Clinical experience with antifibrotics in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a 3-year real-life observational study

Rectus femoris cross sectional area and timed up and go test potential useful of as a predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease often complicated by sarcopenia, significantly impacting patient outcomes. This study investigates the prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenia in IPF patients using morphofunctional assessment methods.

Materials and methods

Eighty-four IPF patients (predominantly male) were evaluated for sarcopenia using the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2) criteria. Assessments included bioelectrical impedance vectorial analysis (Nutrilab, Akern), handgrip strength (HGS), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and nutritional ultrasound (NU) measurements of rectus femoris and abdominal adipose tissue. Statistical analysis was performed (version 2.3.28 for macOS) to obtain sarcopenia cut-off points for the different techniques, and then the predictive capacity of these values for survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier curve.

Results

Sarcopenia was prevalent in 20.2% of the cohort. Sarcopenic patients exhibited significantly lower forced vital capacity (FVC) (2,142 mL vs. 2745.6 mL, p < 0.05), higher GAP stages (p < 0.05), and worse quality of life (SGRQ impact scores: 45.2 vs. 27.5, p < 0.05). The identified cutoff values were 2.94 cm2 for RFCSA, 9.19 s for TUG, and 1.08 cm for the RF-Y-axis and body cell mass (BCM) cutoff of 25.4 kg. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a higher hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in sarcopenic patients. Specifically, RFCSA sarcopenia patients had a 2.37 times higher risk of events (HR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.02-5.48, p = 0.045), and TUG sarcopenia presented a 4.89 times higher risk of adverse events (HR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.43-16.70, p = 0.011).

Conclusion

Sarcopenia is prevalent in IPF patients and is associated with greater disease severity and reduced quality of life. RFCSA, BCM, and TUG are good predictors of sarcopenia and 12-month mortality, improving the prognostic value of classical diagnostics based on EWGSOP2 criteria. Despite limitations such as a predominantly male sample and cross-sectional design, the findings emphasize the importance of early detection and targeted interventions. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to better understand sarcopenia progression in IPF and evaluate the efficacy of various therapeutic approaches.

Lung fibrosis in sarcoidosis. Is there a place for antifibrotics?

Sarcoidosis, an enigmatic disease with unknown etiology, is characterized by inflammation and the potential involvement of various organs, predominantly the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes. Non-caseating granulomas can resolve spontaneously in approximately 60% of cases within 2-3 years. However, sarcoidosis-related mortality has increased. Lung fibrosis, affecting up to 20% of sarcoidosis patients, stands out as a primary cause of mortality. Traditionally, fibrosis is viewed because of prolonged inflammation, necessitating anti-inflammatory treatment with systemic steroids, immunosuppressants, and anti-TNF agents to manage the disease. The recent introduction of antifibrotic drugs such as nintedanib and pirfenidone offers new avenues for treating fibrotic sarcoidosis. Nintedanib, effective in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD), has shown promise in patients with various progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILD), including those with sarcoidosis. Pirfenidone, also effective in IPF, has demonstrated potential in managing fibrotic sarcoidosis, though results have been inconclusive due to limited participant numbers in studies. This review explores the theoretical and empirical evidence supporting the use of antifibrotics in sarcoidosis, weighing the benefits and drawbacks. While antifibrotics offer a potential therapeutic approach, further randomized controlled trials are essential to determine their efficacy in fibrotic sarcoidosis. Addressing fibrosis as a continuum of chronic inflammation, the role of antifibrotics in managing sarcoidosis remains an area requiring more in-depth research to improve patient outcomes and advance treatment paradigms.

Safety, effectiveness, and usefulness of higher-dose tablets of generic pirfenidone in patients with IPF: a nationwide observational study in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Pirfenidone is an antifibrotic medication approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Fybro®, a generic version of pirfenidone developed in South Korea, gained approval and is available in 200 mg and in higher-dose formulations of 400 and 600 mg. This real-world prospective cohort study investigated the safety and effectiveness of Fybro®.

METHODS

A nationwide observational study was conducted in patients with IPF. Patients were followed up for 6 months, with a subset of patients being followed up for 12 months. Data on lung function and adverse events were collected. Patient adherence to fewer-pill (400 and/or 600 mg tablets) and multiple-pill (200 mg tablets) regimens were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 359 enrolled patients, 352 received pirfenidone (Fybro®) at least once and were included in the analysis. The mean age was 69.0 years and 82.4% of patients were male. The median treatment duration was 186.0 days. A total of 253 patients (71.9%) experienced adverse events, with decreased appetite being the most common (16.5%). The adjusted decline rates in lung function were -1.5% and -2.2% predicted per year for forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity, respectively. No significant differences were observed based on the pirfenidone dose. For a daily intake of 1,200 or 1800 mg of pirfenidone, a significantly longer duration of drug administration was observed with the fewer-pill regimen than with multiple-pill regimen.

