PINOT NOIR: pulmonic insufficiency improvement with nitric oxide inhalational response

Delivery of Inhaled Nitric Oxide During MRI to Ventilated Neonates and Infants

BACKGROUND

Many pediatric and neonatal ICU patients receive nitric oxide (NO), with some also requiring magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. MRI-compatible NO delivery devices are not always available. We describe and bench test a method of delivering NO during MRI using standard equipment in which a NO delivery device was positioned in the MRI control room with the NO blender component connected to oxygen and set to 80 ppm and delivering flow via 12 m of tubing to a MRI-compatible ventilator, set up inside the MRI scanner magnet room.

METHODS

For our bench test, the ventilator was set up normally and connected to an infant test lung to simulate several patients of differing weight (ie, 4 kg, 10 kg, 20 kg). The NO blender delivered flows of 2-10 L/min to the ventilator to achieve a range of NO and oxygen concentrations monitored via extended tubing. The measured values were compared to calculated values.

RESULTS

A range of NO concentrations (12-41 ppm) and F_IO2 values (0.67-0.97) were achieved during the bench testing. The additional flow increased delivered peak inspiratory pressure and PEEP by 1-5 cm H₂O. Calculated values were within acceptable ranges and were used to create a lookup table.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical use, this system can safely generate a range of NO flows of 15-42 ppm with an accompanying F_IO2 range of 0.34-0.98.

Rationale for Use of an FDA-Cleared Delivery System for Administration of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a pulmonary vasodilator approved for use to improve lung function in neonates >34 weeks' gestational age with hypoxic respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension. Infants with severe respiratory disease frequently require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for evaluation of treatment and diagnosis of concurrent disease processes. Until 2015, incompatibility between the standard iNO delivery system components and the magnetic field within the MRI setting required iNO treatment to be interrupted for MRI, which could increase risk of deoxygenation and rebound pulmonary hypertension. In some cases, patients had to forego or delay MRI in order to maintain uninterrupted iNO delivery. The US Food and Drug Administration cleared the first iNO delivery system specifically modified for conditional use with MRI scanners (INOmax DS_IR ^® Plus MRI) in 2015, based on the determination that the MRI-cleared system met the performance standards equivalent to the standard system. The system design and manufacturer risk management activities, as well as the regulatory requirements for clearance and continued use, provide necessary safeguards to ensure that high-risk neonates receive uninterrupted iNO in a safe manner. Anecdotal reports suggest that adoption of the MRI-cleared system may help optimize care for critically ill neonates who require concurrent administration of iNO and MRI scanning. Further research will be necessary to quantify the nature and magnitude of clinical improvements associated with adoption of the MRI iNO delivery system.

Vicious circle between progressive right ventricular dilatation and pulmonary regurgitation in patients after tetralogy of Fallot repair? Right heart enlargement promotes flow reversal in the left pulmonary artery

BACKGROUND

The left pulmonary artery (LPA) contributes more than the right (RPA) to total pulmonary regurgitation (PR) in patients after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair, but the mechanism of this difference is not well understood. This study aimed to analyze the interplay between heart and lung size, mediastinal geometry, and differential PR.

METHODS

Forty-eight Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) studies in patients after TOF repair were analyzed. In addition to the routine blood flow and ventricular volume quantification cardiac angle between the thoracic anterior-posterior line and the interventricular septum, right and left lung areas as well as right and left hemithorax areas were measured on an axial image. Statistical analysis was performed to compare flow parameters between RPA and LPA and to assess correlation among right ventricular volume, pulmonary blood flow parameters and lung area.

RESULTS

There was no difference between LPA and RPA diameters. The LPA showed significantly less total forward flow (2.49 ± 0.87 L/min/m(2) vs 2.86 ± 0.89 L/min/m(2); p = 0.02), smaller net forward flow (1.40 ± 0.51 vs 1.89 ± 0.60 mL/min/m(2); p = <0.001), and greater regurgitant fraction (RF) (34 ± 10 % vs 43 ± 12 %; p = 0.001) than the RPA. There was no difference in regurgitant flow volume between RPA and LPA (p = 0.29). Indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDVi) correlated with LPA RF (R = 0.48, p < 0.001), but not with RPA RF (p = 0.09). Larger RVEDVi correlated with a more leftward cardiac axis (R = 0.46, p < 0.001) and with smaller left lung area (R = -0.58, p < 0.001). LPA RF, but not RPA RF, correlated inversely with left lung area (R = -0.34, p = 0.02). The follow-up CMRs in 20 patients showed a correlation of the rate of RV enlargement with the rates of LPA RF worsening (R = 0.50, p = 0.03), and of increasing left lung compression (R = -0.55, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

An enlarged and levorotated heart is associated with left lung compression and impaired flow into the left lung.

