The efficacy of preoperative PET/CT for prediction of curability in surgery for locally advanced gastric carcinoma

18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for the evaluation of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In the last years, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) has demonstrated its utility for the evaluation of gastric cancer; however, considering some histotypes such as gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC) the results are limited. The aim of this review is to analyze the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT for the assessment of GSRCC.

METHODS

A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library databases was made to find relevant published articles about the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the evaluation of GSRCC.

RESULTS

The comprehensive computer literature search revealed 179 articles. On reviewing the titles and abstracts, 162 articles were excluded because the reported data were not within the field of interest. Nine studies were included in the review and references were also screened for additional articles. Finally, 26 articles were selected and retrieved in full-text version.

CONCLUSION

Despite some limitations affect our review, GSRCC seems to have low 18F-FDG uptake, and therefore 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT reveals impaired sensitivity for its evaluation. However, a correlation between 18F-FDG uptake and some clinico-pathologic features (such as stage, depth of invasion, size and presence of nodal metastasis) has been demonstrated. Besides, a possible prognostic role of PET/CT features is starting to emerge.

Pattern of use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan in non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers at KFSHRC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Background

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan is useful if clinically indicated. It is not for conventional routine use due to its high cost. Moreover, it can be confusing if ordered in non-indicated conditions. We evaluate if the pattern of PET/CT ordered in gastrointestinal cancers (non-colorectal origin) has followed evidence-based guidelines and whether it helped in the improvement of patient’s outcome. This study included non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer patients from 2007 to 2008 who had one or more PET/CT scans done during their management. In each case, data collected revealed whether PET/CT affected the management or the stage or not. Patients were identified through the hospital tumor registry software CNExT (C/NET Solutions, Berkeley, CA). Tabulation and statistical data analysis were done using JMP-SAS statistical software application (version 9.4: SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The scan report quality and use indications were outlined.

Results

Seventy-seven patients were identified, with 107 PET/CT scans done. Their median age is 59 (21–86) years. Males were 45 (58.5%). Tumor origin was 46.8% esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer, 15.6% gastric cancer, 11.7% pancreatic cancer, 11.7% hepatobiliary tumors, 10.4% neuroendocrine tumors, 2.6 % gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and 1.3% small bowel cancer. Indications of the PET/CT were as follows: staging in 59.8%, follow-up after finishing treatment in 14.9%, restaging at relapse in 8.4%, assessing response after/during treatment in 3.7%, follow-up of previous PET/CT in 12.1%, and others in 0.9%. PET/CT changed the stage in 19.6% and affected the management plan in 11.2% only. Fifty-two scans needed pathological pursuit as decided by investigators; of them, PET/CT for the lesions that could have changed the stage reported indeterminate/equivocal results in 32 (29.9%) of all scans. The pathological pursuit for the equivocal lesions on PET/CT scans was done in only 12 of 52 (23.1%) scans.

Conclusions

Local guidelines for ordering PET/CT scan are suggested because overuse was documented, and an evidence-based approach should be respected before its use.

Prognostic value of metabolic parameters on preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography in patients with stage III gastric cancer

This study investigated the prognostic value of metabolic parameters determined by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with stage III gastric cancer. Patients with pre-operative PET/CT and confirmed stage III after curative surgical resection were retrospectively enrolled. Parameters evaluated from pre-operative PET/CTwere maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) and peak SUV (SUV_peak) of primary tumor, SUV_max or SUV_peak of tumor to liver ratio (TLR_max and TLR_peak). Volumetric parameters, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), were also evaluated. These PET/CT parameters were compared with the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). From total of 133 consecutive patients, tumor recurrence was found in 54 patients (40.6%) and 53 died during the follow-up period (median, 43 mo; range 5-62). In univariate analysis, SUV_max, SUV_peak, TLR_max and TLR_peak were significantly associated with the OS and RFS. In multivariate analysis, high TLR_max and TLR_peak were significantly unfavorable prognostic factors for RFS (both P<0.05) even after adjusting for age, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and chemotherapy. MTV and TLG showed no statistically significant correlation with outcome. In conclusion, glucose metabolism of primary tumor measured by pre-operative PET/CT provides prognostic information, especially for recurrence, in stage III gastric cancer.

