A randomized controlled trial investigation of a non-stimulant in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ACTION): rationale and design

A Signature of Attention-Elicited Electrocortical Activity Distinguishes Response From Non-Response to the Non-Stimulant Atomoxetine in Children and Adolescents With ADHD

OBJECTIVE

Atomoxetine has several characteristics that make it an attractive alternative to stimulants for treating ADHD, but there are currently no tests identifying individuals for whom the medication should be a first-line option.

METHOD

Within the ADHD Controlled Trial Investigation Of a Non-stimulant (ACTION) study, we examined neuro-cortical activity in 52 youth with ADHD. Baseline event-related potentials (ERP) were compared between those who subsequently responded to 6 weeks of atomoxetine versus those who did not.

RESULTS

Responders were distinguished by significantly lower auditory oddball N2 amplitudes than both non-responders and typically developing controls, particularly in the right frontocentral region ( p = .002, Cohen's d = 1.1). Leave-one-out cross validation determined that N2 amplitude in this region was able to accurately predict non-responders with a specificity of 80.8%. There were no P3 differences between responders and non-responders.

CONCLUSION

The N2 amplitude is a biomarker that may have utility in predicting response to atomoxetine for youth with ADHD.

Response inhibition and emotional cognition improved by atomoxetine in children and adolescents with ADHD: The ACTION randomized controlled trial

Although the non-stimulant medication atomoxetine is effective for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents, there are still significant gaps in our knowledge about whether atomoxetine improves anxiety symptoms or cognition in children. Furthermore, while cognition has been proposed as an intermediate phenotype for ADHD dysfunction, the relationships between clinical and cognitive outcomes are not yet understood. We addressed these knowledge gaps in a controlled trial using objective assessments of both general and emotional cognitive functions implicated in ADHD and in anxiety, which commonly co-occurs with ADHD. A total of 136 children and adolescents with ADHD (ages 6-17years; 80% male; 31.6% with a comorbid anxiety disorder) were enrolled in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial of 6-weeks treatment with atomoxetine. Of these, 109 completed the second cross-over phase. Selected cognitive domains associated with ADHD and anxiety disorders (Sustained attention, response inhibition and fearful face identification) were assessed using a normed, computerized test battery. Symptom outcomes were assessed by parent reports on the ADHD Rating Scale-IV and Conners' Anxious-Shy subscale. For completers, atomoxetine caused a greater improvement in the primary cognitive outcomes of response inhibition and fear identification compared to placebo, but not in sustained attention. Atomoxetine also improved ADHD and anxiety symptoms. Anxiety symptoms improved most for ADHD and anxiety disorder combined, but presence of an anxiety disorder did not moderate any other outcomes. Changes in cognitive and clinical outcomes were not correlated. These findings contribute to the foundations of measurement-based treatment planning and offer targets for probing the mechanisms of atomoxetine action.

Identification of biotypes in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, a report from a randomized, controlled trial

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a heterogeneous disorder. Current subtypes lack longitudinal stability or prognostic utility. We aimed to identify data-driven biotypes using multiple cognitive measures, then to validate these biotypes using EEG, ECG, and clinical response to atomoxetine as external validators. Study design was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial of atomoxetine including 116 subjects ages 6 through 17 with diagnosis of ADHD and 56 typically developing controls. Initial features for unsupervised machine learning included a cognitive battery with 20 measures affected in ADHD. External validators included baseline mechanistic validators (using electroencephalogram/EEG and electrocardiogram/ECG) and clinical response (ADHD Rating Scale and correlation with cognitive change). One biotype, labeled impulsive cognition, was characterized by increased errors of commission and shorter reaction time, had greater EEG slow wave (theta/delta) power and greater resting heart rate. The second biotype, labeled inattentive cognition, was characterized by longer/more variable reaction time and errors of omission, had lower EEG fast wave (beta) power, resting heart rate that did not differ from controls, and a strong correlation (r = -0.447, p < 0.001) between clinical response to atomoxetine and improvement in verbal memory immediate recall. ADHD comprises at least two biotypes that cut across current subtype criteria and that may reflect distinct arousal mechanisms. The findings provide evidence that further investigation of cognitive subtypes may be at least as fruitful as symptom checklist-based subtypes for development of biologically-based diagnostics and interventions for ADHD.