Proton pump inhibitors and acute kidney injury: a nested case-control study

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin system blockade or diuretics and risk of acute kidney injury: A case-crossover study

BACKGROUND

Aging-related physiological changes, such as decline in renal function, not only exacerbates pre-existing comorbidities but also escalate the susceptibility to adverse events. Previous studies have shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the concomitant use of renin-angiotensin system blockade or diuretics may further potentiate the risk. However, studies evaluating the risk of AKI associated with NSAIDs (including routes, concomitant use of different NSAIDs, categories (traditional NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors), and cumulative doses of NSAIDs) are limited, particularly the risk of AKI associated with the dual or triple combination of NSAIDs with renin-angiotensin system blockade (RAS blockades) and/or diuretics.

METHODS

A case-crossover study utilized two sets of longitudinal data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Newly admitted patients with a primary AKI diagnosis were included, with the index date defined as the first admission date. The 1-7 days and 181-187 days prior to the index date served as the case and control periods. Exposure to NSAIDs and co-exposures of RAS blockade and/or diuretics were assessed in both periods. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders, estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for AKI associated with NSAIDs, dual, or triple combinations. Sensitivity analyses explored result robustness by varying case and control period lengths.

RESULTS

The study included 1,284 newly diagnosed AKI patients. NSAIDs showed a 3.55-fold increased risk of AKI (aOR: 3.55; 95 % CI 2.70-4.65), with similar risks for traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Use of multiple NSAIDs, parenteral dosage forms, and higher cumulative doses increased AKI risk. Dual combination with either RAS blockade or diuretics resulted in a 2.90-fold (aOR: 2.90; 95 %CI 1.47-5.70) and 12.68-fold (aOR: 12.68; 95 %CI 6.15-26.12) risk, respectively. The highest risk occurred with triple combination (aOR: 29.22; 95 %CI 12.82-66.64).

CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs, including both non-selective NSAIDs and COX2 inhibitors, elevate the risk of AKI. Increased AKI risk is linked to using multiple NSAIDs, the parenteral dosage form, and higher cumulative doses. Dual combination of RAS blockade with NSAIDs or diuretics with NSAIDs, as well as triple therapy, heightens the risk, with the latter associated with the highest risk of AKI.

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of acute kidney injury in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A Danish population-based cohort study

Previous studies have suggested that the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) more than doubles the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, this association may be confounded. Therefore, we conducted a register-based cohort study to examine the risk of AKI in users and nonusers of PPIs among cancer patients treated with ICIs in Denmark from 2011 through 2021 while accounting for a comprehensive range of potential confounders. PPI use was determined based on redeemed prescriptions of PPIs before ICI initiation. We identified laboratory-recorded AKI events within the first year after ICI initiation. We estimated the risks and hazard ratios (HRs) of AKI while accounting for a comprehensive range of confounders (including comorbidities and comedication) by propensity score weighting. Furthermore, we performed an additional per-protocol analysis while accounting for informative censoring by weighting. We identified 10 200 cancer patients including 2749 (27%) users, 6214 (61%) nonusers, and 1237 (12%) former users of PPIs. PPI users had an increased risk of AKI compared to nonusers (1-year risk, 24.7% vs 19.9%; HR, 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-1.56]); however, this association attenuated when accounting for confounders (weighted 1-year risk, 24.2% vs 23.8%; weighted HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.93-1.21]). In the per-protocol analysis, the crude HR was 1.86 (95% CI, 1.63-2.12), while the weighted HR was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03-1.49). Thus, the association between PPI use and AKI could largely be explained by confounding, suggesting that previous studies may have overestimated the association.

Proton pump inhibitors and chronic kidney disease risk: a comparative study with histamine-2 receptor antagonists

This observational study explored the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use and the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) and six-hospital electronic health record (EHR) databases, CKD incidence was analyzed among PPI and H2RA users. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, with 1,869 subjects each in the PPI and H2RA groups from the NHIS-NSC, and 5,967 in EHR databases. CKD incidence was similar for both groups (5.72/1000 person-years vs. 7.57/1000 person-years; HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.35-1.30). A meta-analysis of the EHR databases showed no significant increased CKD risk associated with PPI use (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.87-1.23). These results suggest PPI use may not increase CKD risk compared to H2RA use, but the potential role of PPI-induced CKD needs further research. Clinicians should consider this when prescribing long-term PPI therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and their interaction with proton pump inhibitors-related interstitial nephritis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy and outcomes, leading to an expanding use in millions of patients worldwide. However, they can cause a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Essentially, any organs can be affected by irAEs, which have emerged as therapy-limiting side effects. In the kidneys, ICI-associated acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN) leads to acute kidney injury (AKI) in 2%-5% of patients on ICI therapy. AKI associated with ICI therapy pathologically presents with AIN in nearly 90% of the cases, but the pathophysiology of ICI-AIN remains to be defined. The generation of autoreactive T cells in patients receiving AIN-inducible drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), is one of the leading theories, supported by a higher incidence of ICI-AIN in patients on these AIN-inducible drugs. In this review, we will discuss our understanding of the incidence, potential pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical presentations, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of PPI-related AIN and its interaction with ICI therapy.

Safety analysis of co-administering tacrolimus and omeprazole in renal transplant recipients - A review

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used to prevent rejection in allogenic solid organ transplant recipients, which is metabolized in the liver with cytochrome P450 isoforms 3A4 and 3A5 (CYP3A4, CYP3A5). In turn, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as Omeprazole - a substrate and inhibitor of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 enzymes - are administered to kidney transplant patients in order to prevent duodenal and gastric ulcer disease, associated with the glucocorticoid treatment. Simultaneous administration of both drugs in renal patients has the potential to trigger drug interactions. In fact, there are several mechanisms which may impact the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus. Inhibition of the CYP2C19 isoform may suppress the metabolism of omeprazole, subsequently altering its metabolic pathway to be metabolized by the CYP3A4 enzyme in order to maintain adequate biotransformation. Therefore, the competition for CYP3A4 may affect the metabolism of tacrolimus and result in its increased plasma concentrations, as well as in adverse reactions. Another mechanism has been related to the genetic polymorphism of the CYP2C19 isoform. Since all these interactions may lead to dysfunctions of the transplanted kidney, it seems significant to eliminate their consequences, for instance via the administration of drugs which are neither substrates, nor inhibitors of the CYP3A4 enzyme. Finally, the nephrotoxic effect of omeprazole should also be accounted for. Bearing in mind the aforementioned observations, the aim of the presented paper was to review the available studies addressing the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus.

