Simple and rapid assay for effect of the new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) rivaroxaban: preliminary results support further tests with all NOACs

Evaluation of the MRX PT DOAC assay for detection of clinically relevant factor Xa inhibitor drug levels

BACKGROUND

Although routine monitoring is not needed for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), knowing if a clinically relevant DOAC level is present can be critical, especially in cases of severe bleeding or urgent surgery. Rapid assays to exclude these levels are necessary but not widely available.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the test performance of MRX PT DOAC for excluding clinically relevant DOAC drug levels.

METHODS

The MRX PT DOAC (Nordic Biomarker, Umeå, Sweden) assay measures the functional effect of DOACs using the clot-time ratio, a ratio between DOAC-sensitive prothrombin time (PT) and DOAC-insensitive PT. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 152 samples from 151 patients with known DOAC levels to assess whether the MRX PT DOAC assay could exclude clinically relevant drug levels >50 ng/mL and whether test performance differed across coagulation analyzers. To assess generalizability, the assay was run on 4 coagulation analyzers: Werfen ACLTOP 750, Diagnostica Stago STACompact MAX, Sysmex CS2500, and Sysmex CN-6000.

RESULTS

The MRX PT DOAC assay had a sensitivity of 100% with a CI of 70% to 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (CI: 57%-100%) for edoxaban drug levels >50 ng/mL. For rivaroxaban, sensitivity was 100% (CI: 61%-100%) and NPV was 100% (CI: 5%-100%). For apixaban, sensitivity ranged from 59% to 83% (CI: 41%-93%) and NPV ranged from 0% to 50% (CI: 0%-69%). The specificity of the assay ranged from 61% to 86% (CI: 36%-97%) for apixaban, 36% to 50% (CI: 2%-97%) for edoxaban, and 75% to 100% (CI: 5%-100%) for rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSION

The MRX PT DOAC assay reliably excludes clinically relevant levels of edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not apixaban, across multiple analyzers.

Perioperative Elective Management in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants - Practical Guide

<b>Introduction:</b> Despite clear, relatively easy-to-use guidance, many clinicians find the perioperative management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) challenging. Inappropriate antithrombotic management can delay procedures and lead to bleeding or thromboembolic complications.<b>Aim:</b> We aimed to describe perioperative management practices related to planned procedures regarding DOACs in accordance with the applicable guidelines of cardiological and surgical societies.<b>Results:</b> Perioperative management of DOAC therapy depends on many factors, and recommendations in the guidelines are not consistent.<b>Conclusions:</b> The best approach to managing these patients is therefore to strike a balance between the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism.

Clot time ratio (CTR) and relation to treatment outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with Rivaroxaban

BACKGROUND

There are situations where information about the anticoagulant effects of Rivaroxaban could be clinically useful. Methods for measuring Rivaroxaban concentrations are not available at all medical laboratories while the test MRX PT DOAC for measuring the functional effects of Rivaroxaban, in CTR (Clot Time Ratio), can be made available around the clock. The objectives of this study were to investigate CTR in trough and peak samples during Rivaroxaban treatment of atrial fibrillation and to correlate the findings to bleeding episodes.

METHODS

3 trough- and 3 peak samples from 60 patients (30 on 20 mg daily and 30 on 15 mg daily) were analyzed with PT DOAC. Patients were monitored for 20 months, and bleeding and thrombotic events were documented. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and non-parametric t-test for comparison between groups. ROC curves for the prediction of DOAC plasma levels > 50 ng/mL as determined with LC-MS/MS and anti-FXa methods were computed.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between trough and peak CTR (median CTR 1.33 vs. 3.57, p < 0.001). 28 patients suffered bleeds. Patients on 20 mg Rivaroxaban with bleeds had higher mean peak CTR than patients without bleeds (CTR 4.11 vs. CTR 3.47, p = 0.040). There was no significant difference in mean CTR between patients on 15 mg Rivaroxaban with or without bleeds (CTR 3.81 vs. 3.21, p = 0.803), or when considering all patients (CTR 3.63 vs. 3.56, p = 0.445). Five out of seven patients on Rivaroxaban 20 with mean peak CTR above the dose specific first to third quartile range (Q1-Q3) suffered bleeds, while 7/16 patients with mean peak CTR within, and 1/7 patients with mean peak CTR below the Q1-Q3 suffered bleeds. The area under the ROC curve was > 0.98 at the upper limit of the PT DOAC reference interval and the negative predictive value of PT DOAC for the prediction of DOAC plasma levels > 50 ng/mL was > 0.96.

CONCLUSIONS

The sample size was too low to draw any firm conclusions but is seems that MRX PT DOAC might be a useful laboratory test in situations where the effect of Rivaroxaban needs evaluation.

Pharmacokinetics of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Extreme Obesity

PURPOSE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended in preference to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) eligible for oral anticoagulation therapy; however, data and clinical experiences supporting the use of DOACs in patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 or weight >120 kg remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of DOACs in patients with AF and extreme obesity.

