Main considerable factors for correct laboratory test interpretation under DOA treatment

Impact of Drugs Used in Intensive Care on Routine Coagulation Testing

Coagulation testing is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to monitor and manage the hemostatic balance, assess bleeding risk, and guide anticoagulant therapy. Routine tests used for this purpose include prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and anti-Xa assays. Some of the drugs commonly used in critically ill patients may influence coagulation assays by interacting in vitro with reagents or in vivo with coagulation pathways, thus altering the coagulation cascade and the fibrinolytic pathway. While the pharmacological effects of drugs on coagulation are usually documented, to our knowledge, no comprehensive review article has been published to date. In this review, we have conducted a critical analysis of the literature to define: (1) the impact of hydroxocobalamin, intravenous lipid emulsion, and propofol on chromogenic assays; (2) the impact of PEGylated compounds, emicizumab, recombinant activated factor VII, antibiotics, and sugammadex on chronometric assays; (3) the challenges associated with bridging anticoagulation in the ICU as well as the effect of N-acetylcystein, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tramadol on the hemostasis system. For each drug, we specify the routine coagulation assay that is impacted, whether this is linked to an in vitro interference or an in vivo effect, and the potential consequences on patient management.

Comparison of clot-based and chromogenic assay for the determination of protein c activity

Activated protein C inactivates factor Va and VIIIa. Deficiency of this natural anticoagulant may result in recurrent venous thrombosis. Performance characteristics of clot-based and chromogenic protein C activity assays are different. The clot-based assay has limitations because of interference with coagulation inhibitors resulting in spuriously increased protein C levels or underestimation because of elevated levels of factor VIII and Factor V-Leiden mutation. The chromogenic assay is not influenced by such interferences but only detects functional defects of protein C that involve the active site rendering it insensitive to rare mutations. To compare two methods, we conducted a retrospective study from January 2015 to June 2017. Our results showed a good correlation between clot-based and chromogenic assay (R = 0.94 and r² = 0.88). The study of agreement between the two methods by the Bland–Altman method showed that chromogenic method on an average measures 7.8% more protein C than that of clot-based. The results also showed that the bias between the two methods is significant. The positive trend noted was contributed by the values of less than 20% of protein C. Both clot-based and chromogenic assays had high sensitivity; however, the chromogenic assay showed better specificity (97%) as compared with the clot-based assay (93%). In conclusion, we recommend the chromogenic method as the assay of choice, which is also recommended by the College of American Pathologist Consensus Study over activated partial thromboplastin time-based assay. We have shown here that despite a good correlation between the two techniques, there is a difference as highlighted by the difference plots.

DOAC-Remove abolishes the effect of direct oral anticoagulants on activated protein C resistance testing in real-life venous thromboembolism patients

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may cause false results of activated protein C resistance (APC-R) ratio. DOAC-Remove, a new reagent based on activated carbon, has been designed to eliminate the interference of DOACs on coagulation assays. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the use of DOAC-Remove enables to determine APC-R in patients treated with DOACs.

Methods

We assessed 74 venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients, including 25 on rivaroxaban, 25 on apixaban and 24 taking dabigatran. APC-R was determined using the Russell Viper Venom Time (RVVT)-based clotting test. APC-R and DOAC concentrations were tested at baseline and following DOAC-Remove. Thrombophilia, including factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation was tested.

Results

FVL mutation was found in 20 (27%) patients. The APC-R ratio at baseline was measurable in 43 patients (58.1%), including 20 (80%) on rivaroxaban, 19 (76%) on apixaban and four (16.7%) on dabigatran. In patients with measurable APC-R at baseline, the ratio >2.9 was found in 23 patients (53.5%). In 16 (37.2%) subjects APC-R ratio <1.8 suggested FVL mutation which was genetically confirmed. Four (9.3%) FVL carriers on dabigatran showed negative/equivocal APC-R results. In 11 (14.9%) patients taking rivaroxaban or apixaban, in whom blood was collected 2–5 h since the last dose, we observed unmeasurable APC-R. DOAC-Remove almost completely eliminated all plasma DOACs. After addition of DOAC-Remove all APC-R ratios were measurable. In four FVL carriers on dabigatran with false negative APC-R, DOAC-Remove resulted in APC-R ratios <1.8.

