Gender effect on clinical features of achalasia: a prospective study

The effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy by achalasia subtype as measured by impedance planimetry

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder with three subtypes based on manometry that can treated with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). With the advent of impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP®), we hypothesized the three achalasia subtypes would have different pre-POEM EndoFLIP® diameter and distensibility index (DI) measurements but would be similar after POEM.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective review of consecutive POEM cases by a single surgeon-endoscopist team from 04/07/2017 to 08/28/2023. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia were stratified into type 1, 2, or 3 based on pre-POEM manometry. Patient characteristics, Eckardt scores, and pre-and-post-POEM diameter and DI were compared by subtype with descriptive, univariate, and multivariable linear regression statistics.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 9(14.1%) had Type 1, 36(56.3%) had Type 2, and 19(29.7%) had Type 3. There were no differences between Types with respect to median pre-POEM Eckardt scores (9[IQR:7-9) vs. 8[IQR:6-9] vs. 7[IQR:5-8], p = 0.148), median post-POEM Eckardt scores (0[IQR:0-1] vs. 0[IQR:0-0] vs. 0[IQR0-0.5], p = 0.112). EndoFLIP® data revealed variation in median pre-POEM diameter and DI between Subtypes (6.9[IQR:6-8.5] vs. 5.5[IQR:5-6.8] vs. 5[IQR:5-6.1], p = 0.025 and 1.8[IQR:1.3-3.2] vs. 0.9[IQR:0.6-1.6] vs. 0.6[IQR:0.5-0.8], p = 0.003, respectively), but not in the change in diameter or DI post-POEM (5.1[IQR:4.3-5.9] vs. 5.1[IQR:4.1-7.1] vs. 5.9[IQR:5-6.4], p = 0.217 and 3.9[IQR:2.5-4.7] vs. 3.4[IQR:2.4-4.7] vs. 2.7[IQR:2.3-3.7], p = 0.461, respectively). However, after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, pre- or post-POEM diameter and DI did not demonstrate statistically significant differences among subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Achalasia subtypes did not demonstrate different pre-POEM diameters or DI as measured by EndoFLIP® nor are there differences after POEM completion. While achalasia subtypes may have slightly different pathophysiology based on manometry findings, similar pre- and post-POEM impedance planimetry findings, along with similar Eckardt scores, support the use of POEM in the treatment of any achalasia subtype.

Correlation of Balloon Pressure Used for Pneumatic Dilatation in Achalasia with Manometric Findings and Factors Associated With the Need for Repeat Procedure

Achalasia is a chronic and rare disorder of esophageal motility. It is characterized by spastic or absent esophageal contractions and impairment of relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment modalities include smooth muscle-relaxing medications, botulinum toxin injections to lower the esophageal sphincter, pneumatic dilatation, and surgical interventions. Pneumatic dilatation is deemed to be an effective treatment option and is the most widely used non-surgical intervention. We designed this prospective study to look for any possible correlation between balloon pressure used in pneumatic dilatation, manometric findings, and patient characteristics. And to find any possible association between the need for repeat pneumatic dilatations and factors like gender, age, duration of symptoms, Eckardt score, daily retrosternal pain, manometric findings, and balloon pressures. Thirty-one patients with confirmed achalasia were enrolled in the study. All of these patients underwent pneumatic dilatation. Pearson's correlation coefficient was found to be 0.234 (p-value 0.23) between the required balloon pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP). Six of these patients required repeat pneumatic dilatations. No statistically significant association was noted between the need for repeat intervention and gender, age over 40, age under 20, Eckardt score over 10, daily chest pain, duration of symptoms over two years, and IRP over 30 mmHg. In conclusion, it could be said that pneumatic dilatation does not carry a 100% success rate, and repeat sessions are needed in many of the patients with achalasia. So, long-term follow-up is crucial. Managing expectations and making a realistic plan with proper informational care is important at the beginning of treatment.

End-Stage Achalasia With Megaesophagus Refractory to Two Heller Myotomies

Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus in which the lower esophageal sphincter fails to relax. Megaesophagus is a rare complication of achalasia characterized by severe dilatation of the esophagus, often indicative of end-stage achalasia. Typical presenting symptoms include dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and chest pain. The majority of patients with achalasia typically have excellent outcomes after surgical intervention with Heller myotomy. We discuss an interesting case of unsuccessful surgical intervention and hypothesize the reason for its failure in our patient.

Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction in Achalasia

Background/Aims

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. Impairment of vagal function has been reported in achalasia. This study evaluated autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunctions in patients with achalasia to establish a correlation between an ANS dysfunction and the clinical symptoms of achalasia.

Methods

Nineteen patients with achalasia (six males/13 females; mean age, 47.1±16.3 years) and 10 healthy controls (four males/six females; 34.8±10.7 years) were enrolled prospectively at Gangnam Severance Hospital between June 2013 and June 2014. All patients completed a questionnaire on ANS dysfunction symptoms and underwent a heart rate variability (HRV) test.

Results

ANS dysfunction symptoms were present in 13 patients with achalasia (69%) and three controls (30%). The ANS dysfunction score was significantly higher in patients with achalasia than in the controls (p=0.035). There were no significant differences in the standard deviation of all normal R-R intervals, high frequency (HF), low frequency (LF), and LF/HF ratio in the HRV test. In subgroup analysis comparing female achalasia patients with controls, the cardiac activity was significantly higher in the female achalasia patients than in the controls (p=0.036). The cardiac activity (p=0.004) and endurance to stress (p=0.004) were significantly higher in the achalasia patients with ANS dysfunction symptoms than the achalasia patients without ANS dysfunction symptoms.

Conclusions

ANS dysfunction symptoms are common in patients with achalasia. Female achalasia patients and those with ANS dysfunction symptoms showed increased cardiac activity. Hence, more attention should be paid to cardiac overload in achalasia patients who are female or have ANS dysfunction symptoms.

Mini-review: Tailored per-oral endoscopic myotomy for type III achalasia

This mini-review summarizes the most recent literature regarding per-oral endoscopic myotomy for type III achalasia, emphasizing the poorly understood science of tailoring myotomy length during this procedure. In addition, special attention will be placed on the current subjective and objective biomarkers, such as the Eckardt score, used to evaluate treatment outcomes in this population to better contextualize the existing data on patient outcomes, as proposed by Low et al in the current issue of the Journal. Understanding the current treatment landscape for type III achalasia and identifying the key areas of research deficiencies will guide future investigation and management of this disease.

Correlation between Lower Esophageal Sphincter Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and the Clinical Presentation of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is characterized by aperistalsis with poor relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). We aimed to systematically assess whether LES metrics on high-resolution manometry (HRM) correlate with the symptomatic or endoscopic presentation of patients with achalasia.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed at two tertiary medical centers. All cases of newly diagnosed, untreated achalasia were reviewed for demographics, symptoms, and endoscopic findings. These were correlated with HRM metrics, including LES basal pressure (LESP), integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), percent LES relaxation, and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology.

RESULTS

108 achalasia patients were included; 56 (51.9%) were men, with a mean overall age of 55.6 ± 17.9 years old. Achalasia subtypes included 23.1% with Type I, 65.7% Type II, and 11.1% Type III. Mean LESP was 40.9 ± 13.7 mmHg, IRP 26.8 ± 11.5 mmHg, with 36% ± 20% LES relaxation. On univariate analyses, a higher IRP was associated with age < 50 (p = 0.028), female sex (p = 0.030), Arab ethnicity (p < 0.001), weight loss (p = 0.016), a tortuous esophagus (p = 0.036), and resistance at the EGJ (p = 0.033). However, on multivariate regression analyses, only ethnicity remained significantly associated with IRP. No unique variables were associated with either LESP or percent LES relaxation. Achalasia subtype and Eckardt score were not associated with any LES metrics. Non-Type 1 EGJ morphology was associated with a lower LESP.

CONCLUSIONS

LES metrics on HRM do not appear to correlate with the clinical or endoscopic presentation of patients with untreated achalasia.

Characteristics of Achalasia Subtypes: Result of a Study in a Tertiary Hospital

BACKGROUND

With the appearance of enhancing high-resolution manometry (HRM), realizing the difference of achalasia symptoms between classified groups by HRM is an outcome of interest in areas with remote access to this device.

METHODS

All patients newly diagnosed with achalasia from January 2019 to March 2020 were enrolled in the study. All the patients were diagnosed via HRM after undergoing endoscopy to rule out pseudo-achalasia, and grouped based on the Chicago classification criteria and answered a questionnaire assessing relevant symptoms.