METHODS

We enrolled all consecutive patients with AF and extreme obesity undergoing treatment with DOACs followed up at Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy. To determine peak plasma and trough levels of DOACs, plasma samples were collected at 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 12th hours from the last dose intake in patients receiving apixaban and dabigatran and at the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 24th hours in those receiving edoxaban and rivaroxaban. The DOACs' peak and trough plasma levels obtained from our study population were compared with those sourced from pharmacokinetic studies among patients without obesity, defined as a normal reference range in the literature. If at least 1 peak or trough plasma level was found ​​below or above the normal reference ranges, the patients were classified as having out-of-range DOAC plasma levels. Study population was then divided into in-range and out-of-range groups. Baseline characteristics, including DOAC treatment, were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify baseline variables associated with DOACs' plasma concentration out of the expected range.

FINDINGS

A total of 58 patients (mean [SD] age, 70.93 [8.73] years; 40% female) with extreme obesity (mean [SD] body mass index. 44.43 [3.54] kg/m2) and AF while undergoing DOAC treatment were included in the present study. In 9 patients (15.5 %), the DOAC plasma concentrations were out of the expected ranges (out-of-range group);, indicating a greater likelihood of edoxaban 30 mg treatment (33% vs 2%; P < 0.01) and inappropriate DOAC underdosing (56% vs 4%; P < 0.005) compared with the in-range group. According to the multivariate logistic analysis (P = 0.0011), the inappropriate DOAC underdosing (hazard ratio = 29.37; P = 0.0002) was an independent predictor of DOAC plasma levels out of the expected ranges.

IMPLICATIONS

Patients with extreme obesity and AF who were receiving DOAC therapy had DOAC plasma concentrations in the expected range. The inappropriate DOAC underdosing seems to be the only independent clinical factor associated with a plasma concentration of the drug out of the expected range.

Comparison of different laboratory tests in the evaluation of hemorrhagic risk of patients using rivaroxaban in the critical care setting: diagnostic accuracy study

Background

Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant designed to dispense with the necessity of laboratory monitoring. However, monitoring rivaroxaban levels is necessary in certain clinical conditions, especially in the critical care setting.

Methods

This is a diagnostic accuracy study evaluating sensitivity and specificity of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and Dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT), to evaluate the hemorrhagic risk in patients taking rivaroxaban. The study used a convenience sample of 40 clinically stable patients using rivaroxaban to treat deep vein thrombosis or atrial fibrillation admitted in a private hospital in Brazil, compared to a group of 60 healthy controls. The samples from patients were collected two hours after the use of the medication (peak) and two hours before the next dose (trough).

Results

The correlation with the plasmatic concentration measured by anti-FXa assay was higher for PT and dRVVTS. The PT and aPTT tests presented higher specificity, while dRVVT was 100% sensible.

Conclusions

There was a strong correlation between the tests and the plasma concentration of the drug. Additionally, our results demonstrated the potential use of dRVVT as a screening test in the emergency room and the need of a second test to improve specificity.

Perioperative management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been licensed worldwide for several years for various indications. Each year, 10-15% of patients on oral anticoagulants will undergo an invasive procedure and expert groups have issued several guidelines on perioperative management in such situations. The perioperative guidelines have undergone numerous updates as clinical experience of emergency management has increased and perioperative studies including measurement of residual anticoagulant levels have been published. The high inter-patient variability of DOAC plasma levels has challenged the traditional recommendation that perioperative DOAC interruption should be based only on the elimination half-life of DOACs, especially before invasive procedures carrying a high risk of bleeding. Furthermore, recent publications have highlighted the potential danger of heparin bridging use when DOACs are stopped before an invasive procedure. As antidotes are progressively becoming available to manage severe bleeding or urgent procedures in patients on DOACs, accurate laboratory tests have become the standard to guide their administration and their actions need to be well understood by clinicians. This review aims to provide a systematic approach to managing patients on DOACs, based on recent updates of various perioperative guidance, and highlighting the advantages and limits of recommendations based on pharmacokinetic properties and laboratory tests.

Ex vivo reversal of effects of rivaroxaban evaluated using thromboelastometry and thrombin generation assay

Background

In major bleeding events, the new direct oral anticoagulants pose a great challenge for physicians. The aim of the study was to test for ex vivo reversal of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban with various non-specific reversal agents: prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), and fibrinogen concentrate (FI).

Methods

Blood was obtained from healthy volunteers and from patients treated with rivaroxaban. Blood samples from healthy volunteers were spiked with rivaroxaban to test the correlation between rivaroxaban concentration and coagulation tests. Patient blood samples were spiked with various concentrations of the above-mentioned agents and analysed using thromboelastometry and thrombin generation.

Results

When added in vitro, rivaroxaban was significantly (P<0.05) correlated with ROTEM^® thromboelastometry EXTEM (extrinsic coagulation pathway) clotting time (CT), time to maximal velocity (MaxV−t), and with all measured thrombin generation parameters. In vivo, CT, MaxV−t, lag time, and peak thrombin generation (C_max) were significantly correlated with rivaroxaban concentrations. Regarding reversal of rivaroxaban, all tested agents significantly (P<0.05) reduced EXTEM CT, but to different extents: rFVIIa by 68%, aPCC by 47%, PCC by 17%, and FI by 9%. Only rFVIIa reversed EXTEM CT to baseline values. Both PCC (+102%) and aPCC (+232%) altered overall thrombin generation (area under the curve) and increased C_max (+461% for PCC, +87.5% for aPCC).

