Lipoprotein(a) is associated with necrotic core progression of non-culprit coronary lesions in statin-treated patients with angina pectoris

Lipoprotein(a) is associated with coronary atheroma progression: analysis from a serial coronary computed tomography angiography study

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been closely related to coronary atherosclerosis and might affect perivascular inflammation due to its proinflammatory properties. However, there are limited data about Lp(a) and related perivascular inflammation on coronary atheroma progression. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the associations between Lp(a) and the perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) with coronary atheroma progression detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent serial CCTA examinations without a history of revascularization and with available data for Lp(a) within one month before or after baseline and follow-up CCTA imaging scans were considered to be included. CCTA quantitative analyses were performed to obtain the total plaque volume (TPV) and the perivascular FAI. Coronary plaque progression (PP) was defined as a ≥ 10% increase in the change of the TPV at the patient level or the presence of new-onset coronary atheroma lesions. The associations between Lp(a) or the perivascular FAI with PP were examined by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were ultimately enrolled in the present study with a mean CCTA interscan interval of 30.80 ± 13.50 months. Among the 116 patients (mean age: 53.49 ± 10.21 years, males: 83.6%), 32 patients presented PP during the follow-up interval. Lp(a) levels were significantly higher among PP patients than those among non-PP patients at both baseline [15.80 (9.09-33.60) mg/dLvs. 10.50 (4.75-19.71) mg/dL,P = 0.029] and follow-up [20.60 (10.45-34.55) mg/dLvs. 8.77 (5.00-18.78) mg/dL,P = 0.004]. However, there were no differences in the perivascular FAI between PP group and non-PP group at either baseline or follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that elevated baseline Lp(a) level (OR = 1.031, 95% CI: 1.005-1.058,P = 0.019) was an independent risk factor for PP after adjustment for other conventional variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) was independently associated with coronary atheroma progression beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other conventional risk factors. Further studies are warranted to identify the inflammation effect exhibited as the perivascular FAI on coronary atheroma progression.

Pitavastatin Combined with Ezetimibe Treatment was an Effective Approach to Non-IRA Lesion of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with the multivessel disease have distinctive plaque characteristics in non-IRA lesions. Intensive statin therapy was a potential approach to treat STEMI patients with the non-IRA disease. However, there is still poor evidence about the therapeutic effect. In this study, we have evaluated the detailed therapeutic effect of statin plus ezetimibe intensive therapy.

METHODS

For STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), 183 control STEMI patients without non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI, and 200 STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI were introduced into this study. 200 STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI were divided into Normal group, Intensive group, Normal & Combined group, and Intensive & Combined group. The baseline information for each participant was recorded. Meanwhile, the physiological and biochemical indicators of each member with different treatments were collected after one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

For STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI, no differences could be detected in multiple indexes such as OCT examination results, age, stroke, etc. However, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and coronary Gensini score were different between different groups (P<0.05). After one year follow-up, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, coronary Gensini score, thin-cap fibroatheroma, length of non-infarcted arterial lesions, non-infarct artery lesion range, myocardial infarction again, and revascularization again were significantly different between different groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results mentioned above suggested that pitavastatin combined with ezetimibe was an effective approach for STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI. The results obtained in this study have provided a novel method for the treatment of STEMI patients with non-IRA disease undergoing primary PCI.

Association of Serum Lipoprotein (a) Levels and Coronary Atheroma Volume by Intravascular Ultrasound

Background

Lp(a) (lipoprotein (a)) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events, but the mechanism of increased risk is uncertain. This study evaluated the relationship between Lp(a) and coronary atheroma volume by intravascular ultrasound.

Methods and Results

This was a post hoc analysis of 6 randomized trials of coronary atheroma by intravascular ultrasound. The population was stratified into high (≥60 mg/dL) and low (<60 mg/dL) baseline serum Lp(a). The primary outcome was baseline coronary percent atheroma volume. A mixed model adjusted for baseline low density lipoprotein, ApoB (apoliporotein B100), non‐high density lipoprotein, sex, age, race, history of myocardial infarction, statin use, and intravascular ultrasound study was used to provide estimates of baseline plaque burden. Of 3943 patients, 17.3% (683) had Lp(a) ≥ 60 mg/dL and 82.7% (3260) had Lp(a) < 60 mg/dL. At baseline, uncorrected low density lipoprotein level (107.7 ± 32.0 versus 99.1 ± 31.5) and statin therapy (99.0% versus 97.0%) were higher in patients with high Lp(a) levels, but low density lipoprotein corrected for Lp(a) was lower (80.6 ± 32.0 versus 94.0 ± 31.4) in patients with high Lp(a) levels. Percent atheroma volume was significantly higher in the high Lp(a) group in unadjusted (38.2% [32.8, 43.6] versus 37.1% [31.4, 43.1], P=0.01) and risk‐adjusted analyses (38.7%±0.5 versus 37.5%±0.5, P<0.001). There was a significant association of increasing risk‐adjusted percent atheroma volume across quintiles of Lp(a) (Lp(a) quintiles 1‐5; 37.3 ± 0.5%, 37.2 ± 0.5%, 37.3 ± 0.5%, 38.0 ± 0.5%, 38.5 ± 0.5%, P=0.002).

Conclusions

Elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with increased percent atheroma volume. Further work is needed to clarify the relationship of Lp(a)‐lowering treatment with cardiovascular outcomes.