RESULTS

We included 62 patients recently diagnosed with achalasia with a mean age of 53.66 in males (n=30), and 45.4 in females (n=32). Mean time of diagnosis was 24 months. Thirty-seven percent were in type I, 50% in type II, and 13% in type III. Dysphagia and weight loss were higher in type III, while all other relevant symptoms were higher in type II, none of which, however, was statistically significant. Weight loss was reversely associated with duration of symptoms (Spearman correlation= -0.3, P=0.01), and this reverse association was more prominent in females (Spearman correlation= -0.47, P=0.009), type III (Spearman correlation= -0.74, P=0.03), and in the first clinical stages (Spearman correlation= -0.55, P=0.04) in sub analysis.

CONCLUSION

Type II is the most common type of achalasia in this study. Unlike HRM classification, clinical manifestations alone cannot be used to group patients into different types. However, significant weight loss of the newly diagnosed subjects can become an indicator of on-time diagnosis of the patients.

Sex differences in symptoms, high-resolution manometry values and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy in Chinese patients with achalasia

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the differences in symptoms, high-resolution manometry (HRM) characteristics, and the efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) regarding patients' sex in achalasia.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with achalasia by HRM who underwent POEM and were followed up for more than 6 months were included. The individual characteristics, symptoms and signs, POEM findings, HRM results and potentially related complications in male and female patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Prior to POEM, dysphagia was more severe in female than male patients (P = 0.044), while regurgitation was more severe (P = 0.013) and heartburn was more common in male patients (P = 0.003). Regarding HRM characteristics, the lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) was higher (P = 0.01) and length of esophagus was shorter in female patients than in male patients. Eckardt scores, LESP and integrated relaxation pressure were significantly improved after the POEM procedure (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the sexes regarding the efficacy of POEM, reflux symptoms, HRM data and complications after POEM.

CONCLUSIONS

Before they seek treatment, female patients with achalasia may experience severe dysphagia and male patients are more likely to experience heartburn and more severe regurgitation. POEM is a safe and effective option for treating both male and female patients with achalasia.

Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy

AIM

To systematically review clinical presentation, diagnosis, and therapy of achalasia, focusing on recent developments in high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) for diagnosis and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for therapy.

METHODS

Systematic review of achalasia using computerized literature search via PubMed and Ovid of articles published since 2005 with keywords ("achalasia") AND ("high resolution" or "HREM" or "peroral endoscopic myotomy" or "POEM"). Two authors independently performed literature searches and incorporated articles into this review by consensus according to prospectively determined criteria.

RESULTS

Achalasia is an uncommon esophageal motility disorder, usually manifested by dysphagia to solids and liquids, and sometimes manifested by chest pain, regurgitation, and weight loss. Symptoms often suggest more common disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), thus often delaying diagnosis. Achalasia is a predominantly idiopathic chronic disease. Diagnosis is typically suggested by barium swallow showing esophageal dilation; absent distal esophageal peristalsis; smoothly tapered narrowing ("bird's beak") at esophagogastric junction; and delayed passage of contrast into stomach. Diagnostic findings at high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) include: distal esophageal aperistalsis and integrated relaxation pressure (trough LES pressure during 4 s) > 15 mmHg. Achalasia is classified by HREM into: type 1 classic; type 2 compartmentalized high pressure in esophageal body, and type 3 spastic. This classification impacts therapeutic decisions. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is required before therapy to assess esophagus and esophagogastric junction and to exclude distal esophageal malignancy. POEM is a revolutionizing achalasia therapy. POEM creates a myotomy via interventional endoscopy. Numerous studies demonstrate that POEM produces comparable, if not superior, results compared to standard laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), as determined by LES pressure, dysphagia frequency, Eckardt score, hospital length of stay, therapy durability, and incidence of GERD. Other therapies, including botulinum toxin injection and pneumatic dilation, have moderately less efficacy and much less durability than POEM.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive review suggests that POEM is equivalent or perhaps superior to LHM for achalasia in terms of cost efficiency, hospital length of stay, and relief of dysphagia, with comparable side effects. The data are, however, not conclusive due to sparse long-term follow-up and lack of randomized comparative clinical trials. POEM therapy is currently limited by a shortage of trained endoscopists.

