The influence of hepatitis B virus on antiviral treatment with interferon and ribavirin in Asian patients with hepatitis C virus/hepatitis B virus coinfection: a meta-analysis. Virol J. 2012;9:186. [PMID: 22950520 PMCID: PMC3511228 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422x-9-186]

Low risk of HBV reactivation in a large European cohort of HCV/HBV coinfected patients treated with DAA

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to analyze the prevalence and clinical characteristics of HCV/HBV coinfection and to evaluate the rate of HBV-reactivation during anti-HCV therapy in a large real-world study.

METHODS

Analyzed population consisted of 10,152 chronic hepatitis C patients treated with DAA between 2015 and 2019 in a nationwide study. Prior to the DAA all subjects had HBsAg and 60% anti-HBc testing.

RESULTS

111 of 10,152 patients (1.1%) had detectable HBsAg and 1239 of 6139 (20.2%) anti-HBcAb. The prevalence of occult hepatitis B was 0.48%. HCV/HBV patients were younger with a higher proportion of males, HIV-coinfected, and advanced fibrosis. They were less often diagnosed with diabetes but more often with chronic kidney disease. In HBsAg(+) subjects with baseline HBV-DNA available 6/102 (5.9%) HBV-reactivations during or after DAA therapy were observed, and in two (1.9%) significant hepatic flares were noted. In HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) group 2 (0.16%) reactivations were observed only in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy.

DISCUSSION

Data from a large European cohort suggest a relatively low risk of HBV-reactivation during DAA-therapy for HCV infection in HBsAg(+) patients. In HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) HBV-reactivation seems to be limited to subjects with immunodeficiency. Importantly, previous exposure to HBV and occult hepatitis B is present in a significant proportion of HCV-infected.

Hepatitis B virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with direct antiviral agents

INTRODUCTION

cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with direct antiviral agents (DAA).

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

the main objectives of the present study are: a) to determine the prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection in HCV patients treated with DAAs in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (CM) and also to determine the incidence and clinical relevance of HBV reactivation; and b) to determine the HBV screening rates in HCV patients in our region. For that purpose, 1,337 HCV patients were consecutively treated with DAAs in two hospitals located in South CM between January 2015 and June 2017.

RESULTS

nine of the 1,337 (0.67%) participants were HBsAg positive and 356 (26.6%) had previous HBV infection markers. Two of the four (50%) HBsAg positive patients with untreated HBV developed a virological reactivation, but not a biochemical reaction. Of the 356 patients with previous HBV infection markers, all had normal transaminases at the end of treatment and during follow-up. The HBV screening rate amounted to 92.9% of the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

the prevalence of HBV (HBsAg positive) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C in the southern area of the CM is low. HBV reactivation in HBsAg positive patients treated with DAAs is common, although without clinical relevance. In our region, there is a high rate of HBV screening in patients with HCV that are likely treated with DAAs.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation with direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus: A cohort study from Egypt and meta-analysis of published data

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) became an issue. However, its frequency has been poorly estimated, because of the varying definitions used and evaluation of heterogeneous study populations, including those concurrently treated for HBV.

METHODS

We prospectively followed HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive Egyptians undergoing interferon-free DAAs, to estimate the risk of HBV reactivation and HBV-related hepatitis. We also conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the reactivation risk using published data obtained from a systematic review of PubMed/Embase, in addition to our Egyptian data. We applied a standard definition of HBV reactivation proposed by the international liver associations (APASL and AASLD).

RESULTS

Of 4471 CHC patients, 35 HBsAg-positive patients started interferon-free DAAs without HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues in our Egyptian cohort. Ten experienced HBV reactivation (28.6%), of whom 1 developed hepatitis (10.0%). Our systematic review identified 18 papers. The pooled reactivation risk in HBsAg-positive patients was 18.2% (95% CI: 7.9%-30.7%) without HBV therapy and 0.0% (95% CI: 0.0%-0.0%) with HBV nucleos(t)ide analogue. The pooled risk of hepatitis in those with HBV reactivation was 12.6% (95% CI: 0.0%-34.7%). The pooled reactivation risk in HBsAg-negative, antibody to HBV core antigen-positive (anti-HBc-positive) patients was negligible (0.1%, 95% CI: 0.0%-0.3%), irrespective of the presence of antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs).