Comparison of DWI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing preoperative N-staging in gastric cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis

The diagnostic values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) for N-staging of gastric cancer (GC) were identified and compared. After a systematic search to identify relevant articles, meta-analysis was used to summarize the sensitivities, specificities, and areas under curves (AUCs) for DWI and PET/CT. To better understand the diagnostic utility of DWI and PET/CT for N-staging, the performance of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) was used as a reference. Fifteen studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 95% confidence intervals of DWI were 0.79 (0.73–0.85), 0.69 (0.61–0.77), and 0.81 (0.77–0.84), respectively. For PET/CT, the corresponding values were 0.52 (0.39–0.64), 0.88 (0.61–0.97), and 0.66 (0.62–0.70), respectively. Comparison of the two techniques revealed DWI had higher sensitivity and AUC, but no difference in specificity. DWI exhibited higher sensitivity but lower specificity than MDCT, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had lower sensitivity and equivalent specificity. Overall, DWI performed better than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative N-staging in GC. When the efficacy of MDCT was taken as a reference, DWI represented a complementary imaging technique, while ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had limited utility for preoperative N-staging.

PET/Computed Tomography and Precision Medicine: Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a disease with low survival rates and high morbidity, requiring accurate and prompt diagnosis and treatment. Although limited in the evaluation of the primary tumor as such, the metabolic information of primary tumors in an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT study can assist in surgical and treatment planning and differentiating gastric cancers. It detects nodal disease with good specificity and positive predictive value, thus enabling appropriate therapy for individual patients. It provides valuable information about distant metastases, altering therapy decisions. It has reasonably good performance in detecting recurrent disease and in the follow-up of patients.

Predictive Role of the Number of 18F-FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes Detected by PET/CT for Pre-Treatment Evaluation of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the numbers of metabolically positive lymph nodes (MPLN) detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 50 patients with LAGC (stage T2-T4) who had undergone pre-operative PET/CT examination and laparotomy (total gastrectomy, n = 11; subtotal gastrectomy, n = 13; distal gastrectomy, n = 22; and bypass with gastrojejunstomy, n = 4). The numbers of MPLN were determined by combining visual observations with semi-quantitative measurements of the maximized standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Performance was investigated in terms of predicting post-surgical overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median post-surgical OS was 32.57 months (range 3.0-94 months). The numbers of MPLN were moderately correlated with the numbers of histological positive LN (r = 0.694, p = 0.001). In univariate analyses, the numbers of MPLN (≤ 2 vs. ≥3), PET/CT LN (positivity vs. negativity), SUVmax of LN (< 2.8 vs. ≥ 2.8), TNM stage (I, II vs. III, IV), and surgery type (R0 vs. non-R0) were significantly associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, surgery type (R0 vs. non-R0) and numbers of MPLN (≤ 2 vs. ≥ 3) were both independent factors for poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

This explored study indicates that the number of MPLN could provide additional information for LAGC prognosis. Patients with MPLNs ≥ 3 may be at the risk of the more bad outcomes, and the further clinical trials are needed.

