New directions in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Frequency, severity and costs of flares increase with disease severity in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: a real-world cohort study, United States, 2004-2015

Objective

To evaluate frequency, severity and costs of flares in US patients with newly diagnosed SLE.

Methods

Adults diagnosed with SLE between January 2005 and December 2014 were identified from US commercial claims data linked to electronic medical records. Disease and flare severity during 1 year after diagnosis were classified as mild, moderate or severe using a claims-based algorithm. Study outcomes included frequency and severity of flares stratified by disease severity during the 1-year post-diagnosis period and all-cause healthcare costs of flares by severity at 30, 60 and 90 days after flare.

Results

Among 2227 patients, 26.3%, 51.0% and 22.7% had mild, moderate and severe SLE, respectively. The overall annual flare rate was 3.5 and increased with disease severity: 2.2, 3.7 and 4.2, respectively, for mild, moderate and severe SLE (p<0.0001). Patients with severe SLE had a higher annual severe flare rate (0.6) compared with moderate (0.1) or mild SLE (0; p<0.0001). Mean total all-cause costs at 30, 60 and 90 days after flare were $16 856, $22 252 and $27 468, respectively, for severe flares (mild flares: $1672, $2639 and $3312; moderate flares: $3831, $6225, $8582; (p<0.0001, all time points)). Inpatient costs were the primary driver of the increased cost of severe flares.

Conclusions

Flare frequency and severity in newly diagnosed patients with SLE increase with disease severity. After a flare, healthcare costs increase over the following 90 days by disease severity. Preventing flares or reducing flare rates and duration may improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Disease and economic burden increase with systemic lupus erythematosus severity 1 year before and after diagnosis: a real-world cohort study, United States, 2004-2015

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic burden of patients with SLE by disease severity in the USA 1 year before and after diagnosis.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with a first SLE diagnosis (index date) between January 2005 and December 2014 were identified from administrative commercial claims data linked to electronic medical records (EMRs). Disease severity during the year after diagnosis was classified as mild, moderate, or severe using claims-based algorithms and EMR data. Healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and all-cause healthcare costs (2017 US$) were reported for 1 year pre-diagnosis and post-diagnosis. Generalised linear modelling examined all-cause costs over 1 year post-index, adjusting for baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index and 1 year pre-diagnosis costs.

RESULTS

Among 2227 patients, 26.3% had mild, 51.0% moderate and 22.7% severe SLE. Mean per-patient costs were higher for patients with moderate and severe SLE compared with mild SLE during the year before diagnosis: mild US$12 373, moderate $22 559 and severe US$39 261 (p<0.0001); and 1-year post-diagnosis period: mild US$13 415, moderate US$29 512 and severe US$68 260 (p<0.0001). Leading mean cost drivers were outpatient visits (US$13 566) and hospitalisations (US$10 252). Post-diagnosis inpatient utilisation (≥1 stay) was higher for patients with severe (51.2%) and moderate (22.4%) SLE, compared with mild SLE (12.8%), with longer mean hospital stays: mild 0.47 days, moderate 1.31 days and severe 5.52 days (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

HCRU and costs increase with disease severity in the year before and after diagnosis; leading cost drivers post-diagnosis were outpatient visits and hospitalisations. Earlier diagnosis and treatment may improve health outcomes and reduce HCRU and costs.

Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is common. Many interventions are used to treat SLE with varying efficacy, risks, and benefits.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for cutaneous disease in SLE.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to June 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Wiley Interscience Online Library, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saude (Virtual Health Library). We updated our search in September 2020, but these results have not yet been fully incorporated.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for cutaneous disease in SLE compared with placebo, another intervention, no treatment, or different doses of the same intervention. We did not evaluate trials of cutaneous lupus in people without a diagnosis of SLE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were complete and partial clinical response. Secondary outcomes included reduction (or change) in number of clinical flares; and severe and minor adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-one RCTs, involving 11,232 participants, reported 43 different interventions. Trials predominantly included women from outpatient clinics; the mean age range of participants was 20 to 40 years. Twenty-five studies reported baseline severity, and 22 studies included participants with moderate to severe cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE); duration of CLE was not well reported. Studies were conducted mainly in multi-centre settings. Most often treatment duration was 12 months. Risk of bias was highest for the domain of reporting bias, followed by performance/detection bias. We identified too few studies for meta-analysis for most comparisons. We limited this abstract to main comparisons (all administered orally) and outcomes. We did not identify clinical trials of other commonly used treatments, such as topical corticosteroids, that reported complete or partial clinical response or numbers of clinical flares. Complete clinical response Studies comparing oral hydroxychloroquine against placebo did not report complete clinical response. Chloroquine may increase complete clinical response at 12 months' follow-up compared with placebo (absence of skin lesions) (risk ratio (RR) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 2.61; 1 study, 24 participants; low-quality evidence). There may be little to no difference between methotrexate and chloroquine in complete clinical response (skin rash resolution) at 6 months' follow-up (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.50; 1 study, 25 participants; low-quality evidence). Methotrexate may be superior to placebo with regard to complete clinical response (absence of malar/discoid rash) at 6 months' follow-up (RR 3.57, 95% CI 1.63 to 7.84; 1 study, 41 participants; low-quality evidence). At 12 months' follow-up, there may be little to no difference between azathioprine and ciclosporin in complete clinical response (malar rash resolution) (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.52; 1 study, 89 participants; low-quality evidence). Partial clinical response Partial clinical response was reported for only one key comparison: hydroxychloroquine may increase partial clinical response at 12 months compared to placebo, but the 95% CI indicates that hydroxychloroquine may make no difference or may decrease response (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.41 to 120.16; 20 pregnant participants, 1 trial; low-quality evidence). Clinical flares Clinical flares were reported for only two key comparisons: hydroxychloroquine is probably superior to placebo at 6 months' follow-up for reducing clinical flares (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.89; 1 study, 47 participants; moderate-quality evidence). At 12 months' follow-up, there may be no difference between methotrexate and placebo, but the 95% CI indicates there may be more or fewer flares with methotrexate (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.83; 1 study, 86 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Adverse events Data for adverse events were limited and were inconsistently reported, but hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, and methotrexate have well-documented adverse effects including gastrointestinal symptoms, liver problems, and retinopathy for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine and teratogenicity during pregnancy for methotrexate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the commonly-used treatment hydroxychloroquine, and there is also evidence supporting chloroquine and methotrexate for treating cutaneous disease in SLE. Evidence is limited due to the small number of studies reporting key outcomes. Evidence for most key outcomes was low or moderate quality, meaning findings should be interpreted with caution. Head-to-head intervention trials designed to detect differences in efficacy between treatments for specific CLE subtypes are needed. Thirteen further trials are awaiting classification and have not yet been incorporated in this review; they may alter the review conclusions.

Evaluating safety and compatibility of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with connective tissue disorders

Inhibition of the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) has been utilized as a treatment strategy for a variety of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMID), including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease and psoriasis. A wide array of biologic therapies targeting the TNFα molecule, including etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab and adalimumab, are routinely used in the care of patients with these conditions. In addition to their therapeutic potential, anti-TNFα agents commonly induce the formation of autoantibodies such as anti-nuclear antibodies and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies; however, the vast majority of these are of IgM isotype and of unclear clinical significance, uncommonly leading to drug-induced autoimmune disease. For these reasons, TNFα inhibition has been a controversial strategy in the treatment of primary connective tissue disorders (CTDs). However, as new therapeutics continue to be developed for the management of CTDs, the potential utility for anti-TNFα agents has become of great interest, demonstrated in several recent case series and small open-label trials. We review the safety and compatibility of anti-TNFα therapy in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), two well-studied example CTDs, as well as summarize the risks of autoantibody generation, infection, malignancy, and iatrogenic lupus flares as side effects of blocking TNFα in patients with these conditions.