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed high HBV reactivation risk in HBsAg-positive patients undergoing DAAs, with only a minority developing clinically important hepatitis. The risk is negligible for HBsAg-negative anti-HBc-positive patients.

HBV Bypasses the Innate Immune Response and Does Not Protect HCV From Antiviral Activity of Interferon

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is sensitive to interferon (IFN)-based therapy, whereas hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is not. It is unclear whether HBV escapes detection by the IFN-mediated immune response or actively suppresses it. Moreover, little is known on how HBV and HCV influence each other in coinfected cells. We investigated interactions between HBV and the IFN-mediated immune response using HepaRG cells and primary human hepatocytes (PHHs). We analyzed the effects of HBV on HCV replication, and vice versa, at the single-cell level.

METHODS

PHHs were isolated from liver resection tissues from HBV-, HCV-, and human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients. Differentiated HepaRG cells overexpressing the HBV receptor sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (dHepaRGNTCP) and PHHs were infected with HBV. Huh7.5 cells were transfected with circular HBV DNA genomes resembling viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), and subsequently infected with HCV; this served as a model of HBV and HCV coinfection. Cells were incubated with IFN inducers, or IFNs, and antiviral response and viral replication were analyzed by immune fluorescence, reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

HBV infection of dHepaRGNTCP cells and PHHs neither activated nor inhibited signaling via pattern recognition receptors. Incubation of dHepaRGNTCP cells and PHHs with IFN had little effect on HBV replication or levels of cccDNA. HBV infection of these cells did not inhibit JAK-STAT signaling or up-regulation of IFN-stimulated genes. In coinfected cells, HBV did not prevent IFN-induced suppression of HCV replication.

CONCLUSIONS

In dHepaRGNTCP cells and PHHs, HBV evades the induction of IFN and IFN-induced antiviral effects. HBV infection does not rescue HCV from the IFN-mediated response.

Potential risk of HBV reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection undergoing direct-acting antiviral treatment for HCV

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite a known risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HBV coinfection, it remains unclear whether patients with past HBV infection are at risk for reactivation. This study evaluated the risk of HBV reactivation during treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens, focusing on patients with resolved HBV infection.

METHODS

This study analyzes the data of 183 consecutive patients treated with SOF-based regimens. From these patients, 63 with resolved HBV infection (negative for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and undetectable HBV DNA but positive for hepatitis B core antibody) were eligible for this study. HBV reactivation was defined as a quantifiable HBV DNA level >20 IU/mL.

RESULTS

Among the patients antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) positive (10-500 mIU/mL) (n = 30), the titre of anti-HBs was significantly decreased with time, as shown by the results of repeated-measures analysis of variance (P = .0029). Overall, four patients (6.3%) with resolved HBV infection came to have detectable HBV DNA during treatment, including one who had HBV reactivation at week 4 (HBV DNA 80 IU/mL). However, none developed hepatic failure. Among four patients who had detectable HBV DNA during treatment, all were negative or had very low-titre (<20 mIU/mL) anti-HBs at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The titre of anti-HBs was significantly decreased from the early stage of DAA treatment. Chronic hepatitis C patients with resolved HBV infection and negative or very low-titre anti-HBs at baseline are at risk for having detectable HBV DNA transiently during treatment.

Comparing the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation between direct-acting antiviral therapies and interferon-based therapies for hepatitis C

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported during antihepatitis C treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HBV co-infection. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of HBV reactivation during anti-HCV therapy and compared those between interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies and IFN-based therapies. Three hundred and twenty-two patients with HCV infection receiving anti-HCV therapy were retrospectively screened. The baseline HBV infection statuses of all eligible patients and the HBV-DNA level of all patients with current or previous HBV infection were examined at the end of treatment. In patients with baseline anti-HBs positivity, changes in anti-HBs titre were evaluated. Of 287 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 157 had current (n=4) or previous (n=153) HBV infection; 85 were treated with IFN-free DAA therapies and 72 were treated with IFN-based therapies. Six patients experienced HBV reactivation (n=2) or HBV reappearance (n=4) after IFN-free DAA therapies, while no patient developed HBV reactivation after IFN-based therapies. The risk factors of HBV reactivation or reappearance were DAA therapies and a reduction in anti-HBs titre to <12 mIU mL^-1 by the end of treatment. The decline changes of anti-HBs titre were significantly higher in patients treated with DAA therapies. Although HBV reactivation hepatitis was not observed, three of four patients with HBV reactivation or reappearance after achieving HCV eradication had viremia 8 weeks after completion of therapy. A significant proportion of patients develop HBV reactivation or reappearance without hepatitis after IFN-free DAA therapies. Low levels of anti-HBs and their decrease to <12 mIU mL^-1 after treatment are significant risk factors for HBV reactivation or reappearance.

