Are treatment benefits in neuropathic pain reflected in the Self Assessment of Treatment questionnaire?

Understanding data visualization techniques in qualitative studies used to develop and validate patient-reported outcome measures: a targeted literature review

PURPOSE

Qualitative data that reflects patients' experiences are the foundation of any patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) development and validation study; however, there is limited understanding of the type of data visualization techniques that facilitate communication of this data. The goal of this targeted literature review was to investigate data visualization methods that have been used in published PROM development and validation literature to report qualitative results.

METHODS

A literature search in OVID via MEDLINE was conducted among the top 10 non-disease-specific journals publishing PROM qualitative development and validation studies. Studies that reported qualitative methods to develop/validate a PROM and included data visualization in the form of tables or figures were included. Article characteristics and data visualization types were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 185 articles were included in data extraction. Most articles (n = 109, 59.1%) included figures (n = 172, average 2 relevant figures per article) in the form of hierarchy/flowcharts (n = 124, 72.1%) and bar charts (n = 29, 16.9%). Information reported in figures included depiction of conceptual frameworks (n = 112, 65.1%) and concept frequency (n = 40, 24.4%). Most articles (n = 152, 81.7%) included tables (n = 307, average 2 relevant tables per article). Information reported in tables included concept frequency (n = 133, 43.3%) and cognitive debriefing and revisions (n = 91, 29.6%).

CONCLUSION

Data visualization techniques used to report qualitative results in the identified PROM qualitative development and validation studies were heterogeneous, and many studies did not utilize any data visualization techniques. This study will inform the development of guidance for using data visualizations to report qualitative PROM research.

Long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: 24-Month results of a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treating refractory painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).

METHODS

The SENZA-PDN study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compared conventional medical management (CMM) alone with 10 kHz SCS plus CMM (10 kHz SCS+CMM) in 216 patients with refractory PDN. After 6 months, participants with insufficient pain relief could cross over to the other treatment. In total, 142 patients with a 10 kHz SCS system were followed for 24 months, including 84 initial 10 kHz SCS+CMM recipients and 58 crossovers from CMM alone. Assessments included pain intensity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), sleep, and neurological function. Investigators assessed neurological function via sensory, reflex, and motor tests. They identified a clinically meaningful improvement relative to the baseline assessment if there was a significant persistent improvement in neurological function that impacted the participant's well-being and was attributable to a neurological finding.

RESULTS

At 24 months, 10 kHz SCS reduced pain by a mean of 79.9% compared to baseline, with 90.1% of participants experiencing ≥50% pain relief. Participants had significantly improved HRQoL and sleep, and 65.7% demonstrated clinically meaningful neurological improvement. Five (3.2%) SCS systems were explanted due to infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 24 months, 10 kHz SCS provided durable pain relief and significant improvements in HRQoL and sleep. Furthermore, the majority of participants demonstrated neurological improvement. These long-term data support 10 kHz SCS as a safe and highly effective therapy for PDN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClincalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03228420.

A Cross-Sectional Web Survey of Satisfaction with Treatment for Pain in Participants with Suspected Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain in Both Feet

Introduction

Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP), a symptom of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), is underdiagnosed in people with diabetes. To date, no studies have determined the relationship between diagnosis of DPN and satisfaction with treatment for pain. Additionally, the factors that influence satisfaction with treatment for pain remain unknown. This questionnaire study was conducted to understand satisfaction with treatment for pain among participants with diabetes who experienced bilateral pain or numbness in their feet.

Methods

This cross-sectional, observational, web-based questionnaire study for participants with diabetes and suspected DPNP was conducted in Japan. Potential respondents were registered in the INTAGE Disease Panel or the Rakuten Insight Disease Panel. The primary endpoint was the number and percentage of participants who were satisfied with their DPNP treatment. Secondary endpoints included participant opinions regarding treatment-related efficacy, side effects, and economic burden, and factors affecting satisfaction with treatment.

