The psychosocial difficulties in brain disorders that explain short term changes in health outcomes

Responding to requests for hastened death in patients living with advanced neurologic disease

A request for hastened death can mean many things, from an emotional plea for help with unmet needs to a request for legal provision of chemically induced hastened death. Regardless of whether the clinician supports legally available hastened death, knowing how to respond to requests for hastened death is important. Responding in an empathic and open manner will strengthen the therapeutic relationship between the patient and clinician. Suggested scripts on how to respond are provided. A framework for assessing the patient's preparation at various stages in the decisional journey is suggested. Additional factors including caring for the family and involving other healthcare providers are discussed. Last, there is some exploration of ethics considerations and a summary of legal chemically induced hastened death availability internationally.

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the PARADISE-24 Questionnaire

Background:

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) suffer from a wide range of psychological problems. Application of a valid and reliable tool for psychosocial assessment is required for Iranian patients. The aim of this study is to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PARADISE-24 questionnaire in Iranian patients with multiple sclerosis.

Methods:

One hundred and thirteen multiple sclerosis cases were enrolled in this study. Participants were asked to answer the valid and reliable Persian version of the fatigue severity scale, social support scale, Pittsburg sleep quality index, and hospital anxiety and depression scale and translated version of the PARADISE-24 questionnaire. Twenty cases filed the questionnaire 2 weeks later to assess reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analysis were used.

Results:

Mean age and mean duration of the disease were 35.8 ± 9.9 and 8.7 ± 5.6 years, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.8 to 0.94 and Cronbach's alpha values (Cronbach's alpha was calculated as 0.91 for the whole questionnaire) were also significant. There were significant correlations between PARADISE-24 score and expanded disability status scale (r = 0.42, P < 0.001), fatigue severity scale (r = 0.62, P < 0.001), anxiety (r = 0.43, P < 0.001) and Pittsburg sleep quality index scores (r = 0.46, P < 0.001). Regression analysis by considering PARADISE-24 as dependent and other variables as independent showed that expanded disability status scale, fatigue severity scale, anxiety score, and Pittsburg sleep quality index were positive predictors of PARADISE-24 score.

Conclusions:

Persian version of PARADISE-24 questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating psychosocial aspects in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Long-term psychosocial outcome following mild traumatic brain injury and minor stroke: a direct longitudinal comparison

Background and purpose

Research suggests comparable long-term psychosocial outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and minor stroke, but no direct comparison has been made. This study aimed to directly compare psychosocial outcome over time in persons with mTBI and minor stroke.

Methods

In this multicenter, prospective longitudinal cohort study, community-dwelling persons with mTBI (n = 182) and minor stroke (n = 48) were assessed at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-injury. Outcome measures included anxiety and depression symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale—HADS), cognitive problems in daily life (Checklist for Cognitive and Emotional Consequences of Stroke—CLCE-24) and quality of life (EuroQol-5D-5L—EQ-5D-5L). Multilevel growth curve modeling, controlled for demographic variables, was used to determine outcomes over time between groups. Proportions of persons reporting persistent psychosocial symptoms at 6 months post-injury were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared tests.

Results

Improvements in outcomes were observed in the first 6 months and effects stabilized to 12 months post-injury in both groups. Minor stroke cases reported significantly higher levels of HADS anxiety and a significantly reduced increase in EQ-5D-5L utility scores than mTBI cases, but differences were small in absolute numbers. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding HADS depression and CLCE-24 cognition scores. Proportions of persons reporting persistent psychosocial symptoms were equal between groups.

Conclusions

Psychosocial outcome is largely comparable following mTBI and minor stroke. Specific attention should be paid to anxiety symptoms and cognitive problems in daily life for which uniform aftercare seems appropriate.

World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review examines research and practical applications of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a basis for establishing specific criteria for evaluating relevant international scientific literature. The aims were to establish the extent of international dissemination and use of WHODAS 2.0 and analyze psychometric research on its various translations and adaptations. In particular, we wanted to highlight which psychometric features have been investigated, focusing on the factor structure, reliability, and validity of this instrument.

METHOD

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a search for publications focused on "whodas" using the ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar electronic databases.

RESULTS

We identified 810 studies from 94 countries published between 1999 and 2015. WHODAS 2.0 has been translated into 47 languages and dialects and used in 27 areas of research (40% in psychiatry).

CONCLUSIONS

The growing number of studies indicates increasing interest in the WHODAS 2.0 for assessing individual functioning and disability in different settings and individual health conditions. The WHODAS 2.0 shows strong correlations with several other measures of activity limitations; probably due to the fact that it shares the same disability latent variable with them. Implications for Rehabilitation WHODAS 2.0 seems to be a valid, reliable self-report instrument for the assessment of disability. The increasing interest in use of the WHODAS 2.0 extends to rehabilitation and life sciences rather than being limited to psychiatry. WHODAS 2.0 is suitable for assessing health status and disability in a variety of settings and populations. A critical issue for rehabilitation is that a single "minimal clinically important .difference" score for the WHODAS 2.0 has not yet been established.

PARADISE 24 instrument: An observational study on psychosocial difficulties, quality of life, and disability levels in patients with epilepsy

AIM

The aim of this observational study was to test the effectiveness of the PARADISE 24 instrument in describing the psychosocial difficulties (PSDs) reported by people with epilepsy, their relation with disability, and quality-of-life (QoL) levels and, overall, to explore a horizontal epidemiology methodology applied to a sample of patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 80 adult patients with epilepsy was included in this cross-sectional study. Patients were interviewed using a structured protocol composed of demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures to collect PSDs associated with epilepsy.

