Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center--a pilot study

Impact of trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing is associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing.

DATA SOURCES

Entries between January 1990 and August 2022 were searched using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Publications comparing the outcomes of pregnancies after preimplantation genetic testing using trophectoderm biopsy and in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were included. Only human studies with a cohort or case-control design or randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion.

METHODS

The study selection process was performed independently by 2 investigators. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 was used to grade the level of bias in randomized controlled trials. The pooled odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model when substantial heterogeneity occurred (indicated by I2 of >50% and P<.1). Otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 studies involving 11,469 live births after preimplantation genetic testing treatment with trophectoderm biopsy before embryo transfer and 20,438 live births after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection only. The odds ratio of preterm delivery was higher in the trophectoderm-biopsied group than in the routine in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection group (pooled odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.21); however, the difference did not exist after sensitivity analysis (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.11). The risk of low birthweight did not increase among the biopsied pregnancies (pooled odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.20). No marked difference was observed in the risk of other obstetrical or neonatal outcomes between the biopsy and control groups. Furthermore, no difference was noted in the perinatal outcomes between trophectoderm-biopsied and nonbiopsied groups in the subgroup analyses by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, frozen-thawed transfer, or single embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION

Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing treatment did not alter the risk of obstetrical or neonatal outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection without preimplantation genetic testing. However, this study was limited by the large observational evidence base, and more randomized controlled trials are needed to further confirm these findings.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection vs. in-vitro fertilization in couples in whom the male partners had a semen analysis within normal reference ranges: An open debate

During recent decades, the application of intracytoplasmic sperm injection has increased considerably worldwide, especially in couples with non-male factor infertility. However, several studies analyzing the broad use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, even in cases with a normal semen analysis, have collectively demonstrated no benefits compared to conventional in-vitro fertilization. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique vs. in-vitro fertilization in cases of poor ovarian response or a low number of oocytes collected, or in patients with advanced maternal age. Since the intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique is more operator-dependent and invasive, its use should only be recommended in cases of male-factor infertility. There is some evidence showing that intracytoplasmic sperm injection is linked with an increased risk of birth defects. Albeit this evidence is limited, and currently it is not possible to draw a firm conclusion on these concerns, we do believe that these risks should be rigorously investigated. Thus, this review aims to clarify the debate on the application of the intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure, as compared to standard in-vitro fertilization, in those assisted reproductive technology cycles without a clear male factor infertility. Furthermore, we try to clarify whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection would result in a higher live birth rate than in-vitro fertilization, in couples with non-male factor infertility.

Promising Perinatal Outcome after Using a Simplified Low-Cost IVF Culture System Specifically Designed for Resource-Poor Countries

Background: Assisted reproductive techniques services are often not accessible to the majority of infertile couples in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC) due to high costs. Lowering IVF laboratory costs is a crucial step to make IVF affordable for a larger part of the world population. We developed a simplified culture system (SCS) which has proven to be effective, and the next step is to prove its safety.Methods: Preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) of 176 singletons born after using the SCS, 105 after fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET), and 71 after frozen embryo transfer (frozen ET) were compared with all IVF/ICSI singletons born in Belgium between 2013 and 2018. When comparing our 105 SCS babies born after fresh ET with all Belgian babies born after conventional IVF only, we also adjusted for 7 risk factors known to influence perinatal outcome, namelythe mother’s age, day of transfer, pituitary inhibition protocol, rank of cycles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, and gender of the baby.Findings: Before adjustment, we found a significantly higher PTB (10.2% vs. 3.8%, OR 2.852, 95% CI [1.042–7.803], p-value 0.0413) and LBW (9.8% vs. 2.9%, OR 3.692, 95% CI [1.163–11.721], p-value 0.0267) in the conventional IVF group versus SCS after fresh ET. After adjusting for seven risk parameters, these differences remained significant (PTB: OR 2.627, 95% CI [1.013–6.816], p-value 0.0471) and LBW: OR 3.267, 95% CI [1.118–9.549], p-value 0.0305). PTB and LBW between both groups was not significantly different for singletons born after frozen ET. Interpretation: Taking into account the small series, PTB and LBW rates in SCS singletons in FRET cycles are very reassuring and significantly lower compared to babies born after conventional IVF in Belgium. Being aware of its effectiveness, our results offer a good perspective for SCS to become an important tool to implement low-cost IVF in LMIC.