Conclusions

DOAC-Remove effectively reduces DOACs concentration in plasma, which enables FVL testing using APC-R.

The central role of thrombin in bleeding disorders

Maintaining normal hemostasis relies on a regulated system of procoagulant and anticoagulant pathways, and disruption of these processes leads to the loss of hemostatic control, with the potential for excessive bleeding or thrombosis. Evaluation of bleeding disorders has conventionally been achieved by laboratory assays that measure the activity of individual coagulation factors. While such assays have proven effective for detecting abnormalities of the coagulation system and aiding diagnosis, inherent limitations prevent them from capturing a complete picture of hemostatic function. An improved understanding of thrombin activity and its central role in hemostasis and bleeding disorders has led to the clinical development of global assays that are more physiologically relevant than traditional assays; furthermore, these global assays are able to monitor responses to therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of thrombin in hemostasis, and describe the clinical benefits of thrombin monitoring in patients with bleeding disorders. Moreover, we discuss recent advances in thrombin-targeting therapeutic strategies that aim to correct thrombin deficiency and prevent bleeding in patients with hemophilia and other rare bleeding disorders.

Shifting Landscape of Hemophilia Therapy: Implications for Current Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Assays

Clinical coagulation assays are an integral part of diagnosing and managing patients with hemophilia; however, in this new era of bioengineered factor products and non-factor therapeutics, problems have arisen with use of traditional coagulation tests for the quantification of several of these new products. Discussion over the use of one-stage clotting assays versus chromogenic substrate assays for clinical decision making and potency labeling has been ongoing for many years. Emerging factor concentrates have heightened concern over assay selection and availability. Emicizumab interferes with all aPTT based assays, rendering them unreliable and potentially falsely reassuring to the unaware provider. This review explores considerations for coagulation assays in the clinical setting and highlights how awareness of institutional coagulation assays and potential limitations have never been more critical for providers caring for patients with bleeding disorders. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Activated protein C resistance in patients following venous thromboembolism receiving rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: assessment using Russell viper venom time-based assay

: Activated protein C resistance (APC-R) is assessed as part of thrombophilia screening, preferably in patients not taking oral anticoagulants. Rivaroxaban is known to alter some APC-R assays. To our knowledge, there have been no reports on the effect of rivaroxaban on the Russell viper venom time (RVVT)-based APC-R assay in real-life patients. In 168 consecutive outpatients suspected of having venous thromboembolism because of thrombophilia, APC-R was determined using the RVVT-based ProC Ac R assay (Siemens, Marburg, Germany). Patients receiving rivaroxaban or vitamin K antagonists were eligible. We measured rivaroxaban concentrations using the anti-Xa Biophen DiXal assay (Hyphen Biomed, Neuville-Sur-Oise, France) and factor V Leiden using the real-time PCR. APC-R was detected in 23 (28%) patients on rivaroxaban (n = 81) administrated 2-48 h since the blood draw, 15 (28%) patients on vitamin K antagonists (n = 54), and in four (12%) patients off anticoagulation (n = 33). Compared with nonanticoagulated patients, APC-R ratios were similar in patients on rivaroxaban, without any correlation with rivaroxaban concentrations (from 0 to 303 μg/l). None of the patients on rivaroxaban were found to have false-negative or false-positive APC-R ratios. Rivaroxaban concentrations up to 300 μg/l do not affect results of the ProC Ac R RVVT-based assay, which could be recommended in patients referred to a clinic for thrombophilia screening in whom the time since the last dose of rivaroxaban is uncertain.