Effect of Inhaled Nitric Oxide on Blood Flow Dynamics in Patients After the Fontan Procedure Using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Flow Measurements

Invasive hemodynamic studies have shown that nitric oxide (NO), a selective pulmonary vasodilator, can lower pulmonary vascular resistance in Fontan patients. Because oximetry-derived flow quantification may be unreliable, we sought to detect changes in blood flow within the Fontan circulation after inhalation of NO using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Thirty-three patients (mean age 12.8 ± 7.0 years) after the Fontan procedure underwent CMR as part of their routine clinical assessment. Standard two-dimensional blood flow measurements were performed in the Fontan tunnel, superior vena cava (SVC) and ascending aorta (AAO) before and after inhalation of 40 ppm NO for 8-10 min. Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral (SPC) flow was calculated as AAO - (SVC + tunnel). Heart rate (82 ± 18 to 81 ± 18 bpm; p = 0.31) and transcutaneous oxygen saturations (93 ± 4 to 94 ± 3 %; p = 0.13) did not change under NO inhalation. AAO flow (3.23 ± 0.72 to 3.12 ± 0.79 l/min/m(2); p = 0.08) decreased, tunnel flow (1.58 ± 0.40 to 1.65 ± 0.46 l/min/m(2); p = 0.032) increased, and SVC flow (1.01 ± 0.39 to 1.02 ± 0.40 l/min/m(2); p = 0.50) remained unchanged resulting in higher total caval flow (Qs) (2.59 ± 0.58 to 2.67 ± 0.68 l/min/m(2); p = 0.038). SPC flow decreased significantly from 0.64 ± 0.52 to 0.45 ± 0.51 l/min/m(2) (p = 0.002) and resulted in a significant decrement of the Qp/Qs ratio (1.23 ± 0.23 to 1.15 ± 0.23; p = 0.001). Inhalation of NO in Fontan patients results in significant changes in pulmonary and systemic blood flow. The reduction in SPC flow is accompanied by a net increase in effective systemic blood flow suggesting beneficial effects of pulmonary vasodilators on cardiac output, tissue perfusion and exercise capacity.

Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2014

There were 102 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2014, which is a 6% decrease on the 109 articles published in 2013. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The 2013 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2014) fell to 4.72 from 5.11 for 2012 (as published in June 2013). The 2013 impact factor means that the JCMR papers that were published in 2011 and 2012 were cited on average 4.72 times in 2013. The impact factor undergoes natural variation according to citation rates of papers in the 2 years following publication, and is significantly influenced by highly cited papers such as official reports. However, the progress of the journal's impact over the last 5 years has been impressive. Our acceptance rate is <25% and has been falling because the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, the Editors have felt that it is useful once per calendar year to summarize the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, so that areas of interest can be reviewed in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles. The papers are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality papers to JCMR for publication.

Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013

There were 109 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2013, which is a 21% increase on the 90 articles published in 2012. The quality of the submissions continues to increase. The editors are delighted to report that the 2012 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2013) has risen to 5.11, up from 4.44 for 2011 (as published in June 2012), a 15% increase and taking us through the 5 threshold for the first time. The 2012 impact factor means that the JCMR papers that were published in 2010 and 2011 were cited on average 5.11 times in 2012. The impact factor undergoes natural variation according to citation rates of papers in the 2 years following publication, and is significantly influenced by highly cited papers such as official reports. However, the progress of the journal's impact over the last 5 years has been impressive. Our acceptance rate is <25% and has been falling because the number of articles being submitted has been increasing. In accordance with Open-Access publishing, the JCMR articles go on-line as they are accepted with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, the Editors have felt that it is useful once per calendar year to summarize the papers for the readership into broad areas of interest or theme, so that areas of interest can be reviewed in a single article in relation to each other and other recent JCMR articles. The papers are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought in the journal. We hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your quality manuscripts to JCMR for publication.