial lung disease who were treated by amiodarone for ischemic heart diseases were evaluated by a conventional clinical workup. All four patients showed marked interstitial pattern on computerized tomography and decreased diffusion capacity (DLCO-SB 51-76%). IS showed lymphocytosis, a high CD4 or CD8 count, eosinophilia and amiodarone in 3 of 4 patients. IS may be a useful tool for assessing amiodarone toxicity in patients with ischemic heart diseases and concomitant pulmonary side effects.

Occupational asthma after withdrawal from the occupational allergen exposure

Occupational asthma is characterised by airway inflammation, variable airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness related causally to work. The aim of the study was to ascertain whether in patients with occupational asthma findings persist after withdrawal from occupational allergen exposure. A group of 37 patients with occupational asthma and a control group of 19 persons were examined. Results in asthmatics obtained during the first visit when occupational asthma was acknowledged, were compared with recent results about 6.5 yr on average after elimination of occupational allergen exposure. Recent findings in occupational asthma patients were compared with the control group. In patients with occupational asthma, no significant differences were found between results obtained at the first and recent visit. Symptoms of asthma persisted in as much as 86.5% of patients. During recent examination there were more positive results in asthmatic patients comparing with the control group in histamine challenge (61.3 vs. 5.3%, p<0.01), eosinophile cationic protein (41.7 vs. 5.3%, p<0.05), prick tests (45.9 vs. 10.5%, p<0.05). Positive results of the present histamine challenge test and elevated eosinophils in sputum were more frequent (p<0.05) in patients with occupational asthma due to high molecular weight allergens than to low molecular weight allergens.

[Use of induced sputum in the investigation of occupational asthma]

The diagnosis of occupational asthma relies mainly on the demonstration of changes in airway calibre and airway responsiveness after exposure to occupational agents in the laboratory or at the workplace. However, spirometry or peak expiratory flow measurements may be open to misinterpretation when they are not performed optimally. As in non-occupational asthma, airway inflammation is one of the main characteristics of occupational asthma. Induced sputum, a non invasive method to assess airway inflammation, has been successfully used in the management of asthma. This article reviews the studies that have investigated and characterized the changes in sputum cell counts occurring in subjects with occupational asthma after exposure to occupational agents in the laboratory or at the workplace in order to assess the place of induced sputum in the investigation of occupational asthma. It also reviews the use of induced sputum during the follow-up of workers with occupational asthma after removal from exposure. This article also describes a new condition identified thanks to the use of induced sputum : occupational eosinophilic bronchitis. In conclusion, induced sputum is a useful tool in the investigation of occupational asthma. Its use on a regular basis in the investigation of occupational asthma also allows for the possibility of diagnosis of overlooked conditions such as occupational eosinophilic bronchitis. Its role in the surveillance of workers at risk to develop occupational asthma remains to be determined.

Diagnosing occupational asthma: insight from induced sputum

The diagnosis of occupational asthma needs to be made objectively using as many criteria as possible. The latter include laboratory exposure tests with occupational agent(s), which are only available in specialized centers. Another approach is to monitor peak expiratory flow (PEF) and (or) methacholine airway responsiveness during periods at work and away from work. However, these measurements are open to misinterpretation when they are not optimally performed. Airway inflammation is one of the main characteristics of asthma. Induced sputum, a non-invasive method to assess airway inflammation, has been successfully used in the management of asthma. However, airway inflammation is seldom assessed during the investigation of occupational asthma. This article reviews the studies that have investigated and characterized the changes in sputum cell counts occurring in subjects with occupational asthma after exposure to occupational agents in the laboratory, or at the workplace to assess to place of induced sputum in the investigation of occupational asthma.

[Is the seric eosinophil cationic protein level a valuable tool of diagnosis in clinical practice?]

SCOPE

The eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) is one of the mediators released during eosinophil activation. These cells are effector cells taking part into the Th2-lymphocyte dependent allergic inflammation. Assaying ECP concentrations in blood and sputum may be useful in evaluating allergic inflammation (asthma and rhinitis). This summary considers the value of measuring ECP levels for the diagnosis of various diseases where an eosinophil-mediated tissue inflammation plays a role.

CURRENT SITUATION AND SALIENT POINTS

Levels of eosinophil cationic protein have been determined in nasal secretions, sputum, gastric secretions, feces and serum. They are increased during seasonal allergic rhinitis and perennial rhinitis, allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis. They are also increased in various gastro-intestinal disorders, some of which are associated with IgE: eosinophil intestinal diseases (esophagitis, gastro-enteritis and colitis), gastro-intestinal food allergy and intestinal parasitoses. Finally, they are increased in non IgE-dependent disorders: non allergic asthma with aspirin intolerance, respiratory infections, sinonasal polyposis, Churg-Strauss disease and idiopathic hyper-eosinophilia (HES) syndrome.

PERSPECTIVES

Assaying serum ECP could help in the diagnosis of several diseases. With parasitic disease the pathogenic progression may be accurately assessed, when serological tests are less indicative. ECP assay may point to non allergic asthma, either Fernand-Widal syndrome or Churg-Strauss disease. As for gastro-intestinal disorders, it indicates an eosinophilic tissue reaction. In the event of isolated hypereosinophilia, ECP assay may clarify whether it is benign or tending towards idiopathic HES. The assay of peroxidase and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) should be also considered.

