1
|
The Influence of Health Behavior Theory on Implementation Practice and Science: Brief Review and Commentary. PHARMACY 2022; 10:pharmacy10050115. [PMID: 36136848 PMCID: PMC9498588 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10050115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
As research defines new treatments and policies to improve the health of patients, an increasing challenge has been to translate these insights into routine clinical practice to benefit patients and society. An important exploration is how theories of human behavior change fit into the science of implementation and quality improvement. In this paper, we begin with a brief review of the intellectual roots of implementation science and quality improvement, followed by a discussion of how theories and principles of behavior change can inform both goals and challenges in using behavior change theories. The insights offered through health behavior change theory have led to changes in how we plan for implementation and select, develop, design and tailor implementation interventions and strategies. While the degree to which organizational and external contexts influence the behavior of providers in these organizations varies widely, some degree of context external to the individual is important and needs adequate consideration. In short, health behavior change theory is essential but not sufficient to integrate in most implementation efforts, where priority must be given to both individual factors and contexts in which individuals operate.
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah MK, Wyatt LC, Gibbs-Tewary C, Zanowiak J, Mammen S, Mohsin FM, Islam N. Protocol and baseline characteristics for a community health worker-led hypertension and diabetes management program for South Asians in Atlanta: The DREAM Atlanta study. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 120:106864. [PMID: 35940551 PMCID: PMC9708117 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND South Asians are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (DMII) and comorbid hypertension (HTN). Community health worker (CHW) interventions have been shown to improve chronic disease outcomes, yet few have been tailored for South Asians. This paper describes the study protocol and baseline characteristics of an evidence-based CHW intervention to improve blood pressure (BP) control among South Asian adults with diabetes and comorbid HTN in Atlanta, GA. METHODS A total of 195 South Asian adults were randomized to treatment and control groups, and of these 190 completed baseline surveys (97 treatment group and 93 control group). The treatment group receives five group education sessions on DMII and HTN management and two one-on-one goal setting sessions. MEASURES Primary outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, and BP control (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <130 and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <80). Secondary outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, diabetes self-efficacy, diet, and physical activity. BASELINE RESULTS Of the enrolled sample, 56% are female and mean age is 56.0 (±11.7). All participants are foreign-born. Mean SBP was 139.2 ± 4.3 and mean DBP was 84.7 ± 9.5. Intervention outcomes are measured at baseline and 6-month endpoint for both study groups. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this study is the first to document the efficacy of a HTN and DMII management intervention among South Asian adults in Atlanta, GA. Future findings of the submitted protocol will fill an important gap on the translation and adaption of evidence-based interventions that have relevance to immigrant and minority populations. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT04263311.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megha K Shah
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, USA.
| | - Laura C Wyatt
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Zanowiak
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, USA
| | - Shinu Mammen
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, USA
| | - Farhan M Mohsin
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, USA
| | - Nadia Islam
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Desse TA, Namara KM, Yifter H, Manias E. Development of a Complex Intervention for Effective Management of Type 2 Diabetes in a Developing Country. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1149. [PMID: 35268240 PMCID: PMC8911192 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been little focus on designing tailored diabetes management strategies in developing countries. The aim of this study is to develop a theory-driven, tailored and context-specific complex intervention for the effective management of type 2 diabetes at a tertiary care setting of a developing country. We conducted interviews and focus groups with patients, health professionals, and policymakers and undertook thematic analysis to identify gaps in diabetes management. The results of our previously completed systematic review informed data collection. We used the United Kingdom Medical Research Council framework to guide the development of the intervention. Results comprised 48 interviews, two focus groups with 11 participants and three co-design panels with 24 participants. We identified a lack of structured type 2 diabetes education, counselling, and collaborative care of type 2 diabetes. Through triangulation of the evidence obtained from data collection, we developed an intervention called VICKY (patient-centred collaborative care and structured diabetes education and counselling) for effective management of type 2 diabetes. VICKY comprised five components: (1) patient-centred collaborative care; (2) referral system for patients across transitions of care between different health professionals of the diabetes care team; (3) tools for the provision of collaborative care and documentation of care; (4) diabetes education and counselling by trained diabetes educators; and (5) contextualised diabetes education curriculum, educational materials, and documentation tools for diabetes education and counselling. Implementation of the intervention may help to promote evidence-based, patient-centred, and contextualised diabetes care for improved patient outcomes in a developing country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tigestu Alemu Desse
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia;
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia;
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Healthcare Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia
| | - Helen Yifter
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia;
| | - Elizabeth Manias
