Association of baseline C-reactive protein and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with need for weekly dosing during maintenance therapy with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease

Comparative effectiveness of higher adalimumab maintenance therapy versus standard dose in anti-tumor necrosis factor experienced Crohn's disease patients: A propensity-score matched cohort analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Crohn's disease (CD) patients who previously failed anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy are at higher risk of treatment failure with subsequent biologics. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of higher maintenance dose regimens of adalimumab compared with standard doses in CD patients who failed anti-TNF.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, CD patients who failed anti-TNF and received adalimumab were categorized according to their post-induction maintenance regimen; 40 mg subcutaneous (sc) weekly or 80 mg sc every other week were defined as a high-dose (HD) maintenance regimen, and 40 mg sc every other week was defined as a standard-dose (SD) maintenance regimen. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using propensity scores to create a cohort of matched participants with similar distribution of baseline covariates.

RESULTS

Forty patients started on HD regimens following induction, and 77 patients received the SD regimen. The median time to failure in the HD group was 6.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-9.6) and 3.0 years (IQR 0.9-9.4) in the SD group (log-rank test P = 0.006). Patients on HD adalimumab had a lower hazard rate of treatment failure (hazard ratio: 0.27; 95% confidence interval [0.12, 0.62]; P = 0.002) compared with SD patients. No difference in adverse events was identified between groups (30% vs 31.2%, P = 1.0). Results were similar in the propensity score-matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose maintenance regimens were associated with longer time-to-failure as compared with SD regimens in CD patient who failed anti-TNF.

Results of the Seventh Scientific Workshop of ECCO: Precision Medicine in IBD-Disease Outcome and Response to Therapy

Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] are a heterogeneous spectrum with two extreme phenotypes, Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], which both represent numerous phenotypical variations. Hence, we should no longer approach all IBD patients similarly, but rather aim to rethink clinical classifications and modify treatment algorithms to usher in a new era of precision medicine in IBD. This scientific ECCO workshop aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview on prognostic and predictive markers, shed light on key questions in biomarker development, propose best practices in IBD biomarker development [including trial design], and discuss the potential for multi-omic data integration to help drive further advances to make precision medicine a reality in IBD.

Personalised medicine in Crohn's disease

Similar to many immune-mediated diseases, Crohn's disease follows a relapsing-remitting pattern, with a variable disease course and heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Frequency of flare-ups, development of complications, and response to treatment collectively determine the effect on a patient's quality of life, which can vary from minimal disruption to profound disability or death. Despite recent advances in the understanding of complex disease pathogenesis, including for Crohn's disease, management decisions are still typically made using a one-size-fits-all approach. Indeed, the inability to reliably predict clinical outcomes in a way that could guide future therapy represents a major unmet need. Recently, several important insights have been made into the biology underlying outcomes in Crohn's disease. In this Review, we will summarise these insights and discuss how greater understanding of these disease mechanisms can be used to develop clinically useful biomarkers, identify novel approaches to optimise disease control, and help deliver the goal of personalised medicine.

Update on C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin: are they accurate measures of disease activity in Crohn's disease?

'Treat-to-target' paradigms in Crohn's disease (CD) directed at suppressing intestinal inflammation require accurate and reliable measures of disease activity. Although endoscopy has traditionally been considered a gold standard, cost, complexity, resource limitations, and invasiveness are important limitations. Hence, substantial interest exists for non-invasive serum and fecal biomarkers, namely C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC), in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of CD. Areas covered: We review the evidence for using serum CRP and FC in distinguishing patients with CD from those with irritable bowel syndrome, categorizing disease activity among patients with an established diagnosis of CD, predicting the likelihood of treatment response, identifying asymptomatic patients in medically or surgically induced remission who are at risk for disease relapse, and as treatment targets. Expert commentary: Accurate interpretation of CRP and FC is dependent on several factors including the clinical context, the performance characteristics of the assay, the specified test cut-offs, and the pre-test probability of disease. Emerging evidence indicates that CRP and FC are valuable adjuncts for the management of CD in specific circumstances described in this review.

What is the role of C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin in evaluating Crohn's disease activity?

