Recent developments in advanced diagnostic bronchoscopy

CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: How we do it

CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy is a well-established method for diagnosing pulmonary lesions. However, despite extensive literature on the subject, many aspects of the procedure remain unexamined in large controlled trials. Consequently, practices vary across centers due to differences in local facilities, operators' preferences, and experience. This article summarizes the essential steps of CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy, covering patient selection to technical tips and tricks, complication management, and rapid onsite cytology evaluation. The techniques described here are based on years of clinical practice, research findings, and close collaboration with colleagues from various specialties, aiming to maximize tissue retrieval while minimizing complications. Moreover, given the growing importance of molecular analyses in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer, this article provides a concise and practical guide on proper biopsy specimen handling.

Added Value of a Robotic-assisted Bronchoscopy Platform in Cone Beam Computed Tomography-guided Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Parenchymal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided bronchoscopic sampling of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) is associated with superior diagnostic outcomes. However, the added value of a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform in CBCT-guided diagnostic procedures is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 100 consecutive PPLs sampled using conventional flexible bronchoscopy under CBCT guidance (FB-CBCT) and 100 consecutive PPLs sampled using an electromagnetic navigation-guided robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform under CBCT guidance (RB-CBCT). Patient demographics, PPL features, procedural characteristics, and procedural outcomes were compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

Patient and PPL characteristics were similar between the FB-CBCT and RB-CBCT cohorts, and there were no significant differences in diagnostic yield (88% vs. 90% for RB-CBCT, P=0.822) or incidence of complications between the 2 groups. As compared with FB-CBCT cases, RB-CBCT cases were significantly shorter (median 58 min vs. 92 min, P<0.0001) and used significantly less diagnostic radiation (median dose area product 5114 µGy•m2 vs. 8755 µGy•m2, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

CBCT-guided bronchoscopy with or without a robotic-assisted bronchoscopy platform is a safe and effective method for sampling PPLs, although the integration of a robotic-assisted platform was associated with significantly shorter procedure times and significantly less radiation exposure.

Breaking New Ground in Interventional Pulmonology: Integrating Cone Beam CT and Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy for High-Risk Pneumothorax in Peripherally Located Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

Lung cancer, a leading cause of global cancer-related deaths, necessitates the development of innovative diagnostic techniques. Traditional bronchoscopy, while useful, has limitations in diagnosing peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) and carries a higher risk of complications such as pneumothorax. However, the field of interventional pulmonology has seen significant advancements, including the introduction of robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB), cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS), and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). These advancements have greatly improved the precision of diagnosing high-risk PPLs. This report presents the case of a 60-year-old female smoker with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and extensive centrilobular emphysema, who had a peripherally located high-risk pulmonary nodule. She was successfully diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma using an integrated approach, despite the challenging location of the lesion and high risk of pneumothorax. The integration of RAB with CBCT and augmented fluoroscopy offers a groundbreaking approach for diagnosing and managing difficult-to-reach, high-risk pulmonary nodules, marking a significant stride in the field of interventional pulmonology.

Spray nozzle for topical anaesthesia during flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised controlled trial

Background

The effectiveness of using a spray nozzle to deliver lidocaine for superior topical airway anaesthesia during non-sedation flexible bronchoscopy (FB) remains a topic of uncertainty when compared with conventional methods.

Methods

Patients referred for FB were randomly assigned to receive topical lidocaine anaesthesia via the bronchoscope's working channel (classical spray (CS) group) or through a washing pipe equipped with a spray nozzle (SN group). The primary outcome was cough rate, defined as the total number of coughs per minute. Secondary outcomes included subjective perceptions of both the patient and operator regarding the FB process. These perceptions were rated on a visual analogue scale, with numerical ratings ranging from 0 to 10.

Results

Our study enrolled a total of 126 (61 CS group; 65 SN group) patients. The SN group exhibited a significantly lower median cough rate compared with the CS group (4.5 versus 7.1 counts·min-1; p=0.021). Patients in the SN group also reported less oropharyngeal discomfort (4.5±2.7 versus 5.6±2.9; p=0.039), better tolerance of the procedure (6.8±2.2 versus 5.7±2.7; p=0.011) and a greater willingness to undergo a repeat FB procedure (7.2±2.7 versus 5.8±3.4; p=0.015) compared with those in the CS group. From the operator's perspective, patient discomfort (2.7±1.7 versus 3.4±2.3; p=0.040) and cough scores (2.3±1.5 versus 3.2±2.4; p=0.013) were lower in the SN group compared with the CS group, with less disruption due to coughing observed among those in the SN group (1.6±1.4 versus 2.3±2.3; p=0.029).

Conclusions

This study illustrates that employing a spray nozzle for the delivery of lidocaine provides superior topical airway anaesthesia during non-sedation FB compared with the traditional method.

Diagnostic efficacy and safety of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for adjacent lesions in segmental or subsegmental bronchi: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Peripheral lung lesions can be sampled using various techniques, including computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration, electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy, virtual navigation bronchoscopy, and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial lung biopsy. Mediastinal lesions can be sampled using techniques like convex probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (CEBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration. However, effective, safe techniques for lesions adjacent to the segmental or subsegmental bronchi are lacking. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic yield and safety of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-assisted transbronchial needle aspiration (REBUS-TBNA) for lesions adjacent to the segmental bronchi, and explored the factors related to diagnostic yield.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the diagnostic yield and safety of REBUS-TBNA cases performed in our department from January 2019 to December 2022. Observation group patients had undergone REBUS-TBNA for lesions adjacent to the segmental bronchi; control group patients had undergone CEBUS-TBNA for mediastinal or hilar lesions. Patient characteristics and lesion sizes, diagnostic yield, adverse events, and relations between diagnostic yield and clinical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were not statistically significant between-group differences in sex, age, diagnostic yield, or rate of adverse events. The observation group (n = 25; 17 male, 8 female) had a mean age of 64.76 ± 10.75 years. The average lesion size was 4.66 ± 1.07 cm, and lesions were predominantly in the upper lobes (80%). REBUS-TBNA diagnostic yield was 84%, with no adverse events reported. Diagnostic yield was not associated with lesion size or extent of bronchial stenosis; however, it was positively correlated with number of punctures. Patients with > 3 punctures had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than those with ≤ 3 punctures.