Preoperative Use of PET/CT in Patients With Colorectal and Gastric Cancer and Its Impact on Treatment Decision Making

The advantages of primary positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) evaluation of both cancers needs to be clarified. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PET-CT compared with computed tomography (CT) in preoperative evaluation of colorectal and gastric cancer patients, and to determine its effects on treatment decision-making. We prospectively evaluated patients who presented with both types of cancer in our clinic between September 2008 and June 2010, using PET-CT and CT. We compared the results with histopathologic findings and determined the changing treatment strategies. In detecting local lymph node positivity, for colorectal cancer patients the sensitivity of PET-CT was 30% and that of CT was 20%; the specificities were the same (100%). For gastric cancer patients, the sensitivity of PET-CT was 38.9% and that of CT was 22%; the specificities were 100% and 83%, respectively. In detecting metastasis, for colorectal cancer patients the sensitivity of PET-CT was 80% and that of CT was 50%; the specificities were similar (100% versus 95%). For gastric cancer patients, the sensitivity of PET-CT was 72% and that of CT was 34%; the specificities were similar (95% versus 90%). In detecting liver metastasis, for colorectal cancer patients the sensitivity of PET was 75% and that of CT was 50%; the specificities were similar (100% versus 95%). For gastric cancer patients, the sensitivity of PET-CT was 57% and that of CT was 28%; the specificities were similar (95% versus 91%). PET-CT findings altered treatment decisions in 16% of patients (n = 10; 9 gastric cancer and 1 colorectal cancer). A high rate of treatment strategy alteration in gastric cancers was seen with PET-CT; its usage is preferred in colorectal cancer staging only for high-risk patients and those with equivocal findings.

Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the added clinical value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional contrast-enhanced multidetector-row CT (CECT) alone for staging of advanced gastric cancer

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 106 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent pretreatment CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Two experienced reviewers assessed the diagnostic performance of both CECT alone and the combination of CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the primary tumor, regional lymph node metastasis (N) and distant metastasis (M), rating their diagnostic confidence with a 5-point scoring system for each location. The two methods were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for histopathologic findings, imaging, and clinical follow-up as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Among the 106 patients, 96 primary tumors (90.6%) were detected by CECT, while 101 (95.3%) were clearly identified by (18)F-FDG PET/CT (p=0.074). Patient-based areas under the ROC curves for CECT alone versus the combination of CECT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of N stage, peritoneal dissemination, liver metastasis, distant lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, metastasis at other sites and overall M stage were 0.787 vs. 0.858 (p=0.13), 0.866 vs. 0.878 (p=0.31), 0.998 vs. 1.0 (p=0.36), 0.744 vs. 0.865 (p=0.049), 0.786 vs. 0.998 (p=0.034), 0.944 vs. 0.984 (p=0.34), and 0.889 vs. 0.912 (p=0.21), respectively. The diagnostic performance of primary tumor detection and NM staging was not influenced by the histologic subtype.

CONCLUSION

Adding (18)F-FDG PET/CT to CECT provides better diagnostic accuracy for detection of distant lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer.

The clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting regional lymph node metastasis and non-curative surgery in primary gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Accurate preoperative detection of regional lymph nodes and evaluation of tumor resectability is critical to determining the most adequate therapy for gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to identify a possible link between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake on PET scan combined with CT scan (PET/CT) and predictions of lymph node metastasis and non-curative surgery.

METHODS

This study included 156 gastric cancer patients who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT and surgery. In cases with perceptible FDG uptake in the primary tumor or lymph nodes, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, non-curative surgery (OR, 11.05; 95% CI, 1.10-111.08; p=0.041), tumor size (≥3 cm) (OR, 7.39; 95% CI, 2.41-22.70; p<0.001), and lymph node metastasis (OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 2.05-14.64; p=0.001) were significant independent predictors for 18F-FDG uptake in the primary tumors. Tumor size (tumor size ≥3 cm) (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.16-8.58; p=0.025) and lymph node metastasis (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.23-9.14; p=0.018) showed significant association with 18F-FDG uptake in lymph node. When the SUVmax of the primary gastric tumor was greater than 3.75, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT with regard to the diagnosis of metastatic lymph node were 73.5% and 74.5%. When the SUVmax of the primary gastric tumor was greater than 4.35 and the FDG uptake of lymph nodes was positive, non-curative surgery was predicted with a sensitivity of 58.8% and specificity of 91.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

A high FDG uptake of the gastric tumor was related to histologic positive lymph nodes and non-curative surgery.