Historically, the evaluation of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) has centered on use of subjective symptom-based assessment. However, patients with CD experience a broad spectrum of non-specific symptoms that may not directly correlate with objective measures of inflammation. Endoscopy has been the gold standard for evaluating the burden and severity of mucosal disease. However, use of ileocolonoscopy for disease monitoring in long-term follow-up is limited by considerations of cost, resource utilization, and invasiveness. As treatment goals in CD have shifted towards 'treat-to-target' paradigms that emphasize tight control of inflammation, it has become increasingly evident that sensitive, accurate, and reliable measures of disease activity are required. The use of non-invasive serum and fecal biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC) has been evaluated in patients with CD for categorizing disease activity, predicting treatment response, identifying patients at risk for disease relapse, and as a potential therapeutic target. In this review, we summarize the interpretation of CRP and FC in patients with CD within specific clinical contexts and according to assay performance characteristics.

Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Adalimumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn's Disease Following Loss of Response or Intolerance to Infliximab: 96-Week Efficacy Data From GAIN/ADHERE Trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the 4-week GAIN clinical trial, adalimumab was efficacious in inducing remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease [CD] who had prior loss of response/intolerance to infliximab. The efficacy and safety of adalimumab in these patients are reported here for up to 96 weeks or for 3 years, respectively, in the ADHERE open-label extension study.

METHODS

Patients who completed GAIN could enrol in ADHERE and receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Efficacy variables included clinical response (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] decrease from baseline ≥70/≥100 points [CR-70/CR-100]) and remission [CDAI<150], steroid discontinuation and fistula remission [absence of drainage]. Data were reported using hybrid non-responder imputation [hNRI], last observation carried forward and as-observed analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed by randomized group in GAIN and by Week 4 efficacy in GAIN. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients from GAIN enrolled in ADHERE. CR-70, CR-100 and remission rates at Week 96 were 39.0%, 35.5%, and 26.5% [hNRI], respectively. Of the patients with CR-70 response or remission at Week 4 of GAIN, 45.5% and 44.4% [hNRI], respectively, maintained the effect at Week 96. Steroid discontinuation and steroid-free remission rates increased from Week 12 to 96 in patients using corticosteroids at GAIN baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term adalimumab maintenance therapy led to sustained clinical remission and response, and steroid discontinuation in a considerable proportion of patients with CD previously treated with infliximab. No new safety signals were observed in this patient population.

Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Therapy for Paediatric Crohn's Disease: Improved Benefits Through Treatment Optimisation, Deeper Understanding of Its Risks, and Reduced Costs due to Biosimilar Availability

Antibodies directed to tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are very effective in treating paediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Over the last few years, research has provided important new insights into how to optimise this treatment's effectiveness. Research on predictors for anti-TNF treatment responsiveness has revealed potential markers, but data on their accuracy in paediatric CD patients are lagging behind. Also, new evidence has become available on the safety profile of anti-TNF antibodies that suggests the assumed increased malignancy risk seen in patients on anti-TNF and thiopurine combination treatment may be linked more to thiopurine use and not to anti-TNF treatment. In addition, the early results of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, in CD patients confirm the expected similarity with its originator. Thus, the effectiveness of anti-TNF antibody treatment is slowly improving, its malignancy risk is lower than assumed, and its costs are reduced by the introduction of equally effective biosimilars. Together, these trends allow for a more prominent role for anti-TNF antibodies in future treatment of paediatric CD.

Thiopurines Dosed to a Therapeutic 6-Thioguanine Level in Combination with Adalimumab Are More Effective Than Subtherapeutic Thiopurine-based Combination Therapy or Adalimumab Monotherapy During Induction and Maintenance in Patients with Long-standing Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The benefit of concomitant immunomodulation with adalimumab (ADA) in Crohn's disease is poorly understood. We aimed to compare ADA monotherapy with combination therapy with thiopurines, stratified by thioguanine nucleotides (TGNs).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of ADA induction and maintenance. Thiopurines were classified according to TGNs (>235 pmol/8 × 10 red blood cell therapeutic).