A Pharmacogenetics-Based Approach to Managing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Current Perspectives and Future Steps

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used medications to treat acid-related conditions, including gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Gastroenterology guidelines mention the importance of CYP2C19 in PPI metabolism and the influence of CYP2C19 genetic variations on variable responses to PPIs, but do not currently recommend the genotyping of CYP2C19 prior to prescribing PPIs. There are strong data to support the influence of CYP2C19 genetic variations on the pharmacokinetics of PPIs and clinical outcomes. Existing pharmacogenetic guideline recommendations for dose increases focus on H. pylori and erosive esophagitis indications, but PPIs are also the main therapy for treating GERD. Recent data suggest GERD patients being treated with a PPI may also benefit from genotype-guided dosing. We summarize the literature supporting this contention and highlight future directions for improved management of patients with GERD through precision medicine approaches.

Postoperative Proton Pump Inhibitors are associated with a significantly higher rate of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in reducing marginal ulcers after pancreatoduodenectomy. However, their impact on perioperative complications has not been defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the effect of postoperative PPIs on 90-day perioperative outcomes in all patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at our institution from April 2017 to December 2020.

RESULTS

284 patients were included; 206 (72.5%) received perioperative PPIs, 78 (27.5%) did not. The two cohorts were similar in demographics and operative variables. Postoperatively, the PPI cohort had significantly higher rates of overall complications (74.3% vs. 53.8%) and delayed gastric emptying (28.6% vs. 11.5%), p < 0.05. However, no differences in infectious complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula, or anastomotic leaks were seen. On multivariate analysis, PPI was independently associated with a higher risk of overall complications (OR 2.46, CI 1.33-4.54) and delayed gastric emptying (OR 2.73, CI 1.26-5.91), p = 0.011. Four patients developed marginal ulcers within 90-days postoperatively; all were in the group who received PPIs.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative proton pump inhibitor use was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall complications and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy.

The association between proton pump inhibitor use and risk of post-hospitalization acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) are among the most commonly used drugs to treat acid-related gastrointestinal disorders in the USA. Although PPI use has been linked to acute interstitial nephritis, the side effects of post-hospitalization acute kidney injury (AKI) and the progression of kidney disease still are controversial. We conducted a matched cohort study to examine the associations between PPI use and the side effects, especially in post-hospitalization AKI.

METHODS

We investigated 340 participants from the multicenter, prospective, matched-cohort ASSESS-AKI study, which enrolled participants from December 2009 to February 2015. After the baseline index hospitalization, follow-up visits were conducted every six months, and included a collection of self-reported PPI use by participants. Post-hospitalization AKI was defined as the percentage increase from the nadir to peak inpatient SCr value was ≥ 50% and/or absolute increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dL in peak inpatient serum creatinine compared with baseline outpatient serum creatinine. We applied a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model to test the relationship between PPI use and post-hospitalization AKI. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models also were conducted to examine the association between PPI use and the risk of progression of kidney disease.

RESULTS

After controlling for demographic variables, baseline co-morbidities and drug use histories, there was no statistically significant association between PPI use and risk of post-hospitalization AKI (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.45). Stratified by AKI status at baseline, no significant relationships were confirmed between PPI use and the risk of recurrent AKI (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.11 to 1.56) or incidence of AKI (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.76). Similar non-significant results also were observed in the association between PPI use and the risk of progression of kidney diseases (Hazard Ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 0.51 to 4.36).

CONCLUSION

PPI use after the index hospitalization was not a significant risk factor for post-hospitalization AKI and progression of kidney diseases, regardless of the AKI status of participants at baseline.

Adverse Effects Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Proton Pump Inhibitors are used widely to manage many gastric acid-related conditions such as gastroesophageal disease, gastritis, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, peptic ulcer disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers, and Helicobacter pylori eradication, around the globe. This review article focuses on adverse effects associated with the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors. Various observational studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses have established the adverse effects associated with the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors including renal disorders (acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease), cardiovascular risks (major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke), fractures, infections (Clostridium difficile infection, community-acquired pneumonia, and Coronavirus disease 2019), micronutrient deficiencies (hypomagnesemia, anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia), hypergastrinemia, cancers (gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatic cancer), hepatic encephalopathy, and dementia. Clinicians including prescribers and pharmacists should be aware of the adverse effects of taking proton pump inhibitors for an extended period of time. In addition, the patients taking proton pump inhibitors for long-term should be monitored for the listed adverse effects. The American Gastroenterological association recommends a few non-pharmacological measures and the use of histamine 2 blockers to lessen gastrointestinal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflex disease and the utilization of proton pump inhibitors treatment if there is a definitive indication. Additionally, the American Gastroenterological association's Best Practice Advice statements emphasize deprescribing when there is no clear indication for proton pump inhibitors therapy.

A Meta-Analysis of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury: Geographical Differences and Associated Factors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed in medical practice for the treatment of several gastrointestinal disorders. Previous epidemiology studies have reported the association between PPI use and the risk of AKI, although the magnitude of the association between PPIs and the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the relationship between PPI therapy and the risk of AKI. We systematically searched for relevant articles published before January 2023 on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. In addition, we conducted a manual search of the bibliographies of potential articles. Two independent reviewers examined the appropriateness of all studies for inclusion. We pooled studies that compared the risk of AKI with PPI against their control using a random effect model. The search criteria based on PRISMA guidelines yielded 568 articles. Twelve observational studies included 2,492,125 individuals. The pooled adjusted RR demonstrated a significant positive association between PPI therapy and the risk of AKI (adjusted RR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.40-2.19, p < 0.001), and it was consistent across subgroups. A visual presentation of the funnel plot and Egger's regression test showed no evidence of publication bias. Our meta-analysis indicated that persons using PPIs exhibited an increased risk of AKI. North American individuals had a higher risk of AKI compared to Asian and European individuals. However, the pooled effect from observational studies cannot clarify whether the observed association is a causal effect or the result of some unmeasured confounding factors. Hence, the biological mechanisms underlying this association are still unclear and require further research.

Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Exposure and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of preoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) exposure with incident acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Severance cardiac surgery cohort included 9860 cardiac surgery patients aged 18 years or older. The National Health Insurance Service-senior cohort included 2933 patients aged 60 years or older who underwent cardiac surgery. Preoperative PPI exposure was defined as a PPI prescription within 3 weeks prior to cardiac surgery. Primary outcomes were postoperative AKI and AKI requiring dialysis (AKI-dialysis).

