HIV, appendectomy and postoperative complications at a reference hospital in Northwest Tanzania: cross-sectional study

Complicated appendicitis in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency worldwide, with significant variations in prevalence, presentation and outcomes between high-income countries (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Complicated appendicitis has significant implications for low- and lower-middle-income countries due to limited healthcare resources. While there is extensive evidence for HICs, the evidence for low- and lower-middle-income countries is lacking. This systematic review aimed to compare the prevalence of complicated appendicitis between low-income countries (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LoMICs).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42024526007). Observational studies and randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus (1990-2024) were retrieved. A grey literature search of Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library was also performed to identify existing reviews on the topic. The primary outcome investigated was the incidence of complicated appendicitis.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven articles with 25 582 participants were included. Meta-analyses of outcomes comparing LICs to LoMICs identified an increased pooled proportion of complicated appendicitis (34% (95% CI 27%-41%) vs. 23% (95% CI 19%-27%) P < 0.001), increased post-operative morbidity (19% (95% CI 13%-27%) vs. 13% (95% CI 8%-20%): P < 0.01) and mortality (OR 2.36).

CONCLUSION

Appendicitis remains a major burden in LICs and LoMICs with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. These findings highlight critical deficiencies in surgical access and delivery, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to improve outcomes in these settings.

Urgent Focus on the Surgical Risks of People Living With HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

With the widespread promotion and application of antiretroviral therapy in clinical practice, people living with HIV (PLWH) have the potential to live as long as non-HIV people and the probability of surgery for PLWH has been increasing dramatically. However, the overall postoperative outcome and risk are still unclear. We performed comprehensive and methodical searches in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science without date and language restrictions. Study outcomes included: (1) cure rate, (2) mortality, (3) reoperation rate, (4) incidence of any postoperative complications, (5) length of stay, and (6) operation duration. NOS scores were employed to evaluate bias risk, while publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger tests. Review Manager version 5.4.1, R version 4.4.1, and Stata version 14.0 were employed to determine quantitative analysis, considering a significance level of p < 0.05. A total of 50 studies were included, involving 54 565 PLWH undergoing surgical treatment. Synthesis analysis showed that the mortality (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.58-1.83, p < 0.00001), reoperation rate (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.36-2.34, p < 0.00001), complication rate (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.26-1.95, p < 0.00001), LOS (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28-1.99, p < 0.00001), and operation time (OR = 7.37, 95% CI: 1.14-13.59, p = 0.02) were increased in PLWH. However, there was no significant difference in the cure rate compared to the control group (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.90-1.79, p = 0.18). Subgroup analysis showed that complication rates increased again in orthopedic (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.34-2.05, p < 0.00001) and general surgery (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.08-2.74, p = 0.02). However, the type of procedure, publication quality, study type, and patient origin were not sources of complication rate heterogeneity. Meta-regression showed that CD4 count had no effect on complication rate, but the anti-retroviral therapy rate had 34.89% explanatory power. There is an increased risk of postoperative death, reoperation, complications, and prolonged hospital stay and surgical duration in PLWH. However, conducting extensive prospective studies across multiple centers is crucial to validate these findings.

Factors associated with early inhospital adverse outcome following surgery for acute appendicitis in Uganda: a multicenter cohort

INTRODUCTION

Surgery for acute appendicitis has been associated with significant morbidity. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with early inhospital adverse outcomes following surgery for acute appendicitis in Uganda.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective cohort in which early inhospital outcome following surgery for acute appendicitis was assessed at 4 regional referral hospitals in Uganda. The occurrence of complications during the admission period was documented as well as the length of hospital stay. Factors associated with adverse outcomes were determined using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis, the majority were males 79(77.5%) with a mean age of 23.8(SD = 12.5) years. The perforated appendix was seen in 26 (25.5%) patients. Post-operative complications occurred in 21(20.6%) with the commonest being surgical site infection in 19(18.6%) patients. The median length of hospital stay was 3(IQR = 3-4) days with 43(42.2%) staying in hospital for more than 3 days. The presence of anemia (Hb < 8) (aRR = 1.376, CI = 1.159-1.634, P =  < 0.001) and having a perforated appendix (aRR = 1.263, CI = 1.026-1.555, P = 0.027) were independently associated with occurrence of complications while being HIV positive (aRR = 1.379, CI = 1.105-1.721, P = 0.005) and having a perforated appendix (aRR = 1.258, CI = 1.019-1.554, P = 0.033) were independently associated with prolonged hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Community education about early presentation is still required in order to reduce the number of patients that present late which should, in turn, reduce the risk of complications and length of hospital stay.