RESULTS

At induction, response was more frequent in combination than ADA monotherapy (83% versus 61%, P = 0.02) and with therapeutic compared with subtherapeutic TGNs (87% versus 70% P = 0.011). Among 280 maintenance semesters in 91 patients, remission was higher with combination than monotherapy (81% versus 60%, P < 0.0001) and therapeutic versus subtherapeutic TGNs (85% versus 58%, P = 0.004). Therapeutic TGN (odds ratio [OR] 4.32, 95% CI, 1.41-13.29, P = 0.01) and albumin (OR 1.09, 95% CI, 1.01-1.18, P = 0.03) were predictors of response to induction. Therapeutic TGN (OR 3.71, 95% CI, 1.87-7.34, P < 0.0001) and ileal disease (OR 0.21, 95% CI, 0.08-0.57, P = 0.002) were predictors of remission semesters. Concomitant immunomodulation at induction was associated with longer time to failure (69 versus 36 months, P = 0.009). Therapeutic TGN at induction (P = 0.03) and male sex (P = 0.026) were associated with time to failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy was superior to ADA monotherapy for induction and during maintenance. This benefit was increased further when thiopurines resulted in therapeutic TGNs. Early use of adequately dosed thiopurines (≥3 months before starting ADA) was associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Dose de-escalation to adalimumab 40 mg every 3 weeks in patients with Crohn's disease - a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Data on dose de-escalation in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are limited.

AIM

To evaluate outcomes of dose de-escalation from adalimumab (ADM) every other week (EOW) to every three weeks (ETW).

METHODS

We selected patients with CD receiving maintenance therapy with ADM 40 mg ETW with serum levels (SL) available before and after dose de-escalation. Sex- and age-matched controls continuing ADM 40 mg EOW were identified. Patient reported outcome, C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin were collected.

RESULTS

Out of 898 patients, we identified 40 (11 male, median 37 years) who de-escalated to ADM 40 mg ETW for ADM-related adverse events (AE, n = 1), ADM SL >7 μg/mL (n = 8), or both (n = 31). Compared to controls, ADM SL dropped significantly within 4 months, without associated clinical or biochemical changes. In 53% of patients, dose de-escalation was associated with disappearance of AE (8/16 skin manifestation, 3/6 arthralgia, 5/7 frequent infectious episodes). During a median follow-up of 24 months, 65% of patients maintained clinical response, but 35% needed dose escalation back to ADM 40 mg EOW because of clinical relapse (n = 8), ADM SL <4 μg/mL (n = 2), or both (n = 4). CRP <3.5 mg/L at dose de-escalation was independently associated with dose escalation-free survival [odds ratio 6.28 (95% CI 1.83-21.59), P = 0.004]. We could not define a minimal ADM SL to consider or maintain dose de-escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 65% of patients who de-escalated to adalimumab 40 mg every 3 weeks remained in clinical remission for a median of 24 months. In 53% of patients, adalimumab-related adverse events disappeared after dose de-escalation. Regardless of adalimumab SL, disease remission should be assessed objectively prior to dose de-escalation.

Optimizing biologic treatment in IBD: objective measures, but when, how and how often?

Background

The advent of biologic agents for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was accompanied in parallel with emerging understanding of persisting underlying inflammation and ensuing bowel damage that can occur even in patients with seeming clinical remission. This lead to the concepts of mucosal healing and deep remission gaining acceptance as the more desired goals for therapy within an ambitious disease-control therapeutic approach, namely, treat-to-target strategy. However, how to practically monitor IBD patients, which objective measures to follow, at what time-points and whether to act upon results in asymptomatic patients are all questions that remain disputed.

Methods and result

In this concise review we aim to provide an overview of objective measures for monitoring of IBD patients, focusing on the challenging group of patients treated by infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and other biologics. These objective measures are discussed in the context of the different common clinical scenarios wherein the clinician may contemplate their use. Specifically, we will delineate the role of objective parameters to be monitored during induction phase of treatment, during maintenance therapy, at loss of response and after elective cessation of therapy in patients in remission.

Conclusion

Coupled with the non-negligible costs of therapy, and the over-all worse prognosis of moderate-severe patients who are the usual recipients of biologic therapies, this challenging patients seem to be the first candidates for this more proactive strategy combining inflammatory and pharmacokinetic monitoring of objective inflammatory and pharmacokinetic measures. More data is still desirable to better define the exact parameters to be followed and their optimal thresholds, and to delineate the optimal cost-effective interventions for these patients.