A critical appraisal of one-stage and chromogenic assays of factor VIII activity

Accurate and precise potency determination by manufacturers of different types of factor VIII product (plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII [rFVIII]) is vital to clinicians and patients using FVIII concentrates. A separate, but related, requirement is ascertaining the FVIII activity levels in clinical samples for diagnosing and treating hemophilia A. The one-stage clotting assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) are the main assays used for these measurements, with both assays being used for potency assignments, and the OSA also being widely used for clinical monitoring. Although the assays can produce concordant results, discrepancies often occur, e.g. when measuring FVIII levels in patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, or when assaying high-purity FVIII products. Modifications to rFVIII proteins, such as B-domain deletion (BDD), and technologies for improving the pharmacokinetic profile of rFVIII may exacerbate assay discrepancies. The CSA appears to be essentially unaffected by these modifications. However, the OSA underestimates the FVIII activity levels and therapeutic potential of some further modified BDD rFVIII products, especially those conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol); the extent of the effects is dependent on the specific OSA reagents used. Although the OSA remains the preferred choice for clinical monitoring in Europe and the USA, an awareness of the limitations of that assay has prompted more laboratories to adopt the CSA.

Preventive strategies against bleeding due to nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

Dabigatran etexilate (DE), rivaroxaban, and apixaban are nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) that have been compared in clinical trials with existing anticoagulants (warfarin and enoxaparin) in several indications for the prevention and treatment of thrombotic events. All NOACs presented bleeding events despite a careful selection and control of patients. Compared with warfarin, NOACs had a decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage, and apixaban and DE (110 mg BID) had a decreased risk of major bleeding from any site. Rivaroxaban and DE showed an increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding compared with warfarin. Developing strategies to minimize the risk of bleeding is essential, as major bleedings are reported in clinical practice and specific antidotes are currently not available. In this paper, the following preventive approaches are reviewed: improvement of appropriate prescription, identification of modifiable bleeding risk factors, tailoring NOAC's dose, dealing with a missed dose as well as adhesion to switching, bridging and anesthetic procedures.

[Importance of Quick, partial thromboplastin time, and Co]

The Quick test and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are so-called global assays used to characterize different steps in plasmatic hemostasis. They reflect hemostasis in its classical differentiation into extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. However, they do not cover physiological aspects of cell-based hemostasis. Results are not necessarily congruent with a specific clinical situation and do not replace a complete medical history. Patients suffering from hemophilia A or B, for example, have normal Quick test results. Severe factor XII deficiency reveals an extreme aPTT prolongation without a significant bleeding tendency. In Lupus patients, aPTT is also prolonged with clinically a rather increased thrombotic risk. Fibrinogen as a substrate of coagulation discloses pathological results in both global tests in case of considerable reduction. In case of positive bleeding history and a normal global assay, disorders in platelets, von Willebrand factor and factor XIII must be considered. Reduced Quick test results may be expected in factor VII, II, V, or X deficiency. Disorders of liver synthesis of coagulation factors as well as vitamin K deficiency will be indicated by the Quick test rather than by aPTT. The most frequent hereditary reasons for a prolonged aPTT are hemophilia A and B as well as von Willebrand disease. In case of an acquired bleeding tendency, the diagnostic strategy must include autoantibodies. The sensitivity of the aPTT reagent varies widely. Low-molecular weight heparin and pentasaccharides do not influence the test. Oral direct inhibitors may reveal pathological results in a reagent-dependent manner.

Direct oral anticoagulants--interference with laboratory tests and mechanism of action

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been established and already registered for clinical use on a wide basis in the United States and Europe. Different from the vitamin K antagonists (VKA), their mode of action is based on the direct inhibition of the single coagulation enzymes factor Xa or IIa. Other laboratory tests of hemostasis, such as the global tests prothrombin time (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), or various functional coagulation assays involving generation of factor Xa or IIa for their endpoints, can be negatively influenced by the presence of the anticoagulant in the test sample. This interference has been well documented for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran and is most prominent during the first hours after intake of the respective agent. Thus, the potential influence of DOACs has always to be considered when interpreting abnormal functional coagulation assays.