The Influence of HIV Status on Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Study from South Africa

BACKGROUND

Despite the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) being the most common comorbidity in South African surgical patients, its impact on appendicitis has not been well-described. We aimed to determine HIV status' influence on patients' presentation, assessment, management and outcomes with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

The retrospective chart review included all patients aged 12 years and older who were HIV-positive or HIV-negative and presented with acute appendicitis between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019. The primary outcome measure was survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes included analysis of the presentation (vital signs), assessment (biochemical, inflammatory markers) and management (intraoperative anatomical severity grading, length of hospital stay).

RESULTS

Of the 1096 patients with appendicitis, 196 (17.9%) were HIV-positive, and CD4 counts were available for 159. The median age was 23 years, with the HIV-positive patients being older and HIV-negative group having more males (58.7%). While the HIV-positive patients had a longer median length of hospital stay, there was no statistically significant difference in the two groups' incidence of high-grade appendicitis (p = 0.670). The HIV-positive patients had a higher median shock index (OR 7.65; 95% [CI 2.042-28.64]) than their HIV-negative counterparts. HIV-positivity had a significant association with mortality (OR 9.56; 95% CI [1.68-179.39]), and of the seven HIV-positive patients who died, 66.7% (n = 4) had a CD4 < 200 cells/mm3 (OR 8.6; 95% CI [1.6-63.9]).

CONCLUSION

HIV-positive patients, those with CD4 < 200 cells/mm3 or not on ART, have increased mortality risk and may benefit from increased perioperative surveillance. Patients with an unknown HIV status in a high-prevalence population should be offered HIV testing to risk stratify more accurately.

Surgical management of appendicitis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity: a propensity score-matched analysis in a base hospital for HIV treatment in Japan

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on surgical outcomes after appendectomy.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between 2010 and 2020 at our hospital were investigated retrospectively. The patients were classified into HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups using propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis, adjusting for the five reported risk factors for postoperative complications: age, sex, Blumberg's sign, C-reactive protein level, and white blood cell count. We compared the postoperative outcomes of the two groups. HIV infection parameters, including the number and proportion of CD4 + lymphocytes and the HIV-RNA levels were also compared before and after appendectomy in the HIV-positive patients.

RESULTS

Among 636 patients enrolled, 42 were HIV-positive and 594 were HIV-negative. Postoperative complications occurred in five HIV-positive patients and eight HIV-negative patients, with no significant difference in the incidence (p = 0.405) or severity of any complication (p = 0.655) between the groups. HIV infection was well-controlled preoperatively using antiretroviral therapy (83.3%). There was no deterioration in parameters and no changes in the postoperative treatment in any of the HIV-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

Advances in antiviral drugs have made appendectomy a safe and feasible procedure for HIV-positive patients, with similar postoperative complication risks to HIV-negative patients.

The role of viruses in human acute appendicitis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

There have been debates about the human appendix function, and while previous research suggested it might be a vestigial organ with no functional significance, recent studies have pointed out that it might have an important role in the immune system. Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of emergency abdominal surgery in the world. Some epidemiologic investigations have found an association between appendicitis and viral infections. In this study, we have reviewed systematically articles to discover viral infections that cause appendicitis and find any possible correlations between the two.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed by searching among electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE on viruses and appendicitis topics.

RESULTS

Conducted search leads to 983 results in all databases after the duplicate removal and screening by title, abstract, and full-text based on inclusion criteria lead to 19 studies. There were several assays to detect the viruses, which are thought to be AA causative agents. RT-PCR and immunoassays were the mainstay methods to detect the probable cause.

CONCLUSION

Investigations suggested that some viruses including measles virus (MV), influenza virus, dengue fever virus (DFV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human herpesviruses, rotavirus, and adenovirus are associated with acute appendicitis. Despite the available reports, the specific mechanisms behind the relationship between acute appendicitis and viral infections are yet to be understood. Therefore, further investigations are necessary to find out the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of viral complications in appendicitis.

The clinical characteristics and outcomes of appendicitis in a population with a high HIV-infection prevalence

•

Many African countries have a high HIV-infection prevalence. Appendicitis is one of the common emergencies and its incidence is increasing in Africa.