CONCLUSION

The safety and effectiveness of Fybro® observed in this real-world cohort study are consistent with previous studies. Using higher-strength tablets to reduce pill burden may improve medication adherence.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Challenges of a Complex Disease

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex interstitial lung disease caused by chronic inhalation of a wide variety of antigens in susceptible and sensitized individuals, commonly associated with an occupational exposure. An impressive number of inciting antigens causing hypersensitivity pneumonitis have been found to cover a wide range of occupations. As working practices have changed over time, especially in industrialized countries, new names for occupational HP have emerged. This review emphasizes the main diagnostic issues arising from the high variability of clinical presentation and the broad spectrum of causal antigens. Furthermore, it provides an overview of current methods to unveil possible causes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis, highlights HP's current diagnostic and treatment challenges and the remaining areas of uncertainty, and presents prevention strategies.

Japanese clinical practice guide 2022 for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Considering recently published two guidelines for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) has now published its own Japanese clinical practice guide for HP. Major types of HP in Japan include summer-type, home-related, bird-related, farmer's lung, painter's lung, humidifier lung, and mushroom grower's lung. Identifying causative antigens is critical for increasing diagnostic confidence, as well as improving prognosis through appropriate antigen avoidance. This guide proposes a comprehensive antigen questionnaire including the outbreak sources reported in Japan. Drawing on the 2021 CHEST guideline, this guide highlights the antigen identification confidence level and adaptations for environmental surveys. The detection of specific antibodies against causative antigens is an important diagnostic predictor of HP. In Japan, the assessments of bird-specific IgG (pigeons, budgerigars) and the Trichosporon asahii antibody are covered by medical insurance. Although this guide adopts the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline diagnostic criteria based on the combination of imaging findings, exposure assessment, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, and histopathological findings, it added some annotations to facilitate the interpretation of the content and correlate the medical situation in Japan. It recommends checking biomarkers; seasonal changes in the KL-6 concentration (increase in winter for bird-related HP/humidifier lung and in summer for summer-type HP) and high KL-6 concentrations providing a basis for the suspicion of HP. Antigen avoidance is critical for disease management of HP. This guide also addresses the pharmacological management of HP, highlighting the treatment strategy for fibrotic HP including combination therapies with anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive and antifibrotic drugs.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Updates in Evaluation, Management, and Ongoing Dilemmas

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a heterogenous disease entity characterized by an aberrant immune response to inhalational antigens. Disease modification hinges on early antigen remediation with a goal to attenuate immune dysregulation. Disease severity and progression are mediated by an interface between degree, type and chronicity of exposure, genetic predisposition, and biochemical properties of the inducing agent. Guidelines have provided a standardized approach; however, decision-making remains with many clinical dilemmas. The delineation of fibrotic and nonfibrotic HP is crucial to identify the differences in clinical trajectories, and further clinical trials are needed to understand optimal therapeutic strategies.

Extracting patient-level data from the electronic health record: Expanding opportunities for health system research

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies of interstitial lung disease (ILD) are limited by small numbers and tertiary care bias. Investigators have leveraged the widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) to overcome these limitations, but struggle to extract patient-level, longitudinal clinical data needed to address many important research questions. We hypothesized that we could automate longitudinal ILD cohort development using the EHR of a large, community-based healthcare system.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We applied a previously validated algorithm to the EHR of a community-based healthcare system to identify ILD cases between 2012-2020. We then extracted disease-specific characteristics and outcomes using fully automated data-extraction algorithms and natural language processing of selected free-text.

RESULTS

We identified a community cohort of 5,399 ILD patients (prevalence = 118 per 100,000). Pulmonary function tests (71%) and serologies (54%) were commonly used in the diagnostic evaluation, whereas lung biopsy was rare (5%). IPF was the most common ILD diagnosis (n = 972, 18%). Prednisone was the most commonly prescribed medication (911, 17%). Nintedanib and pirfenidone were rarely prescribed (n = 305, 5%). ILD patients were high-utilizers of inpatient (40%/year hospitalized) and outpatient care (80%/year with pulmonary visit), with sustained utilization throughout the post-diagnosis study period.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated the feasibility of robustly characterizing a variety of patient-level utilization and health services outcomes in a community-based EHR cohort. This represents a substantial methodological improvement by alleviating traditional constraints on the accuracy and clinical resolution of such ILD cohorts; we believe this approach will make community-based ILD research more efficient, effective, and scalable.