RESULTS

In the Severance cardiac surgery cohort after propensity score matching for PPI exposure, incident AKI (44.0% [472 of 1073] vs 40.5% [1304 of 3219]) and AKI-dialysis (5.8% [62 of 1073] vs 3.7% [119 of 3219]) were more common in patients exposed to PPI than in those who were not. Hospital and intensive care unit stay durations were longer among PPI-exposed than PPI-nonexposed patients. Multivariable conditional logistic analyses revealed that PPI exposure was significantly associated with incident AKI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.42; P=.02) and AKI-dialysis (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.63; P=.009). The National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort had similar results, revealing a significant association between PPI exposure and incident AKI-dialysis (AOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.81; P=.003). Discontinuation of PPI prior to operation was associated with a lower odds of AKI development in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PPI exposure may be a modifiable risk factor for AKI among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and macrolide antibiotics and risk of acute kidney injury: a self-controlled case series study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia. However, several studies have suggested that PPI use increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). PPIs are often concomitantly used with antibiotics, such as macrolides and penicillins for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Although macrolide antibiotics are considered to have relatively low nephrotoxicity, they are well known to increase the risk of AKI due to drug-drug interactions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between PPI use and the development of AKI. We also evaluated the effect of concomitant use of PPIs and macrolide antibiotics on the risk of AKI.

METHODS

This self-controlled case series study was conducted using electronic medical records at Kyoto University Hospital. We identified patients who were prescribed at least one PPI and macrolide antibiotic between January 2014 and December 2019 and underwent blood examinations at least once a year. An adjusted incident rate ratio (aIRR) of AKI with PPI use or concomitant use macrolide antibiotics with PPIs was estimated using a conditional Poisson regression model controlled for the estimated glomerular filtration rate at the beginning of observation and use of potentially nephrotoxic antibiotics.

RESULTS

Of the 3,685 individuals who received PPIs and macrolide antibiotics, 766 patients with episodes of stage 1 or higher AKI were identified. Any stage of AKI was associated with PPI use (aIRR, 1.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 2.04)). Stage 2 or higher AKI was observed in 279 cases, with an estimated aIRR of 2.01 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.58, for PPI use). For the period of concomitant use of macrolide antibiotics with PPIs compared with the period of PPIs alone, an aIRR of stage 1 or higher AKI was estimated as 0.82 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings added epidemiological information for the association between PPI use and an increased risk of stage 1 or higher AKI. However, we did not detect an association between the concomitant use of macrolide antibiotics and an increased risk of AKI in PPI users.

The Association of Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonists with Clinical Complications in Patients with Severe Sepsis

Objective. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used to treat gastric acidity, and their frequent use may trigger various malfunctioning, such as cardiac, renal, and liver function failure. In the current study, we evaluated the association between the excessive use of the PPIs and the clinical complications of intensive care unit (ICU) septic patients. Methods. A total of 208188 patients were analyzed from 2016 to 2017 through the China Critical Care Sepsis Trial (CCCST) database. The characteristics of the study group and outcome of events from the PPI- and H2 blocker-using groups were reported. To get unbiased results, the data from the target trials were randomly assigned for PPI and H2 blocker groups. Result. The data revealed 43.34 excess deaths (95% confidence intensive (CI) 25.12 to 62.02) per 1000 patients in patients extensively consuming PPI drugs. The sepsis with chronic kidney disease attributed to deaths 21.36; 95% CI (9.34 to 23.23). However, comorbidities, including circulatory diseases (16.34; 95% CI 5.78 to 23.45), nervous system (2.08; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.34), mental disorders (1.87; 95% CI 1.65 to 2.95), genitourinary system (5.23; 95% CI 3.69 to 8.89), and infectious and parasitic disease (4.17; 95% CI 1.44 to 7.49), were also reported. Extensive use of the PPIs and H2 blockers was associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma, Barrett’s esophagus, neoplasms, and GI cancers. Conclusion. We conclude that the excessive use of PPI in sepsis patients triggers chronic kidney disease which has a higher clinical complication rate among others.

Indications for the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis and Peptic Ulcer Bleeding in Hospitalized Patients

Proton pump inhibitors are widely used throughout the world for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders that are related to acid secretion, such as peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia. Another common indication for proton pump inhibitors is stress ulcer prophylaxis. Proton pump inhibitors have proven efficacy for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders, but there is concern that their use may be associated with the development of significant complications, such as fractures, Clostridium difficile infection, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and hypomagnesemia. Proton pump inhibitors are overused in the hospital setting, both for stress ulcer prophylaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding, and then they are often inappropriately continued after discharge from the hospital. This narrative review article outlines the evidence surrounding appropriate proton pump inhibitor use for stress ulcer prophylaxis and peptic ulcer bleeding.

Risk of bias in non-randomized observational studies assessing the relationship between proton-pump inhibitors and adverse kidney outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed as acid-suppression therapy. Some observational studies suggest that long-term use of PPIs is potentially associated with certain adverse kidney outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review to assess potential bias in non-randomized studies reporting on putative associations between PPIs and adverse kidney outcomes (acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, chronic interstitial nephritis, acute tubular necrosis, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease).

METHODS

We searched the medical literature within 10 years of 17 December 2020. Pre-specified criteria guided identification of relevant English language articles for assessment. Risk of bias on an outcome-specific basis was evaluated using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Of 620 initially identified records, 26 studies met a priori eligibility criteria and underwent risk of bias assessment. Nineteen studies were judged as having a moderate risk of bias for reported adverse kidney outcomes, while six studies were judged as having a serious risk of bias (mainly due to inadequate control of confounders and selection bias). We were unable to determine the overall risk of bias in two studies (one of which was assessed as having a moderate risk of bias for a different adverse kidney outcome) due to insufficient information presented. Effect estimates for PPIs in relation to adverse kidney outcomes varied widely (0.24-7.34) but associations mostly showed increased risk.

CONCLUSION

Using ROBINS-I, we found that non-randomized observational studies suggesting kidney harm by PPIs have moderate to serious risk of bias, making it challenging to establish causality. Additional high-quality, real-world evidence among generalizable populations are needed to better understand the relation between PPI treatment and acute and chronic kidney outcomes, accounting for the effects of varying durations of PPI treatment, self-treatment with over-the-counter PPIs, and potential critical confounders.

Development of a knowledge mining approach to uncover heterogeneous risk predictors of acute kidney injury across age groups

OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury (AKI) risk increases with age and the underlying clinical predictors may be heterogeneous across age strata. This study aims to uncover the AKI risk factor heterogeneity among general inpatients across age groups using electronic medical records (EMR).

METHODS

Patient data (n = 179,370 encounters) were collected from an academic hospital between 2007 and 2016, and were stratified into four age groups: 18-35, 36-55, 56-65, and > 65. Potential risk factors extracted for the cohort included demographics, vital signs, laboratory values, past medical diagnoses, medications and admission diagnoses. We developed a data driven knowledge mining approach consisting of a machine learning algorithm to identify AKI predictors across age strata and a statistical method to quantify the impact of those factors on AKI risk. Identified predictors were evaluated for their predictability of AKI in terms of area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUC) and validated against expert knowledge.