An Overview of Achalasia and Its Subtypes

Achalasia is one of the most studied esophageal motility disorders. However, the pathophysiology and reasons that patients develop achalasia are still unclear. Patients often present with dysphagia to solids and liquids, regurgitation, and varying degrees of weight loss. There is significant latency prior to diagnosis, which can have nutritional implications. The diagnosis is suspected based on clinical history and confirmed by esophageal high-resolution manometry testing. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy is necessary to rule out potential malignancy that can mimic achalasia. Recent data presented in abstract form suggest that patients with type II achalasia may be most likely, and patients with type III achalasia may be least likely, to report weight loss compared to patients with type I achalasia. Although achalasia cannot be permanently cured, palliation of symptoms is possible in over 90% of patients with the treatment modalities currently available (pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, or peroral endoscopic myotomy). This article reviews the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management options in patients with achalasia, as well as potential insights into histopathologic differences and nutritional implications of the subtypes of achalasia.

Relationship between esophageal clinical symptoms and manometry findings in patients with esophageal motility disorders: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Manometry is the gold-standard diagnostic test for motility disorders in the esophagus. The development of high-resolution manometry catheters and software displays of manometry recordings in color-coded pressure plots have changed the diagnostic assessment of esophageal disease. The diagnostic value of particular esophageal clinical symptoms among patients suspected of esophageal motor disorders (EMDs) is still unknown. The aim of this study was to explore the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of presenting esophageal symptoms between abnormal and normal esophageal manometry findings.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 623 patients aged 11-80 years. Data were collected from clinical examinations as well as patient questionnaires. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated after high-resolution manometry plots were reviewed according to the most recent Chicago Criteria.

RESULTS

The clinical symptoms were not sensitive enough to discriminate between EMDs. Nevertheless, dysphagia, noncardiac chest pain, hoarseness, vomiting, and weight loss had high specificity and high accuracy to distinguish EMDs from normal findings. Regurgitation and heartburn did not have good accuracy for the diagnosis of EMDs.

CONCLUSION

Clinical symptoms are not reliable enough to discriminate between EMDs. Clinical symptoms can, however, discriminate between normal findings and EMDs, especially achalasia.

Idiopathic (primary) achalasia: a review

Idiopathic achalasia is a primary esophageal motor disorder characterized by loss of esophageal peristalsis and insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in response to deglutition. Patients with achalasia commonly complain of dysphagia to solids and liquids, bland regurgitation often unresponsive to an adequate trial of proton pump inhibitor, and chest pain. Weight loss is present in many, but not all patients. Although the precise etiology is unknown, it is often thought to be either autoimmune, viral immune, or neurodegenerative. The diagnosis is based on history of the disease, barium esophagogram, and esophageal motility testing. Endoscopic assessment of the gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia is necessary to rule out malignancy. Newer diagnostic modalities such as high resolution manometry help in predicting treatment response in achalasia based on esophageal pressure topography patterns identifying three phenotypes of achalasia (I-III) and outcome studies suggest better treatment response with types I and II compared to type III. Although achalasia cannot be permanently cured, excellent outcomes are achieved in over 90 % of patients. Current medical and surgical therapeutic options (pneumatic dilation, endoscopic and surgical myotomy, and pharmacologic agents) aim at reducing the LES pressure and facilitating esophageal emptying by gravity and hydrostatic pressure of retained food and liquids. Either graded pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic surgical myotomy with a partial fundoplication are recommended as initial therapy guided by patient age, gender, preference, and local institutional expertise. The prognosis in achalasia patients is excellent. Most patients who are appropriately treated have a normal life expectancy but the disease does recur and the patient may need intermittent treatment.

Clinical, endoscopic and manometric features of the primary motor disorders of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Significant incidence, diagnostic difficulties, clinical relevance and therapeutic efficacy associated with the small number of publications on the primary esophageal motor disorders, motivated the present study.

AIM

To determine the manometric prevalence of these disorders and correlate them to the endoscopic and clinical findings.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 2614 patients, being 1529 (58.49%) women and 1085 (41.51%) men. From 299 manometric examinations diagnosed with primary esophageal motor disorder, were sought-clinical data (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, odynophagia, non-cardiac chest pain, pharyngeal globe and extra-esophageal symptoms) and/or endoscopic (hiatal hernia, erosive esophagitis, food waste) that motivated the performance of manometry.