Perinatal outcome of babies born after using a simplified IVF culture system versus ICSI with sibling oocytes: a prospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there a difference in perinatal outcome in the same patient cohort for babies conceived following randomization of sibling oocytes allocated to a simplified IVF culture system (SCS) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) followed by conventional culturing?

DESIGN

The study compared the perinatal outcomes of 367 babies born from 1 January 2013 until 31 December 2020 after using split SCS and ICSI insemination of sibling oocytes in a selected group of normo-responsive women, excluding cases of severe male infertility. Primary outcome measures were preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks' gestation), low birthweight (LBW; <2.5 kg) and small for gestational age (SGA) as a primary outcome parameter while secondary outcome measures included mean birthweight, mean gestational age, extreme prematurity (<32 weeks), very low birthweight (<1.5 kg), perinatal mortality, multiple pregnancy and Caesarean section rate.

RESULTS

A total of 105 and 103 singleton babies were born after fresh embryo transfer (FRET) and 71 and 50 singletons after frozen embryo transfer (FET) in the SCS and ICSI groups, respectively. For babies born after FRET, the LBW rate was 2.9% (3/105) for SCS and 7.8% (8/103) for ICSI (P = 0.10). LBW occurred in 4.2% (3/71) and 0% (0/50) of babies born after the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed SCS and ICSI embryos, respectively (P = 0.14). The rate of PTB was 3.8% and 6.8% for SCS and ICSI in FRET cycles (P = 0.33), and 8.5% and 6.0% for SCS and ICSI in FET cycles (P = 0.62). One congenital malformation was found in the SCS FET group.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in perinatal outcome for singleton and twin babies born after SCS and ICSI.

Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles

Background

An explosive increase in couples attending assisted reproductive technology has been recently observed, despite an overall success rate of about 20%–30%. Considering the assisted reproductive technology‐related economic and psycho‐social costs, the improvement of these percentages is extremely relevant. However, in the identification of predictive markers of assisted reproductive technology success, male parameters are largely underestimated so far.

Study design

Retrospective, observational study.

Objectives

To evaluate whether conventional semen parameters could predict assisted reproductive technology success.

Materials and methods

All couples attending a single third‐level fertility center from 1992 to 2020 were retrospectively enrolled, collecting all semen and assisted reproductive technology parameters of fresh cycles. Fertilization rate was the primary end‐point, representing a parameter immediately dependent on male contribution. Pregnancy and live birth rates were considered in relation to semen variables. Statistical analyses were performed using the parameters obtained according to the World Health Organization manual editions used for semen analysis.

Results

Note that, 22,013 in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were considered. Overall, fertilization rate was significantly lower in patients with abnormal semen parameters compared to normozoospermic men, irrespective of the World Health Organization manual edition. In the in vitro fertilization setting, both progressive motility (p = 0.012) and motility after capacitation (p = 0.002) significantly predicted the fertilization rate (statistical accuracy = 71.1%). Sperm motilities also predicted pregnancy (p < 0.001) and live birth (p = 0.001) rates. In intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles, sperm morphology predicted fertilization rate (p = 0.001, statistical accuracy = 90.3%). Sperm morphology significantly predicted both pregnancy (p < 0.001) and live birth (p < 0.001) rates and a cut‐off of 5.5% was identified as a threshold to predict clinical pregnancy (area under the curve = 0.811, p < 0.001).

Discussion

Interestingly, sperm motility plays a role in predicting in vitro fertilization success, while sperm morphology is the relevant parameter in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. These parameters may be considered reliable tools to measure the male role on ART outcomes, potentially impacting the clinical management of infertile couples.

Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Live Births Following Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements in Single Frozen-Thawed Blastocyst Transfer Cycles: a Retrospective Cohort Study