RESULTS

Among the final analysis cohort of 76,957 hospital admissions, AKI prediction across age groups 18-35 (16.73%), 36-55 (32.74%), 56-65 (23.52%), and > 65 years (27.01%) achieved AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80-0.88), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90), respectively. Compared to expert knowledge, absolute consistency rates of the top-150 identified risk factors for each group were 78.4%, 77.2%, 81.3%, and 79.5%, respectively. Impact of many predictors on AKI varied across age groups; for example, high body mass index (BMI) was found to be associated with higher AKI risk in elderly patients, but low BMI was found to be associated with higher AKI risk in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We verified the effectiveness of the knowledge mining method from the perspectives of accuracy, stability and credibility, and used this approach to clarify the heterogeneity of AKI risk factors between age groups. Future decision support systems need to consider such heterogeneity to enhance personalized patient care.

Kidney Outcomes in Long COVID

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 is associated with increased risk of post-acute sequelae involving pulmonary and extrapulmonary organ systems-referred to as long COVID. However, a detailed assessment of kidney outcomes in long COVID is not yet available.

METHODS

We built a cohort of 1,726,683 US Veterans identified from March 1, 2020 to March 15, 2021, including 89,216 patients who were 30-day survivors of COVID-19 and 1,637,467 non-infected controls. We examined risks of AKI, eGFR decline, ESKD, and major adverse kidney events (MAKE). MAKE was defined as eGFR decline ≥50%, ESKD, or all-cause mortality. We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression, adjusting for predefined demographic and health characteristics, and algorithmically selected high-dimensional covariates, including diagnoses, medications, and laboratory tests. Linear mixed models characterized intra-individual eGFR trajectory.

RESULTS

Beyond the acute illness, 30-day survivors of COVID-19 exhibited a higher risk of AKI (aHR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.86 to 2.04), eGFR decline ≥30% (aHR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.37), eGFR decline ≥40% (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.51), eGFR decline ≥50% (aHR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.51 to 1.74), ESKD (aHR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.49 to 3.51), and MAKE (aHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.58 to 1.74). Increase in risks of post-acute kidney outcomes was graded according to the severity of the acute infection (whether patients were non-hospitalized, hospitalized, or admitted to intensive care). Compared with non-infected controls, 30-day survivors of COVID-19 exhibited excess eGFR decline (95% CI) of -3.26 (-3.58 to -2.94), -5.20 (-6.24 to -4.16), and -7.69 (-8.27 to -7.12) ml/min per 1.73 m² per year, respectively, in non-hospitalized, hospitalized, and those admitted to intensive care during the acute phase of COVID-19 infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who survived COVID-19 exhibited increased risk of kidney outcomes in the post-acute phase of the disease. Post-acute COVID-19 care should include attention to kidney disease.

Effects of the Long-term Treatment of Proton Pump Inhibitors on the Function of Kidney and Liver in Laboratory Female Rats

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a group of medications effectively used to inhibit gastric acid secretion and to treat many acid-related disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease and other gastric disorders. Recent studies recommended that they may be associated with the risk of chronic kidney disease and liver disease. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effect of long-term treatment with PPIs on kidney and liver function in laboratory rats. Fifteen female albino white rats (Rattusnorvigicus) were randomly assigned to three groups of five animals. The control group was fed regular pellet, group PPI-2 received standard pellet diet and was given esomeprazole (10 mg/kg b.w.) via daily oral gavage in mornings for two weeks, and group PPI-3 was fed standard pellet diet and was given esomeprazole (10 mg/kg b.w.) via daily oral gavage in mornings for three months. Blood samples were taken after 2 weeks and 3 months by cardiac puncture for measuring serum creatinine, urea, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). In addition, kidney and liver tissues were histopathologically evaluated. Serum creatinine, urea, ALT, total bilirubin, and ALP significantly increased in group PPI-3, compared to other groups. Histopathological study of the kidneys and liver revealed normal histology structure in the control group and the rats of the PPI-2 group, while some histological changes were observed in the liver and kidney of the animals in the PPI-3 group. The histological changes included the widening of Bowman's space and shrunken glomeruli, whereas the renal tubules had congested tubular cells. Furthermore, congestion in the blood vessels and hepatic cells degradation were observed in the liver. These data indicate that the long-term administration of PPIs has adverse effects on the structure and function of the kidney and liver.

Long-term continuous use of proton-pump inhibitors is associated with renal function decline in patients without acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used to treat gastroesophageal reflex disease, peptic ulcer disease, and stress ulcer prophylaxis. This study estimated the progress rate of renal dysfunction in patients taking PPIs in clinical settings and compared the results with those of patients taking histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients' data collected from Kochi Medical School Hospital's information system between 2001 and 2019. Patients were classified into PPI and H2RA groups, and survival time was defined as the period between initial drug administration and a 30% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

RESULTS

On survival analysis, the PPI group was associated with higher event incidence rates compared to that in the H2RA group. The rate of underlying disease was significantly higher in the PPI group than in the H2RA group, with no significant differences in age and sex between the groups. Comparing the PPI group to the H2RA group, the use of aspirin, clopidogrel, statin, and angiotensin II receptor blocker was significantly higher, whereas the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids was significantly less. Regarding survival rate and 30% decrease in eGFR, the PPI group had a significantly higher survival rate compared to that in the H2RA group at 730 days, but not earlier. PPI use, older age, and eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m² exhibited high hazard ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use was significantly associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease development compared to that with H2RA use.

Association between a low dose of proton pump inhibitors and kidney function decline in elderly hypertensive patients: a retrospective observational study

Objectives

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid suppression therapy. Recently, PPI use was reported to be associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, whether a low dose of PPIs is associated with CKD remains unknown.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included hypertensive patients who visited Kenwakai Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Renal parameters, such as the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (Scr), were extracted from medical records and compared between three years before treatment and the baseline. PPI use was assessed as cumulative exposure for three years.

Results

The study population included 152 patients (57.9% men; mean age, 74.5 years). Of those, 35.5% were PPI users (low dose, 17.1%; high dose, 18.4%). A significant decrease in eGFR and an increase in Scr were observed between three years before treatment and the baseline in the high-dose PPI group but not the non-use or low-dose PPI groups.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that a low dose of PPIs may be safe in clinical settings, but further prospective studies are needed to clarify our findings.

Analysis of the association between emergency dialysis start in patients with end-stage kidney disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton-pump inhibitors, and iodinated contrast agents

BACKGROUND

The association between the use of potentially nephrotoxic drugs [Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), Iodinated Contrast Agents, Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)] and emergency start of dialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease has not been well explored, although these compounds are commonly prescribed or available without prescription.