RESULTS

There were 80 patients, 40 females; mean age was 41.2years; mean disease duration was 18.7years; and mean number of AED was 2.09. Moderate severity rating according to clinicians' rating scale, low impact of comorbidities (mean: 2.36, SD: 2.97), high levels of QoL (mean: 30.00, SD: 4.4), medium levels of resilience (mean: 13.56, SD: 2.66), high levels of perceived empathy (mean: 15.05, SD: 4.74), poor or moderate perceived social support, and low levels of disability (mean: 10.85, SD: 10.05) were observed. The most frequently reported PSDs were related to tiredness (80%), emotional problems (73.75%), anxiety (68.75%), depressive mood (66.25%), and driving problems (61.25%). The EUROHIS-QOL (p=.003) had a negative significant relationship with PARADISE 24 while WHODAS-12 (p=.000) and CRS (p=.027) had a positive significant relationship with PARADISE 24.

CONCLUSIONS

The PARADISE 24 permits data comparison and the creation of a complete description of a person's functioning and of all of his/her PSDs and allows better and more tailored interventions.

Psychosocial difficulties of individuals with multiple sclerosis: the PARADISE-24 questionnaire

The aim of this study is to identify the most relevant psychosocial difficulties (PSDs) experienced by persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS); to evaluate the relation between an overall level of PSDs measured with the PARADISE-24 and other variables; to assess which factors may predict PARADISE-24 overall score. Adults PwMS were consecutively enrolled and completed a battery of eight self-reported instruments (i.e. SCQ, EUROHIS-QOL 8, BRS, BFI-10, JSPE, OSS-3, WHODAS-12, PARADISE-24). A clinical evaluation was performed for each patient and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was determined by neurologists. A total of 80 PwMS, mean age 41.0, 65% women, 62% married, and 76.3% working, 86.3% relapsing-remitting MS, with an EDSS median score of 1.5, took part in the study. The mean disease duration was 7.7 years. The most frequently reported PSDs involved motor and emotional functioning. Free of charge access to medicines; health treatments and family, friends and health professionals' assistance represented the most important facilitators. WHODAS-12 and EUROHIS-QOL 8 were excluded from regression because of their strong correlation with PARADISE-24. EDSS, BRS, OSS-3, and neuroticism were the main predictors of the PARADISE-24 score. Despite MS heterogeneity, a common pattern of PSDs can be observed among PwMS. The level of physical impairment and personal resilience were the main predictors of the overall level of PSDs in PwMS, with a lower but significant additional role played by social support and personality traits. Attention to PSDs and their predictors, using PARADISE-24, can help clinicians to plan tailored and personalized rehabilitation programs.

Psychosocial difficulties in patients with episodic migraine: a cross-sectional study

To explore the relationships between psychosocial difficulties (PSDs), quality of life (QoL), and disability and to explore the degree to which PSDs can be predicted by demographic variables, clinical variables, and risk and protective factors. Patients with episodic migraine completed a protocol inclusive of PARADISE 24 questionnaire (the 24-item Psychosocial Difficulties Relevant to Brain Disorders questionnaire), a new questionnaire that captures PSDs relevant to brain disorders, and assessments of disability, QoL, disease severity, presence of comorbidities, social support, and clinical and risk factors (i.e., smoking and body mass index). Spearman's correlation was used to address the relationship between PARADISE 24, and the assessments of disability and QoL; multivariable linear regression analysis was carried out to address PARADISE 24 predictors. Eighty patients were enrolled (86.3 % females, mean age 44.5). PARADISE 24 was well correlated with disability (ρ = 0.787) and moderately with QoL (ρ = -0.526). The regression analysis shows that younger age, higher migraine frequency, higher comorbidities index and being a smoker were predictors of PARADISE 24 (R ²: 0.470). Addressing the burden associated with PSDs in migraineurs is important as these might be the reason why patients look for specialists in headache disorders. PARADISE 24 represents a viable way to address patients' difficulties in daily practice.

Psychosocial difficulties from the perspective of persons with neuropsychiatric disorders

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to determine whether persons with neuropsychiatric disorders experience a common set of psychosocial difficulties using qualitative data from focus groups and individual interviews.

METHOD

The study was performed in five European countries (Finland, Italy, Germany, Poland and Spain) using the focus groups and individual interviews with persons with nine neuropsychiatric disorders (dementia, depression, epilepsy, migraine, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, stroke and substance dependence). Digitally recorded sessions were analysed using a step-by-step qualitative and quantitative methodology resulting in the compilation of a common set of psychosocial difficulties using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a framework.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven persons participated in the study. Most persons with neuropsychiatric disorders experience difficulties in emotional functions, sleeping, carrying out daily routine, working and interpersonal relationships in common. Sixteen out of 33 psychosocial difficulties made up the common set. This set includes mental functions, pain and issues addressing activities and participation and provides first evidence for the hypothesis of horizontal epidemiology of psychosocial difficulties in neuropsychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides information about psychosocial difficulties that should be covered in the treatment and rehabilitation of persons with neuropsychiatric disorders regardless of clinical diagnoses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

Emotional problems, work and sleep problems should be addressed in all the treatments of neuropsychiatric disorders regardless of their specific diagnosis, etiology and severity. Personality issues should be targeted in the treatment for neurological disorders, whereas communication skill training may also be useful for mental disorders. The effects of medication and social environment on patient's daily life should be considered in all the neuropsychiatric conditions.