Results

The questionnaire was accessed by 7565 potential participants; 777 met the eligibility criteria (final analysis set). Satisfaction with treatment for bilateral foot pain was low (satisfied, 27.9%; neither satisfied nor unsatisfied, 42.2%; unsatisfied, 23.4%; very unsatisfied, 6.4%). Participants were somewhat more satisfied with treatment side effects than with treatment efficacy and economic burden. Satisfaction with treatment mainly differed by improvement in actions in daily life, improvement in quality of life, and communication with doctors. The diagnostic testing rate for DPN was low, and diagnosis was more common in participants who complained of symptoms of pain and numbness (any visit) versus those who did not.

Conclusion

Participants with diabetes who experience bilateral foot pain or numbness reported a low level of satisfaction with treatment for pain.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01810-x.

People with diabetes may develop diabetic polyneuropathy and experience diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, which is often felt as pain or numbness below the knee. This study aimed to learn whether participants with diabetes who had pain or numbness in both feet were satisfied with the pain treatment they received. Factors affecting satisfaction with treatment were also evaluated. Potential participants with diabetes identified from two commercial databases (INTAGE Disease Panel or Rakuten Insight Disease Panel) of patients with various diseases living in Japan were asked to respond to our web survey. Besides satisfaction with treatment for pain, participants were asked about how well their treatment was working, treatment side effects, how treatment affected them financially, and what factors affected their satisfaction with treatment. The main finding was that only 27.9% of participants were satisfied with their treatment for foot pain and numbness. Generally, participants were more satisfied with treatment side effects than they were with how well the treatment worked, and how treatment affected them financially. Participants were more satisfied if they had an improved ability to perform everyday activities or experienced an improvement in quality of life with treatment. Participants were also more satisfied if they communicated well with their physician. The rate of diagnostic tests was low; however, participants were more likely to receive a diagnostic test when they complained of pain or numbness than when they did not. On the basis of these findings, we think improvements in the treatment of foot pain or numbness in those with diabetes are needed.

Dermatopharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a novel nanostructured formulation containing capsaicinoids for treating neuropathic pain

The in vivo skin penetration by dermal microdialysis and the pharmacological efficacy of a chitosan hydrogel containing capsaicinoids-loaded nanocapsules (CHNC_Caps) was evaluated in this study. Such gel has previously been proven to control capsaicinoids release and decrease the drugs side effects in humans. The nanocapsules containing capsaicinoids had an average size around 150 nm, with a low polydispersity index, positive zeta potential, and high encapsulation efficiency of the drugs. The CHNC_Caps showed intact nanocapsules, a slightly acid pH value, and a pseudoplastic behavior suitable for topical application. Microdialysis experiments showed a 1.6-fold increase in the concentration of capsaicinoids in the dermis (after 12 h of its application) when CHNC_Caps was administered compared to a chitosan hydrogel containing capsaicinoids in hydroethanolic solution (CHET_Caps) and the commercial cream. The CHNC_Caps showed antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects from 6 h to 96 h after treatment initiation, whereas CHET_Caps and the commercial cream showed antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects only at 48 h and 96 h after treatment initiation, respectively. CHNC_Caps and the commercial cream maintained antihyperalgesic activity for 6 days after treatment interruption. For mechanical allodynia, the antinociceptive effect was maintained for 48 h after treatment interruption only with CHNC_Caps. In conclusion, CHNC_Caps is a promising formulation for treating peripheral neuropathic pain.

Advancing Nursing Practice: Management of Neuropathic Pain With Capsaicin 8% Without Physician Supervision

PURPOSE/AIMS

The purpose of this study was to examine the management of patient's neuropathic pain with capsaicin 8% in a nurse-led clinic when administered by 1 registered advanced nurse practitioner without physician supervision.

