Early rectal stenosis following stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids

Surgical approach for lower postoperative anal stenosis

After anorectal surgery, hemorrhoids frequently lead to chronic issues, particularly in patients with mixed hemorrhoids. Liu et al investigated the outcomes of staple removal at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions following modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids. This study included patients who underwent standard or modified SH between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Key metrics assessed included hospital stay duration, blood loss, operation time, and the incidence of minor or major complications. The findings indicated that the modified SH technique is a safe option for advanced-grade hemorrhoids, resulting in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis compared to standard SH. Notably, this technique also showed reduced anal stenosis rates in patients with prior hemorrhoid treatments. While the modified SH demonstrates immediate benefits, further research is necessary to evaluate long-term effects. Despite its advantages, the study's limited sample size restricts the generalizability of the findings, underscoring the need for larger, long-term studies to validate these results. Clinically, the modified SH method appears to significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative anal stenosis, a common concern following typical surgeries. If confirmed by larger trials, this procedure may become the preferred surgical approach for hemorrhoids. In conclusion, the work of Liu et al signifies a meaningful advancement in hemorrhoid surgery, enhancing patient safety and outcomes.

Modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy for lower postoperative stenosis: A five-year experience

BACKGROUND

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) is currently a widely accepted method for treating the prolapse of internal hemorrhoids. Postoperative anal stenosis is a critical complication of SH. A remedy for this involves the removal of the circumferential staples of the anastomosis, followed by the creation of a hand-sewn anastomosis. Numerous studies have reported modified SH procedures to improve outcomes. We hypothesized that our modified SH technique may help reduce complications of anal stenosis after SH.

AIM

To compare outcomes of staple removal at the 3- and 9-o'clock positions during modified SH in patients with mixed hemorrhoids.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020, were included. The operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and incidence of minor or major complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who underwent standard or modified SH at our colorectal center between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2020, were included. Operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and incidence of minor or major complications were recorded. We investigated 187 patients (mean age, 50.9 years) who had undergone our modified SH and 313 patients (mean age, 53.0 years) who had undergone standard SH. In the modified SH group, 54% of patients had previously undergone surgical intervention for hemorrhoids, compared with the 40.3% of patients in the standard SH group. The modified SH group included five (2.7%) patients with anal stenosis, while 21 (6.7%) patients in the standard SH group had complications of anal stenosis. There was a significant relationship between the rate of postoperative anal stenosis and the modified SH: 0.251 (0.085-0.741) and 0.211 (0.069-0.641) in multiple regression analysis. The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.

CONCLUSION

The modified SH technique is a safe surgical method for advanced grade hemorrhoids and might result in a lower rate of postoperative anal stenosis than standard SH.

STAPLED HEMORRHOIDOPEXY: RESULTS, LATE COMPLICATIONS, AND DEGREE OF SATISFACTION AFTER 16 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has been widely used for the treatment of hemorrhoids, but concerns about complications and recurrences after prolonged follow-up are still under debate.

Comparison of the short-term outcomes of using DST and PPH staplers in the treatment of grade III and IV hemorrhoids

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has a few advantages such as less postoperative pain and faster recovery compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. There are two major devices used for stapled hemorrhoidopexy, PPH stapler (Ethicon EndoSurgery) and DST stapler (Covidien). This study was conducted to investigate the postoperative outcomes among patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids who underwent hemorrhoidopexy with either of these two devices. A total of 242 consecutive patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy with either PPH stapler (110 patients) or DST stapler (132 patients) at a single center in 2017. We performed a retrospective case–control study to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes and the complications between these two groups. After matching the cases in terms of age, gender, and the grade of hemorrhoids, there were 100 patients in each group (PPH versus DST). There were no significant differences in the postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score and analgesic usage. Among complications, the incidence of anorectal stricture was significantly higher in the DST group (p = 0.02). Evaluation of the mucosal specimen showed that the total surface area, the muscle/mucosa ratio and the surface area of the muscle were also significantly higher in the DST group (p = 0.03). Further analysis of the DST group demonstrated that patients with anorectal stricture after surgery are younger than patients without anorectal stricture, and higher muscle/mucosa ratio (p = 0.03) and a higher surface area of the muscle (p = 0.03) also measured in the surgical specimen. The two devices provide similar outcomes of postoperative recovery. Patients who underwent DST stapled hemorrhoidopexy had a higher incidence rate of stricture, larger area of muscle excision, and higher muscle/mucosa ratio in the surgical specimen. Further investigation is warranted for a better understanding of the correlation between muscle excision and anorectal stricture.

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: functional results, recurrence rate, and prognostic factors in a single center analysis

PURPOSE

Since its introduction, stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SHP), the so-called Longo procedure, became a widely accepted treatment option for prolapsing hemorrhoids. Nevertheless, from the early years, concerns grew about the early functional results and potential recurrences. In order to evaluate of SHP with special respect to early defecation disorders und recurrences, our single institute high-volume results were evaluated.

METHOD

One thousand one hundred forty-four consecutive patients with SHP for prolapsing hemorrhoids were evaluated in a period from January 2007 to December 2013. In a prospective analysis, patients were followed with special respect to postoperative complications, functional disorders, mainly perianal irritation, stenosis, and recurrence.