Role of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in gastrointestinal cancers

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) has become a routine imaging modality for many malignancies and its use is currently increasing. In the present review article, we will summarize the evidence for FDG-PET/CT use in digestive cancers (excluding neuroendocrine tumours), and review the existing recommendations. While PET/CT is nowadays considered to be an important tool in the initial workup of oesophageal and anal cancers, new data are emerging regarding its use in assessing therapeutic efficacy, radiotherapy treatment planning, and detection of recurrence in case of isolated tumour marker elevation. Moreover, PET/CT may help decision making by detecting distant metastatic sites especially in potentially resectable metastatic colorectal cancer and, to a lesser extent, in localized gastric and pancreatic cancers. Finally, incidental focal colonic FDG uptakes require exploration by colonoscopy, as they are often associated with premalignant or malignant lesions.

Improving patient selection for 18F-FDG PET scanning in the staging of gastric cancer

Standard pretreatment staging for gastric cancer includes CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; gastroscopy; and laparoscopy. Although (18)F-PET combined with CT has proven to be a useful staging tool in many cancers, some gastric cancers are not (18)F-FDG-avid and its clinical value is still debatable.

METHODS

Gastric cancer patients who underwent staging (18)F-FDG PET scans from 2002 to 2013 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed, and a systematic review was also conducted using PubMed between 2000 to March 2014 to investigate clinicopathologic parameters associated with (18)F-FDG avidity. A pretreatment PET scoring system was developed from predictors of (18)F-FDG avidity.

RESULTS

Both the retrospective analysis of the patients and the systematic literature review showed similar significant predictors of (18)F-FDG avidity, including large tumor size, non-signet ring cell carcinoma type, and glucose transporter 1-positive expression on immunohistochemistry. A PET scoring system was developed from these clinicopathologic parameters that allowed (18)F-FDG-avid tumors to be detected with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 71%.

CONCLUSION

A pretreatment PET scoring system can assist in the selection of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma when staging (18)F-FDG PET is being considered.

Assessment of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography in the preoperative management of patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The significance of (18)F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-glucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography imaging (FDG-PET/CT) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative FDG-PET/CT in staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

FDG-PET/CT results for 90 patients with gastric cancer were retrospectively examined. For quantitative PET analysis, FDG uptake was assessed based on the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax).

RESULTS

FDG-PET/CT detected the primary gastric cancer in 71 of the 90 patients (sensitivity 78.9 %). The median SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with T3/T4 disease than in those with T1/T2 (9.0 vs. 3.8; P < 0.001), in patients with distant metastasis than in those with no metastasis (9.5 vs. 7.7; P = 0.018), and with stage III/IV tumors than in those with stage I/II (9.0 vs. 4.7; P = 0.017). The SUVmax of the primary tumor was significantly correlated with tumor size (r = 0.461, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in assessing metastasis to regional lymph nodes were 64.5, 85.7, and 71.1 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT results are significantly associated with tumor progression in gastric cancer, and such findings can reliably identify cancer cell populations.

Diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer by positron emission tomography

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of gastric cancer has been significantly improved with the broad availability of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Effective technologies for accurate staging and quantitative evaluation are still in demand to merit reasonable treatment and better prognosis for the patients presented with advanced disease. Preoperative staging using conventional imaging tools, such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography, is inadequate. Positron emission tomography (PET), using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a tracer and integrating CT for anatomic localization, holds a promise to detect unsuspected metastasis and has been extensively used in a variety of malignancies. However, the value of FDG PET/CT in diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer is still controversial. This article reviews the current literature in diagnosis, staging, response evaluation, and relapse monitoring of gastric cancer, and discusses the current understanding, improvement, and future prospects in this area.