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shelley D, Cleland CM, Nguyen T, Van Devanter N, Siman N, Van M H, Nguyen NT. Effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy for implementing guidelines for treating tobacco use in Vietnam Commune Health Centers. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 24:196-203. [PMID: 34543422 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Strategies are needed to increase implementation of evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) in health care systems in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS We conducted a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of two strategies for implementing TDT guidelines in community health centers (n=26) in Vietnam. Arm 1 included training and a tool kit (e.g., reminder system) to promote and support delivery of the 4As (Ask about tobacco use, Advise to quit, Assess readiness, Assist with brief counseling) (Arm 1). Arm 2 included Arm 1 components plus a system to refer smokers to a community health worker (CHW) for more intensive counseling (4As+R). Provider surveys were conducted at baseline, six- and 12-months to assess the hypothesized effect of the strategies on provider and organizational-level factors. The primary outcome was provider adoption of the 4As. RESULTS Adoption of the 4As increased significantly across both study arms (all p<.001). Perceived organizational priority for TDT, compatibility with current workflow, and provider attitudes, norms and self-efficacy related to TDT also improved significantly across both arms. In Arm 2 sites, 41% of smokers were referred to a CHW for additional counseling. CONCLUSION The study demonstrated the effectiveness of a multicomponent and multilevel strategy (i.e., provider and system) for implementing evidence-based TDT in the Vietnam public health system. Combining provider-delivered brief counseling with opportunities for more in-depth counseling offered by a trained CHW may optimize outcomes and offers a potentially scalable model for increasing access to TDT in health care systems like Vietnam. IMPLICATIONS Improving implementation of evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment (TDT) guidelines is a necessary step towards reducing the growing burden of non-communicable disease (NCDs) and premature death in LMICs. The findings provide new evidence on the effectiveness of multilevel strategies for adapting and implementing TDT into routine care in Vietnam, and offers a potentially scalable model for meeting FCTC Article 14 goals in other LMICs with comparable public health systems. The study also demonstrates that combining provider-delivered brief counseling with referral to a community health worker for more in-depth counseling and support can optimize access to evidence-based treatment for tobacco use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Shelley
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY
| | - C M Cleland
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, NY
| | - T Nguyen
- Institute of Social and Medical Studies, My Dinh Ward, South Tu Liem District, Ha Noi, Vietnam
| | - N Van Devanter
- Rory Myers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY
| | - N Siman
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, NY
| | - Hoang Van M
- Minh Hoang Van, MD, Hanoi University of Public Health, Duc Thang Ward, North Tu Liem district, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - N T Nguyen
- Institute of Social and Medical Studies, My Dinh Ward, South Tu Liem District, Ha Noi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leon N, Namadingo H, Cooper S, Bobrow K, Mwantisi C, Nyasulu M, Sicwebu N, Crampin A, Levitt N, Farmer A. Process evaluation of a brief messaging intervention to improve diabetes treatment adherence in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1576. [PMID: 34418987 PMCID: PMC8379852 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11552-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The SMS text Adherence suppoRt for people with type 2 diabetes (StAR2D) intervention is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, testing the effectiveness of brief text messaging for improving clinical outcomes and medication adherence. The intervention did not impact glycaemic control. We conducted a pre-and post-trial process evaluation alongside the StAR2D study in Malawi and South Africa, exploring the experiences and perceptions of patient participants, to better understand potential underlying reasons for the trial outcomes. Methods We employed a qualitative research design, including conducting semi structured in-depth interviews and focus groups at both trial sites. Purposive sampling was used to ensure representation of a wide range of patients with type 2 diabetes with regards to age, gender, ethnicity, language, and duration of diabetes. We interviewed the same participants at baseline and at the end of the trial. We used within-case and across-case thematic analysis to identify key themes. Results Brief messages delivered by text were acceptable and useful for addressing informational and support needs for participants. Some participants reported behaviour changes because of the text reminders and advice on a healthy lifestyle. Both participating in the trial and the messages were experienced as a source of support, caring, and motivation. Participants’ ability to act on the messages was limited. A common theme was frustration over the lack of ability to effectively control one’s blood glucose level. They reported a range of routinised, partial diabetes care adherence behaviours, shaped by complex and interacting individual, social, and health service factors. Participant responses and intervention impact were similar across sites, despite differences in health services. Conclusion This process evaluation provided context and insight into the factors influencing participants’ engagement with the text messaging intervention. The complex context in which patients take their diabetes medication, may explain in part, why brief text messaging may have been insufficient to bring about changes in health outcomes. The scale of need for self-management and health service support, suggests that health system strengthening, and other forms of self-management support should accompany digital communication interventions. (Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70768808, registered 03/08/2015.) Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11552-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Leon
- South African Medical Research Council, Fransie van Zyl Drive, 7535, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa. .,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - H Namadingo
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - S Cooper
- South African Medical Research Council, Fransie van Zyl Drive, 7535, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - K Bobrow
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C Mwantisi
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - M Nyasulu
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - N Sicwebu
- Division of Social and Behavioural Science, School of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - A Crampin
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - N Levitt
- Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - A Farmer
