1
|
Mousa A, Blok SG, Karssen D, Aman J, Annema JT, Bogaard HJ, Bonta PI, Haaksma ME, Heldeweg MLA, Lieveld AWE, Nanayakkara P, Nossent EJ, Smit JM, Smit MR, Vlaar APJ, Schultz MJ, Bos LDJ, Paulus F, Tuinman PR. Correlation between Serum Biomarkers and Lung Ultrasound in COVID-19: An Observational Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:421. [PMID: 38396460 PMCID: PMC10888244 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Serum biomarkers and lung ultrasound are important measures for prognostication and treatment allocation in patients with COVID-19. Currently, there is a paucity of studies investigating relationships between serum biomarkers and ultrasonographic biomarkers derived from lung ultrasound. This study aims to assess correlations between serum biomarkers and lung ultrasound findings. This study is a secondary analysis of four prospective observational studies in adult patients with COVID-19. Serum biomarkers included markers of epithelial injury, endothelial dysfunction and immune activation. The primary outcome was the correlation between biomarker concentrations and lung ultrasound score assessed with Pearson's (r) or Spearman's (rs) correlations. Forty-four patients (67 [41-88] years old, 25% female, 52% ICU patients) were included. GAS6 (rs = 0.39), CRP (rs = 0.42) and SP-D (rs = 0.36) were correlated with lung ultrasound scores. ANG-1 (rs = -0.39) was inversely correlated with lung ultrasound scores. No correlations were found between lung ultrasound score and several other serum biomarkers. In patients with COVID-19, several serum biomarkers of epithelial injury, endothelial dysfunction and immune activation correlated with lung ultrasound findings. The lack of correlations with certain biomarkers could offer opportunities for precise prognostication and targeted therapeutic interventions by integrating these unlinked biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amne Mousa
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.L.A.H.)
- Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Siebe G. Blok
- Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dian Karssen
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.L.A.H.)
| | - Jurjan Aman
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (E.J.N.)
| | - Jouke T. Annema
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (E.J.N.)
| | - Harm Jan Bogaard
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (E.J.N.)
| | - Peter I. Bonta
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (E.J.N.)
| | - Mark E. Haaksma
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.L.A.H.)
- Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Micah L. A. Heldeweg
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.L.A.H.)
- Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arthur W. E. Lieveld
- Section Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Prabath Nanayakkara
- Section Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther J. Nossent
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (E.J.N.)
| | - Jasper M. Smit
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.L.A.H.)
- Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marry R. Smit
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander P. J. Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus J. Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieuwe D. J. Bos
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederique Paulus
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter R. Tuinman
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands (M.L.A.H.)
- Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com), 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heldeweg MLA, Lieveld AW, Walburgh-Schmidt RS, Smit JM, Haaksma ME, Veldhuis L, de Grooth HJ, Girbes AR, Heunks LM, Tuinman PR. Concise Versus Extended Lung Ultrasound Score to Monitor Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19. Respir Care 2023; 68:400-407. [PMID: 36649978 PMCID: PMC10027145 DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be used to monitor critically ill patients with COVID-19, but the optimal number of examined lung zones is disputed. METHODS This was a prospective observational study. The objective was to investigate whether concise (6 zones) and extended (12 zones) LUS scoring protocols are clinically equivalent in critically ill ICU subjects with COVID-19. The primary outcome of this study was (statistical) agreement between concise and extended LUS score index evaluated in both supine and prone position. Agreement was determined using correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots to detect systematic differences between protocols. Secondary outcomes were difference between LUS score index in supine and prone position using similar methods. RESULTS We included 130 LUS examinations in 40 subjects (mean age 69.0 ± 8.5y, 75% male). Agreement between concise and extended LUS score index had no clinically relevant constant or proportional bias and limits of agreement were below the smallest detectable change. Across position changes, supine LUS score index was 8% higher than prone LUS score index and had limits above the smallest detectable change, indicating true LUS score index differences between protocols may occur due to the position change itself. Lastly, inter-rater and intra-rater agreement were very good. CONCLUSIONS Concise LUS was equally informative as extended LUS for monitoring critically ill subjects with COVID-19 in supine or prone position. Clinicians can monitor patients undergoing position changes but must be wary that LUS score index alterations may result from the position change itself rather than disease progression or clinical improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah LA Heldeweg
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Arthur We Lieveld
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Section Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robin S Walburgh-Schmidt
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper M Smit
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Section Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark E Haaksma
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lars Veldhuis
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harm-Jan de Grooth
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Armand Rj Girbes
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leo Ma Heunks
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter R Tuinman