METHODS

In this study, the Renal Epidemiology Information Network (REIN) registry data of all patients ≥ 18 years of age who started dialysis in France in 2015 were matched with those in the French National Health Insurance Database. The association between clinical characteristics, nephrotoxic drug exposure and emergency dialysis start was investigated. Patients were categorized into four classes of NSAID and PPI exposure (new, current, past, no user) on the basis of the pre-dialysis exposure period (1-30, 31-90, and 91-365 days). For iodinated contrast agents, exposure in the 72 h and 7 days before dialysis was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 8805 matched patients, 30.2% needed to start dialysis in emergency. After adjustment for socio-demographic and clinical variables, new NSAID users were more likely to experience emergency dialysis start [OR = 1.95; 95% CI (1.1-3.4)]. This association was higher for new than for current users [OR: 1.44; 95% CI (1.08-1.92)]. Emergency dialysis start was also associated with iodinated contrast agent exposure in the previous 7 days [OR: 1.44; 95% CI (1.2-1.7)]. No significant relationship was detected between PPIs and emergency dialysis start.

CONCLUSIONS

Using both clinical and healthcare data, this study shows that emergency dialysis start is independently associated with recent exposure to NSAIDs and iodinated contrast agents. This suggests the need to strengthen the information given to healthcare professionals and patients with regard to nephrotoxic drugs.

Proton-pump inhibitors and chronic kidney disease: Hidden consequences of an inappropriate drug use?

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective therapy for gastric acid- related diseases. They are generally well tolerated with rare, often self-limiting adverse reactions. On the other hand, there is growing concern regarding the increased public access and inappropriate PPI use. This review aims to give a critical appraisal of current literature and to analyze a possible relationship between renal disorders and PPI use. A plethora of observational pharmacoepidemiological studies link PPI therapy to the development of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). Most of these studies show a higher risk for acute kidney injury, de novo chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease. However, current evidence is inadequate to establish a causal relationship between PPI use and many of the proposed renal syndromes. Residual confounding and bias related to study design and the over extrapolation of quantitatively small treatment effects contributed to the unnecessary controversy about PPI safety. Undoubtedly, PPI use may rarely induce AIN. Given the worldwide use of PPIs, the number of patients with biopsy- proven AIN is extremely small. However, more research is required to explore the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and possible differences between commercially available PPIs regarding adverse renal effects. Till then, the PPIs should be used in the lowest effective dose, and inappropriate use should be avoided.

Association of proton pump inhibitors and concomitant drugs with risk of acute kidney injury: a nested case-control study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess whether the combined use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antibiotics (penicillins, macrolides, cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones) was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

DESIGN

A nested case-control study.

SETTING

A health insurance claims database constructed by the Japan Medical Data Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were eligible if they were prescribed a PPI, NSAID and antibiotic at least once between January 2005 and June 2017. The patients who were new PPI users and did not have any history of renal diseases before cohort entry were included (n=219 082). The mean age was 45 and 44% were women.

INTERVENTIONS

Current use of PPIs, NSAIDs, or antibiotics.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Acute kidney injury.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 2.4 (SD, 1.7) years, 317 cases of AKI were identified (incidence rate of 6.1/10 000 person-years). The current use of PPIs was associated with a higher risk of AKI compared with past PPI use (unadjusted OR, 4.09; 95% CI, 3.09 to 5.44). The unadjusted ORs of AKI for the current use of PPIs with NSAIDs, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, compared with the current use of PPIs alone, were 3.92 (95% CI, 2.40 to 6.52), 2.57 (1.43 to 4.62) and 3.08 (1.50 to 6.38), respectively. The effects of concurrent use of PPIs with NSAIDs, cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones remain significant in the adjusted model. The analyses on absolute risk of AKI confirmed the results from the nested case-control study.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of NSAIDs with PPIs significantly increased the risk for AKI. Moreover, the results suggested that concomitant use of cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones with PPIs was associated with increased risk of incident AKI.

Acute kidney injury following the use of different proton pump inhibitor regimens: A real-world analysis of post-marketing surveillance data

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recent evidence has concerned acute kidney injury (AKI) after the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) application. There are few real-world studies to compare the occurrences, clinical features, and prognosis of AKI related to various PPI regimens. We aimed to evaluate and compare the links between different PPIs and AKI in a large population by investigating the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) until recently.

METHODS

Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used in data mining to screen the suspected AKI after different PPIs based on the FAERS from January 2004 to December 2019. The times to onset, fatality, and hospitalization rates of PPI-associated AKI were also investigated.

RESULTS

We identified 19 522 PPI-associated AKIs, which appeared to influence more middle-aged patients than elderly ones (53.04% vs 33.94%). Women were more affected than men (55.42% vs 44.58%). Lansoprazole appeared a stronger AKI association than other PPIs, based on the highest reporting odds ratio (reporting odds ratio = 20.8, 95% confidence interval = 20.16, 21.46), proportional reporting ratio (proportional reporting ratio = 15.55, χ²  = 73 899.68), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (empirical Bayes geometric mean = 15.15, 95% confidence interval = 14.76). The median time to AKI onset was 446 (interquartile range [IQR] 16-2176) days after PPI administration. PPIs showed a significant difference in average time to AKI onset (P < 0.001), with the shortest of 9 (IQR 3-25) days for rabeprazole and the longest of 1221 (IQR 96.5-2620) days for esomeprazole. PPI-associated AKI generally led to a 5.69% fatality rate and an 8.94% hospitalization rate. The highest death rate occurred in rabeprazole (15.35%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the FAERS database, we profiled AKI related to various PPIs with more details in occurrences, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. Concern should be paid for PPIs when applied to patients with a tendency for AKI.

Acute Kidney Injury in a National Cohort of Hospitalized US Veterans with COVID-19

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with higher risk of AKI. We aimed to describe rates and characterize predictors and health outcomes associated with AKI in a national cohort of US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In a cohort of 5216 US veterans hospitalized with COVID-19 identified through July 23, 2020, we described changes in serum creatinine and examined predictors of AKI and the associations between AKI, health resource utilization, and death, utilizing logistic regressions. We characterized geographic and temporal variations in AKI rates and estimated variance explained by key variables utilizing Poisson regressions.