•

Literatures documenting the comparative demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of appendicitis between HIV-infected and non-infected patients are limited in Africa.

•

This study, conducted in an African country, informs the stakeholders in Botswana and other African countries with a similar setup on the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of appendicitis patients with HIV-infection, and it helps to design a relevant research and approach to patient management.

Introduction

Method

Results

Conclusion

Human immunodeficiency virus infection is associated with a differential increase in cytokine response and increased risk of perforation in acute appendicitis

HIV infection causes increased perforation rate in acute appendicitis and alters cytokine profile resulting in increased pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum but decreased in peritoneal fluid. It is also accompanied by increased anti-inflammatory cytokines.

Acute appendicitis in people living with HIV: What does the emergency surgeon needs to know?

Acute appendicitis is among the commonest surgical emergencies seen in an acute setting. Individuals living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and/or the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) have an increased risk of encountering complications with acute appendicitis. We conducted a literature search using the words appendicitis and HIV in google scholar, Medline, Scopus and PubMed. The search also extended to cover HIV presented with acute appendicitis, their outcome during and following the management of acute appendicitis. Several studies showed that HIV is associated with a higher rate of acute appendicitis than the general population. HIV can directly affect the appendix, through opportunistic infections, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome associated with start of antiretroviral medication. High index of suspicion is needed to exclude conditions that mimic acute appendicitis (abdominal tuberculosis, pyelonephritis, cytomegalovirus, cryptosporidium, pneumococcus, Amoebic appendicitis and pill impaction). The clinical presentation may not be typical of acute appendicitis and can be associated with low white cell count and variable fever. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis can be used and more research is needed to establish cut-off point value. Computed tomography scan and ultrasound are widely used in clinical diagnosis. Importantly, acute appendicitis with HIV/AIDS can be associated with high rate of post-surgical complications like infections, delay of healing, perforation, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscess and longer hospital stay. HIV/AIDS with acute appendicitis is complex condition. Therefore, we conclude that patients with known HIV and acute appendicitis should also be managed in close liaison with HIV physicians during, before and after surgical treatment.

Leucocyte count and C-reactive protein cannot be relied upon in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

South Africa has the highest prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the world, and is commonly found in association with appendicitis. Atypical presentation of appendicitis in the presence of HIV infection makes clinical diagnosis of appendicitis unreliable, and inflammatory markers are commonly used as adjuncts. The aim of this study was ascertain the value of inflammatory markers in the diagnosis of appendicitis in patients with and without HIV infection.

METHODS

Patients with acute appendicitis were studied and divided into HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected groups. Symptoms, and systemic and local signs were recorded. Appendiceal pathology was classified as simple or as complicated by abscess, phlegmon or perforation. Total white cell count (WCC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were chosen as inflammatory markers. Findings were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 125 patients, of whom 26 (20.8 per cent) had HIV infection. Clinical manifestations did not differ statistically, and there was no difference in the incidence of simple or complicated appendicitis between the two groups. The mean CRP level was significantly higher in HIV-infected patients (194.9 mg/l versus 138.9 mg/l in HIV-uninfected patients; P = 0.049), and mean WCC (x109/L) was significantly lower (11.07 versus 14.17×109/l respectively; P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Clinical manifestations and pathology did not differ between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients with appendicitis, except that the WCC response was significantly attenuated and CRP levels were generally higher in the presence of HIV infection.

HIV Infection: Its Impact on Patients with Appendicitis in Botswana

BACKGROUND

To compare the presentation, management, and outcome of HIV-positive patients with appendicitis to those of HIV-negative patients with appendicitis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The literature is limited regarding the impact of HIV infection on patients with appendicitis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with appendicitis and known HIV status admitted to Princess Marina Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana, aged 13 years and greater was performed from January 2013 to December 2015. Data on patient demographics, presentation, laboratory findings, management, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 295 patients with appendicitis and known HIV status were identified, of which 119 (40.3%) were HIV positive. The median [IQR] ages for HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients were 34 [29-42] and 26 [20-33] years, respectively. The male-to-female ratio for the same two groups was 0.8:1 and 1.4:1, respectively. Presenting symptoms, signs, and white blood cell count were similar in both groups. HIV-positive patients had significantly higher overall (4.2 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.010) and postoperative (4.4 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.024) mortality rates. There was no significant difference in the total complication rate between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients (13.2 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.192). Compared to HIV-positive patients with a CD4 count ≥200, patients with a CD4 count <200 have a significantly higher postoperative mortality rate (17.6 vs. 1.4%, p = 0.023) and a trend toward a higher total postoperative complication rate (31.3 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.054).