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McIntyre SA, Francis JJ, Gould NJ, Lorencatto F. The use of theory in process evaluations conducted alongside randomized trials of implementation interventions: A systematic review. Transl Behav Med 2021; 10:168-178. [PMID: 30476259 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/iby110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Interventions to implement changes into health care practice (i.e., implementation interventions) are critical to improving care but their effects are poorly understood. Two strategies to better understand intervention effects are conducting process evaluations and using theoretical approaches (i.e., theories, models, frameworks). The extent to which theoretical approaches have been used in process evaluations conducted alongside trials of implementation interventions is unclear. In this study context, we reviewed (a) the proportion of process evaluations citing theoretical approaches, (b) which theoretical approaches were cited, and (c) whether and how theories were used. Systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42016042789). MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched up to July 31, 2017. For all studies, data extraction included names and types of theoretical approaches cited. For studies citing a theory, data extraction included study characteristics and extent of theory use (i.e., "informed by," "applied," "tested," "built/created" theory). We identified 123 process evaluations. Key findings: (a) 77 (63%) process evaluations cited a theoretical approach; (b) the most cited theory was normalization process theory; (c) 32 (26%) process evaluations used theory: 7 (22%) were informed by, 18 (56%) applied, 7 (22%) tested, and none built/created theory. Although nearly two thirds of process evaluations cited a theoretical approach, only a quarter were informed by, applied, or tested a theory-despite the potential complementarity of these strategies. When theory was used, it was primarily applied. Using theory more substantively in process evaluations may accelerate our understanding of how implementation interventions operate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A McIntyre
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jill J Francis
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Natalie J Gould
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Fabiana Lorencatto
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.,UCL Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morrow A, Tucker KM, Shaw TJ, Parkinson B, Abraham C, Wolfenden L, Taylor N. Understanding implementation success: protocol for an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial testing methods to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in Australian hospitals. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033552. [PMID: 32540886 PMCID: PMC7299044 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In multisite intervention trials, implementation success often varies widely across settings. Process evaluations are crucial to interpreting trial outcomes and understanding contextual factors and causal chains necessary for successful implementation. Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition conferring an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Despite systematic screening protocols to identify Lynch syndrome, the condition remains largely underdiagnosed. The Hide and Seek Project ('HaSP') is a cluster randomised controlled trial determining the effectiveness of two approaches to improving Lynch syndrome detection at eight Australian hospital networks. To enhance widespread implementation of optimal Lynch syndrome identification, there is a need to understand not only what works, but also why, in what contexts, and at what costs. Here we describe an in-depth investigation of factors influencing successful implementation of procedures evaluated in the HaSP trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed-methods, theory-driven process evaluation will be undertaken in parallel to the HaSP trial. Data will include: interviews of Implementation Leads and Lynch syndrome stakeholders, pre-post implementation questionnaires, audio analysis of meetings and focus groups, observation of multidisciplinary team meetings, fidelity checklists and project log analysis. Results will be triangulated and coded, drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Proctor's implementation outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Use of a theory-based process evaluation will enhance interpretation and generalisability of HaSP trial findings, and contribute to the implementation research field by furthering understanding of the conditions necessary for implementation success. Ethical approval has been granted and results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. At trial completion, key findings will be fed back to sites to enable refinement of intervention strategies, both in the context of Lynch syndrome and for the possible generalisability of intervention components in other genetic and broader clinical specialties. HASP TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Identifier: ACTRN12618001072202). Registered 27 June 2018. http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12618001072202.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Morrow
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim J Shaw
- Research in Implementation Science and eHealth (RISe), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bonny Parkinson
- The Macquarie University Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charles Abraham
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Woolloomooloo, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Lorito C, Bosco A, Pollock K, H. Harwood R, das Nair R, Logan P, Goldberg S, Booth V, Vedhara K, Godfrey M, Dunlop M, van der Wardt V. External Validation of the ' PHYT in Dementia', a Theoretical Model Promoting Physical Activity in People with Dementia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E1544. [PMID: 32121040 PMCID: PMC7084200 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Physical activity is beneficial for people with dementia. We previously developed a theoretical model to explain behaviour change in physical activity in dementia (PHYT-in-dementia). This study aimed to externally validate the model. Validation occurred through the process evaluation of a programme promoting activity in people with dementia (PrAISED 2). Twenty participants with dementia and their carers were interviewed to investigate their experience of the programme. The data were analysed through content analysis. The original constructs of the model were used as initial codes and new codes were generated, if elicited from the data. The constructs were also ranked, based on their frequency in the interviews. All of the original model constructs were validated and two novel constructs created: 'personal history' and 'information/knowledge'. Certain constructs (e.g., support) were more frequently mentioned than others (e.g., personal beliefs). We suggested modifications and integrated them into a revised model. The PHYT-in-dementia recognised that dementia has an impact on motivation to initiate and maintain behaviour change over time. The model advocates that interventions adopt a more holistic approach than traditional behaviour change strategies. The suggested revisions require further validation to accurately predict behaviour change in physical activity in people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Di Lorito
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (P.L.); (V.B.); (M.G.); (M.D.)
| | - Alessandro Bosco
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; (A.B.); (R.d.N.)
| | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (K.P.); (R.H.H.); (S.G.)
| | - Rowan H. Harwood
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (K.P.); (R.H.H.); (S.G.)
| | - Roshan das Nair
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK; (A.B.); (R.d.N.)
| | - Pip Logan
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (P.L.); (V.B.); (M.G.); (M.D.)
| | - Sarah Goldberg
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (K.P.); (R.H.H.); (S.G.)
| | - Vicky Booth
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (P.L.); (V.B.); (M.G.); (M.D.)
| | - Kavita Vedhara
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Room 1305 Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK;
| | - Maureen Godfrey
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (P.L.); (V.B.); (M.G.); (M.D.)
| | - Marianne Dunlop
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; (P.L.); (V.B.); (M.G.); (M.D.)