Control chart for monitoring occupational asthma

INTRODUCTION

Work-related asthma has become the most prevalent occupational respiratory disease in the developed world. Occupational asthma is thought to affect 5%-10% of people worldwide. The first step in the diagnosis of occupational asthma is to establish work-relatedness. Although considerable research has been conducted in the area of occupational asthma, no simple, effective, and statistically sound method has been developed that can be used as an initial step to effectively identify the workers at risk for occupational asthma. The purpose of this research was to investigate whether Shewhart control chart method can be used as an effective method to detect occupational asthma.

METHOD

Forty-five workers who completed the study and provided usable peak expiratory flow (a lung function marker) recordings while at work and away from work were included in this study. Control charts were developed using Shewhart's Method. The lower control limit of at work control chart (LCL(W)) was compared to each subject's Personal Best (PB) value.

RESULTS

Reviewing the results of this comparison showed LCL(W)<60% PB to have a sensitivity of 85.71%, specificity of 87.50%, and an error rate of 13.33%. When the subjects suspected for false positive and false negative diagnoses were identified, the test produced a sensitivity of 95.24%, a specificity of 95.83% and an error rate of 4.44%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results were as good as, and in some cases better than, published clinical guidelines.

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY

Our research showed that the control chart method is an effective, simple, and inexpensive tool for early intervention in workers suspected for occupational asthma.

Occupational asthma

Substantial epidemiologic and clinical evidence indicates that agents inhaled at work can induce asthma. In industrialized countries, occupational factors have been implicated in 9 to 15% of all cases of adult asthma. Work-related asthma includes (1) immunologic occupational asthma (OA), characterized by a latency period before the onset of symptoms; (2) nonimmunologic OA, which occurs after single or multiple exposures to high concentrations of irritant materials; (3) work-aggravated asthma, which is preexisting or concurrent asthma exacerbated by workplace exposures; and (4) variant syndromes. Assessment of the work environment has improved, making it possible to measure concentrations of several high- and low-molecular-weight agents in the workplace. The identification of host factors, polymorphisms, and candidate genes associated with OA is in progress and may improve our understanding of mechanisms involved in OA. A reliable diagnosis of OA should be confirmed by objective testing early after its onset. Removal of the worker from exposure to the causal agent and treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids lead to a better outcome. Finally, strategies for preventing OA should be implemented and their cost-effectiveness examined.

Monitoring response to treatment in asthma management: food for thought

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways that is characterized by episodic symptoms. In this regard, asthma management has classically involved periodic re-assessment by the health-care provider, during which therapy is altered mainly based on clinical and physiological parameters, such as assessment of symptoms, spirometry and peak expiratory flow monitoring. In this context, various markers of airway inflammation (e.g. eosinophils in the induced sputum, nitric oxide in the exhaled air) have been proposed to assess the severity of asthma and to adjust the therapy accordingly. The evaluation of airway hyper-responsiveness with different stimuli has also been suggested as a new tool to monitor asthma. However, the lack of definite relationships between airway inflammation and asthmatic symptoms strongly limit the use of markers of asthma severity in the clinical setting. Therefore, the need of new tools to assess the severity of asthma is raised. The ideal measurement employed to establish the proper asthmatic therapy should be safe, non-invasive, easy to perform, reproducible and accurate, and have the capability to monitor the changes induced by the therapeutic interventions. A careful review of the available techniques, and the evaluation of their sensitivity and specificity in the clinical setting is warranted.

The use of sputum eosinophils in the evaluation of occupational asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis of occupational asthma needs to be made objectively using as many criteria as possible. These include laboratory exposure tests with occupational agent(s), which are only available in specialized centres. Another approach is to monitor peak expiratory flow or methacholine airway responsiveness during periods at work and away from work. However, these measurements are open to misinterpretation when they are not performed optimally. Airway inflammation is one of the main characteristics of occupational asthma, but is not often assessed during its investigation. The purpose of this work was to review recent studies that have investigated and characterized the changes in sputum cell counts occurring in patients with occupational asthma, in order to evaluate the role of the analysis of sputum cell counts.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is evidence that monitoring sputum eosinophils can help in the management of asthma. In the majority of cases of occupational asthma, the percentage of sputum eosinophils increases after exposure to occupational agents in the laboratory compared with baseline, but an increase in sputum neutrophils has also been observed. The changes in airway inflammation occurring at the workplace have been less investigated, but indicate that there are significant changes in airway inflammation and especially sputum eosinophils when workers are exposed to a sensitizer at their workplace compared with periods away from the workplace.

SUMMARY

Induced sputum has successfully been used to manage patients with mild to moderate asthma. Its use is promising in occupational asthma, and its role in the investigation of occupational asthma needs to be better defined.