RESULTS

During the timeframe, a total of 663 men and 481 women were treated for prolapsing hemorrhoids. The mean age was 52.6 years (±14.4 years). Indication for surgery was prolapsing hemorrhoids in all cases. In addition to prolapse, 90 patients (7.9 %) suffered from bleeding, 96 patients (8.4 %) had itching, and 95 (8.3 %) had anal wetness; the mean operative time was 11 min (±4 min). Patients were treated as inpatients; the mean hospital stay was 3 days (±1 day). Early complications were observed in 14 patients (1.2 %). The follow-up revealed inflammatory reaction at the stapleline in 8 patients (0.7 %) and rectal stenosis in 22 cases (1.9 %), and recurrence was observed in 46 cases (4.0 %).

CONCLUSION

The data presented here provide evidence that SHP is a save procedure with a very low rate for functional disorders and low recurrence rate. Therefore, in our hands, SHP remains standard for prolapsing hemorrhoids.

Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele

BACKGROUND

Various sequelae which might lead to reintervention have been described after stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids. One potential treatment modality for persistent complaints after stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SHP) or stapling for rectocele is the so-called agraffectomy (removal of the retained staples). This treatment option means a further procedure that can range from removal of the staples through the anoscope to removal of the entire staple line with the associated scar tissue.

METHODS

In order to review the published literature, we conducted a search on Medline, Pubmed, and Embase using different terms for "agraffectomy."

RESULTS

Overall, fourteen reports were found, dealing with agraffectomy for various conditions after low rectal stapling for hemorrhoids or rectocele. Agraffectomy is a rarely mentioned treatment option for conditions after SHP. In rectal stenosis with complete occlusion of the rectal lumen, the removal of the stenotic anastomosis and remaining staples seems to be reasonable. The same can be said of the removal of retained staples for rectal bleeding or in order to avoid penile injuries in anal intercourse. In contrast, the collected published reports on agraffectomy in this review only provide low-level evidence that this procedure provides relief for other problems such as incontinence or chronic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear evidence that agraffectomy is indicated if not in case of rectal stenosis and hemorrhage caused by the staples.

Obstructed Defecation after Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A Report of Four Cases

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy or Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) has become an accepted alternative to excisional hemorrhoidectomy for treating prolapsing hemorrhoids. Although rare, severe complications have been reported after this procedure. We report a series of four male patients with the unusual but debilitating symptoms of obstructed defecation (OD) after PPH. Presenting symptoms included evacuation difficulty, rectal pain, and urgency. All had scarring and stenosis at their PPH anastomotic staple line with a resultant ball-valve effect in three patients as the mobile, excessive, proximal rectal mucosa prolapsed past this relatively immobile area. The fourth patient had an anterior rectal mucosal pouch distal to the PPH staple line. In three of the four patients the anastomosis was below the dentate line or on an oblique angle. Corrective operative intervention largely relieved OD symptoms. One patient, more refractory to successful revision, was eventually diagnosed and treated successfully for pudendal neuropathy. Avoidance of the complication of OD is possible through careful patient selection, proper operative technique, and consideration of nonsurgical etiologies. These complications are complex in nature but most patients will respond to an individualized treatment plan that combines surgical and medical interventions.

Life threatening sepsis and mortality following stapled hemorrhoidopexy

BACKGROUND

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) was conceived and developed in Europe. Over the past decade, there have been reports of severe, life-threatening complications and 2 deaths. These are the first such cases from the Americas including the third known mortality.

METHODS

Two case reports from US surgeons are combined with eleven reports from the medical literature (both English and non-English speaking journals) for review. Only complications which required emergency abdominal operative intervention with fecal diversion were included.

RESULTS

These 2 cases occurred early in the surgeons' experience with SH (under 10 cases). Incomplete rings (doughnuts) of excised rectal tissue were noted in both patients. There have been a total of 13 patients reported from seven countries across three continents requiring emergency abdominal exploration and fecal diversion for complications related directly to SH. The complications noted in these 13 patients include: 9 cases of perforation, 6 cases of sepsis, 2 cases each of obstruction and Fournier's gangrene, and 1 case each of rectovaginal fistula and intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Seventy per cent of patients underwent abdominal exploration within 3 days of SH, 90% within 5 days. The age range was 24 to 77 years. Two of the 3 oldest patients did not survive the complication (68 and 77 years of age). Three patients succumbed to sepsis in the immediate postoperative period: one on postoperative day 4 after SH (Germany),one on postoperative day 6 after SH (Spain) and the third on postoperative day 10 after SH (US). The 2 mortalities from Europe occurred immediately after colostomy 4 days after SH (Germany) and immediately after re-exploration 6 days after SH and 5 days after initial colostomy (Spain). There have been a few reports of successful, non-operative management in select patients. Symptoms of abdominal pain, urinary retention, and fever after SH frequently herald these severe life-threatening complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SH has resulted in potential serious morbidity and even mortality in the immediate postoperative period. As the procedure has spread in popularity around the world, so too, it appears, have these severe, life-threatening complications. These complications are often heralded by abdominal pain, urinary retention, and fever. Surgeons should be aware of all of the potential complications (and associated warning signs and symptoms) of SH.