CONCLUSION

Within our setting, HIV infection, particularly with a CD4 <200, was correlated with significantly higher mortality in patients with acute appendicitis.

HIV status and mortality of surgical inpatients in rural Zimbabwe: A retrospective chart review

Background

People living with HIV treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) are now living longer and thus many are requiring surgical procedures. For healthcare resource planning, it would be helpful to better understand the prevalence of HIV in surgical patients, the types of surgery HIV-positive patients are undergoing and whether HIV status impacts mortality.

Objective

The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of HIV in surgical inpatients and the extent of ART coverage, as well as to assess any differences between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients in type of surgery undergone and in-hospital mortality at Karanda Mission Hospital, Mount Darwin, Zimbabwe.

Method

A 1-year retrospective chart review was undertaken to collect clinical and demographic data for adult (excluding maternity cases) and paediatric surgical inpatients including age, sex, type of surgery, HIV status, CD4+ counts and, if patient was HIV-positive, whether he or she was taking ART.

Results and conclusion: Charts for 1510 surgical inpatient stays were reviewed. HIV prevalence among the adults was higher than that in the general population in Zimbabwe in 2016 (23.2% vs. 14.7%). There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality between the HIV-negative group and the HIV-positive group. Within the group of patients with malignancies, people living with HIV were significantly younger than uninfected patients (mean age 50.5 vs. 64.4 years; p < 0.01). There were correlations between HIV and certain malignancies. Thus, in addition to AIDS-defining illnesses, clinicians must be alert to squamous cell carcinoma and oesophageal, anal and penile cancers in HIV-positive patients.

A retrospective evaluation of the Modified Alvarado Score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of a Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) ≥7 for acute appendicitis in both Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-negative (HIVneg) and positive (HIVpos) patientcohorts.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all HIV-tested patients undergoing appendectomy at a regional hospital from March 2010 to March 2011. The MAS was calculated for all patients, as well as for the HIVneg and HIVpos groups separately. Two subgroups were considered for each of these: MAS ≥7 (high likelihood of appendicitis) and MAS <7 (low likelihood of appendicitis). These subgroups were then analysed against histopathological findings of the resected appendix. MAS specificities and sensitivities were determined by comparing Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves for the various scores.

RESULTS

The study comprised 133 patients. Eighty-six (65%) were men and the median age was 20 years (range 4-64); 18 patients (14%) were HIVpos. Appendicitis was confirmed histologically in 113 patients, 100 in the HIVneg group and 13 in the HIVpos group. Specificity and sensitivity of a MAS ≥7 for HIVneg patients was 73 and 85% respectively. Based on the ROC curves, HIVpos patients only showed similar sensitivities (69%) and specificities (80%) at a MAS ≥8.

CONCLUSION

A MAS ≥7 is a reliable predictor of acute appendicitis in HIVneg patients. In HIVpos patients, the MAS threshold required to accurately predict appendicitis is 8. The use of a MAS ≥7 in this group of patients will result in unnecessary surgical intervention.

Appendectomy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus: Not as bad as we once thought

BACKGROUND

The number of patients living with human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is growing due to advances in antiretroviral therapy. Existing literature on appendectomy within this patient population has been limited by small sample sizes. Therefore, we used a large, multiyear, nationwide database to study this topic comprehensively.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified 338,805 patients between 2005 and 2012 who underwent laparoscopic or open appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Interval appendectomies were excluded. We used multivariable adjusted regression models to test differences between patients with human immunodeficiency virus without acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and a reference group, as well as human immunodeficiency virus with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and a reference group, with regard to duration of stay, hospital charges, in-hospital complications, and in-hospital mortality. Models were adjusted for patient age, sex, race, insurance, socioeconomic status, Elixhauser comorbidity score, and appendix perforation.