| | - Veronika van der Wardt
- Wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin, Zentrum für Methodenwissenschaften und Gesundheitsforschung Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Präventive und Rehabilitative Medizin, Philipps-Universität Marburg Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35032 Marburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Lorito C, Pollock K, Harwood R, das Nair R, Logan P, Goldberg S, Booth V, Vedhara K, Van Der Wardt V. A scoping review of behaviour change theories in adults without dementia to adapt and develop the 'PHYT in dementia', a model promoting physical activity in people with dementia. Maturitas 2019; 121:101-113. [PMID: 30686623 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research has established that exercise and physical activity can improve executive functioning, independence and quality of life in people with dementia. A dedicated theory explaining behaviour change in relation to physical activity in people with dementia does not exist. We aimed to develop a theoretical model which can be used to inform effective interventions to promote physical activity in people with dementia. METHODS There were five phases: 1. A search of the literature to identify theories which have been used to explain behaviour change in relation to physical activity in adult populations without a diagnosis of dementia; 2. Description of the theories (and sub-theories) and their main constructs; 3. Synthesis of the constructs; 4. Adaptation of the constructs to dementia; 5. Development and explanation of a model for physical activity in people with dementia (the 'PHYT in dementia'). RESULTS We identified nine theories used to explain behaviour change in relation to physical activity in adult populations without a diagnosis of dementia. Through our synthesis, we identified nine umbrella constructs. We integrated three more dementia-relevant constructs and developed the 'PHYT in dementia'. The model was explained by providing a practical example of its application. DISCUSSION Based on a scoping review of behaviour change theories in adults without dementia and following adaptation of the constructs from these theories to dementia, we derived a new theoretical model, the 'PHYT in dementia', which includes both individual-level and environment-level constructs. The model needs to be tested empirically, which our research team will do in the process evaluation of the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment (PrAISED 2) study. Results from field-testing will inform refinement of the model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Di Lorito
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
| | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Rowan Harwood
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Roshan das Nair
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham and Institute of Mental Health, Triumph Road, NG7 2TU Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Pip Logan
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Goldberg
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Vicky Booth
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - Kavita Vedhara
- Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Room 1305 Tower Building, University Park, NG7 2RD Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Veronika Van Der Wardt
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Malo TL, Hall ME, Brewer NT, Lathren CR, Gilkey MB. Why is announcement training more effective than conversation training for introducing HPV vaccination? A theory-based investigation. Implement Sci 2018; 13:57. [PMID: 29673374 PMCID: PMC5907716 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0743-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving healthcare providers' communication about HPV vaccination is critical to increasing uptake. We previously demonstrated that training providers to use presumptive announcements to introduce HPV vaccination improved uptake, whereas training them to use participatory conversations had no effect. To understand how communication training changed provider perceptions and communication practices, we evaluated intermediate outcomes and process measures from our randomized clinical trial, with a particular focus on identifying mechanisms that might explain the announcement training's impact. METHODS In 2015, a physician educator delivered 1-h in-clinic HPV vaccination recommendation trainings at 20 primary care clinics in North Carolina serving 11,578 patients age 11 or 12. Clinics were randomized to receive training to use "announcements" that presume parents are ready to vaccinate or "conversations" that invite dialog about vaccination. Training participants were 83 HPV vaccine providers. Pre- and post-training surveys assessed constructs from the theory of planned behavior (TPB), including providers' attitudes and subjective norms about HPV vaccination and their perceived behavioral control to recommend HPV vaccination. Surveys also assessed providers' perceptions of the announcement and conversation communication strategies. RESULTS Both trainings improved TPB-related constructs, including providers' positive attitudes toward HPV vaccination, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control to recommend the vaccine (all p < .001, Cohen's d = .62-.90). Furthermore, in both trainings, the amount of time providers reported needing to discuss HPV vaccination with parents decreased from pre-training to 1-month follow-up (mean = 3.8 vs. 3.2 min, p = .01, d = .28). However, announcement trainings outperformed conversation trainings on other measures. For example, providers who received announcement training more often reported that the communication strategy saved them time, was easy to use, helped them promote HPV vaccination as routine care, and increased HPV vaccination coverage in their clinics (all p < .05; d = .44-.60). CONCLUSIONS Both announcement and conversation trainings improved providers' HPV vaccine-related perceptions. However, providers viewed announcements as easier to use and more effective, which may help to explain the success of this training approach. Future provider communication interventions should consider implementation outcomes, including acceptability, alongside more traditional TPB constructs. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02377843 . Registered on February 27, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teri L Malo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, CB7293, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. .,Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Pubic Health, University of North Carolina, CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Megan E Hall
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, CB7355, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, CB7293, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.,Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Pubic Health, University of North Carolina, CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Christine R Lathren
- Program on Aging, Disability, and Long-Term Care, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, CB7590, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Melissa B Gilkey