Innate Immune Cells' Contribution to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against nuclear antigens, immune complex deposition, and tissue damage in the kidneys, skin, heart and lung. Because of the pathogenic role of antinuclear antibodies and autoreactive T cells in SLE, extensive efforts have been made to demonstrate how B cells act as antibody-producing or as antigen-presenting cells that can prime autoreactive T cell activation. With the discovery of new innate immune cells and inflammatory mediators, innate immunity is emerging as a key player in disease pathologies. Recent work over the last decade has highlighted the importance of innate immune cells and molecules in promoting and potentiating SLE. In this review, we discuss recent evidence of the involvement of different innate immune cells and pathways in the pathogenesis of SLE. We also discuss new therapeutics targets directed against innate immune components as potential novel therapies in SLE.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with long-term corticosteroid exposure in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective To evaluate the association between exposure to oral corticosteroids and future healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods Adults diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (index date) between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2013 and naive to oral corticosteroids with continuous health plan enrollment for ≥6 months pre- and ≥5 years post-index were identified from a large health plan claims database. Per-patient monthly average daily dose of oral corticosteroids (prednisone or its equivalent) was calculated for the first 2 years post-index to categorize patients into four steroid exposure cohorts: low (≤5 mg/day), medium (6-20 mg/day), high (>20 mg/day) and no steroids. Differences in healthcare resource utilization and total healthcare costs during the third year post-index across corticosteroid exposure cohorts were modeled with adjustment for baseline characteristics. Results The study included 18,618 systemic lupus erythematosus patients (163 high dose, 1127 medium dose, 6717 low dose and 10,611 no steroids). Compared to low-dose corticosteroid users, high-dose corticosteroid users were more likely to have emergency room visits (39.3% vs. 29.7%; p = 0.0085) and to be hospitalized (21.5% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.0005). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, they also had significantly greater average annual total healthcare costs (US$60,366 vs. US$18,777; p < 0.0001). A 1 mg increase in corticosteroid average daily dose was associated with 1.07 times the average annual costs after adjusting for baseline characteristics ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion Long-term high-dose oral corticosteroid use was associated with significantly greater future healthcare resource utilization and costs. Judicious reduction in daily steroid dose may decrease the imminent economic burden associated with high-dose steroid use in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Understanding systemic lupus erythematosus patients' desired outcomes and their perceptions of the risks and benefits of using corticosteroids

Introduction The use of corticosteroids in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients requires difficult trade-offs between efficacy and risk of toxicity. This qualitative study examined SLE patients' most desired outcomes and their concerns with corticosteroid use in SLE treatment. Methods SLE patients with current/past experience with using corticosteroids were recruited from the clinics at the Johns Hopkins Lupus Center and the University of Maryland Medical Center. Five in-depth interviews ( N = 5) and four focus groups ( N = 15) were conducted during which discussions were transcribed and analyzed based on a grounded theory approach. Results We identified five major themes describing SLE patients' most desired outcomes: reduction in flares, maintenance of normal activities, minimization of treatment side effects, prevention of future organ damage, and finding a cure. Further, SLE patients reported these primary concerns with the adverse effects of corticosteroids: weight gain, organ damage (particularly bone-related damage), mood swings/irritability, sleep disturbances, and dental issues. Patients appeared to be more concerned with adverse effects that immediately affected their day-to-day lives. Conclusion Knowledge gained during this study better informs how patients view the benefits and risks of corticosteroids. This can facilitate discussions between physicians and patients as they work together to determine the appropriate use of corticosteroids.

Burden of illness in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a UK patient and carer online survey

Objective The objective of this study was to assess the impact of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on patients and carers. Methods Adults with SLE and carers of SLE patients completed a UK-specific online survey covering many aspects of the disease. Surveys were developed in collaboration with an NHS lupus unit and a lupus patient organization. Results A total of 121 patients and 31 carers completed the surveys. Of the 70% of patients initially misdiagnosed with another condition, 59% received treatment for the misdiagnosis. Fatigue was the most debilitating symptom, experienced daily by 79% of patients. The proportion of patients not reporting flares to healthcare providers varied with flare severity: mild flares (43%), moderate flares (15%) and severe flares (5%). Most patients (89%) reported reduced ability to socialize, and 76% had changed employment; of these, 52% stopped working completely. Over one-half (52%) of carers in paid employment missed time from work, and 55% of carers reported a worsened financial status. Most carers (87%) experienced interference with social activities. Conclusion SLE is commonly misdiagnosed and has a considerable impact on the physical, social and financial status of patients and carers. Increased awareness of the disease among healthcare providers and employers of patients and their carers is needed.