DESIGN

A longitudinal, single-group, descriptive research design was used to assess pain scores and quality of life 3 times over 3 months after treatment.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of neuropathic pain were assessed and treated with capsaicin 8% by 1 advanced nurse practitioner with prescriptive authority in a nurse-led clinic. Pain scores were collected at baseline, and self-assessed pain, activity level, and quality of life were assessed at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months after treatment. Twenty-four patients were recruited, and data were analyzed using Friedman's test. In post hoc analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Pain scores differed from pretreatment to posttreatment at each of the 3 time points, at rest (χ3 = 20.54, P = .001) and on movement (χ3 = 23.644, P = .001), and remained significant after Bonferroni correction. Overall, 62.5% (n = 15) of patients achieved at least a 30% reduction in self-reported pain at rest from pretreatment to 3 months, and 54% (n = 13) achieved the same reduction in pain on movement. Most improvements in patient's quality of life occurred between 1 and 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was high, with 83% stating that they would be happy to have the treatment repeated.

CONCLUSION

Single-dose capsaicin 8% decreased neuropathic pain after being administered in an outpatient setting by an experienced registered advanced nurse practitioner. Further multicenter research led by advanced nurse practitioners is needed to support high-quality, safe treatment of neuropathic pain with high-concentration capsaicin in nurse-led chronic pain clinics.

Evaluating the Measurement Properties of the Self-Assessment of Treatment Version II, Follow-Up Version, in Patients with Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Background. The Self-Assessment of Treatment version II (SAT II) measures treatment-related improvements in pain and impacts and impressions of treatment in neuropathic pain patients. The measure has baseline and follow-up versions. This study assesses the measurement properties of the SAT II. Methods. Data from 369 painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) patients from a phase III trial assessing capsaicin 8% patch (Qutenza®) efficacy and safety were used in these analyses. Reliability, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness (using the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy [BPI-DN] and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]) analyses were conducted, and minimally important differences (MID) were estimated. Results. Exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor solution for the six impact items. The SAT II has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.96) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.62–0.88). Assessment of convergent validity showed moderate to strong correlations with change in other study endpoints. Scores varied significantly by level of pain intensity and sleep interference (p < 0.05) defined by the BPI-DN. Responsiveness was shown based on the PGIC. MID estimates ranged from 1.2 to 2.4 (pain improvement) and 1.0 to 2.0 (impact scores). Conclusions. The SAT II is a reliable and valid measure for assessing treatment improvement in PDPN patients.

Burden of HIV-Related Neuropathic Pain in the United States

BACKGROUND

HIV-related neuropathic pain (HIV-NeP) is common; however, the burden of HIV-NeP is not well-understood.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study aimed to characterize the HIV-NeP burden. A total of 103 patients with HIV-NeP recruited during routine office visits completed a questionnaire to assess patient-reported outcomes, including pain severity, health status, sleep, mood, and lost productivity. Physicians completed a 6-month retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

The sample was predominantly male and not employed for pay. A majority (75.7%) of patients experienced moderate or severe pain. Pain interference, general health, physical health, and depression were worse among patients with more severe pain (all Ps < .006). Most (87.4%) patients were prescribed at least 1 medication for NeP. HIV-related neuropathic pain was associated with 36.1% work impairment. Adjusted annualized costs increased with increasing pain severity (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The impact of HIV-NeP on health status, physical function, and depression increases with severity, resulting in substantial clinical and economic burden.

Quality of life and self-reported lower extremity function in adults with HIV-related distal sensory polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP) is a common complication of HIV disease. Its effects on quality of life (QOL) and function have not been well described.

OBJECTIVE

The study objectives were: (1) to compare QOL and lower extremity function in people with HIV-related DSP and people with HIV disease who do not have DSP, (2) to determine the extent to which function predicts QOL, (3) to evaluate the agreement of 2 function scales, and (4) to describe the use of pain management resources.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional survey study with predictive modeling and measurement tool concordant validation.

METHODS

A demographic questionnaire, the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey, the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI), and a review of medical records were used. General linear modeling was used to assess group differences in QOL and the relationship between function and QOL. Bland-Altman procedures were used to assess the agreement of the LEFS and the LLFI.