Eosinophilic bronchitis in the workplace

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to report that eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma may occur as an occupational airway disease. This condition is characterized by cough that is responsive to corticosteroids and eosinophilia detectable in the sputum, without variable airflow obstruction or airway hyperresponsiveness.

RECENT FINDINGS

Eosinophilic bronchitis can be regarded as an occupational respiratory disorder when it develops as a consequence of work exposures. Recently, exposure to certain occupational allergens or sensitizers, such as natural rubber latex, mushroom spores, acrylates and an epoxy resin hardener, have been reported to cause eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma. Several hypotheses have been put forward trying to explain why patients with eosinophilic bronchitis do not have airway hyperresponsiveness. It is unknown whether eosinophilic bronchitis may progress to typical occupational asthma, or if eosinophilic airway inflammation may persist when asthma symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness have waned after the cessation of exposure to the occupational agent.

SUMMARY

Eosinophilic bronchitis, like asthma, may arise from occupational exposures. The examination of induced sputum should be added to the objective monitoring of lung function during periods at work and away from work, as well as before and after specific inhalation challenges with occupational agents.

[Occupational asthma]

BACKGROUND

Occupational asthma (OA) is a frequent work-related disease in industrialised countries. It often leads to severe social and medical consequences.

TWO TYPES OF OA

A distinction must be made between OA with a latency period, the origin of which is essentially allergic, and OA without a latency period or Reactive airways dysfunction syndrome (RADS), induced by acute inhalation of irritant substances.

PREVALENCE

This is currently estimated as one case of asthma of occupational origin in one adult out of ten. In many cases its diagnosis is missed because it is not systematically searched for.

REGARDING DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis, initiated on the results of questioning, must be supported by immunological tests whenever possible and notably on functional respiratory explorations (longitudinal monitoring of peak flow or spirometry, repeated measurements of non-specific bronchial reactivity), which objectifies significant variations in the parameters measured and related to professional activity. Bronchial challenge tests specifically identify the causal agent, but such examinations are long, expensive, potentially dangerous and therefore cannot be used in routine.

MANAGEMENT OF OA

Both social and medical, the management is aimed at stopping the exposure to the risk whilst protecting the person's employment. The declaration of occupational diseases is one of the principle measures of the medico-social care.

Sputum tests in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review the techniques of sputum analysis with relevance to the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE databases were searched to identify all publications involving sputum studies related to the diagnosis and treatment of asthma from 1990 to October 2003. We also used internal reference files related to sputum and searched bibliographies of relevant articles. The review was limited to human data in English-language publications.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected by the expert opinions of the authors for quality and relevance to the evaluation of asthmatic inflammation by induced sputum.

RESULTS

During the past 10 years, there have been an increasing number of publications concerning the diagnosis and treatment of asthma using sputum analysis. Analysis of induced sputum provides similar data to secretions obtained through bronchial wash, bronchoalveolar lavage, and, to some extent, bronchial biopsy. The techniques of cellular counting and immunochemical analysis are described along with potential problems and pitfalls of these methods. Clinical application of sputum analysis is discussed as it pertains to the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma and asthma-related conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of induced sputum is increasingly being considered as a noninvasive means of evaluating airway inflammation and may provide useful information with regard to the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma in select individuals.

An effective strategy for diagnosing occupational asthma: use of induced sputum

Monitoring airway inflammation by means of induced sputum cell counts seems to improve the management of asthma. We sought to assess whether such monitoring at the end of periods at and away from work combined with the monitoring of PEF could improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma. We enrolled subjects suspected of having occupational asthma. Serial monitoring of PEF was performed during 2 weeks at and away from work. At the end of each period, induced sputum was collected. Specific inhalation challenge was subsequently performed. PEF graphs were interpreted visually by five independent observers. Forty-nine subjects, including 23 with positive specific inhalation challenge, completed the study. The addition of sputum cell counts to the monitoring of PEF increased the specificity of this test, respectively, by 18 (range [r] 13.7-25.5) or 26.8% (r 24.8-30.4) depending if an increase of sputum eosinophils greater than 1 or 2% when at work was considered as significant. The sensitivity increased by 8.2% (r 4.1-13.4) or decreased by 12.3% (r 3.1-24.1) depending on the cutoff value in sputum eosinophils chosen (greater than 1 or 2%, respectively). The addition of sputum cell counts to PEF monitoring is useful to improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma.

Biological markers in diagnosing, monitoring, and treating asthma: a focus on noninvasive measurements

Asthma is a major concern for society, healthcare professionals, and individuals and families directly affected by asthma due to rising morbidity rates and costs associated with the disease. The pathological hallmark of asthma is airway inflammation that is considered to be a major cause of exacerbations and persistent structural alterations of the airways. Assessing airway inflammation is important for investigating the underlying mechanisms of the disease and possibly for following the progression and resolution of the disease. The presence and type of airway inflammation can be difficult to detect clinically, and may result in delays in initiating appropriate therapy. The purpose of this article is to review noninvasive methods for assessing biological markers of airway inflammation and their potential role in the future for diagnosing, monitoring, and treating asthma. The article reviews the noninvasive measurements of induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide as indicators of airway inflammation.