This study investigated whether singleton pregnancies conceived after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) are associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes than singleton pregnancies conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We collected data on singleton live births after PGT-SR (n = 107) and ICSI (n = 585) in our hospital from January 2017 to August 2020. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for maternal age, body mass index, gravidity and parity, paternal age, ovulatory disorder, and recurrent spontaneous abortion. The unadjusted results showed a significantly higher risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-5.54; P = 0.029) associated with PGT-SR singleton pregnancies than with ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, after adjusting for potential confounders, there were no longer any significant differences in the risk of HDP (adjusted OR = 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92-5.48; P = 0.077) between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. There were no significant differences between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies in terms of gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, placenta previa, cesarean delivery, gestational age (weeks), preterm delivery (< 37 weeks), very preterm delivery (≥ 28 weeks and < 32 weeks), birth weight (g), low birth weight (< 2500 g), very low birth weight (< 1500 g), birth height (cm), birth defects, and 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores. In conclusion, for single frozen-thawed blastocyst cycles, there were no significant differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between PGT-SR and ICSI singleton pregnancies. However, due to the limited sample size, these conclusions need to be confirmed by further studies.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes following blastocyst biopsy for PGT in single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) increase the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of 5097 single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles from January 2016 to December 2018, with 2061 cycles in the biopsied group and 3036 cycles in the unbiopsied group enrolled in the analyses. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The live birth rate in the biopsied group (41.1%) was significantly higher than that in the unbiopsied group (35.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.54, P = 0.012) after adjusting for maternal age, maternal body mass index, gravidity, parity, infertility diagnosis, timing of blastocyst transfer, blastocyst quality, regimen of endometrial preparation, endometrial thickness before transfer and treatment year. The rates of total pregnancy loss (25.4% versus 32.2%, aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.91, P = 0.008) and early miscarriage (12.1% versus 17.3%, aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83, P = 0.004) were significantly lower in the biopsied group than in the unbiopsied group. No significant differences were found in sex ratio or the risks of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, diabetes in pregnancy, placenta previa, preterm premature rupture of membranes, low birthweight, very low birthweight, macrosomia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age or birth defects between the two groups. When the subgroup analyses were conducted based on different types of PGT, similar patterns were found for all types.

CONCLUSION

Blastocyst biopsy might not increase the risks of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in the short term.

Conventional IVF revisited: Is ICSI better for non-male factor infertility? Randomized controlled double blind study

STUDY QUESTION

Is ICSI better than conventional IVF for non-male factor infertility?

SUMMARY ANSWER

IVF should be the choice of assisted reproductive technique in non-male factor infertility cases.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

Although total fertilization failure is a major concern for patients and professionals, the overall risk/benefit analysis favors conventional IVF in non-male factor infertility cases. However, according to the ESHRE EIM database pertaining to 1997-2012, the use of IVF has been continuously decreasing in favor of ICSI.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Randomized controlled double-blind study involving 138 women undergoing ART in a private Center.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All couples with a female partner ≤42 years of age and without severe male factor (total progressive motile sperm with normal morphology >10.000) were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were: history of total fertilization failure, less than 6 cumulus oocyte complexes (COC) available for fertilization, prenatal genetic testing (PGT) cycles, unwillingness to participate and couples undergoing total cryopreservation for any indication. On the day of oocyte pick up, sibling COCs were randomly allocated to fertilization with IVF or denudation followed by ICSI to MII oocytes. The decision to transfer IVF or ICSI embryo(s) depended on embryo quality. Women receiving two embryos were given only IVF or ICSI embryos. Neither the clinician performing the transfer nor the patients were aware of the fertilization method used to generate the embryos transferred. Main outcome parameters were fertilization, clinical pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Demographic variables, ovarian reserve and infertility etiology, duration of stimulation, total gonadotropin consumption, peak estradiol levels were similar for IVF-ET and ICSI-ET groups. Mean number of COCs (18.95 vs 19.24), number of embryos transferred (1,81 vs 1,81), the ratio of good quality embryos/total embryos (56.89 % and 55.97 %), clinical pregnancy rates (63 % vs 49 %), implantation rates (31 % vs 28 %), and abortion rates (12,5 % vs 8,1 %) were also similar. A total of 1306 COCs were allocated for IVF while 1331 COCs were denuded for ICSI. Fertilization rate per inseminated oocyte was significantly higher in ICSI group (56,20 % vs 63,78 %). There were ten cases of total fertilization failure, all in the IVF group. Although overall fertilization rate was higher for ICSI, it was similar in both groups when cases with total fertilization failure were excluded.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The non-availability of live birth rates is a limitation. Randomization of sibling oocytes, not patients requires careful interpretation of pregnancy and implantation rates.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Lower cost, ease of application and similar clinical outcome makes IVF the choice of fertilization method in non-male factor infertility cases.

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in couples with nonsevere male infertility

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is associated with improved outcomes compared with conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) for patients with nonsevere male factor infertility.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

University-affiliated reproductive endocrinology unit.

PATIENT(S)

Couples who received their first-cycle embryo transfer without severe oligoasthenozoospermia (OA) between January 2012 and December 2016 were included in this study.

INTERVENTION(S)

Six subgroup analyses were performed according to the proposed indications for the use of ICSI as follows: non-male factor infertility, advanced maternal age (≥38 years), unexplained infertility, low oocyte yield (≤6), mild OA, and moderate OA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth rates and selected perinatal outcomes.