The clinical impact of the sum of the maximum standardized uptake value on the pretreatment with F-FDG-PET/CT in small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of the sum of the maximum standardized uptake value (sumSUVmax) on pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) in newly diagnosed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 145 SCLC patients from March 2005 to June 2013 who underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG-PET/CT. The sumSUVmax was assessed in all malignant lesions up to a maximum of 5 lesions and a maximum of 2 lesions per organ according to RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the low and high sumSUVmax groups (low vs. high sumSUVmax, 91.5 vs. 77.3%; p = 0.018) in the response rate (RR) following frontline platinum-based chemotherapy. The group with low sumSUVmax showed significantly better overall survival (OS; p < 0.001) as well as better progression-free survival (PFS; p < 0.001) compared with the group with high sumSUVmax. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that a high sumSUVmax alone was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.676; 95% confidence interval, 1.674-4.277; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the sumSUVmax adopted from RECIST 1.1 on pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT was significantly correlated with response to treatment, OS, and PFS in patients with SCLC.

Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Progression-Free Survival in Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

We performed this study to evaluate the predictive value of pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Of 321 patients with a diagnosis of gastric cancer, we retrospectively enrolled 97 patients (men:women = 61:36, age 59.8 ± 13.2 years), who underwent pretreatment F-18 fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) from January 2009 to December 2009. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured for each case with detectable primary lesions. In the remaining non-detectable cases, SUVmax was measured from the corresponding site seen on gastroduodenoscopy for analysis. In subgroup analysis, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was measured in 50 patients with clearly distinguishable primary lesions. SUVmax, stage, depth of tumor invasion and presence of lymph node metastasis were analyzed in terms of PFS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to find optimal cutoff values of SUVmax and MTV for disease progression. The relationship between SUVmax, MTV and PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazard regression methods.

RESULTS

Of 97 patients, 15 (15.5 %) had disease progression. The mean follow-up duration was 29.6 ± 10.2 months. The mean PFS of low SUVmax group (≤5.74) was significantly longer than that of the high SUVmax group (>5.74) (30.9 ± 8.0 vs 24.3 ± 13.6 months, p = 0.008). In univariate analysis, stage (I vs II, III, IV), depth of tumor invasion (T1 vs T2, T3, T4), presence of lymph node metastasis and SUVmax (>5.74 vs ≤5.74) were significantly associated with recurrence. In multivariate analysis, high SUVmax (>5.74) was the only poor prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.002, HR 11.03, 95 % CI 2.48-49.05). Subgroup multivariate analysis revealed that high MTV (>16.42) was the only poor prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.034, HR 3.59, 95 % CI 1.10-11.71).

CONCLUSION

In gastric cancer, SUVmax measured by pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT has a significant predictive value for PFS. In addition, if MTV is measurable, high MTV is an independent factor for disease progression.

Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response

Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection is the only cure available and is dependent on the GC stage at presentation, which incorporates depth of tumor invasion, extent of lymph node and distant metastases. Accurate preoperative staging is therefore essential for optimal surgical management with consideration of preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with its ability to assess tumor depth, nodal disease and metastases is the preferred technique for staging GC. Endoscopic ultrasonography is more accurate for assessing the depth of wall invasion in early cancer, but is limited in the assessment of advanced local or stenotic cancer and detection of distant metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although useful for staging, is not proven to be effective. Positron emission tomography (PET) is most useful for detecting and characterizing distant metastases. Both MDCT and PET are useful for assessment of treatment response following preoperative chemotherapy and for detection of recurrence after surgical resection. This review article discusses the usefulness of imaging modalities for detecting, staging and assessing treatment response for GC and the potential role of newer applications including CT volumetry, virtual gastroscopy and perfusion CT in the management of GC.

Gastric cancers with microsatellite instability exhibit high fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancers exhibit various degrees of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptakes on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FDG uptake in gastric cancer varies according to the microsatellite instability (MSI) status.