RESULTS

There were 1,291 (0.38%) patients with human immunodeficiency virus, among which 497 (0.15%) patients had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. In regression analysis, human immunodeficiency virus alone was not associated with adverse outcomes, while acquired immunodeficiency syndrome alone was associated with longer duration of stay (incidence rate ratio 1.40 [1.37-1.57 95% confidence interval], P < .0001), increased total charges (exponentiated coefficient 1.16 [1.10-1.23 95% confidence interval], P < .0001), and increased risk of postoperative infection (odds ratio 2.12 [1.44-3.13 95% confidence interval], P = .0002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who undergo appendectomy for acute appendicitis are subject to longer and more expensive hospital admissions and have greater rates of postoperative infections while patients with human immunodeficiency virus alone are not at risk for adverse outcomes.

Appendicitis in the HIV Era: a South African perspective

The relationship between HIV infection and the clinical spectrum of appendicitis has not been fully elucidated in the South African context. The aim of this study is to compare the surgical management, histopathology, and outcomes between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients undergoing surgery for appendicitis. A retrospective chart analysis was performed of 50 patients who underwent surgery for appendicitis at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban, South Africa between January 2012 and December 2012. Patients were stratified by HIV serostatus into HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups. Fifty patients underwent surgery for appendicitis during the study period. Of the 50 patients, 14 were HIV-positive (28 %) and 36 were HIV-negative (72 %). Perforated appendicitis was more frequent in the HIV-positive group (50 vs. 25 %, p > 0.05). There was a significantly higher laparotomy rate in HIV-positive patients (71 vs. 33 %, p < 0.05). Granulomatous inflammation of the appendix was only noted in HIV-positive patients (n = 3). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05) and no difference in the mean length of hospital stay (7.8 ± 4.89 vs. 5.8 ± 3.94 days, p > 0.05). In this retrospective study, perforated appendicitis was seen to be more common in HIV-positive patients resulting in a higher laparotomy rate in this group. Granulomatous inflammation was only found in HIV-positive patients. There was no difference seen in the complication rate, length of hospital stay, and mortality between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients.

Significance of CD4+ T-cell count in the management of appendicitis in patients with HIV

SUMMARY

Identification of complicated appendicitis (CA) is critical to the management of appendicitis. However, previous studies have not investigated indicators of CA among patients with HIV or whether it is safe to use conservative treatment for appendicitis in these patients. Among 322 patients with appendicitis, we identified 14 who had HIV. Six of them were operated and 8 were treated with antibiotics; CA was diagnosed in 4. Patients with HIV and CA had a significantly lower CD4+ T-cell count than those with uncomplicated appendicitis. A white blood cell count lower than 7.4 × 10(9)/L was observed exclusively in patients with CA. No patient with HIV whose appendicitis was treated conservatively died or experienced a recurrence. We discuss our findings, which suggest the possibility of conservative treatment of appendicitis in patients with HIV and identification of CA by low CD4+ T-cell count.

Etiology, treatment outcome and prognostic factors among patients with secondary peritonitis at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania

INTRODUCTION

Secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the gastrointestinal tract is one of the most common surgical emergencies all over the world and is associated with significantly morbidity and mortality. Previous studies conducted at Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) were retrospective and each was focused on single etiology; therefore there was an obvious need to evaluate the etiologies, treatment outcome and their prognostic factors altogether.

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study involving patients with secondary peritonitis admitted at BMC from May 2014 to April 2015. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics among consented patients were collected using questionnaires. Peritoneal aspirate, biopsy and blood were collected perioperatively and processed using standard operating procedures. Analysis was done using STATA version 11 software.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 97 patients with the female to male ratio of 1:1.8 and approximately 41.2 % (40/97) were in their third and fourth decades of life. Only 3 (3.09 %) patients arrived to the hospital within 24 hours of onset of illness, 26 (26.80 %) patients presented with shock and HIV seropositivity among all patients was 13.40 % (13/97). The common etiologies of secondary peritonitis were perforated appendicitis 23 (23.71 %), peptic ulcer disease 18 (18.56 %), ischemia 18 (18.56 %) and typhoidal perforation 15 (15.46 %). Of the 97 patients, 35 (36.08 %) had complications and 15 (15.46 %) died. Presence of premorbid illness and post-operative complication were found to be associated with death (p values = 0.004 and <0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common etiologies of secondary peritonitis at BMC are perforated appendicitis, peptic ulcer disease, ischemia and typhoidal perforation. Premorbid illness and postoperative complications in this setting are associated with death and as the matter of fact proper screening on admission should be done to identify patients with premorbid illness and confer prompt management.