Sex-specific effects of LiCl treatment on preservation of renal function and extended life-span in murine models of SLE: perspective on insights into the potential basis for survivorship in NZB/W female mice

Considerable research effort has been invested in attempting to understand immune dysregulation leading to autoimmunity and target organ damage. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), patients can develop a systemic disease with a number of organs involved. One of the major target organs is the kidney, but patients vary in the progression of the end-organ targeting of this organ. Some patients develop glomerulonephritis only, while others develop rapidly progressive end organ failure. In murine models of SLE, renal involvement can also occur. Studies performed over the past several years have indicated that treatment with LiCl of females, but not males of the NZB/W model, at an early age during the onset of disease, can prevent development of end-stage renal disease in a significant percentage of the animals. While on Li treatment, up to 80 % of the females can exhibit long-term survival with evidence of mild glomerulonephritis which does not progress to renal failure in spite of on-going autoimmunity. Stopping the treatment led to a reactivation of the disease and renal failure. Li treatment of other murine models of SLE was less effective and decreased survivorship in male BxSB mice, exhibited little effect on male MRL-lpr mice, and only modestly improved survivorship in female MRL-lpr mice. This perspective piece discusses the findings of several related studies which support the concept that protecting target organs such as the kidney, even in the face of continued immune insults and some inflammation, can lead to prolonged survival with retention of organ function. Some possible mechanisms for the effectiveness of Li treatment in this context are also discussed. However, the detailed mechanistic basis for the sex-specific effects of LiCl treatment particularly in the NZB/W model remains to be elucidated. Elucidating such details may provide important clues for development of effective treatment for patients with SLE, ~90 % of which are females.

Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas).

FINDINGS

In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.77 ; P < 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88-1.29; P = 0.506.

IMPLICATIONS

The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.

Impact of standard of care treatments and disease variables on outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus trials: analysis from the Lupus Foundation of America Collective Data Analysis Initiative

OBJECTIVE

Most clinical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) study the efficacy and safety of investigational agents added to variable background immunosuppressants, which has resulted in high response rates in patients treated with placebo plus standard of care (SOC) plus rescue measures. This project compared the impact of different SOC treatments and disease variables on the outcomes of SLE trials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were obtained from 981 patients receiving only SOC treatments in three nephritis and three general SLE trials to compare response and flare rates on the basis of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index, a measure common to all trials.

RESULTS

For subjects enrolled in general SLE trials (n=173), those receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had more severe baseline disease, included more patients of African descent, and were administered higher baseline steroid doses compared with those receiving azathioprine (AZA) or methotrexate (MTX). BILAG responses at week 12 were MMF 35%, AZA 49%, MTX 34%, and no immunosuppressant (NIS) 65%. At week 52, MMF response rates increased to 41% despite reducing the steroid doses, but fell in all others (p=0.07, adjusted for steroids). Patients with severe disease activity at baseline (SDAB) who were defined as ≥1 BILAG A (severe) organ score had lower response rates to AZA or MTX but higher rates to MMF or NIS. Interim flares were highest with MMF [flares/patient-year (pt-yr)]. For all flares, rates were as follows: AZA 1.24, MMF 1.87, MTX 1.42, and NIS 0.81 and severe flares were as follows: AZA 0.66, MMF 1.29, MTX: 1.20, and NIS 0.55. Interim flares occurred in 71% of MMF-endpoint responders, 54% of AZA, 50% of MTX, and 22% of NIS. Patients with SDAB had more flares than moderate patients in the MMF and MTX groups: MMF: 2.39 vs. 1.03 flares/pt-yr (p=0.01), MTX: 2.33 vs. 0.63 (p=0.0002), severe flares: 1.87 vs. 0.34 for MMF (p=0.0013), 2.13 vs. 0.40 for MTX (p<0.0001). In nephritis trials (n=808), MMF subjects received less steroids than intravenous cyclophosphamide and response rates were similar, but MMF-treated patients had fewer severe flares (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Compared with MMF, AZA and MTX were associated with lower response rates at week 52. AZA-treated subjects had fewer flares and remained more stable in trials while engendering lower placebo plus SOC responses. MMF-treated subjects had frequent responses but more flares, suggesting that flares should be included in endpoint definitions. Given the likelihood of treatment selection bias, these data do not provide conclusions regarding efficacy but may help future trial designs by distinguishing factors definable at entry that are predictive of outcomes.