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and Amsterdam Leiden IC Focused Echography, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vetrugno L, Mojoli F, Boero E, Berchialla P, Bignami EG, Orso D, Cortegiani A, Forfori F, Corradi F, Cammarota G, De Robertis E, Mongodi S, Chiumello D, Poole D, Ippolito M, Biasucci DG, Persona P, Bove T, Ball L, Pelosi P, Navalesi P, Antonelli M, Corcione A, Giarratano A, Petrini F. Level of Diffusion and Training of Lung Ultrasound during the COVID-19 Pandemic - A National Online Italian Survey (ITALUS) from the Lung Ultrasound Working Group of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI). ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2022; 43:464-472. [PMID: 34734405 PMCID: PMC9534595 DOI: 10.1055/a-1634-4710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this survey was to describe the use and diffusion of lung ultrasound (LUS), the level of training received before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the clinical impact LUS has had on COVID-19 cases in intensive care units (ICU) from February 2020 to May 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Italian Lung Ultrasound Survey (ITALUS) was a nationwide online survey proposed to Italian anesthesiologists and intensive care physicians carried out after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. It consisted of 27 questions, both quantitative and qualitative. RESULTS 807 responded to the survey. The median previous LUS experience was 3 years (IQR 1.0-6.0). 473 (60.9 %) reported having attended at least one training course on LUS before the COVID-19 pandemic. 519 (73.9 %) reported knowing how to use the LUS score. 404 (52 %) reported being able to use LUS without any supervision. 479 (68.2 %) said that LUS influenced their clinical decision-making, mostly with respect to patient monitoring. During the pandemic, the median of patients daily evaluated with LUS increased 3-fold (p < 0.001), daily use of general LUS increased from 10.4 % to 28.9 % (p < 0.001), and the daily use of LUS score in particular increased from 1.6 % to 9.0 % (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION This survey showed that LUS was already extensively used during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic by anesthesiologists and intensive care physicians in Italy, and then its adoption increased further. Residency programs are already progressively implementing LUS teaching. However, 76.7 % of the sample did not undertake any LUS certification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Vetrugno
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Udine, Italy, Udine, Italy
- Correspondence Dr. Luigi Vetrugno Department of Medicine, University of UdineVia Colugna 5033100 UdineItaly+39/4 32/55 95 01
| | - Francesco Mojoli
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Pavia Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Pavia, Italy
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Boero
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospital Saint-Giovanni Bosco Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Berchialla
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Torino, Italy
| | - Elena Giovanna Bignami
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma Department of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy
| | - Daniele Orso
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Udine, Italy
| | - Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinic Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Forfori
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Corradi
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa School of Medicine, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gianmaria Cammarota
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia School of Medicine and Surgery, Perugia, Italy
| | - Edoardo De Robertis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia Department of Medicine, Perugia, Italy
| | - Silvia Mongodi
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Pavia, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Clinico-Chirurgiche, Diagnostiche e Pediatriche, University of Pavia Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Chiumello
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Daniele Poole
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Operative Unit, Hospital Saint-Martinus, Belluno, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Ippolito
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinic Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniele Guerino Biasucci
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Agostino Gemelli Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Persona
- UOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy, Padua, Italy
| | - Tiziana Bove
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Udine, Italy, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Udine, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Genoa School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Genoa School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Navalesi
- UOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy, Padua, Italy
| | - Massimo Antonelli
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Agostino Gemelli Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Corcione
- Unit of Anaesthesia and intensive Care, Monaldi Hospital Naples, Italy, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Giarratano
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinic Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Palermo, Italy
| | - Flavia Petrini
- Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, President Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI), Rome Italy, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buonsenso D, Vetrugno L. Lung Ultrasound in Adults and Children with COVID-19: From First Discoveries to Recent Advances. J Clin Med 2022; 11:4340. [PMID: 35893430 PMCID: PMC9331199 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
During this pandemic, the lung ultrasound (LUS) imaging modality has shown promising results as a diagnostic, prognostic and monitoring tool for COVID-19 patients [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Buonsenso
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00120 Rome, Italy
- Centro di Salute Globale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00120 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Vetrugno