Conclusions

Thromboelastometry and thrombin generation assays do not favour the same reversal agents for rivaroxaban anticoagulation. Controlled clinical trials are urgently needed to establish doses and clinical efficacy of potential reversal agents.

Clinical trial registration

EudracCT trial no. 213-00474-30.

Supporting the use of a coagulometric method for rivaroxaban control: a hypothesis-generating study to define the safety cut-offs

Aims

Although quantitative anti-FXa assays can be used to measure rivaroxaban plasma levels, they are not widely performed or available. We aimed to tentatively determine the cut-off for thromboembolism and bleeding prevention based on the clotting effect of non-rivaroxaban conjugate-activated FX plasma levels in patients with rivaroxaban using a coagulometric method.

Methods and results

Rivaroxaban was added in vitro to normal plasma at a range of 0 to 241 μg/L to cover expected peak and trough levels. Rivaroxaban chromogenic (μg/L) and RVV-confirm as a ratio were determined. Patient plasma samples were assayed with the RVV-confirm reagent. The appropriate rivaroxaban plasma concentration to inhibit clotting mechanisms was based on the remaining FXa in plasma, which was expressed as the ratio of patients/normal, R-C. There is a high correlation between R-C in vitro and spiked normal plasma rivaroxaban concentration (R-Square 0.910, linear equation; 0.971 quadratic equation, p < 0.0001 for both) but not with plasma rivaroxaban chromogenic assays. We propose a cut-off R-C value of 1.65 and 4.5 for safety. Based on the proposed therapeutic range, in 158 assays performed in 58 patients, 6.3 % assays were above the level of bleeding tendency at the peak (R-C 5.39 ± 1.01, median 5.13) and 42 % assays were below the prevention cut-off at the trough (R-C 1.31 ± 0.18, median 1.35).

Conclusions

RVVconfirm® is fast and sensitive to measure the effect of rivaroxaban. Clinical studies are needed to establish whether this cut-off is useful for identifying patients at increased risk of hemorrhage or those who exhibit a low level of anticoagulation.

Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants: Accurate Measurement of Plasma Drug Concentrations

Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have now widely reached the lucrative market of anticoagulation. While the marketing authorization holders claimed that no routine monitoring is required and that these compounds can be given at fixed doses, several evidences arisen from the literature tend to demonstrate the opposite. New data suggests that an assessment of the response at the individual level could improve the benefit-risk ratio of at least dabigatran. Information regarding the association of rivaroxaban and apixaban exposure and the bleeding risk is available in the drug approval package on the FDA website. These reviews suggest that accumulation of these compounds increases the risk of experiencing a bleeding complication. Therefore, in certain patient populations such as patients with acute or chronic renal impairment or with multiple drug interactions, measurement of drug exposure may be useful to ensure an optimal treatment response. More specific circumstances such as patients experiencing a haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event during the treatment duration, patients who require urgent surgery or an invasive procedure, or patient with a suspected overdose could benefit from such a measurement. This paper aims at providing guidance on how to best estimate the intensity of anticoagulation using laboratory assays in daily practice.

Does the Russell Viper Venom time test provide a rapid estimation of the intensity of oral anticoagulation? A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (DRVV-T) might be useful in urgent settings for screening patients on Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs).

AIM

To compare the accuracy of DRVV-T with gold standard assays for the assessment of pharmacodynamics of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in plasma samples from patients.

METHODS

Sixty rivaroxaban, 48 dabigatran and 50 VKA samples from patients were included. DRVV-T was performed in all groups using STA®-Staclot®DRVV-Screen and -Confirm. For NOACs, PT and aPTT were performed using different reagents while plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). For VKA, INR was performed using RecombiPlasTin 2G®.

RESULTS

For NOACs, correlations between calibrated STA®-Staclot®DRVV-Confirm and LC-MS/MS (rs=0.88 and 0.97 for rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively) were higher than the ones obtained with STA®-Staclot®DRVV-Screen (rs=0.87 and 0.91), PT (rs=0.83 to 0.86) or aPTT (rs=0.84 to 0.89). Bland Altman analyses showed that calibrated DRVV-T methods tend to overestimate plasma concentrations of NOACs. ROC curves revealed that cut-off to exclude supra-therapeutic levels at Ctrough (i.e. 200ng/mL) are different for dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Neither STA®-Staclot®DRVV-Screen nor -Confirm correlated sufficiently with the intensity of VKA therapy (rs=0.35 and 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

STA®-Staclot®DRVV-Confirm provides a rapid estimation of the intensity of anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran without specific calibrators. At Ctrough, thresholds for rivaroxaban and dabigatran can be used to identify supra-therapeutic plasma level. However, this test cannot differentiate the nature of the NOACs. The development of a point-of-care device optimising this method would be of particular interest in emergency situations.