RESULT(S)

ICSI resulted in live birth rates similar to those achieved with IVF (41.68% vs. 44.31%). There were no significant differences in the incidences of gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension disorder of pregnancy, placental previa, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, fetal macrosomia, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and congenital anomalies between the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that ICSI resulted in a lower rate of NICU admission in couples with moderate OA.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results suggested that routine use of ICSI for all causes of infertility did not result in better pregnancy and perinatal outcomes compared with conventional IVF in the first cycle. ICSI might be associated with a lower risk of NICU admission when used in couples with moderate OA. Large prospective studies are required to validate our current findings.

ICSI Versus Conventional IVF in Women Aged 40 Years or More and Unexplained Infertility: A Retrospective Evaluation of 685 Cycles with Propensity Score Model

This study compared the cumulative live birth rates following Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF) in women aged 40 years or more and unexplained infertility. A cohort of 685 women undergoing either autologous conventional IVF or ICSI was retrospectively analyzed. The effects of conventional IVF or ICSI procedure on cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were evaluated in univariate and in multivariable analysis. In order to reduce potential differences between women undergoing either IVF or ICSI and to obtain unbiased estimation of the treatment effect, propensity score was estimated. ICSI was performed in 307 couples (ICSI group), whereas cIVF was performed in 297 couples (cIVF group), resulting in 45 and 43 live deliveries, respectively. No differences were observed in morphological embryo quality, in the number of cleavage stage embryos, in the number of transferred embryos, and in the number of vitrified embryos. As for the clinical outcome, no differences were observed in pregnancy rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, live birth rate, cumulative live birth rate, and abortion rate. The present results suggest that ICSI is not associated with increased likelihood of a live birth for unexplained, non-male factor infertility, in women aged 40 years or more.

Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To examine available data from randomized controlled trials to assess if the freeze-all embryo and subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) results in better clinical outcomes than fresh embryo transfer (ET).

METHODS

Meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We conducted an electronic literature search on PubMed and Embase databases and manually supplemented another 2 articles from relevant citations. Seven studies were finally included in the meta-analysis,including 1141 women who underwent fresh embryo transfer and 1079 who underwent frozen embryo transfer. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that the live birth rate [RR (95% CI) 1.18 (1.08-1.30), P = 0.0003] and clinical pregnancy rate [RR (95% CI) 1.10 (1.02-1.19), P = 0.02] were significantly higher in FET group. Miscarriage rate [RR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.48-0.80), P = 0.0002], and moderate to severe OHSS occurrence rate [RR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.12 to 0.39), P < 0.00001] were significantly lower in FET group. Differences of biochemical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate between the two groups did not reach the statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the IVF/ICSI with FET is more efficient and less risky for OHSS compared with ET. However, we should comprehensively inform patients with advantages, disadvantages and potential risks related to embryo cryopreservation, and carefully assess their fertility conditions to make the most beneficial clinical decision.

Congenital Malformations in Singleton Infants Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Singleton Infants by Natural Conception in Tehran, Iran

Background:

Multiple pregnancies occur more frequently in assisted reproductive technology (ART) compared to normal conception (NC). It is known that the risk of congenital malformations in a multiple pregnancy are higher than single pregnancy. The aim of this study is to compare congenital malformations in singleton infants conceived by ART to singleton infants conceived naturally.

Materials and Methods:

In this historical cohort study, we performed a historical cohort study of major congenital malformations (MCM) in 820 singleton births from January 2012 to December 2014. The data for this analysis were derived from Tehran’s ART linked data file. The risk of congenital malformations was compared in 164 ART infants and 656 NC infants. We performed multiple logistic regression analyses for the independent association of ART on each outcome.

Results:

We found 40 infants with MCM 29 (4.4%) NC infants and 14 (8.3%) ART infants. In comparison with NC infants, ART infants had a significant 2-fold increased risk of MCM (P=0.046). After adjusting individually for maternal age, infant gender, prior stillbirth, mother’s history of spontaneous abortion, and type of delivery, we did not find any difference in risk. In this study the majority (95.1%) of all infants were normal but 4.9% of infants had at least one MCM. We found a difference in risk of MCMs between in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). We excluded the possible role of genotype and other unknown factors in causing more malformations in ART infants.

Conclusion:

This study reported a higher risk of MCMs in ART singleton infants than in NC singleton infants. Congenital heart disease, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and urogenital malformations were the most reported major malformations in singleton ART infants according to organ and system classification.