C-reactive protein in Crohn's disease: how informative is it?

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important acute-phase marker, produced mainly in the liver. Its production by mesenteric adipocytes has been recently stressed in Crohn's disease (CD). There are many factors affecting CRP levels, both environmental and genetics. The short-life of this biomarker makes it of pertinent use in the assessment of inflammation. There are inconsistent results concerning the association of clinical activity indices, mucosal healing, histological activity and CRP. This review summarizes the role of CRP in CD, namely its importance in the differential diagnosis of CD; its relationship with clinical activity indices, other markers of inflammation and endoscopic and radiological cross sectional imaging; prediction of response to anti-TNF treatment and prediction of outcome.

High C-reactive protein in Crohn's disease patients predicts nonresponse to infliximab treatment

BACKGROUND

Infliximab (IFX) is effective in treating Crohn's disease (CD) and C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful biomarker in assessing inflammatory activity.

AIM

Correlate CRP levels before beginning of IFX, at week 14 and CRP delta within the first year of IFX treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective study of CD patients undergoing treatment with IFX. Primary nonresponse (PNR) was defined as no symptomatic improvement and CRP persistently elevated; sustained response (SR) as symptomatic improvement for at least 1 year without therapeutic adjustment; response after therapeutic adjustment (RTA) as analytic and clinical response but requiring IFX dose/frequency adjustment or association with another drug.

RESULTS

Baseline CRP levels were higher in PNR compared with SR (26.2mg/L vs 9.6 mg/L, p=0.015) and RTA (26.2mg/L vs 7.6 mg/L, p=0.007). CRP levels greater than 15 mg/L at baseline predict PNR with 67% sensitivity and 65% specificity. Lower CRP levels at week 14 were more likely to predict SR relative to RTA (3.1mg/L vs 7.6 mg/L p=0.019) and PNR (3.1mg/L vs 9.1mg/L; p=0.013). CRP levels greater than 4.6 mg/L at week 14 predict PNR with 67% sensitivity and 62% specificity. A higher CRP delta between beginning of treatment and week 14 is more likely to predict SR relative to RTA (5.2mg/L vs 0.6 mg/L p=0.027).

CONCLUSION

CRP levels at week 14 were associated with SR in patients treated with IFX, independently of baseline CRP serum levels. High inflammatory burden at beginning of IFX treatment was correlated with a worse response.

Adalimumab maintains remission of Crohn's disease after up to 4 years of treatment: data from CHARM and ADHERE

BACKGROUND

Therapies that maintain remission for patients with Crohn's disease are essential. Stable remission rates have been demonstrated for up to 2 years in adalimumab-treated patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease enrolled in the CHARM and ADHERE clinical trials.

AIM

To present the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab therapy through 4 years of treatment.

METHODS

Remission (CDAI <150), response (CR-100) and corticosteroid-free remission over 4 years, and maintenance of these endpoints beyond 1 year were assessed in CHARM early responders randomised to adalimumab. Corticosteroid-free remission was also assessed in all adalimumab-randomised patients using corticosteroids at baseline. Fistula healing was assessed in adalimumab-randomised patients with fistula at baseline. As observed, last observation carried forward and a hybrid nonresponder imputation analysis for year 4 (hNRI) were used to report efficacy. Adverse events were reported for any patient receiving at least one dose of adalimumab.

RESULTS

Of 329 early responders randomised to adalimumab induction therapy, at least 30% achieved remission (99/329) or CR-100 (116/329) at year 4 of treatment (hNRI). The majority of patients (54%) with remission at year 1 maintained this endpoint at year 4 (hNRI). At year 4, 16% of patients taking corticosteroids at baseline were in corticosteroid-free remission and 24% of patients with fistulae at baseline had healed fistulae. The incidence rates of adverse events remained stable over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged adalimumab therapy maintained clinical remission and response in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease for up to 4 years. No increased risk of adverse events or new safety signals were identified with long-term maintenance therapy. (clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00077779).