RESULTS

In total, 1655 (32%) participants had AKI; 961 (58%), 223 (13%), and 270 (16%) met Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definitions of stage 1, 2, and 3 AKI, respectively, and 201 (12%) received KRT. Eight percent of participants had AKI within 1 day of hospitalization, and 47% did not recover to baseline serum creatinine by discharge. Older age, Black race, male gender, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and lower eGFR were significant predictors of AKI during hospitalization with COVID-19. AKI was associated with higher mechanical ventilation use (odds ratio, 6.46; 95% confidence interval, 5.52 to 7.57) and longer hospital stay (5.56 additional days; 95% confidence interval, 4.78 to 6.34). AKI was also associated with higher risk of death (odds ratio, 6.71; 95% confidence interval, 5.62 to 8.04); this association was stronger in Blacks (P value of interaction <0.001). Hospital-level rates of AKI exhibited substantial geographic variability, ranging from 10% to 56%. Between March and July 2020, AKI rates declined from 40% to 27%; proportions of AKI stage 3 and AKI requiring KRT decreased from 44% to 17%. Both geographic and temporal variabilities were predominately explained by percentages of Blacks (31% and 49%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI is common during hospitalization with COVID-19 and associated with higher risk of health care resource utilization and death. Nearly half of patients with AKI did not recover to baseline by discharge. Substantial geographic variation and temporal decline in rates and severity of AKI were observed.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_11_16_CJN09610620_final.mp3.

Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury in children

Background

To evaluate the association between use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and the risk of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (HA-AKI) in hospitalized children.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in hospitalized children aged 1 month to 18 years from 25 tertiary hospitals across China from 2013 to 2015. Patient-level data were obtained from the electronic hospitalization databases. AKI was defined and staged using the serum creatinine (SCr) data according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria.

Results

Among 42,232 children analyzed, 11,496 (27.2%) used PPI, 1,760 (4.2%) used histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), and 3,514 (8.3%) had HA-AKI during hospitalization. Over 85% of PPIs were prescribed for prophylaxis of gastro-duodenal lesions in children. The use of PPI was associated with a significantly increased risk of HA-AKI compared with both non-users [odds ratio (OR), 1.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–1.53)] and H2RA users (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01–1.52). The associations were consistent across children of different age range, gender, subtypes of PPIs and methods of administration. A larger effect was observed in children with chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 2.46–4.62) and those needed intensive care (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.33–1.78). The risk of HA-AKI was increased even within the recommended dosage range of PPI.

Conclusions

PPIs were widely used and associated with an increased risk of HA-AKI in hospitalized children in China.

Changing relative risk of clinical factors for hospital-acquired acute kidney injury across age groups: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Likelihood of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) increases with age. We aimed to explore whether the predictability of AKI varies between age groups and assess the volatility of risk factors using electronic medical records (EMR).

Methods

We constructed a retrospective cohort of adult patients from all inpatient units of a tertiary care academic hospital and stratified it into four age groups: 18–35, 36–55, 56–65, and > 65. Potential risk factors collected from EMR for the study cohort included demographics, vital signs, medications, laboratory values, past medical diagnoses, and admission diagnoses. AKI was defined based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) serum creatinine criteria. We analyzed relative importance of the risk factors in predicting AKI using Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm and explored the predictability of AKI across age groups using multiple machine learning models.

Results

In our cohort, older patients showed a significantly higher incidence of AKI than younger adults: 18–35 (7.29%), 36–55 (8.82%), 56–65 (10.53%), and > 65 (10.55%) (p < 0.001). However, the predictability of AKI decreased with age, where the best cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) achieved for age groups 18–35, 36–55, 56–65, and > 65 were 0.784 (95% CI, 0.769–0.800), 0.766 (95% CI, 0.754–0.777), 0.754 (95% CI, 0.741–0.768), and 0.725 (95% CI, 0.709–0.737), respectively. We also observed that the relative risk of AKI predictors fluctuated between age groups.

Conclusions

As complexity of the cases increases with age, it is more difficult to quantify AKI risk for older adults in inpatient population.

Low dose of flurbiprofen axetil decrease the rate of acute kidney injury after operation: a retrospective clinical data analysis of 9915 cases

Background

Flurbiprofen axetil (FA) is a commonly prescribed agent to relieve perioperative pain, but the relationship between FA and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear. This study attempted to evaluate the effects of different dose of perioperative FA on postoperative AKI.

Methods

A total of 9915 patients were enrolled for this retrospective study. The clinical characteristics and the prevalence of postoperative AKI among patients non-using, using low dose (50-100 mg), middle dose (100-250 mg) and large dose (≧250 mg) of FA were analyzed respectively. The impact of different dose of FA on postoperative AKI was analyzed using univariable and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The prevalence of postoperative AKI was 6.7% in the overall subjects and 5.1% in 2446 cases who used FA. The incidence of AKI in low dose group was significantly less than that of non use group (4.5% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001), but the incidence of AKI in large dose group was significantly higher than that in the non-use group (18.8% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between patients without using FA and subjects using middle dose of FA (7.2% vs 5.6%, p = 0.355). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low dose of FA was a protective factor for postoperative AKI (OR = 0.75, p = 0.0188), and large dose of FA was a risk factor for postoperative AKI (OR = 4.8, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The impact of FA on postoperative AKI was dose-dependent, using of low dose FA (50-100 mg) perioperatively may effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI.

The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Renal Function in Kidney Transplanted Patients

Recently, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake has been linked to acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of PPIs on renal function and rejection rate in kidney transplant patients. We performed a single center, retrospective analysis of 455 patients who received a kidney transplant between May 2010 and July 2015. Median follow-up time was 3.3 years. PPI prescription was assessed in half-year intervals. Primary outcome parameters were the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in the eGFR, and >30% and >50% eGFR decline for different time periods (up to four years post-transplantation). Our secondary outcome parameter was occurrence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) in the first two years after transplantation. Except for >30% eGFR decline from half a year to two years post-transplantation (p = 0.044) and change in the eGFR, >30% and >50% eGFR decline showed no association with PPI intake in our patient cohort (p > 0.05). Similarly, by analyzing 158 rejection episodes, BPAR showed no correspondence with mean daily PPI intake. We conclude that prolonged PPI intake has no relevant adverse effect on kidney transplant function or rejection rates. Polypharmacy, however, remains a problem in renal transplant recipients and it is thus advisable to question the necessity of PPI prescriptions when clear indications are missing.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disorder in industrialized countries. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the most frequent diseases encountered by primary care providers. The primary symptoms of GERD include heartburn, regurgitation, globus sensation, dysphagia, chest pain, and belching. If symptoms are left untreated, a major concern is complications and the potential risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with GERD. With the increasing prevalence and incidence of GERD and the increasing cost of this disease, there is a need for advanced practice registered nurses to understand the nature of GERD including its pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, and treatment options to address the disease.

Proton pump inhibitor use and progression to major adverse renal events: a competing risk analysis

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and there are reports associating their use with the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

AIM

To determine if PPI use is associated with major adverse renal events (MARE) in patients with CKD.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study comprising patients with CKD attending secondary care renal clinics from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2016.