RESULTS

Usable data for analyses were available for 82 of the 94 participants enrolled. The 67% of participants who reported DSP symptoms tended to be older, had HIV disease longer, and were more likely to receive disability benefits. Participants without DSP had better LLFI, LEFS, and physical health summary scores. In multivariate models, lower limb function predicted physical and mental health summary scores. The LLFI identified participants with a lower level of function more often than the LEFS. Participants with DSP were more likely to use medical treatment, physical therapy, and complementary or alternative treatments.

LIMITATIONS

A sample of convenience was used; the sample size resulted in a low power for the mental health summary score of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of life and function were more impaired in participants with HIV disease and DSP. The LLFI was more likely to capture limitations in function than the LEFS. Participants with DSP reported more frequent use of pain management resources.

[Usefulness of a multidimensional self-administered questionnaire for the clinical management of a pain treatment unit]

OBJECTIVE

To study the feasibility of a multidimensional self-administered questionnaire before the patient is seen at the first visit in a clinical Pain Treatment Unit (PTU) of a tertiary hospital, and its impact on the management of patients in the first visit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study. Self-administered questionnaire that gathered: socio-demographic data, medical history of pain, pain perception (intensity and characteristics), comorbidity of pain and patient expectations of analgesic treatment ("What do you expect from our treatment? If we cannot resolve your pain, what level of pain would you be willing to live with?). A descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 293 consecutive patients (31% men, 69% women), mean age (SD) 62 (16) years-old, were included in 2011. All patients completed and returned the questionnaire before the first visit to the PTU. The questionnaire was completed fully and correctly by 80% (234, 95% CI: 75-84) of the patients, and the rest completed the questionnaire with some points unanswered. About 24% (70/293, 95% CI: 19-29) of the patients should not have been referred to the PTU [20% were not attended]. A small percentage (9%,26/293, 95% CI: 6-13) were evaluated as «urgent'» and visited over the following 7 days, with 19% (56/293, 95%CI: 15-24) being «preferential» (visited before 15 days) and 52% (152/293, 95% CI: 46-58) as «non-urgent/non-preferential» (visited before 60 days). Almost one third (30%, 87/293, 95% CI: 25-35) did not need a second visit to the PTU. Patient expectations: 21% expected complete pain relief and 64% would accept a lower pain intensity score of 4.

CONCLUSION

The use of a multidimensional self-administered questionnaire before the first visit to a clinical Pain Treatment Unit of a tertiary hospital was a practicable and useful tool for the management of patients on the first visit. Likewise, the questionnaire provided information on the patient's perception of pain and the expectations concerning the analgesic treatment.

HIV-related neuropathy: current perspectives

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) related to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is one of the most common neurologic complications of HIV, possibly affecting as many as 50% of all individuals infected with HIV. Two potentially neurotoxic mechanisms have been proposed to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of HIV DSP: neurotoxicity resulting from the virus and its products; as well as adverse neurotoxic effects of medications used in the treatment of HIV. Clinically, HIV DSP is characterized by a combination of signs and symptoms that include decreased deep tendon reflexes at the ankles and decreased sensation in the distal extremities as well as paresthesias, dysesthesias, and pain in a symmetric stocking-glove distribution. These symptoms are generally static or slowly progressive over time, and depending on the severity, may interfere significantly with the patient's daily activities. In addition to the clinical picture, nerve conduction studies and skin biopsies are often pursued to support the diagnosis of HIV DSP. Anticonvulsants, antidepressants, topical agents, and nonspecific analgesics may help relieve neuropathic pain. Specifically, gabapentin, lamotrigine, pregabalin, amitriptyline, duloxetine, and high-dose topical capsaicin patches have been used in research and clinical practice. Further research is needed to elucidate the pathogenesis of HIV DSP, thus facilitating the development of novel treatment strategies. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical findings, diagnosis, and management of DSP in the setting of HIV.