The Effectiveness of Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis and Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Real-World Study

Background: Nintedanib is an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recent evidence demonstrated that nintedanib reduced functional disease progression also in subjects with non-IPF progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). However, real-life data on the effectiveness of nintedanib in PF-ILD and familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) are lacking. Methods: this retrospective monocentric study enrolled 197 patients affected with IPF, PF-ILD and FPF treated with nintedanib at the Referral Centre of Siena from 2014 to 2021. Pulmonary functional tests and survival data were collected throughout the observation period for the evaluation of mortality and disease progression outcomes. Results: nintedanib treatment significantly reduced the FVC decline rate in IPF and PF-ILD subgroups, but not in FPF subjects. No significant differences were observed among the subgroups in terms of survival, which appeared to be influenced by gender and impaired lung function (FVC < 70% of predicted value). Concerning disease progression rate, a diagnosis of FPF is associated with more pronounced FVC decline despite nintedanib treatment. Conclusions: our research studies the effectiveness and safety of nintedanib in reducing functional disease progression of IPF and PF-ILD. FPF appeared to be less responsive to nintedanib, even though no differences were observed in terms of survival.

Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To inform an American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax clinical practice guideline, this systematic review evaluated existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic nintedanib. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using nintedanib to treat patients with PPF. Mortality, disease progression, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Two relevant studies were selected. The annual decline in FVC was less in the nintedanib arm in the overall study population [mean difference (MD) 107 milliliters (mL)/year (yr) (95% CI 65.4-148.5 mL/yr)] and in the subgroups with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of pulmonary fibrosis [MD 128.2 mL/yr (95% CI 70.8-185.6 mL/yr)], non-UIP patterns of pulmonary fibrosis [MD 75.3 mL/yr (95% CI 15.5-135.0 mL/yr)], fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD [MD 106.2 mL/yr (95% CI 10.6-201.9 mL/yr)], fibrotic idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia [MD 141.7 mL/yr (95% CI 46.0-237.4 mL/yr)], and fibrotic occupational ILD [MD 252.8 mL/yr (95% CI 79.2-426.5 mL/yr)], but not fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis [MD 72.9 mL/yr (95% CI -8.9-154.7 mL/yr)], fibrotic sarcoidosis [MD -20.5 mL/yr (95% CI -337.1-296.1 mL/yr)], or unclassified fibrotic ILD [MD 68.5 mL/yr (95% CI -31.3-168.4 mL/yr)] when compared to placebo. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects were common. Quality of evidence for the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate GRADE. Conclusions: Nintedanib use in patients with PPF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in disease progression but increase in GI side effects regardless of the radiographic pattern of pulmonary fibrosis. However, limitations in the available evidence lead to low certainty in these effect estimates and make definitive conclusions about the differential effects by subtype of ILD difficult to determine.

Pirfenidone in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To inform an American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax clinical practice guideline, this systematic review evaluated existing interstitial lung disease literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic pirfenidone. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using pirfenidone to treat patients with PPF. Mortality, disease progression, lung function, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Two studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses revealed changes in FVC % predicted [mean difference (MD) 2.3% (95% CI 0.5-4.1)], FVC in mL [MD 100.0 mL (95% CI 98.1-101.9)], and 6MWD in meters [MD 25.2 m (95% CI 8.3-42.1)] all favored pirfenidone to placebo. Change in DLCO in mmol/kPa/min [MD 0.40 mmol/kPa/min (95% CI 0.10-0.70)] and risk of DLCO declining more than 15% [relative risk (RR) 0.27 (95% CI 0.08-0.95)] also favored pirfenidone. The risks of gastrointestinal discomfort [RR 1.83 (95% CI 1.29-2.60)] and photosensitivity [RR 4.88 (95% CI 1.09-21.83)] were higher with pirfenidone. The quality of evidence was low or very low GRADE, depending on the outcome. Conclusions: Pirfenidone use in patients with PPF is associated with statistically significant decrease in disease progression and protection in lung function. However, there is very low certainty in the estimated effects due to limitations in the available evidence.

