Oral corticosteroids in asthma and beyond: moving forward

Systemic corticosteroid dose-response effects in asthma: an observational cohort study

This study is among the first in a large patient database over an extended period to identify a link between SCS use/overuse and mortality in asthma in a positive dose-response relationship with average daily exposure and cumulative dose categories https://bit.ly/3zzl2QN.

Unlocking Better Asthma Control: A Narrative Review of Adherence to Asthma Therapy and Innovative Monitoring Solutions

This review addresses the ongoing challenges in asthma management, particularly focusing on patient adherence to inhaler therapy. Asthma, a chronic condition characterized by variable respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if not properly managed. Despite advances in inhaler technology and therapeutic options, non-adherence remains a significant barrier to optimal asthma control. This review explores both intentional and unintentional non-adherence, influenced by factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and the complexity of inhaler devices. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) provides guidelines aimed at improving adherence through targeted interventions, and this review examines their application. Common inhaler technique errors, including incorrect inhalation speed, not exhaling before inhaling, and failure to hold breath post-inhalation, are identified as major contributors to inadequate asthma control. Furthermore, the review explores the emerging role of electronic monitoring devices (EMDs), such as CapMedic and DigiHaler, which offer real-time feedback to enhance inhaler technique and adherence. The role of biomarkers in assessing adherence and the potential of personalized treatment strategies, including biologic therapies, are also discussed. Overall, addressing adherence requires a comprehensive approach that integrates patient education, tailored interventions, and technological innovations to achieve better clinical outcomes in asthma management.

[Efficacy and toxicity of short-course corticosteroid therapy in chronic bronchial diseases]

Chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are characterized by airway inflammation. While corticosteroids (CS) are frequently prescribed during exacerbations of these conditions, their repeated use is associated with numerous side effects. The aim of this review is to synthesize the recent literature on the indications, benefits, and risks of short-term CS therapy for these two diseases. French guidelines recommend short-term CS as a first-line treatment during asthma exacerbation (0,5 to 1mg/kg/day, not exceeding 60mg/day, for at least 5 to 7 days) or as a second-line treatment for COPD exacerbation (5 days, 30 to 40mg/day). However, these recommendations are not without limitations; they are primarily based on studies conducted in hospital settings, raising questions about the generalizability of their results to primary care, and as they employ a "one size fits all" strategy, they do not take into account the phenotypic heterogeneity of different patients. Moreover, repeated short-term CS courses generate side effects that even at low doses can appear early in young asthma patients, and they can exacerbate pre-existing comorbidities in COPD patients. The concept of a threshold dose should be employed in routine practice in view of accurately assessing the risk of side effects. In the near future, it will be important to consider recently published data supporting the use of predictive biomarkers for responses to CS, particularly in COPD cases.

Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Intermittent Oral Corticosteroid Prescribing Patterns in Asthma

Purpose

Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use for asthma is associated with considerable healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, no study has investigated this in relation to patterns of intermittent OCS prescription.

Methods

This historical UK cohort study used primary care medical records, linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, from 2008 to 2019, of patients (≥4 years old) with asthma prescribed intermittent OCS. Patients were categorized by OCS prescribing pattern (one-off [single], less frequent [≥90-day gap] and frequent [<90-day gap]) and matched 1:1 (by sex, age and index date) with people never prescribed OCS with/without asthma. HCRU (reported as episodes, except for length of hospital stay [days] and any prescription [records]) and associated costs were compared between intermittent OCS and non-OCS cohorts, and among intermittent OCS prescribing patterns.

Results

Of 149,191 eligible patients, 50.3% had one-off, 27.4% less frequent, and 22.3% frequent intermittent OCS prescribing patterns. Annualized non-respiratory HCRU rates were greater in the intermittent OCS versus non-OCS cohorts for GP visits (5.93 vs 4.70 episodes, p < 0.0001), hospital admissions (0.24 vs 0.16 episodes, p < 0.0001), and length of stay (1.87 vs 1.58 days, p < 0.0001). In the intermittent OCS cohort, rates were highest in the frequent prescribing group for GP visits (7.49 episodes; p < 0.0001 vs one-off), length of stay (2.15 days; p < 0.0001) and any prescription including OCS (25.22 prescriptions; p < 0.0001). Mean per-patient non-respiratory related and all-cause HCRU-related costs were higher with intermittent OCS than no OCS (£3902 vs £2722 and £8623 vs £4929, respectively), as were mean annualized costs (£565 vs £313 and £1526 vs £634, respectively). A dose-response relationship existed; HCRU-related costs were highest in the frequent prescribing cohort (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Intermittent OCS use and more frequent intermittent OCS prescription patterns were associated with increased HCRU and associated costs. Improved asthma management is needed to reduce reliance on intermittent OCS in primary care.

Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study

Purpose

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients often present overlapping inflammatory features rendering them eligible for multiple biologic therapies; switching biologic treatment is a strategy adopted to optimize asthma control when patients show partial or no response to previous biologics.

Patients and Methods

ANANKE is a retrospective, multicenter Italian study (NCT04272463). Here, we outline the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in naïve-to-biologics and biologics-experienced patients treated with benralizumab for up to 96 weeks. Bio-experienced patients were split into omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets according to the type of biologic previously used.

Results

A total of 124 (76.5%) naïve and 38 (23.5%) bio-experienced patients were evaluated at index date; 13 patients (34.2%) switched from mepolizumab, 21 patients (55.3%) switched from omalizumab, and four patients (10.5%) received both biologics. The mepolizumab subset was characterized by the longest SEA duration (median of 4.6 years), the highest prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (76.5%), and the greatest oral corticosteroid (OCS) daily dosage (median of 25 mg prednisone equivalent). The omalizumab group showed the highest severe annual exacerbation rate (AER) (1.70). At 96 weeks, treatment with benralizumab reduced any and severe AER by more than 87% and 94%, respectively, across all groups. Lung function was overall preserved, with major improvements observed in the mepolizumab group, which also revealed a 100% drop of the median OCS dose. Asthma Control Test (ACT) score improved in the naïve group while its increment was more variable in bio-experienced patients; among these, a marked difference was noticed between omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets (median ACT score of 23.5 and 18, respectively).

Conclusion

Benralizumab promotes durable and profound clinical benefits in naïve and bio-experienced groups, indicating that a nearly complete depletion of eosinophils is highly beneficial in the control of SEA, independently of previous biologic use.

Oral corticosteroid use and sarcopenia-related traits in older people with chronic airway disease: a population-based study

Background

Sarcopenia is characterised by two major phenotypic components: low handgrip strength (HGS) and appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI). Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use is an important medication for acute respiratory exacerbations in patients with COPD and asthma. However, the association of OCS and sarcopenia components in older people is largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to examine the association between OCS use and HGS or ASMI in the general population and explore interactions with chronic airway diseases.

Methods

From the population-based Rotterdam Study, 5054 participants (age 69.0±8.8 years; 56% females) were included in the cross-sectional analysis and 1324 in the longitudinal analysis. Associations between OCS and muscle strength and mass were analysed using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, fat %, height, kidney function, smoking and comorbidities.

Results

At baseline, ever-OCS users had lower handgrip strength (β= -0.48, 95% CI -0.84- -0.12) than never-OCS users, with cumulative frequency (≥10 OCS prescriptions)-dependent effects (β= -1.25, 95% CI -2.16- -0.33). COPD ever-OCS users, but not asthma, had lower handgrip strength (β= -0.98, 95% CI -1.91- -0.06) and lower lean mass (β= -0.14, 95% CI -0.27- -0.01) than never-OCS users. After 5.6 years of follow-up in those free of sarcopenia traits at baseline, COPD ever-OCS users developed lower handgrip strength (β= -1.64, 95% CI -2.87- -0.40) with frequency (β= -3.64, 95% CI -6.57- -0.72) and duration (β= -1.51, 95% CI -2.87- -0.15) association compared to never-OCS users.

Conclusions

OCS use is associated with a decline in handgrip strength in people with COPD in a cumulative frequency and duration-dependent manner. Routine muscle examination may be necessary for patients with COPD.

Definition, Phenotyping of Severe Asthma, Including Cluster Analysis

Asthma is defined as severe when it is uncontrolled despite the high intensity of treatment, or that loses control when a therapeutic step down is tried.These patients, for years, have been "uniformly" treated with massive doses of inhaled and oral corticosteroids regardless of their inflammatory state.Initially, asthma was considered of genesis "exclusively allergic." Subsequently, thanks to the development of noninvasive tools and of human monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin 5, a pathogenetic role has been given to eosinophils. Management of steroids based on sputum eosinophil counts has been suggested according to clinical phenotypes identified through cluster analysis.The algorithms obtained from the cluster analysis have proved later to be poorly predictive of the inflammatory phenotype and difficult to apply in clinical practice.In the new era of precision medicine, the greatest challenge is finding clinical or biological elements predictive of response to therapies such as biologics. Cluster analyses performed on omics data or on cohorts of patients treated with biologics are more promising in this sense.In this article, starting from the current definition of severe asthma, we review the phenotypes proposed over time to date, showing the difficulty underlying the process of "phenotyping" due to the scarcity of available biomarkers.