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gil-Rodríguez J, Pérez de Rojas J, Aranda-Laserna P, Benavente-Fernández A, Martos-Ruiz M, Peregrina-Rivas JA, Guirao-Arrabal E. Ultrasound findings of lung ultrasonography in COVID-19: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2022; 148:110156. [PMID: 35078136 PMCID: PMC8783639 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the defining lung ultrasound (LUS) findings of COVID-19, and establish its association to the initial severity of the disease and prognostic outcomes. METHOD Systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We queried PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database and Scopus using the terms ((coronavirus) OR (covid-19) OR (sars AND cov AND 2) OR (2019-nCoV)) AND (("lung ultrasound") OR (LUS)), from 31st of December 2019 to 31st of January 2021. PCR-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, obtained from original studies with at least 10 participants 18 years old or older, were included. Risk of bias and applicability was evaluated with QUADAS-2. RESULTS We found 1333 articles, from which 66 articles were included, with a pooled population of 4687 patients. The most examined findings were at least 3 B-lines, confluent B-lines, subpleural consolidation, pleural effusion and bilateral or unilateral distribution. B-lines, its confluent presentation and pleural abnormalities are the most frequent findings. LUS score was higher in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and emergency department (ED), and it was associated with a higher risk of developing unfavorable outcomes (death, ICU admission or need for mechanical ventilation). LUS findings and/or the LUS score had a good negative predictive value in the diagnosis of COVID-19 compared to RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS The most frequent ultrasound findings of COVID-19 are B-lines and pleural abnormalities. High LUS score is associated with developing unfavorable outcomes. The inclusion of pleural effusion in the LUS score and the standardisation of the imaging protocol in COVID-19 LUS remains to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Gil-Rodríguez
- Internal Medicine Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain,Corresponding author
| | - Javier Pérez de Rojas
- Preventive Medicine and Public Health Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - Pablo Aranda-Laserna
- Internal Medicine Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | | | - Michel Martos-Ruiz
- Internal Medicine Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | | | - Emilio Guirao-Arrabal
- Infectious Diseases Unit, San Cecilio University Hospital, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vetrugno L, Mojoli F, Cortegiani A, Bignami EG, Ippolito M, Orso D, Corradi F, Cammarota G, Mongodi S, Boero E, Iacovazzo C, Vargas M, Poole D, Biasucci DG, Persona P, Bove T, Ball L, Chiumello D, Forfori F, de Robertis E, Pelosi P, Navalesi P, Giarratano A, Petrini F. Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care expert consensus statement on the use of lung ultrasound in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (ITACO). JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2021; 1:16. [PMID: 37386555 PMCID: PMC8611396 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-021-00015-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To produce statements based on the available evidence and an expert consensus (as members of the Lung Ultrasound Working Group of the Italian Society of Analgesia, Anesthesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care, SIAARTI) on the use of lung ultrasound for the management of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS A modified Delphi method was applied by a panel of anesthesiologists and intensive care physicians expert in the use of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 intensive critically ill patients to reach a consensus on ten clinical questions concerning the role of lung ultrasound in the following: COVID-19 diagnosis and monitoring (with and without invasive mechanical ventilation), positive end expiratory pressure titration, the use of prone position, the early diagnosis of pneumothorax- or ventilator-associated pneumonia, the process of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, and the need for radiologic chest imaging. RESULTS A total of 20 statements were produced by the panel. Agreement was reached on 18 out of 20 statements (scoring 7-9; "appropriate") in the first round of voting, while 2 statements required a second round for agreement to be reached. At the end of the two Delphi rounds, the median score for the 20 statements was 8.5 [IQR 8.9], and the agreement percentage was 100%. CONCLUSION The Lung Ultrasound Working Group of the Italian Society of Analgesia, Anesthesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care produced 20 consensus statements on the use of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. This expert consensus strongly suggests integrating lung ultrasound findings in the clinical management of critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Vetrugno
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Via Colugna n 50, 33100, Udine, Italy.
- University-Hospital of Friuli Centrale, ASU FC, Udine, Italy.
| | - Francesco Mojoli
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elena Giovanna Bignami
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mariachiara Ippolito
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Daniele Orso
- University-Hospital of Friuli Centrale, ASU FC, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesco Corradi
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, "Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera", Genova, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Mongodi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Boero
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Carmine Iacovazzo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Vargas
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Daniele Poole
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Operative Unit, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy
| | - Daniele Guerino Biasucci
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Persona
- UOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Tiziana Bove
- University-Hospital of Friuli Centrale, ASU FC, Udine, Italy
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Davide Chiumello
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Forfori
- Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Navalesi
- UOC Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonino Giarratano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| | - Flavia Petrini
- Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
8806 Russian patients demonstrate T cell count as better marker of COVID-19 clinical course severity than SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Sci Rep 2021; 11:9440. [PMID: 33941816 PMCID: PMC8093219 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88714-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL), T lymphocyte count and respiratory index PaO2:FiO2 ratio as prospective markers of COVID-19 course severity and prognosis. 8806 patients and asymptomatic carriers were investigated in time interval 15 March–19 December 2020. T cell count demonstrated better applicability as a marker of aggravating COVID-19 clinical course and unfavourable disease prognosis than SARS-CoV-2 VL or PaO2:FiO2 ratio taken alone. Using T cell count in clinical practice may provide an opportunity of early prediction of deteriorating a patient’s state.