Addition of antifibrotic therapy to immunosuppression in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A case series

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis has historically been treated with immunosuppression, but recently nintedanib was approved for the treatment of progressive fibrotic HP. One limitation of INBUILD is that the only immunosuppression (IS) permitted at the time of enrollment was glucocorticoids at a dose of less than 20mg per day, so the additive effect of antifibrotic (AF) therapy to IS in HP remains unclear. We present 5 cases of patients with HP for whom AF therapy was added to IS. Trends observed in the cohort include reduced decline in FVC, oxygen requirement, and symptoms in the year after adding AF to IS in 4 of the 5 patients. All 5 patients (100%) in our series demonstrated progression in the year prior to initiation of antifibrotic based on criteria outlined in the INBUILD trial, but only 1 of 5 (20%) progressed in the year after AF. There was a significant decrease in the rate of relative decline in % predicted FVC in the 12 months after initiation of antifibrotic compared to the 12 months prior to antifibrotic (0.4% ±7.6 vs -17.5% ±7.6, p = 0.0495). Compared to the 12 months prior to antifibrotic therapy, fewer patients met criteria for progression in the 12 months after initiating antifibrotic therapy (p = 0.048). Similarly, fewer patients met criteria for progression in the 6 months after initiating antifibrotic therapy compared to the 6 months prior (p = 0.048). A larger study with control groups on IS alone and AF alone is needed to confirm the role of AF therapy in combination with IS in patients with HP.

Advances with pharmacotherapy for the treatment of interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

In recent decades, the primary focus of pharmaceutical research in interstitial lung diseases (ILD) has been on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Recently, pharmaceutical development has also focused on other forms of ILDs, including connective tissue diseases associated ILD, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and sarcoidosis.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ILD. Specifically, the authors review the most recent studies and discuss the most recent research findings and future prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

Data collected over the past years have confirmed the efficacy of antifibrotic drugs on slowing disease progression in IPF. The usual strategy for CTD-ILD management is represented by the combined use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. There is an urgent need for new target therapies. The concept of progressive fibrosing ILD has emerged in the ILD community in recent years, which has led to grouping several diseases with a common disease behavior to find an effective treatment . At present, selecting the best therapy in ILDs should be reasonably performed on a case-by-case basis through a multidisciplinary team discussion in tertiary ILD centers, taking into consideration patients' symptoms, lung functional trends, and radiological changes.

Safety and Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Interstitial Lung Diseases: Insights from a Machine Learning Radiographic Model

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often includes systemic corticosteroids. Use of steroid-sparing agents is amenable to avoid potential side effects.

METHODS

Functional indices and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) patterns of patients with non-IPF ILDs receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed. Two independent radiologists and a machine learning software system (Imbio 1.4.2.) evaluated HRCT patterns.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (n = 55) patients were included in the analysis (male: 30 [55%], median age: 65.0 [95% CI: 59.7-70.0], mean forced vital capacity %predicted [FVC %pred.] ± standard deviation [SD]: 69.4 ± 18.3, mean diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide %pred. ± SD: 40.8 ± 14.3, hypersensitivity pneumonitis: 26, connective tissue disease-ILDs [CTD-ILDs]: 22, other ILDs: 7). There was no significant difference in mean FVC %pred. post-6 months (1.59 ± 2.04) and 1 year (-0.39 ± 2.49) of treatment compared to baseline. Radiographic evaluation showed no significant difference between baseline and post-1 year %ground glass opacities (20.0 [95% CI: 14.4-30.0] vs. 20.0 [95% CI: 14.4-25.6]) and %reticulation (5.0 [95% CI: 2.0-15.6] vs. 7.5 [95% CI: 2.0-17.5]). A similar performance between expert radiologists and Imbio software analysis was observed in assessing ground glass opacities (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.73) and reticulation (ICC = 0.88). Fourteen patients (25.5%) reported at least one side effect and 8 patients (14.5%) switched to antifibrotics due to disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that MMF is a safe and effective steroid-sparing agent leading to disease stabilization in a proportion of patients with non-IPF ILDs. Machine learning software systems may exhibit similar performance to specialist radiologists and represent fruitful diagnostic and prognostic tools.

An updated safety review of the drug treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

The approval of antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone revolutionized the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). These treatments showed acceptable tolerability in randomized-clinical trials; however, they have been associated with a spectrum of potential side effects which require careful assessment of risks and benefits in the individual patient before commencing and during antifibrotic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The accrued evidence on safety of nintedanib and pirfenidone is summarized, from the first randomized clinical trials to the open-label extension studies and post-marketing clinical experiences which helped clarify the long-term tolerability of these drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

The data collected over the last years confirmed the comparable tolerability profile of nintedanib and pirfenidone. The physician's assessment of expected side effects may help decide the optimal first-line therapy for the individual patient. Patient's counseling during treatment remains essential to manage emerging adverse events and eventually inform the decision of drug discontinuation.