Burden of corticosteroid use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a Delphi panel

Corticosteroid-related adverse events (AEs) are commonly reported in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but are often under-represented in claims data. The most common corticosteroid-related AEs are not necessarily the most costly. The present study aimed to examine corticosteroid-related AE rates and identify the associated cost consequences in patients with SLE from the perspective of rheumatologists treating SLE in the United States (US). A modified Delphi process and RAND Appropriateness Method was used to estimate corticosteroid-related AEs and costs based on data from SLE-treating US rheumatologists and estimates from alternative sources. The panel (n=10) participated in two web-based questionnaires, covering disease severity, corticosteroid use, corticosteroid-related AEs, and resource utilization associated with treatment of the AEs. Eight members of the panel then participated in a guided discussion by interactive teleconference, in which the costs associated with specific corticosteroid-related AEs were also discussed. Consensus was achieved in the teleconference when a single response category (consensus values from 1 to 4 [4=strongly agree, 1=strongly disagree]) accounted for ≥80% of responses. Thirteen consensus statements were developed following two Delphi rounds. Costs were estimated for eight corticosteroid-associated AEs from the panel of rheumatologists. In the patients with SLE treated by these physicians, 41.5% were considered to have mild disease, 36.5% moderate disease, and 22.0% severe disease. The number of specialist visits, corticosteroid use, and corticosteroid dose increased with disease severity. The estimated rates of all AEs (except for cataracts) were at least doubled in patients receiving corticosteroid doses>20 mg/day compared with ≤20 mg/day. The highest estimated mean total costs of an event (for the required treatment duration for one patient) were for avascular necrosis ($14,460) and serious infection ($11,660). The costs of more common AEs, such as osteoporosis, obesity, diabetes, and fractures, ranged from $1190 to $8220. Ten rheumatologists concluded that as disease severity increases, corticosteroid doses increased. Greater utilization of resources is needed to manage patients and corticosteroid-related AEs.

Sifalimumab, a human anti-interferon-α monoclonal antibody, in systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase I randomized, controlled, dose-escalation study

Objective

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple intravenous (IV) doses of sifalimumab in adults with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential dose-escalation study, patients were randomized 3:1 to receive IV sifalimumab (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10.0 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks to week 26, then followed up for 24 weeks. Safety assessment included recording of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated, and disease activity was assessed.

Results

Of 161 patients, 121 received sifalimumab (26 received 0.3 mg/kg; 25, 1.0 mg/kg; 27, 3.0 mg/kg; and 43, 10 mg/kg) and 40 received placebo. Patients were predominantly female (95.7%). At baseline, patients had moderate-to-severe disease activity (mean SLE Disease Activity Index score 11.0), and most (75.2%) had a high type I interferon (IFN) gene signature. In the sifalimumab group versus the placebo group, the incidence of ≥1 treatment-emergent AE was 92.6% versus 95.0%, ≥1 serious AE was 22.3% versus 27.5%, and ≥1 infection was 67.8% versus 62.5%; discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 9.1% versus 7.5%, and death occurred in 3.3% (n = 4) versus 2.5% (n = 1). Serum sifalimumab concentrations increased in a linear and dose-proportional manner. Inhibition of the type I IFN gene signature was sustained during treatment in patients with a high baseline signature. No statistically significant differences in clinical activity (SLEDAI and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group score) between sifalimumab and placebo were observed. However, when adjusted for excess burst steroids, SLEDAI change from baseline showed a positive trend over time. A trend toward normal complement C3 or C4 level at week 26 was seen in the sifalimumab groups compared with baseline.