No evidence of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with resolved infection treated with direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C in a large real-world cohort

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been observed following interferon (IFN)-based treatment in HBV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients. Recent reports suggest that reactivation may also occur in both hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and HBsAg-negative patients during HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).

AIM

To investigate the rate of patients with HBV reactivation during IFN-based and IFN-free HCV treatment in a large real-world cohort.

METHODS

A total of 848 patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with different combinations of DAAs. Among patients with available outcome and HBV data, there were 272 patients hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive (HBsAg-positive, n=9; HBsAg-negative, n=263), and 536 were HBcAb-negative. All HBcAb-positive patients were tested for HBV DNA at the end of DAA therapy and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were frequently measured during therapy and follow-up.

RESULTS

Seventy-three percent (n=192/263) of HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients had elevated ALT levels at baseline, which declined to normal values in all but 18 patients, and no HBV reactivation was observed. Eight patients had detectable but not quantifiable HBV DNA (<20 IU/mL) at end of treatment, but none were associated with elevated ALT. Five of nine HBsAg-positive/HBcAb-positive patients experienced transient or permanent HBV reactivation, three of whom required nucleos(t)ide treatment during (n=1) or after (n=2) DAA therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV reactivation was not observed in HBsAg-negative/HBcAb-positive patients but common in HBsAg-positive/HBcAb-positive patients treated with different combinations of DAAs for HCV.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation among hepatitis C patients treated with direct-acting antiviral therapies in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with IFN-free direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapies has recently emerged as a potential risk. Given the potential burden of this issue, further data are needed to establish its actual clinical impact.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to analyze the occurrence of HBV reactivation in a cohort of CHC patient treated with DAAs in routine clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive CHC patients with different genotypes, treated with DAA between January 2015 and January 2016 were included in the study. Subjects had been tested for HBsAg and anti-HBc antibodies before antiviral therapy. HBV-DNA levels were examined in anti-HBc positive patients at baseline and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Post-treatment HBsAg determination was performed in case of HBV-DNA positivity. Serum anti-HBs kinetics was analysed in anti-HBs and anti-HBc positive subjects.

RESULTS

A cohort of 137 consecutive HCV patients treated with IFN-free regimens in routine clinical practice was evaluated. From this cohort, plasma samples of 44 subjects with positive serology for HBV (anti-HBc positive) were tested for HBV-DNA levels at baseline and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Two of them were HBsAg-positive, while the others had signs of a past HBV exposure (HBsAg-negative±HBsAb-positive). No reactivation was found in HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative subjects. In the two HBsAg-positive, one experienced an increase in HBV-DNA levels of ≥2 log10 IU/mL during treatment. However, the reactivation was without clinical impact and, most important, was followed by HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience, a past HBV infection seems not to be a condition predisposing to HBV reactivation. On the contrary, in HBsAg-positive subjects not in suppressive treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs, regular monitoring of HBV-DNA during and after DAA treatment should be considered.

Hepatitis B reactivation during or after direct acting antiviral therapy - implication for susceptible individuals

The FDA issued a warning following 24 cases of HBV reactivation during DAA therapy for HCV, including individuals with inactive, occult and past HBV infection. Clinical presentations ranged from asymptomatic fluctuations in HBV DNA to fulminant hepatic failure, liver transplantation and death. The mechanism is unknown. Areas covered: HCV/HBV coinfection is common, particularly in regions endemic for HBV. HCV and HBV utilize host factors to support replication; both viruses evade/impair host immunity. Clinical presentations of HBV reactivation during DAAs are summarized. Other causes of HBV reactivation are revisited and recent data regarding HBV reactivation are presented. Expert opinion: HBV reactivation during DAAs for HCV occurs, with life-threatening consequences in some individuals. The risk of HBV reactivation is observed in all HBV stages. The rapid removal of HCV likely alters and liberates host-viral ± viral-viral interactions that lead to increased HBV replication. As immune reconstitution occurs with HCV removal, host recognition of HBV DNA likely ensues followed by vigorous host immune responses leading to liver injury (HBV flare). These cases highlight the importance of HBV testing prior to initiating DAA therapy, the need for close monitoring of HBV during therapy and timely administration of anti-HBV therapy to prevent serious sequelae.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing anti-viral therapy with an interferon-free regimen

BACKGROUND

A few cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during anti-viral therapy against hepatitis C (HCV) have been reported. However, the information regarding the real impact of this phenomenon is scarce.