METHODS

We collated baseline clinical, socio-demographic and biochemical data at start of PPI (PPI group) or study inception (control group). MARE was considered a composite of doubling of creatinine or end-stage renal disease. Association between PPI exposure and progression to MARE was assessed by cause-specific hazards competing risk survival analysis.

RESULTS

There were 3824 patients with CKD included in the analyses of whom 1195 were prescribed a PPI. The PPI group was younger (64.8 vs. 67.0 years, P < 0.001), with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (30 vs. 35 ml/min, P < 0.001) and more proteinuria (64 vs. 48 mg/mmol, P < 0.001). PPI use was associated with progression to MARE on multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 1.02-1.25], P = 0.021). Other factors significantly associated with progression to MARE were higher systolic blood pressure, lower eGFR, greater proteinuria, congestive cardiac failure and diabetes. Hypomagnesaemia was more common in the PPI group (39.5 vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PPI use was associated with progression to MARE, but not death in patients with CKD after adjusting for factors known to predict declining renal function, including lower eGFR, proteinuria and comorbidities. A prospective cohort study is required to validate these findings.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Kidney: Implications of Current Evidence for Clinical Practice and When and How to Deprescribe

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), long thought to be safe, are associated with a number of nonkidney adverse health outcomes and several untoward kidney outcomes, including hypomagnesemia, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, incident chronic kidney disease, kidney disease progression, kidney failure, and increased risk for all-cause mortality and mortality due to chronic kidney disease. PPIs are abundantly prescribed, rarely deprescribed, and frequently purchased over the counter. They are frequently used without medical indication, and when medically indicated, they are often used for much longer than needed. In this In Practice review, we summarize evidence linking PPI use with adverse events in general and adverse kidney outcomes in particular. We review the literature on the association of PPI use and risk for hypomagnesemia, acute kidney injury, acute interstitial nephritis, incident chronic kidney disease, kidney disease progression, end-stage kidney disease, and death. We provide an assessment of how this evidence should inform clinical practice. We review the impact of this evidence on patients' perception of risk, synthesize PPI deprescription literature, and provide our recommendations on how to approach PPI use and deprescription.

The association between proton pump inhibitor use and the risk of adverse kidney outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Existing epidemiological studies illustrate that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be related to adverse kidney outcomes. To date, no comprehensive meta-analysis has been conducted to evaluate and quantify this association.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies to assess the association between PPI use and the risk of adverse kidney outcomes. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and grey literature with no language restrictions (through 31 October 2016). Adverse kidney outcomes were acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The risk ratios (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random effects model. The strength of evidence (SOE) for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommended Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

Results

Of 2037 identified studies, four cohort and five case-control studies with ∼2.6 million patients were included. Of these, 534 003 (20.2%) were PPI users. Compared with non-PPI users, PPI users experienced a significantly higher risk of AKI [RR 1.44 (95% CI 1.08-1.91); P = 0.013; SOE, low] and CKD [RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.07-1.72); P = 0.012; SOE, low]. Moreover, PPIs increased the risk of AIN [RR 3.61 (95% CI 2.37-5.51); P < 0.001; SOE, insufficient] and ESRD [RR 1.42 (95% CI 1.28-1.58); P < 0.001; SOE, insufficient].

Conclusion

PPI usage was associated with adverse kidney outcomes; however, these findings were based on observational studies and low-quality evidence. Additional rigorous studies are needed for further clarification.

Inflammatory leucocyte infiltrates are associated with recovery in biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis: a 20-year registry-based case series

Background

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a renal injury causing renal function deterioration and requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in a substantial number of cases. Therapy is based on withdrawal of suspicious causative drugs or the underlying diseases and/or steroid application if renal function is not restored after cessation of the underlying condition. Hard clinical evidence for augmenting steroid therapy is not available.

Methods

We reviewed the course and diagnosis for >20 years among all 1126 biopsied samples of our tertiary renal centre.

Results

49 (4.4%) were diagnosed with primary AIN, corresponding to an annual incidence of 1/100 000 population; 17 out of 49 biopsy-proven AIN patients required short-term or long-term (n = 5) RRT. According to a combined outcome criterion of coming off dialysis and/or reaching serum creatinine <200 µmol/L, 19 patients reached recovery whereas 20 did not. Among 39 patients with a comprehensive clinical and histopathological data set, presence of cortical scars, AIN histological activity (acute leucocyte infiltrates) and proteinuria were baseline parameters discriminating significantly between groups with or without recovery. No associations with the presence of specific drugs were found. Therapeutic use of steroids was associated with a lower probability of recovery (P = 0.008), presumably due to inclusion bias.

Conclusions

Following our basic finding of the importance of histopathological parameters of acuity associated with recovery, we argue for the inauguration of grading measures to characterize this issue quantitatively and make it usable for future controlled investigations. Finally, we provide a suggestion for a therapeutic algorithm in the management of AIN.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Risk of Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been linked to acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, current evidence has only been evaluated in a small number of studies with short follow-up periods. This study examined the association between PPI use and risk of incident AKI and CKD in a large population-based health maintenance organization (HMO) cohort.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older, without evidence of preexisting renal disease, started on PPI therapy, and those continuously enrolled for at least 12 months between July 1993 and September 2008 were identified in an HMO database. Incidences of AKI and CKD were defined using documented International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes or a glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m² after initiation of PPI therapy. Patients with AKI were followed for up to 90 days (cohort 1), and patients with CKD required at least 1 year of follow-up (cohort 2). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for differences in demographics (excluding race), comorbidities, and medication use between groups.

RESULTS

In 93,335 patients in the AKI cohort, 16,593 of whom were exposed to PPIs, the incidence rate of AKI was higher in the PPI group than nonusers (36.4 vs 3.54 per 1000 person-years, p<0.0001, respectively). In adjusted models, PPI exposure was associated with an increased risk of AKI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.14-6.04, p<0.0001). In 84,600 patients in the CKD cohort, 14,514 of whom were exposed to PPIs, the incidence rate of CKD was higher in the PPI group than nonusers (34.3 vs 8.75 per 1000 person-years, p<0.0001, respectively). In adjusted models, PPIs were associated with a higher risk of CKD compared with controls (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28, p<0.0001). Associations between PPI use and AKI and CKD persisted in propensity score-matched analyses.

CONCLUSION

The use of PPIs is associated with an increased risk of incident AKI and CKD. This relationship could have a considerable public health impact; therefore, health care provider education and deprescribing initiatives will be necessary to raise awareness and reduce health care burden.