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Pubic Health, University of North Carolina, CB7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Murphy ME, Byrne M, Zarabzadeh A, Corrigan D, Fahey T, Smith SM. Development of a complex intervention to promote appropriate prescribing and medication intensification in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in Irish general practice. Implement Sci 2017; 12:115. [PMID: 28915897 PMCID: PMC5602930 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0647-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be seen as failure to meet recommended targets for management of key risk factors including glycaemic control, blood pressure and lipids. Poor control of risk factors is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Failure to intensify medications for patients with poor control of T2DM when indicated is called clinical inertia and is one contributory factor to poor control of T2DM. We aimed to develop a theory and evidence-based complex intervention to improve appropriate prescribing and medication intensification in poorly controlled T2DM in Irish general practice. METHODS The first stage of the Medical Research Council Framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions was utilised. To identify current evidence, we performed a systematic review to examine the effectiveness of interventions targeting patients with poorly controlled T2DM in community settings. The Behaviour Change Wheel theoretical approach was used to identify suitable intervention functions. Workshops, simulation, collaborations with academic partners and observation of physicians were utilised to operationalise the intervention functions and design the elements of the complex intervention. RESULTS Our systematic review highlighted that professional-based interventions, potentially through clinical decision support systems, could address poorly controlled T2DM. Appropriate intensification of anti-glycaemic and cardiovascular medications, by general practitioners (GPs), for adults with poorly controlled T2DM was identified as the key behaviour to address clinical inertia. Psychological capability was the key driver of the behaviour, which needed to change, suggesting five key intervention functions (education, training, enablement, environmental restructuring and incentivisation) and nine key behaviour change techniques, which were operationalised into a complex intervention. The intervention has three components: (a) a training program/academic detailing of target GPs, (b) a remote finder tool to help GPs identify patients with poor control of T2DM in their practice and (c) A web-based clinical decision support system. CONCLUSIONS This paper describes a multifaceted process including an exploration of current evidence and a thorough theoretical understanding of the predictors of the behaviour resulting in the design of a complex intervention to promote the implementation of evidence-based guidelines, through appropriate prescribing and medication intensification in poorly controlled T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E. Murphy
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Molly Byrne
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Atieh Zarabzadeh
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Derek Corrigan
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tom Fahey
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan M. Smith
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Clinical Trials Network, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nguyen N, Nguyen T, Chapman J, Nguyen L, Kumar P, VanDevanter N, Shelley D. Tobacco cessation in Vietnam: Exploring the role of village health workers. Glob Public Health 2017; 13:1265-1275. [PMID: 28776481 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2017.1360376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore current tobacco use treatment (TUT) practice patterns, and attitudes and beliefs among Village Health Workers (VHWs) about expanding their role to include delivering smoking cessation interventions and the perceived barriers. We conducted a survey of 449 VHWs from 26 communes in Thai Nguyen province, Vietnam. We assessed TUT practice patterns including asking about tobacco use, advising smokers to quit, offering assistance (3As) and attitudes, self-efficacy, and norms related to TUT. Seventy two per cent of VHWs reported asking patients if they use tobacco, 78.6% offered advice to quit, and 41.4% offered cessation assistance to few or more patients in the past month. Self-efficacy was low, with 53.2% agreeing that they did not have the skills to counsel patients about smoking cessation. The most commonly reported barriers to offering TUT were a lack of training and perceived lack of patient interest. Greater awareness of their commune health centre's smoke-free policy and higher levels of self-efficacy were associated with screening and offering cessation assistance. VHWs support an expanded role in tobacco cessation, but require additional resources and training to increase their self-efficacy and skills to provide effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nam Nguyen
- a Institute of Social and Medical Studies , Ha Noi , Vietnam
| | - Trang Nguyen
- a Institute of Social and Medical Studies , Ha Noi , Vietnam
| | - Jessica Chapman
- a Institute of Social and Medical Studies , Ha Noi , Vietnam
| | - Linh Nguyen
- a Institute of Social and Medical Studies , Ha Noi , Vietnam
| | - Pritika Kumar
- b Department of Population Health , New York University School of Medicine , New York , NY , USA
| | - Nancy VanDevanter
- c New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing , New York , NY , USA
| | - Donna Shelley
- b Department of Population Health , New York University School of Medicine , New York , NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Presseau J, Grimshaw JM, Tetroe JM, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Godin G, Graham ID, Hux JE, Johnston M, Légaré F, Lemyre L, Robinson N, Zwarenstein M. A theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational messages to increase primary care physicians' prescription of thiazide diuretics for hypertension [ISRCTN72772651]. Implement Sci 2016; 11:121. [PMID: 27619339 PMCID: PMC5020459 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0485-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pragmatic trials of implementation interventions focus on evaluating whether an intervention changes professional behaviour under real-world conditions rather than investigating the mechanism through which change occurs. Theory-based process evaluations conducted alongside pragmatic randomised trials address this by assessing whether the intervention changes theoretical constructs proposed to mediate change. The Ontario Printed Educational Materials (PEM) cluster trial was designed to increase family physicians' guideline-recommended prescription of thiazide diuretics. The trial found no intervention effect. Using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), we hypothesised that changes in thiazide prescribing would be reflected in changes in intention, consistent with changes in attitude and subjective norm, with no change to their perceived behavioural control (PBC), and tested this alongside the RCT. METHODS We developed and sent TPB postal questionnaires to a random sub-sample of family physicians in each trial arm 2 months before and 6 months after dissemination of the PEMs. We used analysis of covariance to test for group differences using a 2 × 3 factorial design. We content-analysed an open-ended question about perceived barriers to thiazide prescription. Using control group data, we tested whether baseline measures of TPB constructs predicted self-reported thiazide prescribing at follow-up. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-six physicians completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. Baseline scores on measures of TPB constructs were high: intention mean = 5.9 out of 7 (SD = 1.4), attitude mean = 5.8 (SD = 1.1), subjective norm mean = 5.8 (SD = 1.1) and PBC mean = 6.2 (SD = 1.0). The arms did not significantly differ post-intervention on any of the theory-based constructs, suggesting a possible ceiling effect. Content analysis of perceived barriers suggested post-intentional barriers to prescribing thiazides most often focused on specific patient clinical characteristics and potential side effects. Baseline intention (β = 0.63, p < 0.01) but not PBC (β = 0.04, p = 0.78) predicted 42.6 % of the variance in self-reported behaviour at follow-up in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Congruent with the Ontario Printed Educational Messages trial results and aligned with the TPB, we saw no impact of the intervention on any TPB constructs. The theoretical basis of this evaluation suggests possible explanations for the failure of the PEM intervention to change professional behaviour, which can directly inform the design and content of future theory-based PEM interventions to change professional behaviour. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, Canada ISRCTN72772651.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Presseau