Collapse
|
8
|
Heldeweg MLA, Lopez Matta JE, Haaksma ME, Smit JM, Elzo Kraemer CV, de Grooth HJ, de Jonge E, Meijboom LJ, Heunks LMA, van Westerloo DJ, Tuinman PR. Lung ultrasound and computed tomography to monitor COVID-19 pneumonia in critically ill patients: a two-center prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med Exp 2021; 9:1. [PMID: 33491147 PMCID: PMC7829056 DOI: 10.1186/s40635-020-00367-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung ultrasound can adequately monitor disease severity in pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. We hypothesize lung ultrasound can adequately monitor COVID-19 pneumonia in critically ill patients. METHODS Adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit of two academic hospitals who underwent a 12-zone lung ultrasound and a chest CT examination were included. Baseline characteristics, and outcomes including composite endpoint death or ICU stay > 30 days were recorded. Lung ultrasound and CT images were quantified as a lung ultrasound score involvement index (LUSI) and CT severity involvement index (CTSI). Primary outcome was the correlation, agreement, and concordance between LUSI and CTSI. Secondary outcome was the association of LUSI and CTSI with the composite endpoints. RESULTS We included 55 ultrasound examinations in 34 patients, which were 88% were male, with a mean age of 63 years and mean P/F ratio of 151. The correlation between LUSI and CTSI was strong (r = 0.795), with an overall 15% bias, and limits of agreement ranging - 40 to 9.7. Concordance between changes in sequentially measured LUSI and CTSI was 81%. In the univariate model, high involvement on LUSI and CTSI were associated with a composite endpoint. In the multivariate model, LUSI was the only remaining independent predictor. CONCLUSIONS Lung ultrasound can be used as an alternative for chest CT in monitoring COVID-19 pneumonia in critically ill patients as it can quantify pulmonary involvement, register changes over the course of the disease, and predict death or ICU stay > 30 days. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR, NL8584. Registered 01 May 2020-retrospectively registered, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8584.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micah L A Heldeweg
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Postbox 7507, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorge E Lopez Matta
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark E Haaksma
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper M Smit
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos V Elzo Kraemer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harm-Jan de Grooth
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evert de Jonge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lilian J Meijboom
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo M A Heunks
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David J van Westerloo
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter R Tuinman
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive Care Focused Echography (ALIFE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Borakati A, Perera A, Johnson J, Sood T. Diagnostic accuracy of X-ray versus CT in COVID-19: a propensity-matched database study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e042946. [PMID: 33158840 PMCID: PMC7650091 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the diagnostic accuracy of common imaging modalities, chest X-ray (CXR) and CT, for diagnosis of COVID-19 in the general emergency population in the UK and to find the association between imaging features and outcomes in these patients. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of electronic patient records. SETTING Tertiary academic health science centre and designated centre for high consequence infectious diseases in London, UK. PARTICIPANTS 1198 patients who attended the emergency department with paired reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) swabs for SARS-CoV-2 and CXR between 16 March and 16 April 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Sensitivity and specificity of CXR and CT for diagnosis of COVID-19 using the British Society of Thoracic Imaging reporting templates. Reference standard was any RT-PCR positive naso-oropharyngeal swab within 30 days of attendance. ORs of CXR in association with vital signs, laboratory values and 30-day outcomes were calculated. RESULTS Sensitivity and specificity of CXR for COVID-19 diagnosis were 0.56 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.60) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.65), respectively. For CT scans, these were 0.85 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.90) and 0.50 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.60), respectively. This gave a statistically significant mean increase in sensitivity with CT of 29% (95% CI 19% to 38%, p<0.0001) compared with CXR. Specificity was not significantly different between the two modalities.CXR findings were not statistically significantly or clinically meaningfully associated with vital signs, laboratory parameters or 30-day outcomes. CONCLUSIONS CT has substantially improved diagnostic performance over CXR in COVID-19. CT should be strongly considered in the initial assessment for suspected COVID-19. This gives potential for increased sensitivity and considerably faster turnaround time, where capacity allows and balanced against excess radiation exposure risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Borakati
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, London, UK
- Emergency Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, London, UK
| | - Adrian Perera
- Emergency Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, London, UK
| | - James Johnson
- Emergency Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, London, UK
| | - Tara Sood
- Emergency Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|