AIM

To evaluate the risk of HBV reactivation during anti-viral therapy against HCV with an interferon-free regimen with direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs).

METHODS

Observational and prospective study of 352 patients receiving DAAs therapy between September 2015 and May 2016. HBV-DNA and ALT levels were monitored at baseline, at week 4 of anti-viral therapy, at end of treatment and 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation in patients with HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positive or HBV core antibody (anti-HBc) positive before starting anti-viral therapy.

RESULTS

Ten (2.8%) and 64 (18%) patients were HBsAg and anti-HBc positive at baseline, respectively. Five (50%) of 10 HBsAg positive and one (1.6%) of 64 anti-HBc positive patients presented HBV virological reactivation (>1log increase in HBV-DNA levels). None of these patients presented clinical reactivation (increase in ALT levels).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV virological reactivation is frequent in HBsAg+ patients receiving anti-viral therapy against HCV. However, HBV-DNA elevations were modest (<20 000 IU/mL) and without clinical impact (no ALT elevation).

Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance for Antiviral Therapy Against HCV Infection in 2015

Overall prevalence of HCV infection in India has been estimated to be approximately 1.3% in the general population. Recent introduction of sofosbuvir in India at a relatively affordable price has led to great optimism about prospects of cure for these patients. This drug is likely to form the backbone of current and future treatment regimes for HCV infection, displacing pegylated interferon. Availability of directly acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) has necessitated revision of INASL guidelines for the treatment of HCV published in 2014, as has happened across the world. Current considerations for the treatment of HCV in India include the poorer response of genotype 3, nonavailability of many of the DAAs recommended by other guidelines and the cost of therapy. Since only one DAA, sofosbuvir, is available in India, only two sofosbuvir-based regimes are possible: either dual drug therapy in combination with ribavirin alone for 6 months or triple drug therapy in combination with ribavirin and pegylated interferon for 3 months. The utility of these regimes in various situations has been discussed. Availability of a few other newer DAAs, expected in 2016, is expected to lead to more widespread use of these agents. Current guidance will be updated once newer DAAs, newer evidence with DAAs and 'real-life experience' with use of DAAs accumulate in India.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation During Successful Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus With Sofosbuvir and Simeprevir

Treatment of hepatitis C virus with potent, interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral regimens with no activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) may increase the risk for HBV reactivation in coinfected patients. We present 2 cases of HBV reactivation during treatment with an all-oral regimen of simeprevir and sofosbuvir and discuss strategies to prevent HBV flare.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation after treatment for hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients with HBV/HCV coinfection

In coinfected HBV/HCV patients, HBV replication is usually suppressed by HCV over the time. No study to date has evaluated the HBV viremia in long-term follow-up after HCV treatment in hemodialysis patients with HBV/HCV coinfection. This study aimed to assess the evolution of HBV viremia after HCV treatment in this special population. Ten hemodialysis patients with HBV/HCV coinfection with dominant HCV infection (HBV lower than 2000 IU/mL) and significant fibrosis were treated with interferon-alpha 3 MU 3×/week for 12 months and could be followed for at least 36 months after HCV treatment. Six cases of HBV reactivation (60%) during follow-up were observed and 5/6 had been successfully treated for HCV. Patients with HBV reactivation received anti-HBV therapy. Our preliminary findings indicate that treatment of hepatitis C in HBV/HCV coinfected hemodialysis patients may favor HBV reactivation. Thus, continued monitoring of HBV viremia must be recommended and prompt anti-HBV therapy should be implemented.

Does hepatitis B virus coinfection have any impact on treatment outcome in hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis?

BACKGROUND

HBV/HCV coinfection is a common finding among hemodialysis patients. However, there is scarce information concerning the impact of HBV coinfection on the response to treatment of HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis.