RESULTS

Were found 49 cases of achalasia, 73 diffuse spasm, 89 nutcracker esophagus, 82 ineffective esophageal motility, and six lower esophageal sphincter hypertension. In relation to the correlations, it was observed that in 119 patients clinical conditions were associated with dysphagia, found in achalasia more than in other conditions; in relationship between endoscopic findings and clinical conditions there was no statistical significance between data.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and endoscopic findings have little value in the characterization of the primary motor disorders of the esophagus, showing even more the need for manometry, particularly in the preoperative period of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Nonspecific motility disorders, irritable esophagus, and chest pain

This paper presents commentaries on whether Starling's law applies to the esophagus; whether erythromycin affects esophageal motility; the relationship between hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter and vigorous achalasia; whether ethnic- and gender-based norms affect diagnosis and treatment of esophageal motor disorders; health care and epidemiology of chest pain; whether normal pH excludes esophageal pain; the role of high-resolution manometry in noncardiac chest pain; whether pH-impedance should be included in the evaluation of noncardiac chest pain; whether there are there alternative therapeutic options to PPI for treating noncardiac chest pain; and the usefulness of psychological treatment and alternative medicine in noncardiac chest pain.

Clinical and manometric characteristics of Allgrove syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The association of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) insensitivity with achalasia and alacrimia (Allgrove syndrome, 3A) constitutes a rare multisystem disorder. Its evolution is not well known. The aim of this study was to describe clinical and esophageal manometric characteristics and outcomes in Allgrove syndrome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study compared clinical and manometric characteristics at diagnosis and on follow-up of 9 children presenting with 3A (mean age at diagnosis 7.1 years) with those of 9 children with idiopathic achalasia (IA) (mean age at diagnosis 8.3 years).

RESULTS

At the time of diagnosis, 3 children with 3A presented with no digestive or respiratory signs because they were identified during a family screening; 1 remained asymptomatic 8 years later. ACTH levels were high in patients with 3A. All of the patients with IA were symptomatic at diagnosis. No significant difference was observed when comparing any of the manometric parameters of the first esophageal manometry of 3A with those of IA. Seven children with 3A were operated on using the Heller procedure, completed by pneumatic esophageal dilation in 2 of these 7. One patient with 3A was treated only by nifedipine. Failure of treatment was observed in 3 children with 3A and 1 child with IA, partial success in 4 with 3A and 1 with IA, and total success in 2 with 3A and 7 with IA (P < 0.03). Control manometry showed that in the 3A group, partial success after surgery was always associated with abnormally low or normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, whereas failure after surgery was associated with high LES pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that 3A presented a more severe course than IA despite presymptomatic diagnosis in cases of family screening. The high LES pressure noted in some patients with 3A is suggestive of a peculiar pattern in 3A affecting the LES and the lower part of the esophagus.

Demographic, clinical features and treatment outcomes in 700 achalasia patients in iran

BACKGROUND Achalasia is the most recognized motor disorder of the esophagus. Because it is an uncommon disease, most studies have reviewed small numbers of patients. Here, we report demographic, clinical features and treatment outcomes in 700 achalasia patients. METHODS In all patients, diagnosis was established based on clinical, radiological, endoscopic and manometric criteria. A questionnaire was completed for each patient and included the patient's age, gender, initial symptoms, frequency of different symptoms, presence of positive family history for achalasia, other accompanying diseases and treatment outcomes. RESULTS In our study men were affected more than women (54.3% vs. 45.7%). Patients' mean age was about 38 years. The most frequent symptoms noted were: dysphagia to solids and liquids, active regurgitation, passive regurgitation and weight loss, respectively. Women complained of chest pain more than men (59% vs. 47.1%, p=0.04). The vast majority of our patients were treated by pneumatic dilation (PD) of the LES and in long-term follow-up, 67% were in the responder group. Females responded better than males to PD. CONCLUSION Dysphagia to solids is the most common symptom in patients with achalasia. Chest pain was significantly higher among women. PD is an effective treatment for achalasia with long-term efficacy in the majority of patients.

Achalasia: a review of Western and Iranian experiences

Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the esophagus, in which esophageal emptying is impaired. Diagnosis of achalasia is based on clinical findings. The diagnosis is confirmed by radiographic, endoscopic, and manometric evaluations. Several treatments for achalasia have been introduced. We searched the PubMed Database for original articles and meta-analyses about achalasia to summarize the current knowledge regarding this disease, with particular focus on different procedures that are used for treatment of achalasia. We also report the Iranian experience of treatment of this disease, since it could be considered as a model for medium-resource countries. Myotomy, particularly laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication, is the most effective treatment for achalasia. Compared to other treatments, however, the initial cost of myotomy is usually higher and the recovery period is longer. When performing myotomy is not indicated or not possible, graded pneumatic dilation with slow rate of balloon inflation seems to be an effective and safe initial alternative. Injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter before pneumatic dilation may increase remission rates. However, this needs to be confirmed in further studies. Due to lack of adequate information regarding the role of expandable stents in the treatment of achalasia, insertion of stents does not currently seem to be a recommended treatment. In summary, laparoscopic myotomy can be considered as the procedure of choice for treatment of achalasia. Graded pneumatic dilation is an effective alternative when the performance of myotomy is not possible for any reason.

