1
|
Prisk GK, Rutting S, Bozier J, Thamrin C, Robinson PD, Thompson BR. Assessing the calculation of conductive and acinar ventilatory heterogeneity indices Scond and Sacin from multiple-breath washout data. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2023; 134:879-886. [PMID: 36825644 DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00423.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Sensor errors resulting in elevated values of N2 concentration [N2] in commercial multiple-breath washout (MBW) devices have been shown to prolong the washout and result in erroneously high functional residual capacity (FRC) and lung clearance index (LCI) values. The errors also affect the indices of conductive and acinar ventilatory heterogeneity (Scond and Sacin) although the mechanism by which this change in values occurs remains unclear. Exploring these effects also provides a timely opportunity to examine the appropriateness of the algorithm used to calculate these indices. Using a two-compartment model with differing specific ventilation (SV) such that the lower SV unit empties late, noise-free MBW were simulated both corrected and uncorrected for the recent sensor error. Scond was calculated using regression of normalized phase III slope (SnIII) against lung turnover (TO) from a TO range starting at 1.5 and ending at an upper turnover (TOupper) between 4 and 8 (default 6) over a range of simulated values. The principal effect of the sensor error was that as the MBW proceeded the phase III slope of successive breaths was normalized by an increasingly overestimated [N2], resulting in SnIII values that fell precipitously at high TO, greatly reducing Scond. Reanalysis of previously published data and of simulated data showed a large proportional bias in Scond, whereas Sacin was only minimally affected. In adult subject data, reducing TOupper below 5.5 was associated with a large drop of up to ∼60% in Scond calculated from data corrected for sensor error. Raising the upper TO limit elevated Scond by ∼20% but with a large concomitant increase in variability. In contrast to Scond, Sacin was relatively unaffected by changes in TOupper with changes of <3%. This work serves to emphasize that the upper limit of TO of 6 represents an appropriate upper limit for the calculation of Scond.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sensor errors that elevated values of N2 concentration in commercial multiple-breath washout (MBW) devices resulted in errors in calculated parameters including Scond and Sacin. We examined the mechanism of the change in values produced by these errors and explored the appropriateness of the calculation of Scond and Sacin. This work serves to emphasize that the current algorithm in use is appropriate for the calculation of Scond and Sacin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kim Prisk
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sandra Rutting
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jack Bozier
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cindy Thamrin
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul D Robinson
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bruce R Thompson
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Model analysis of multiple breath nitrogen washout data: robustness to variations in breathing pattern. J Clin Monit Comput 2022; 37:409-420. [PMID: 36149575 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00915-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
We recently developed a model-based method for analyzing multiple breath nitrogen washout data that does not require identification of Phase-III. In the present study, we assessed the effect of irregular breathing patterns on the intra-subject variabilities of the model parameters. Nitrogen fraction at the mouth was measured in 18 healthy and 20 asthmatic subjects during triplicate performances of multiple breath nitrogen washout, during controlled (target tidal volume 1 L at 8-12 breaths per minute) and free (unrestricted) breathing. The parameters Scond, Sacin and functional residual capacity (FRC) were obtained by conventional analysis of the slope of Phase-III. Fitting the model to the washout data provided functional residual capacity (FRCM), dead space volume (VD), the coefficient of variation of regional specific ventilation ([Formula: see text]), and the model equivalent of Sacin (Sacin-M). Intra-participant coefficients of variation for the model parameters for both health and asthma were FRCM < 5.2%, VD < 5.4%, [Formula: see text] < 9.0%, and Sacin-M < 45.6% for controlled breathing, and FRCM < 4.6%, VD < 5.3%, [Formula: see text] < 13.2%, and Sacin-M < 103.2% for free breathing. The coefficients of variation limits for conventional parameters were FRC < 6.1%, with Scond < 73.6% and Sacin < 49.2% for controlled breathing and Scond < 35.0% and Sacin < 74.4% for free breathing. The model-fitting approach to multiple breath nitrogen washout analysis provides a measure of regional ventilation heterogeneity in [Formula: see text] that is less affected by irregularities in the breathing pattern than its corresponding Phase-III slope analysis parameter Scond.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bozier J, Jeagal E, Robinson PD, Prisk GK, Chapman DG, King GG, Thamrin C, Rutting S. The effect of O 2 and CO 2 cross-sensitivity sensor error in the Eco Medics Exhalyzer D device on measures of conductive and acinar airway function. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00614-2021. [PMID: 35854872 PMCID: PMC9289373 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00614-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test provides important clinical information in obstructive airways diseases. Recently, a significant cross-sensitivity error in the O2 and CO2 sensors of a widely used commercial MBNW device (Exhalyzer D, Eco Medics AG, Duernten, Switzerland) was detected, which leads to overestimation of N2 concentrations. Significant errors in functional residual capacity (FRC) and lung clearance index (LCI) have been reported in infants and children. This study investigated the impact in adults, and on additional important indices reflecting conductive (Scond) and acinar (Sacin) ventilation heterogeneity, in health and disease. Methods Existing MBNW measurements of 27 healthy volunteers, 20 participants with asthma and 16 smokers were reanalysed using SPIROWARE V 3.3.1, which incorporates an error correction algorithm. Uncorrected and corrected indices were compared using paired t-tests and Bland–Altman plots. Results Correction of the sensor error significantly lowered FRC (mean difference 9%) and LCI (8–10%) across all three groups. Scond was higher following correction (11%, 14% and 36% in health, asthma and smokers, respectively) with significant proportional bias. Sacin was significantly lower following correction in the asthma and smoker groups, but the effect was small (2–5%) and with no proportional bias. Discussion The O2 and CO2 cross-sensitivity sensor error significantly overestimated FRC and LCI in adults, consistent with data in infants and children. There was a high degree of underestimation of Scond but minimal impact on Sacin. The presence of significant proportional bias indicates that previous studies will require reanalysis to confirm previous findings and to allow comparability with future studies. O2 and CO2 cross-sensitivity sensor error in the Exhalyzer D device significantly overestimates FRC and LCI in adults, consistent with infants and children. Importantly, there was a high degree of underestimation of Scond, but minimal impact on Sacin.https://bit.ly/3HcH3Tp
Collapse
|
4
|
Handley BM, Bozier J, Jeagal E, Rutting S, Schoeffel RE, Robinson PD, King GG, Milne S, Thamrin C. Controlled versus free breathing for multiple-breath nitrogen washout in asthma. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00487-2021. [PMID: 34881331 PMCID: PMC8646005 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00487-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple-breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) is an emerging clinical test for assessing ventilation heterogeneity [1], often characteristically increased in asthma. MBNW indices both indicate and predict response to asthma treatment [2–4], and therefore may be an important tool for guiding treatment decisions [2]. Two established breathing protocols are currently in use: 1-L tidal volume (VT) controlled breathing (CB) [5, 6] and unrestricted free breathing (FB) [7]. The CB protocol requires targeted VT and respiratory rate, whereas the FB protocol encourages relaxed tidal breathing, making it more suitable for paediatrics [8]. Two recently published studies in healthy adults showed that indices of conductive and acinar ventilation heterogeneity (Scond and Sacin, respectively) and, to a lesser extent, lung clearance index (LCI), were not comparable between breathing protocols [9, 10]. Importantly, differences between the protocols were dependent on the magnitude of ventilation heterogeneity. Thus, the assumption is that these effects would be amplified in disease, where ventilation heterogeneity is greater and clinical utility is most relevant. However, this has not been confirmed to date. We hypothesised that people with asthma, where ventilation heterogeneity is greater, would exhibit greater differences between the two protocols than the differences seen in healthy adults. The lack of comparability in indices of ventilation heterogeneity between free- and controlled-breathing MBNW protocols is confirmed in asthmahttps://bit.ly/3lmri4A
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake M Handley
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,These first authors contributed equally
| | - Jack Bozier
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,These first authors contributed equally
| | - Edward Jeagal
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,University of Technology Sydney, School of Life Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sandra Rutting
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Robin E Schoeffel
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul D Robinson
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Gregory G King
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Milne
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital and Division of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,These senior authors contributed equally
| | - Cindy Thamrin
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Glebe, NSW, Australia.,These senior authors contributed equally
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Verbanck S, Schuermans D, Paiva M, Robinson PD, Vanderhelst E. Reply: Fixed breathing protocols in multiple-breath-washout testing: truly an option in children? Eur Respir J 2021; 57:57/3/2100189. [PMID: 33664102 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00189-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Verbanck
- Respiratory Division, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Schuermans
- Respiratory Division, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manuel Paiva
- Respiratory Division, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul D Robinson
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Contibuted equally
| | - Eef Vanderhelst
- Respiratory Division, University Hospital UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Contibuted equally
| |
Collapse
|