AIM

We aimed to compare the rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment with interferon-alfa (IFN) between hemodialysis patients with HBV/HCV coinfection and those with HCV-monoinfection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis treated with IFN were included. Patients coinfected by HBV/HCV were compared to HCV-monoinfected patients, regarding clinical and biochemical features and rates of SVR.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven patients were treated. HBV/HCV coinfection was observed in 18/111 patients (16%). Coinfected patients were younger (p = 002), had more time on dialysis (p = 0.05) and showed a tendency to present a higher prevalence of septal fibrosis (p = 0.06). The analysis by intention to treat showed SVR of 56% among coinfected patients and 18% in HCV-monoinfected patients (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, end-stage renal disease patients with HBV/HCV coinfection exhibit higher rate of SVR to HCV treatment than HCV-monoinfected patients. It is possible that factors related to the host immune response and viral interaction could explain the better response observed among coinfected patients.

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus dual infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) share common mode of transmission and both are able to induce a chronic infection. Dual HBV/HCV chronic coinfection is a fairly frequent occurrence, especially in high endemic areas and among individuals at high risk of parenterally transmitted infections. The intracellular interplay between HBV and HCV has not yet been sufficiently clarified, also due to the lack of a proper in vitro cellular model. Longitudinal evaluation of serum HBV DNA and HCV RNA amounts has revealed that complex virological profiles may be present in coinfected patients. Dual HBV/HCV infection has been associated to a severe course of the liver disease and to a high risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite the clinical importance, solid evidence and clear guidelines for treatment of this special population are still lacking. This review summarizes the available data on the virological and clinical features as well as the therapeutic options of the dual HBV/HCV infection, and highlights the aspects that need to be better clarified.

Consensus Statement of HCV Task Force of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL). Part II: INASL Recommendations for Management of HCV in India

The estimated prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in India is between 0.5 and 1.5% with hotspots showing much higher prevalence in some areas of northeast India, in some tribal populations and in certain parts of Punjab. Genotype 3 is the most prevalent type of infection. Recent years have seen development of a large number of new molecules that are revolutionizing the treatment of hepatitis C. Some of the new directly acting agents (DAAs) like sofosbuvir have been called game-changers because they offer the prospect of interferon-free regimens for the treatment of HCV infection. These new drugs have not yet been approved in India and their cost and availability is uncertain at present. Till these drugs become available at an affordable cost, the treatment that was standard of care for the whole world before these newer drugs were approved should continue to be recommended. For India, cheaper options, which are as effective as the standard-of-care (SOC) in carefully selected patients, are also explored to bring treatment within reach of poorer patients. It may be prudent to withhold treatment at present for selected patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection and low levels of fibrosis (F1 or F2), and for patients who are non-responders to initial therapy, interferon intolerant, those with decompensated liver disease, and patients in special populations such as stable patients after liver and kidney transplantation, HIV co-infected patients and those with cirrhosis of liver.

Loss of HBsAg and antiviral treatment: from basics to clinical significance

Accurate prediction of the sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy against chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is still a crucial problem needing profound investigation. In recent years, quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), a reliable predictor of SVR and an ideal endpoint of treatment, has attracted increasing attention. Serum HBsAg titer may reflect the level of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in most patients, and vary with natural phases of chronic HBV infection, genotypes and variants, antiviral therapy, and other related factors. Serum HBsAg <200 IU/mL or yearly reduction ≥0.5 log10IU/mL may be the optimum cut-off values for prediction of the chance of spontaneous seroclearance of HBsAg. Serum HBsAg <1,000 IU/mL with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL may identify most of the inactive HBV carriers from active HBeAg(-) hepatitis. Interferon-based therapy can lead to more significant HBsAg decline than therapy based on nucleoside and/or nucleotide analogues. Different patterns or kinetics of HBsAg decline during therapy are related to different probabilities of SVR. A low HBsAg level, <3,000 IU/mL at baseline, or HBsAg level, <1,500 IU/mL at week 12, or a rapid on-treatment HBsAg decline of ≥0.5 log10IU/mL at week 12, may predict higher probability of SVR. However these cut-off values must be further validated for larger cohort of patients across genotypes worldwide. Incorporation of serum HBsAg level, HBeAg status, HBV DNA load, HBV genotypes, and other related factors might help establish new concept of more practical "response-guided treatment (RGT)" rules for antiviral therapy.