Analysis of postmarketing safety data for proton-pump inhibitors reveals increased propensity for renal injury, electrolyte abnormalities, and nephrolithiasis

Proton pump inhibitors, PPIs, are widely prescribed and sold globally. Although initially intended for time-limited treatment of acute disorders, such as gastric ulcers and esophagitis, PPIs are now commonly used for prolonged durations and are considered safe for over the counter access. Recent studies have raised concern over associations between PPI use and acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, and electrolyte abnormalities. The growing concern over potentially serious adverse drug reactions warrants an evaluation of post marketing surveillance data. In this study of over ten million FDA Adverse Event Reporting System records, we provided evidence of kidney injury and electrolyte imbalances in an alarming number of patients taking PPIs. Additionally, we assessed differences between specific PPIs and observed significant electrolyte and renal abnormalities for each individual drug with varying magnitudes.

The association of proton pump inhibitors and chronic kidney disease: cause or confounding?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss whether the recently described relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the risk of adverse kidney outcomes represents a causal relationship or is merely the result of confounding.

RECENT FINDINGS

A wave of observational studies has described an association between PPI use and the risk of development of chronic kidney disease and its progression to end-stage renal disease. The results are generally robust and remarkably consistent across different studies. The application of modern pharmacoepidemiologic methods to estimate the effect of a putative unmeasured or unknown confounder or set of confounders on the relationship of PPI use and risk of adverse renal outcomes suggests that confounding is unlikely to explain away the reported association.

SUMMARY

The constellation of evidence from all available studies suggests that PPI use is associated with increased risk of adverse kidney outcomes. Exercising vigilance in the use of PPI is warranted.

Proton pump inhibitors use and risk of chronic kidney disease in diabetic patients

AIMS

Chronic kidney disease consumes a huge amount of medical resources and proton pump inhibitors may be a potential factor for the increasing prevalence. This population-based cohort study investigates the risk of chronic kidney disease in a diabetic population using proton pump inhibitors in Taiwan.

METHODS

This study is based on a specific diabetic database obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Individuals with a new diagnosis of diabetes from 2002 to 2013 were enrolled. "Exposure" to proton pump inhibitors was defined as at least one prescription and dosage over 180 DDD (defined daily dose) in one year after the index date. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model and competing-risk regression model were applied.

RESULTS

There were 5994 patients in the final cohort of proton pump inhibitor users and 23,976 patients in the matched controlled cohort based on 1:4 propensity score matching. Compared with no exposure users, PPIs exposure group had more anemia prevalence, anti-hypertension medication and NSAIDs prescriptions. The multivariable Cox proportional hazard model showed that the adjusted hazard ratio of chronic kidney disease was 1.52 (95% CI 1.40-1.65) in diabetic individuals with PPIs exposure, compared with no exposure users.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton pump inhibitors use is associated with 1.52-fold increased risk of chronic kidney disease in diabetic patients when the dosage is over 180 DDD in one year in Taiwan.

Adverse outcomes of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The association between the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risks of various diseases remains controversial. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to quantify the associations as presented in the literature and to also provide this information to healthcare professionals and patients about their potentially adverse effects. In July 2016, we searched through Medline (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception using common keywords. We included observational studies that provided risk estimates on the long-term use of PPIs and their adverse effects. Overall, 43 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 28 studies were also included in the random effect meta-analysis. Odds of community-acquired pneumonia, hip fracture, and colorectal cancer were 67% [odds ratio (OR)=1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-2.67], 42% (OR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.33-1.53), and 55% (OR=1.55; 95% CI: 0.88-2.73) higher in patients with long-term PPIs use compared with patients who did not use PPIs. Although the use of PPIs provides short-term health benefits, their prolonged use is associated with minor and also potentially major adverse health outcomes. Hence, we strongly recommend that the prescription of PPIs should be done with caution to improve the medication's efficacy and patients' safety.

Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Recent observational studies have indicated that use of proton pump inhibitors may be associated with adverse renal outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of proton pump inhibitors increases the risk of acute kidney injury among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We conducted the study as a historical prospective cohort study, including patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 30-84 years of age, during 2004-2015. Among these, we identified and matched episodes of use and non-use of proton pump inhibitors (control episodes) 1:4 on the propensity score, including 24,579 episodes of use of proton pump inhibitors and 98,230 control episodes. The primary outcome was a first diagnosis of acute kidney injury and the secondary outcome was any serious renal event (acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease). The primary time point for analysis was 120 days after study entry.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of acute kidney injury was 2.2 per 1000 person-years during episodes of use of proton pump inhibitors and 0.9 during control episodes. Use of proton pump inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of acute kidney injury (hazard ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.26-4.20). The absolute risk difference was 40 (95% confidence interval 8-99) events of acute kidney injury per 100,000 episodes of use of proton pump inhibitors. Use of proton pump inhibitors was also associated with a significantly increased risk of the secondary outcome of any serious renal event (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.80-3.80).

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort study among patients with rheumatoid arthritis found a significantly increased risk of acute kidney injury associated with the use of proton pump inhibitors. These findings may help inform clinical decision making when considering the risks and benefits of proton pump inhibitor treatment in rheumatoid arthritis.

Duration and dosing of Proton Pump Inhibitors associated with high incidence of chronic kidney disease in population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Our objective was to quantify the association between PPI use and incident CKD in a population-based cohort.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We used a population-based retrospective cohort, including people aged 15 years or over, between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2012. PPI use was measured in a follow-up session by recording prescriptions. Incident CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/ min/1.73 m2 and/or urinary albumin level to creatinine level ≥ 30 mg/g, in two or more determinations over a period of at least 3 months of the follow-up. Proton Pump Inhibitor use was associated with incident CKD in analysis adjusted for different clinical variables (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% CI 1.04-1.51) in individuals who used PPI in the basal visit (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.25-1.50) and in those who started to use PPI during the follow-up. High doses of PPI increased the risk of incident CKD (HR 1.92; 95%CI 1.00-6.19) for any type of exposure to PPIs (HR 2.40; 95%CI 1.65-3.46) and for individuals who used high doses throughout the follow-up. This risk of incident CKD increased after three months' exposure to PPIs, (HR1.78; 95% CI 1.39-2.25) between the third and sixth months and (HR 1.30; 95%CI 1.07-1.72) after the sixth month.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use is associated with a higher risk of incident CKD. This association is greater for high doses and becomes apparent after three months' exposure.

The Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use With Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most commonly prescribed medicines and are the mainstay of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Recently, there has been an increase in the use of these medicines for unclear and inappropriate indications. Although generally well tolerated and considered to be safe, several observational studies have linked PPI use with a variety of conditions such as pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, fractures, hypomagnesemia, and dementia. The well-established association between PPIs and acute interstitial nephritis has raised questions about whether they may also cause acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Observational studies have evaluated these possible associations. This paper reviews the currently available literature about these associations and considers their possible underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. The level of evidence-linking PPI use with acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease is weak and does not establish causality. More research is required to explore these possible associations further. The PPIs should be used in the lowest effective dose and inappropriate use should be avoided.