CONCLUSIONS

REBUS-TBNA is a safe, effective diagnostic technique, particularly for lesions adjacent to the segmental or subsegmental bronchi of the upper lobe. Performing more than three punctures during the procedure improves the diagnostic yield. Larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm these results, and to further explore the clinical value of REBUS-TBNA.

Endobronchial ultrasound: a pictorial essay

BACKGROUND AND AIM

endobronchial ultrasound has gained widespread popularity in the last decade, becoming the primary technique for minimally invasive evaluation of the mediastinum and staging of lung cancer. Several tertiary and quaternary care institutes use this method, performed by trained and accredited specialists. Its main indications are (I) diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, (II) mediastinal lymphadenopathy diagnosis (III) sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

this manuscript aims to describe the operational potential of both convex endobronchial ultrasound probe and radial endobronchial ultrasound probe technology, focusing on lung cancer. This narrative review is complemented with by the description of peculiar clinical cases in which endobronchial ultrasound played a pivotal role in reaching the diagnosis.

Endoscopic Technologies for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: From Diagnosis to Therapy

Peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are frequent incidental findings in subjects when performing chest radiographs or chest computed tomography (CT) scans. When a PPL is identified, it is necessary to proceed with a risk stratification based on the patient profile and the characteristics found on chest CT. In order to proceed with a diagnostic procedure, the first-line examination is often a bronchoscopy with tissue sampling. Many guidance technologies have recently been developed to facilitate PPLs sampling. Through bronchoscopy, it is currently possible to ascertain the PPL's benign or malignant nature, delaying the therapy's second phase with radical, supportive, or palliative intent. In this review, we describe all the new tools available: from the innovation of bronchoscopic instrumentation (e.g., ultrathin bronchoscopy and robotic bronchoscopy) to the advances in navigation technology (e.g., radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound, virtual navigation, electromagnetic navigation, shape-sensing navigation, cone-beam computed tomography). In addition, we summarize all the PPLs ablation techniques currently under experimentation. Interventional pulmonology may be a discipline aiming at adopting increasingly innovative and disruptive technologies.

Performance of a new single-use bronchoscope versus a marketed single-use comparator: a bench study

BACKGROUND

Single-use flexible bronchoscopes eliminate cross contamination from reusable bronchoscopes and are cost-effective in a number of clinical settings. The present bench study aimed to compare the performance of a new single-use bronchoscope (Boston Scientific EXALT Model B) to a marketed single-use comparator (Ambu aScope 4), each in slim, regular and large diameters.

METHODS

Three bronchoscopy tasks were performed: water suction and visualization, "mucus" mass (synthetic mucoid mixture) suctioned in 30 s, and "mucus" plug (thicker mucoid mixture) suction. Suction ability, task completion times, and subjective ratings of visualization and overall performance on a scale of one to 10 (best) were compared. All bronchoscopy tasks were completed by 15 physicians representing diversity in specialization including pulmonary, interventional pulmonary, critical care, anesthesia, and thoracic surgery. Each physician utilized the six bronchoscope versions with block randomization by bronchoscope and task.

RESULTS

Aspirated mean mass of "mucus" using EXALT Model B Regular was comparable to that for an aScope 4 Large (41.8 ± 8.3 g vs. 41.5 ± 5.7 g respectively, p = 0.914). In comparisons of scopes with the same outer diameter, the aspirated mean mass by weight of water and "mucus" was significantly greater for EXALT Model B than for aScope 4 (p < 0.001 for all three diameters). Mean ratings for visualization attributes were significantly better for EXALT Model B compared to aScope 4 (p-value range 0.001-0.029).

CONCLUSION

A new single-use bronchoscope provided strong suction capability and visualization compared to same-diameter marketed single-use comparators in a bench model simulation.

The hemorrhage risk of patients undergoing bronchoscopic examinations or treatments

BACKGROUND

In recent years, bronchoscopic procedures have become more complex and sophisticated, as well as more extensively used. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, particularly the hemorrhage risk, of patients undergoing bronchoscopic examinations or treatments.

METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of inpatients and outpatients who underwent bronchoscopic examinations or treatments in our respiratory department between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2019. We collected and analyzed the patient and bronchoscopic data.

RESULTS

Among the 45,734 patients who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic bronchoscopies, the severe complication rate was 0.85%, and the mortality was 0.01%. The severe complication rates varied significantly among the types of bronchoscopic procedures; the rate was higher with therapeutic bronchoscopies than with exploratory examination or biopsy bronchoscopies. Bleeding was the most common severe complication, and it occurred more frequently with biopsies in the left upper lobe and the bronchus intermedius, but its incidence decreased as the number of biopsies increased above one.

CONCLUSIONS

Although bronchoscopic procedures have become more complex and sophisticated, bronchoscopies are still well tolerated. However, precautions should be taken because hemorrhaging and pneumothorax remain potential complications, and they can be fatal.