Current clinical approach to achalasia

Idiopathic achalasia is a rare primary motility disorder of the esophagus. The classical features are incomplete relaxation of a frequently hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and a lack of peristalsis in the tubular esophagus. These motor abnormalities lead to dysphagia, stasis, regurgitation, weight loss, or secondary respiratory complications. Although major strides have been made in understanding the pathogenesis of this rare disorder, including a probable autoimmune mediated destruction of inhibitory neurons in response to an unknown insult in genetically susceptible individuals, a definite trigger has not been identified. The diagnosis of achalasia is suggested by clinical features and confirmed by further diagnostic tests, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), manometry or barium swallow. These studies are not only used to exclude pseudoachalasia, but also might help to categorize the disease by severity or clinical subtype. Recent advances in diagnostic methods, including high resolution manometry (HRM), might allow prediction of treatment responses. The primary treatments for achieving long-term symptom relief are surgery and endoscopic methods. Although limited high-quality data exist, it appears that laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication is superior to endoscopic methods in achieving long-term relief of symptoms in the majority of patients. However, the current clinical approach to achalasia will depend not only on patients’ characteristics and clinical subtypes of the disease, but also on local expertise and patient preferences.

Hospitalization for achalasia in the United States 1997-2006

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) was used to study the demographic characteristics of achalasia patients.

METHODS

HCUP data from 1997 to 2006 were stratified by categories pertaining to patient demographics, such as age, sex, race, income, residence in metropolitan area, and region of the United States, as well as categories pertaining to hospital characteristics, such teaching status, location, and bed size. The distributions of inpatients among different categories were compared between achalasia and all other diagnoses, using odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for comparison.

RESULTS

The annual hospitalization rates of achalasia revealed a clear-cut age-dependent rise between the youngest age group less than 18 years old (0.25/100,000) and the oldest age group over 85 years old (37.35/100,000). Between 1997 and 2007, the rates of hospitalization remained largely unchanged for all age groups alike. Achalasia was equally distributed among men and women and among various ethnic groups. Compared with other diagnoses, achalasia was more frequent among hospitalized patients from zip codes associated with a higher average income (1.26, 1.23-1.29), living in metropolitan areas (1.12, 1.09-1.15), and living in the northeast region of the United States (1.27, 1.25-1.30). Achalasia patients were mostly seen in large hospitals (1.22, 1.19-1.26), teaching hospitals (1.73, 1.70-1.76), and hospitals located in metropolitan areas (1.15, 1.14-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

With exception of its striking age-dependence, the epidemiology of achalasia does not reveal any clues about its yet unsolved etiology.

Idiopathic (primary) achalasia

Idiopathic achalasia is a primary esophageal motor disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and abnormal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation in response to deglutition. It is a rare disease with an annual incidence of approximately 1/100,000 and a prevalence rate of 1/10,000. The disease can occur at any age, with a similar rate in men and women, but is usually diagnosed between 25 and 60 years. It is characterized predominantly by dysphagia to solids and liquids, bland regurgitation, and chest pain. Weight loss (usually between 5 to 10 kg) is present in most but not in all patients. Heartburn occurs in 27%-42% of achalasia patients. Etiology is unknown. Some familial cases have been reported, but the rarity of familial occurrence does not support the hypothesis that genetic inheritance is a significant etiologic factor. Association of achalasia with viral infections and auto-antibodies against myenteric plexus has been reported, but the causal relationship remains unclear. The diagnosis is based on history of the disease, radiography (barium esophagogram), and esophageal motility testing (esophageal manometry). Endoscopic examination is important to rule out malignancy as the cause of achalasia. Treatment is strictly palliative. Current medical and surgical therapeutic options (pneumatic dilation, surgical myotomy, and pharmacologic agents) aimed at reducing the LES pressure and facilitating esophageal emptying by gravity and hydrostatic pressure of retained food and liquids. Although it cannot be permanently cured, excellent palliation is available in over 90% of patients.