Conclusion

The observed safety/tolerability and clinical activity profile of sifalimumab support its continued clinical development for SLE.

Anti-C1q autoantibodies, novel tests, and clinical consequences

Although anti-C1q autoantibodies have been described more than four decades ago a constant stream of papers describing clinical associations or functional consequences highlights that anti-C1q antibodies are still hot and happening. By far the largest set of studies focus on anti-C1q antibodies is systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In SLE anti-C1q antibodies associate with involvement of lupus nephritis in such a way that in the absence of anti-C1q antibodies it is unlikely that a flare in nephritis will occur. Anti-C1q antibodies occur in several autoimmune conditions but also in healthy individuals. Although considerable progress has been made in the understanding of how anti-C1q antibodies may contribute to tissue injury there is still a lot to learn about the processes involved in the breaking of tolerance to this protein. There has been considerable improvement in the assays employed to test for the presence of anti-C1q antibodies. Hopefully with these new and standardized assays at hand larger clinical association studies will be conducted with independent replication. Such large-scale studies will reveal the true value of clinical testing for anti-C1q autoantibodies in several clinical conditions.

Adverse event burden, resource use, and costs associated with immunosuppressant medications for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review

This paper assessed the burden of adverse events (AEs) associated with azathioprine (AZA), cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methotrexate (MTX), and cyclosporine (CsA) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Thirty-eight publications were included. Incidence of AEs ranged from 42.8% to 97.3%. Common AEs included infections (2.4-77%), gastrointestinal AEs (3.2-66.7%), and amenorrhea and/or ovarian complications (0-71%). More hematological cytopenias were associated with AZA (14 episodes) than MMF (2 episodes). CYC was associated with more infections than MMF (40-77% versus 12.5-32%, resp.) or AZA (17-77% versus 11-29%, resp.). Rates of hospitalized infections were similar between MMF and AZA patients, but higher for those taking CYC. There were more gynecological toxicities with CYC than MMF (32-36% versus 3.6-6%, resp.) or AZA (32-71% versus 8-18%, resp.). Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 0-44.4% across these medications. In summary, the incidence of AEs associated with SLE immunosuppressants was consistently high as reported in the literature; discontinuations due to these AEs were similar across treatments. Studies on the economic impact of these AEs were sparse and warrant further study. This paper highlights the need for more treatment options with better safety profiles.

Healthcare utilization and cost of systemic lupus erythematosus in a US managed care health plan

OBJECTIVE

To assess healthcare resource utilization and costs in a cohort of US managed care patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Claims data from a large managed care plan were used to identify patients of 18-64 years old with SLE-related claims from 2004-2005. Algorithms were developed to retrospectively categorize patients by disease severity and identify flare episodes by flare severity. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed to estimate healthcare resource utilization and costs over a 2-year period for the cohort overall and by disease and flare severity.

RESULTS

Among the 2990 patients in the study cohort, disease severity was mild in 789 (26.4%), moderate in 1558 (52.1%), and severe in 643 (21.5%). During the 2-year follow-up period, SLE patients utilized the following categories of care: office visit (99.7%), laboratory service (99.5%), outpatient hospital visit (76.0%), emergency room visit (45.6%), and inpatient hospital stay (26.4%). Mean total unadjusted healthcare cost per patient was $30,010 over the 2-year follow-up period, with medical and pharmacy costs comprising 76.5% and 23.5% of total expenditures, respectively. Additionally, 95.7% of patients had one or more flares, with a mean (SD) of 6.7 (3.6) flares during the 2-year follow-up period. The average unadjusted cost per mild, moderate, and severe flare, respectively, was $909, $1539, and $17,059, most of which was for medical cost rather than pharmacy cost. The frequency and cost of flares increased with disease severity.

LIMITATIONS

The disease severity and flare severity algorithms were based upon managed care claims data; the algorithm was not verified clinically and may not be generalizable to other health plans.