METHODS

Consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent PET/CT imaging and MSI analysis were included in the study. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of gastric cancer was assessed using PET/CT imaging.

RESULTS

Of 131 gastric cancers, 16 exhibited a high incidence of MSI (MSI-H) and 3 exhibited a low incidence of MSI (MSI-L). In 29 subjects who showed no uptake on PET/CT imaging the gastric cancers were all microsatellite stable (MSS). Gastric cancers with MSI were related to age older than 60 years (p = 0.002), cancer volume larger than 10 cm(3) (p = 0.015), and the presence of FDG uptake on PET/CT imaging (p = 0.001). A higher SUVmax of gastric cancer was linked to the presence of MSI (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of MSI is related to FDG uptake in gastric cancer. Care should be taken with MSS gastric cancers, because they show lower SUVmax on PET/CT imaging than MSI gastric cancers.

Role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of gastric cancer recurrence after curative surgical resection

PURPOSE

The study evaluated the role of preoperative (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the prediction of recurrent gastric cancer after curative surgical resection.

METHODS

A total of 271 patients with gastric cancer who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent curative surgical resection were enrolled. All patients underwent follow-up for cancer recurrence with a mean duration of 24 ± 12 months. (18)F-FDG PET/CT images were visually assessed and, in patients with positive (18)F-FDG cancer uptake, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of cancer lesions was measured. (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings were tested as prognostic factors for cancer recurrence and compared with conventional prognostic factors. Furthermore, (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings were assessed as prognostic factors according to histopathological subtypes.

RESULTS

Of 271 patients, 47 (17 %) had a recurrent event. Positive (18)F-FDG cancer uptake was shown in 149 patients (55 %). Tumour size, depth of invasion, presence of lymph node metastasis, positive (18)F-FDG uptake and SUV(max) were significantly associated with tumour recurrence in univariate analysis, while only depth of invasion, positive (18)F-FDG uptake and SUV(max) had significance in multivariate analysis. The 24-month recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients with negative (18)F-FDG uptake (95 %) than in those with positive (18)F-FDG uptake (74 %; p < 0.0001). In subgroup analysis, (18)F-FDG uptake was a significant prognostic factor in patients with tubular adenocarcinoma (p = 0.003) or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0001). However, only marginal significance was shown in patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG uptake of gastric cancer is an independent and significant prognostic factor for tumour recurrence. (18)F-FDG PET/CT could provide effective information on the prognosis after surgical resection of gastric cancer, especially in tubular adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Predictive value of pretreatment metabolic activity measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer: the maximal SUV of the stomach is a prognostic factor

PURPOSE

Few studies have evaluated metabolic activity by (18)F-FDG PET as a prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We investigated its prognostic role in metastatic AGC.

METHODS

We enrolled 82 patients with metastatic AGC, who were treatment-naive and underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT scanning. In each patient, the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured in each target lesion. Stomach(SUVmax) was defined as SUVmax in the stomach, while Total(SUVmax) was defined as the highest SUVmax among all the target lesions.

RESULTS

The stomach was the organ most frequently displaying the highest SUVmax among all the target lesions (in 67.1% of patients). A Total(SUVmax) value of 11.5 was the value with the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity from receiver-operating characteristic curves for progression-free survival (PFS). PFS was significantly longer in patients with a Total(SUVmax) value <11.5 than in those with a Total(SUVmax) value ≥11.5 (P = 0.023); however, overall survival (OS) was not (P = 0.055). A Stomach(SUVmax) value of 6.0 was derived by similar methods. PFS and OS were significantly longer in those with a Stomach(SUVmax) value <6.0 than in those with a Stomach(SUVmax) value ≥6.0 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). Furthermore, those with a low Total(SUVmax) and those with a low Stomach(SUVmax) showed better chemotherapeutic responses (P = 0.016 and P = 0.034, respectively). Among patients with histologically undifferentiated carcinomas, those with lower Total(SUVmax) and those with lower Stomach(SUVmax) showed longer median PFS (P = 0.027 and P = 0.005, respectively) and OS (P = 0.009 and P <0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated Stomach(SUVmax) as an independent predictor of PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment metabolic activity may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with metastatic AGC undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Notably, Stomach(SUVmax) was the single, most robust factor predicting prognosis.