Pregnancy outcomes and maternal and perinatal complications of pregnancies following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection using own oocytes, donor oocytes, and vitrified embryos: A prospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Several global studies have assessed maternal and perinatal outcomes and complications with the type of embryo transfer (ET) following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). The present study assessed the incidence of maternal and perinatal outcomes and complications following IVF/ICSI associated with the type of embryo transferred.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 2112 ETs were performed in 2092 female patients aged 21-50 years between January 1 and December 31, 2014 (Group A: Fresh ET using self-oocytes: 691; Group B: Fresh ET using donor oocytes: 810; and Group C: Thaw ET using vitrified-warmed embryos: 611).

RESULTS

Incidence of clinical pregnancy rate, abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and maternal complications was: Group A: 40.8%, 15.9%, 2.8%, 27.3%, 31.9%, and 17.7%; Group B: 50.2%, 21.8%, 1.6%, 32.5%, 36.9%, and 23.7%; and Group C: 42.9%, 25.2%, 1.1%, 31.3%, 29.6%, and 17.8%, respectively. Incidence of prematurity (<36 weeks of pregnancy), lower birth weight (<2500 g), perinatal mortality, and congenital abnormalities was as follows: Group A (29.52%, 36.2%, 5.22%, and 1.39%), Group B (42.58%, 46.2%, 4.6%, and 1.32%), and Group C (35.74%, 32.4%, 7.85%, and 0.94%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The higher incidence of the pregnancy outcomes in oocyte donation (OD) cycles can mainly be attributed to the younger age of oocyte donors. The higher incidence of complications in OD cycles could be due to advanced maternal age, different placentation, and immune tolerance.

Are intracytoplasmic sperm injection and high serum estradiol compounding risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes in assisted reproductive technology?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) use and E2 on the final day of assisted reproductive technology (ART) stimulation are associated with adverse obstetric complications related to placentation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large private ART practice.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 383 women who underwent ART resulting in a singleton live birth.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Adverse placental outcomes composed of placenta accreta, placental abruption, placenta previa, intrauterine growth restriction, preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, and small for gestational age infants.

RESULT(S)

Patients with adverse placental outcomes had higher peak serum E2 levels and were three times more likely to have used ICSI. Adverse placental outcomes were associated with increasing E2 (odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.65) and ICSI (odds ratio 3.86, 95% confidence interval 1.61-9.27). Adverse outcomes increased when E2 was >3,000 pg/mL and continued to increase in a linear fashion until E2 was >5,000 pg/mL. The association of ICSI with adverse outcomes was independent of male factor infertility. Interaction testing suggested the adverse effect of E2 was primarily seen in ICSI cycles, but not in conventional IVF cycles. Estradiol >5,000 pg/mL was associated with adverse placental events in 36% of all ART cycles and 52% of ICSI cycles.

CONCLUSION(S)

ICSI and elevated E2 on the day of hCG trigger were associated with adverse obstetric outcomes related to placentation. The finding of a potential interaction of E2 and ICSI with adverse placental events is novel and warrants further investigation.

Independent factors influencing large-for-gestation birth weight in singletons born after in vitro fertilization

PURPOSE

Higher risk for birth of singletons being large for gestational age (LGA) has been revealed after in vitro fertilization (IVF) frozen-thawed embryo-transfer (FET). This phenomenon is now being investigated, since there is a speculation that these neonates could suffer from underlying epigenetic disturbances. The aim of the study was to expose independent LGA risk factors and to identify those connected to the IVF techniques.

METHODS

Altogether, 4508 singleton pregnancies and births were included in the cohort case-matched study. Two hundred eleven singleton pregnancies and births after FET and 916 after fresh embryo transfer (ET) were included into two study groups. The IVF procedures were performed at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana between 2004 and 2011. For each IVF pregnancy, three matched consecutive controls after natural conception were included. Using logistic regression models, we observed LGA connection to maternal parameters (smoking, hypertension, parity, BMI, gestational diabetes, IVF conception, FET, double ET, and ICSI procedure).

RESULTS

Singletons born after FET had a significantly higher risk for being LGA (p = 0.032; OR 1.697; 95 % CI 1.047-2.752). BMI 25-30 was a significant independent risk factor for LGA in the IVF groups (FET p = 0.041, OR 2.460, 95 % CI 1.030-5.857 and fresh ET p = 0.003; OR 2.188, 95 % CI 1.297-3.691). ICSI and double ET had no significant effect on LGA occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides maternal BMI, FET is a significant independent LGA risk factor in IVF patients. Other observed factors (smoking, hypertension, multiparity, GDM, ICSI procedure, or number of embryos transferred) do not influence LGA risk significantly.