CONCLUSIONS

SLE is associated with high levels of healthcare utilization and costs in a managed care health plan. Inpatient hospital stays were the primary medical cost drivers, followed by physician office visits and outpatient hospital visits.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease that is associated with B-cell hyperactivity, autoantibodies, and increased concentrations of B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS). The efficacy and safety of the fully human monoclonal antibody belimumab (BLyS-specific inhibitor) was assessed in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

Patients (aged ≥18 years) who were seropositive with scores of at least 6 on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) were enrolled in a multicentre phase 3 study, which was done in Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and eastern Europe. Patients were randomly assigned by use of a central interactive voice response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to belimumab 1 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, or placebo by intravenous infusion in 1 h on days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 28 days until 48 weeks, with standard of care. Patients, investigators, study coordinators, and sponsors were masked to treatment assignment. Primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) at week 52 (reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI score; no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG] A organ domain score and no more than 1 new B organ domain score; and no worsening [<0·3 increase] in Physician's Global Assessment [PGA] score) versus baseline. Method of analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00424476.

FINDINGS

867 patients were randomly assigned to belimumab 1 mg/kg (n=289) or 10 mg/kg (n=290), or placebo (n=288). 865 were treated and analysed in the belimumab (1 mg/kg, n=288; 10 mg/kg, n=290) and placebo groups (n=287). Significantly higher SRI rates were noted with belimumab 1 mg/kg (148 [51%], odds ratio 1·55 [95% CI 1·10-2·19]; p=0·0129) and 10 mg/kg (167 [58%], 1·83 [1·30-2·59]; p=0·0006) than with placebo (125 [44%]) at week 52. More patients had their SELENA-SLEDAI score reduced by at least 4 points during 52 weeks with belimumab 1 mg/kg (153 [53%], 1·51 [1·07-2·14]; p=0·0189) and 10 mg/kg (169 [58%], 1·71 [1·21-2·41]; p=0·0024) than with placebo (132 [46%]). More patients given belimumab 1 mg/kg (226 [78%], 1·38 [0·93-2·04]; p=0·1064) and 10 mg/kg (236 [81%], 1·62 [1·09-2·42]; p=0·0181) had no new BILAG A or no more than 1 new B flare than did those in the placebo group (210 [73%]). No worsening in PGA score was noted in more patients with belimumab 1 mg/kg (227 [79%], 1·68 [1·15-2·47]; p=0·0078) and 10 mg/kg (231 [80%], 1·74 [1·18-2·55]; p=0·0048) than with placebo (199 [69%]). Rates of adverse events were similar in the groups given belimumab 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, and placebo: serious infection was reported in 22 (8%), 13 (4%), and 17 (6%) patients, respectively, and severe or serious hypersensitivity reactions on an infusion day were reported in two (<1%), two (<1%), and no patients, respectively. No malignant diseases were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Belimumab has the potential to be the first targeted biological treatment that is approved specifically for systemic lupus erythematosus, providing a new option for the management of this important prototypic autoimmune disease.

FUNDING

Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline.

Thrombotic microangiopathy in haematopoietic cell transplantation: an update

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) represents a vital procedure for patients with various hematologic conditions. Despite advances in the field, HCT carries significant morbidity and mortality. A rare but potentially devastating complication is transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA). In contrast to idiopathic TTP, whose etiology is attributed to deficient activity of ADAMTS13, (a member of the A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease with Thrombospondin 1 repeats family of metalloproteases), patients with TA-TMA have > 5% ADAMTS13 activity. Pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with TA-TMA, include loss of endothelial cell integrity induced by intensive conditioning regimens, immunosuppressive therapy, irradiation, infections and graft-versus-host (GVHD) disease. The reported incidence of TA-TMA ranges from 0.5% to 75%, reflecting the difficulty of accurate diagnosis in these patients. Two different groups have proposed consensus definitions for TA-TMA, yet they fail to distinguish the primary syndrome from secondary causes such as infections or medication exposure. Despite treatment, mortality rate in TA-TMA ranges between 60% to 90%. The treatment strategies for TA-TMA remain challenging. Calcineurin inhibitors should be discontinued and replaced with alternative immunosuppressive agents. Daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-CD25 antibody, has shown promising results in the treatment of TA-TMA. Rituximab or the addition of defibrotide, have been reported to induce remission in this patient population. In general, plasma exchange is not recommended.