Prognostic Value of Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography for Premature Acute Coronary Syndromes

Little is known about the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and future ischemic cardiovascular events in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A total of 1464 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography for premature ACS (males <45 years and females <55 years) were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into quartiles according to serum Lp(a) levels (Q1: ≤11.1 nmol/L; Q2: 11.1-27.7 nmol/L; Q3: 27.7-79.3 nmol/L; and Q4: >79.3 nmol/L). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) increased with Lp(a) quartiles after 2-year follow-up (among quartiles, respectively; P = .001). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed significant differences in event-free survival rates among Lp(a) quartile groups ( P = .001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that serum Lp(a) level was an independent predictor of MACE either as a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.002, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.001-1.004; P = .009) or as a categorical variable (HR: 1.443, 95% CI: 1.074-1.937; P = .015). Furthermore, Lp(a) levels (as a variable) significantly improved the prognostic value for MACE. These findings suggest that Lp(a) measurement has value for cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with premature ACS.

Reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in hyper-Lp(a) patients on lipoprotein apheresis. The G.I.L.A. (Gruppo Interdisciplinare Aferesi Lipoproteica) pilot study

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is the elective therapy for homozygous and other forms of Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Familial Combined Hypercholesterolemia, resistant/intolerant to lipid lowering drugs, and hyper-lipoproteinemia(a). Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been classified as the most prevalent genetic risk factor for coronary artery disease and aortic valve stenosis.

AIM

Our multicenter retrospective study has the aim to analyze the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE) before and during the LA treatment, in subjects with elevated level of Lp(a) (>60 mg/dL) [hyper-Lp(a)] and chronic ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

We collected data of 23 patients (mean age 63 ± 9 years, male 77%; from hospital of Pisa 11/23, Pistoia 7/23, Verona 2/23, Padova 2/23 and Ferrara 1/23), with hyper-Lp(a), pre-apheresis LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dL, cardiovascular disease, on maximally tolerated lipid lowering therapy and LA treatment (median 7 years, interquartile range 3-9 years). The LA treatment was performed by heparin-induced LDL precipitation apheresis (16/23), dextran-sulphate (4/23), cascade filtration (2/23) and immunoadsorption (1/23). The time lapse between first cardiovascular event and beginning of apheresis was 6 years (interquartile range 1-12 years).

RESULTS

The recorded ACVE, before and after the LA treatment inception, were 40 and 10 respectively (p < 0.05), notably, the AVCE rates/year were 0.43 and 0.11 respectively (p < 0.05) with a 74% reduction of event occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm long-term efficacy and positive impact of LA on morbidity in patients with hyper-Lp(a) and chronic ischemic heart disease on maximally tolerated lipid lowering therapy.

Relation of Plasma Lipoprotein(a) to Subclinical Coronary Plaque Volumes, Three-Vessel and Left Main Coronary Disease, and Severe Coronary Stenoses in Apparently Healthy African-Americans With a Family History of Early-Onset Coronary Artery Disease

Serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factor in persons of European ancestry. Levels are twofold to threefold higher in African-Americans (AAs), but reported associations with CAD have been inconsistent. The relation of Lp(a) with the extent and severity of subclinical coronary plaque has not been described in AAs. We screened 269 apparently healthy AAs for risk factors and coronary plaque using advanced coronary computed tomographic angiography. Total coronary plaque (TCP), noncalcified coronary plaque, and calcified coronary plaque volumes (mm(3)) were quantified using a validated automated method. Lp(a) was measured by ELISA. Multivariable modeling was performed with adjustment for traditional CAD risk factors and intrafamilial correlations. Mean age was 51 ± 11 years and 64% were female. Plaque was present in 41%. Lp(a) was independently associated with TCP volume [log(TCP + 1)] (p = 0.04), 3-vessel and/or left main involvement (p = 0.04), and at least 1 stenosis >50% (p = 0.006). Best-fit regression analyses showed that subjects with Lp(a) >40 mg/dl were threefold more likely to have 3-vessel and/or left main disease (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 6.8, p = 0.005) and fourfold more likely to have stenosis >50% (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 15.0, p = 0.02). In subjects with plaque (n = 110), multivariable models showed the Lp(a) level was significantly and independently associated with TCP (p = 0.009), noncalcified coronary plaque (p = 0.01), and calcified coronary plaque (p = 0.003) and affected vessel length (p = 0.01). In conclusion, high Lp(a) is strongly associated with coronary plaque volumes, extent, and severity in apparently healthy AAs. High levels of Lp(a) may be particularly important in the pathogenesis of CAD in AAs.

Lipoprotein(a) apheresis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, different methods for extracorporeal elimination of atherogenic apolipoprotein B100 containing lipoprotein particles are used in clinical practice. Most of them effectively remove both lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and LDL. The aim of this review is to highlight research describing the clinical advantages of specific Lp(a) immunosorption compared with other lipoprotein apheresis systems.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data on the utility of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with elevated Lp(a) level are limited. However, several longitudinal studies demonstrated improvement in cardiovascular outcomes when both Lp(a) and LDL cholesterol levels were decreased with different apheresis systems. The main limitation of these trials is the absence of a control group. First developed in 1991, studies on apheresis with a specific immunosorbent to Lp(a) were small and noncontrolled before 2000s. The only prospective controlled clinical trial utilising Lp(a) apheresis (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02133807), demonstrated regression of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis when Lp(a) was removed weekly for 18 months.

SUMMARY

Lipoprotein apheresis usually affects multiple lipoproteins, and there are minimal data regarding the effect of specific removal of Lp(a) alone. There is a need for randomized controlled trial with specific Lp(a) apheresis to investigate its effect on cardiovascular outcomes.