Gastric recurrence of a primary colon plasmacytoma: staging and evaluating response to therapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT

A 53-year-old male with a remote history of colon adenocarcinoma presented with weakness, severe anaemia and an actively bleeding ulcerated lesion in the stomach. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT showed FDG-avid masses in the stomach and mesentery, which were biopsied to reveal an unsuspected diagnosis of plasmacytoma. The original colon tumour pathology was identical and this prompted its re-evaluation to a primary colon plasmacytoma. The patient was treated with chemotherapy and a follow-up PET/CT scan showed complete resolution of the gastric and mesenteric masses. 18F-FDG PET/CT is useful in the restaging and follow-up of this very rare extramedullary plasmacytoma.

The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the preoperative staging and posttherapy follow up of gastric cancer: comparison with spiral CT

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) in the preoperative and posttherapy restaging of gastric cancer and to compare with spiral computerized tomography (CT).

METHOD

A total of 42 PET/CT scans of 36 gastric cancer patients (28M, 8F; mean age: 56.0±15) were included in the study. A retrospective analysis of the PET/CT results of the patients were compared with concurrent CT results. Confirmation was made by clinical course and serial imaging studies in the follow up. The compatibility ratios were calculated and the accuracy of the PET/CT was assessed. Agreement between PET/CT and concurrent CT was calculated using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Patients were separated into 3 groups: the patients who were referred to our clinic for preoperative staging (4 patients), for posttherapy evaluation (24 patients) and for the suspicion of local recurrence and/or metastasis exploration after a disease free period (8 patients). Groups 1 and 3 included a small number of patients so they were omitted from the statistical analysis. Focusing on Goup 2, the overall concordance rate was 50% (12 patients). Region based analysis showed the rates of concordance for local recurrence, local lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were 91% (Kappa: 0.70), 95% (Kappa: 0.86) and 50% (Kappa: 0.26) respectively. Distant metastases were also investigated in detail and the two techniques showed a concordance of 91% (Kappa: 0.75) for liver, 79% (Kappa:0.31) for distant lymph node, 79% (0.42) for lung, 87% (Kappa:0.33) for bone and 95% for intestinal wall metastasis.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT is a complementary imaging method which can be successfully used in both preoperative and posttherapy evaluation of gastric cancer.

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Task Force for Research Promotion: clinical utility of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gastric cancer. A systematic review of the literature

Since April 2010, the Japanese Public Health Insurance System has covered the costs incurred for performing ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging for patients with advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this review was to evaluate the clinical impact of PET for patients with gastric cancer. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE using the keywords "gastric cancer" and "PET" to search for relevant articles published from January 2000 to September 2010. The clinical impact of selected articles was assessed by the authors to evaluate the following: (a) tumor staging, (b) diagnosis for recurrent disease, (c) evaluation of treatment response, and (d) screening for gastric cancer. FDG uptake increases in papillary adenocarcinoma, tubular adenocarcinoma, and solid-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. This uptake is also associated with glucose transporter 1 expression. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for metastatic lymph node detection were 21-40% and 89-100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for distant metastasis detection were 35-74% and 74-99%, respectively. Treatment response can be detectable at an earlier stage by PET than by computed tomography (CT), because FDG uptake by cancer cells decreases according to the treatment response. In summary, although PET has limitations such as frequent false-negative cases in signet-ring cell carcinoma and non-solid type poorly differentiated carcinoma, it can contribute to the selection of a more appropriate treatment modality by detecting distant metastases and treatment response.