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Jeremy M. Grimshaw
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5 Canada
| | | | - Martin P. Eccles
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX England
| | - Jill J. Francis
- School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0HB UK
| | - Gaston Godin
- Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 Avenue de la Medicine, Room 1445, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Ian D. Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5 Canada
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5 Canada
| | - Janet E. Hux
- Canadian Diabetes Association, 522 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2 Canada
| | - Marie Johnston
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, 2nd floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD UK
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec G1K 7P4 Canada
| | - Louise Lemyre
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, 120 University, Social Sciences Building FSS-5052, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5 Canada
| | - Nicole Robinson
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada
| | - Merrick Zwarenstein
- Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1465 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 3K7 Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Steinmetz H, Knappstein M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P, Kabst R. How Effective are Behavior Change Interventions Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior? ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2016. [DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 228] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Abstract. The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is a prominent framework for predicting and explaining behavior in a variety of domains. The theory is also increasingly being used as a framework for conducting behavior change interventions. In this meta-analysis, we identified 82 papers reporting results of 123 interventions in a variety of disciplines. Our analysis confirmed the effectiveness of TPB-based interventions, with a mean effect size of .50 for changes in behavior and effect sizes ranging from .14 to .68 for changes in antecedent variables (behavioral, normative, and control beliefs, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intention). Further analyses revealed that the interventions’ effectiveness varied for the diverse behavior change methods. In addition, interventions conducted in public and with groups were more successful than interventions in private locations or focusing on individuals. Finally, we identified gender and education as well as behavioral domain as moderators of the interventions’ effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger Steinmetz
- Department of International Business Studies, University of Paderborn, Germany
| | - Michael Knappstein
- Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, Wuppertal University, Germany
| | - Icek Ajzen
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Peter Schmidt
- Faculty of Social Science, University of Giessen, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Kabst
- Department of Management, University of Paderborn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mann C, Shaw A, Guthrie B, Wye L, Man MS, Hollinghurst S, Brookes S, Bower P, Mercer S, Salisbury C. Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: the 3D study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011260. [PMID: 27147391 PMCID: PMC4861104 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As an increasing number of people are living with more than 1 long-term condition, identifying effective interventions for the management of multimorbidity in primary care has become a matter of urgency. Interventions are challenging to evaluate due to intervention complexity and the need for adaptability to different contexts. A process evaluation can provide extra information necessary for interpreting trial results and making decisions about whether the intervention is likely to be successful in a wider context. The 3D (dimensions of health, drugs and depression) study will recruit 32 UK general practices to a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of a patient-centred intervention. Practices will be randomised to intervention or usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The aim of the process evaluation is to understand how and why the intervention was effective or ineffective and the effect of context. As part of the intervention, quantitative data will be collected to provide implementation feedback to all intervention practices and will contribute to evaluation of implementation fidelity, alongside case study data. Data will be collected at the beginning and end of the trial to characterise each practice and how it provides care to patients with multimorbidity. Mixed methods will be used to collect qualitative data from 4 case study practices, purposively sampled from among intervention practices. Qualitative data will be analysed using techniques of constant comparison to develop codes integrated within a flexible framework of themes. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated to describe case study sites and develop possible explanations for implementation variation. Analysis will take place prior to knowing trial outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Study approved by South West (Frenchay) National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee (14/SW/0011). Findings will be disseminated via a final report, peer-reviewed publications and practical guidance to healthcare professionals, commissioners and policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN06180958.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Mann
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Shaw
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Division of Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Lesley Wye
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Mei-See Man
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Sara Brookes
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stewart Mercer
- Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Russo DA, Stochl J, Painter M, Shelley GF, Jones PB, Perez J. Use of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to assess factors influencing the identification of students at clinical high-risk for psychosis in 16+ Education. BMC Health Serv Res 2015; 15:411. [PMID: 26399522 PMCID: PMC4581078 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1074-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The longer psychotic disorders are untreated the worse their prognosis. Increasing the awareness of early psychosis by professionals who come into regular contact with young people is one strategy that could reduce treatment delay. As teachers engage with students on a daily basis, their role could be exploited to increase awareness of the early signs of psychosis. This study employed the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to identify and measure factors that influence identification of students at high-risk (HR) of developing psychosis in 16+ educational institutions. METHODS An elicitation phase revealed beliefs underlying teachers' motivations to detect HR students and informed the construction of a preliminary 114-item questionnaire incorporating all constructs outlined in the TPB. To define the determinants of teachers' intention to identify HR students, 75 teachers from secondary and further education institutions in 12 counties surrounding Cambridgeshire completed the questionnaire. A psychometric model of item response theory was used to identify redundant items and produce a reduced questionnaire that would be acceptable to teachers. RESULTS The final instrument comprised 73 items and showed acceptable reliability (α = 0.69-0.81) for all direct measures. Teacher's confidence and control over identification of HR students was low. Although identification of HR students was considered worthwhile, teachers believed that their peers, students and particularly their managers might not approve. Path analysis revealed that direct measures of attitude and PBC significantly predicted intention, but subjective norm did not. PBC was the strongest predictor of intention. Collectively, the direct measures explained 37 % of the variance of intention to identify HR for psychosis. CONCLUSIONS This research demonstrated how the TPB can be used to identify and measure factors that influence identification of students at HR of developing psychosis in 16+ educational institutions and confirmed the feasibility, reliability and acceptability of a TPB-based questionnaire for teachers. Consideration of the key determinants of identification in schools will facilitate the design of successful educational intervention strategies with the potential to reduce treatment delays for HR students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra A Russo
- CAMEO Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Block 7, Ida Darwin Site, Fulbourn Hospital, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EE, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jan Stochl
- CAMEO Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Block 7, Ida Darwin Site, Fulbourn Hospital, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EE, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Michelle Painter
- CAMEO Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Block 7, Ida Darwin Site, Fulbourn Hospital, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EE, UK.
| | - Gillian F Shelley
- CAMEO Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Block 7, Ida Darwin Site, Fulbourn Hospital, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EE, UK.
| | - Peter B Jones
- CAMEO Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Block 7, Ida Darwin Site, Fulbourn Hospital, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EE, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jesus Perez
- CAMEO Early Intervention in Psychosis Service, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Block 7, Ida Darwin Site, Fulbourn Hospital, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EE, UK. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Impact of the organisational culture on primary care staff members’ intention to engage in research and development. J Health Organ Manag 2015; 29:234-51. [DOI: 10.1108/jhom-03-2013-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to understand how organisational culture influences the intentions of primary care staff members (PCSM) to engage in research and development (R&D).
Design/methodology/approach
– The participants (n=30) were PCSM employed in a care centre in south-western Sweden. The study had an observational design with an ethnographic approach. The data were collected by means of observations, interviews and analysis of documents.
Findings
– The results revealed the perceptions of PCSM in two domains, research and clinical practice, both of which existed at three different cultural levels: visible (structures and policy), semi-visible (norms and values) and invisible (taken-for-granted attitudes).
Research limitations/implications
– It is difficult to conduct a purely objective ethnographic study because the investigation is controlled by its context. However, it is necessary to highlight and discuss the invisible level to improve understanding of negative attitudes and preconceptions related to the implementation of R&D in the clinical setting.
Practical implications
– By highlighting the invisible level of culture, the management of an organisation has the opportunity to initiate discussion of issues related to concealed norms and values as well as attitudes towards new thinking and change in the primary health context.
Originality/value
– This paper is one of the very few studies to investigate the influence of organisational culture on the intentions of PCSM to engage in R&D.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bussières AE, Al Zoubi F, Quon JA, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Stuber K, Sajko S, French S. Fast tracking the design of theory-based KT interventions through a consensus process. Implement Sci 2015; 10:18. [PMID: 25880218 PMCID: PMC4330935 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0213-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 01/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite available evidence for optimal management of spinal pain, poor adherence to guidelines and wide variations in healthcare services persist. One of the objectives of the Canadian Chiropractic Guideline Initiative is to develop and evaluate targeted theory- and evidence-informed interventions to improve the management of non-specific neck pain by chiropractors. In order to systematically develop a knowledge translation (KT) intervention underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), we explored the factors perceived to influence the use of multimodal care to manage non-specific neck pain, and mapped behaviour change techniques to key theoretical domains. METHODS Individual telephone interviews exploring beliefs about managing neck pain were conducted with a purposive sample of 13 chiropractors. The interview guide was based upon the TDF. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by two independent assessors using thematic content analysis. A 15-member expert panel formally met to design a KT intervention. RESULTS Nine TDF domains were identified as likely relevant. Key beliefs (and relevant domains of the TDF) included the following: influence of formal training, colleagues and patients on clinicians (Social Influences); availability of educational material (Environmental Context and Resources); and better clinical outcomes reinforcing the use of multimodal care (Reinforcement). Facilitating factors considered important included better communication (Skills); audits of patients' treatment-related outcomes (Behavioural Regulation); awareness and agreement with guidelines (Knowledge); and tailoring of multimodal care (Memory, Attention and Decision Processes). Clinicians conveyed conflicting beliefs about perceived threats to professional autonomy (Social/Professional Role and Identity) and speed of recovery from either applying or ignoring the practice recommendations (Beliefs about Consequences). The expert panel mapped behaviour change techniques to key theoretical domains and identified relevant KT strategies and modes of delivery to increase the use of multimodal care among chiropractors. CONCLUSIONS A multifaceted KT educational intervention targeting chiropractors' management of neck pain was developed. The KT intervention consisted of an online education webinar series, clinical vignettes and a video underpinned by the Brief Action Planning model. The intervention was designed to reflect key theoretical domains, behaviour change techniques and intervention components. The effectiveness of the proposed intervention remains to be tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André E Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, H3G 1Y5, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Département chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
- Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation (CRIR), Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Fadi Al Zoubi
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, H3G 1Y5, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Jeffrey A Quon
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Spine Program, Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Sara Ahmed
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, H3G 1Y5, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation (CRIR), Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 3630 Promenade Sir-William-Osler, H3G 1Y5, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation (CRIR), Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Kent Stuber
- Division of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Simon French
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Scott SD, Rotter T, Hartling L, Chambers T, Bannar-Martin KH. A protocol for a systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research. Syst Rev 2014; 3:149. [PMID: 25534345 PMCID: PMC4307977 DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Accepted: 12/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experimental designs for evaluating knowledge translation (KT) interventions for professional behavior change can provide strong estimates of intervention effectiveness but offer limited insight how the intervention worked or not. Furthermore, trials provide little insight into the ways through which interventions lead to behavior change and how they are moderated by different facilitators and barriers. As a result, the ability to generalize the findings from one study to a different context, organization, or clinical problem is severely compromised. Consequently, researchers have started to explore the causal mechanisms in complementary studies (process evaluations) alongside experimental designs for evaluating KT interventions. This study focuses on improving process evaluations by synthesizing current evidence on process evaluations conducted alongside experimental designs for evaluating KT interventions. METHODS/DESIGN A medical research librarian will develop and implement search strategies designed to identify evidence that is relevant to process evaluations in health research. Studies will not be excluded based on design. Included studies must contain a process evaluation component aimed at understanding or evaluating a KT intervention targeting professional behavior change. Two reviewers will perform study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction using standard forms. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or third party adjudication. Data to be collected include study design, details about data collection approaches and types, theoretical influences, approaches to evaluate intervention dose delivered, intervention dose received, intervention fidelity, intervention reach, data analysis, and study outcomes. This study is not registered with PROSPERO. DISCUSSION There is widespread acceptance that the generalizability of quantitative trials of KT interventions would be significantly enhanced to other contexts, health professional groups, and clinical conditions through complementary process evaluations alongside trials. This systematic review will serve as a 'state of the science' on methodological approaches to process evaluations and will allow us to: 1) take stock of current research approaches and 2) develop concrete recommendations for knowledge users (e.g., quality consultants and health services researchers) designing future KT process evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon D Scott
- Faculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kramer L, Hirsch O, Becker A, Donner-Banzhoff N. Development and validation of a generic questionnaire for the implementation of complex medical interventions. GERMAN MEDICAL SCIENCE : GMS E-JOURNAL 2014; 12:Doc08. [PMID: 24696674 PMCID: PMC3972438 DOI: 10.3205/000193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2013] [Revised: 03/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The implementation of complex medical interventions in daily practice is often fraught with difficulties. According to the iterative phase model proposed by the British Medical Research Council (MRC), the development, implementation and evaluation of complex interventions should be theory-driven. A conceptual model that seems to be a promising framework is the Theory of planned behaviour (TPB). In our study we aimed to develop and validate a generic and multifaceted questionnaire based on the TPB to detect physicians’ willingness to implement complex medical interventions and the factors influencing this willingness. Methods: The questionnaire was developed according to the literature and was informed by previous qualitative research of our department. It was validated on the example of an electronic library of decision aids, arriba-lib. The sample consisted of 181 General Practitioners (GPs) who received a training regarding arriba-lib and subsequently filled in the questionnaire, assessing the TPB variables attitude, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control and intention. Follow-up assessments were conducted after two (assessing retest reliability) and eight weeks (assessing target behaviour). We performed a confirmatory factor analysis investigating the factorial structure of our questionnaire according to the TPB. Beside the calculation of the questionnaire’s psychometric properties we conducted a structural equation model and an ordinal regression to predict actual behaviour regarding the installation and application of arriba-lib. Results: The postulated three factorial model (attitude, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control) of our questionnaire based on the TPB was rejected. A two factorial model with a combined factor subjective norm/perceived behaviour control was accepted. The explained variance in the ordinal regression was low (Nagelkerke’s R2=.12). Neither attitude nor intention were able to predict the use or non-use of arriba-lib (attitude: p=.68, intention: p=.44). For the combined factor subjective norm/perceived behaviour control a significant, but small effect (p=.03) was shown. Conclusions: The TPB is not an adequate theoretical framework to guide the development of a generic questionnaire in the context of the implementation of complex interventions. To enable the successful implementation of complex medical interventions evaluators have to go through the whole development and evaluation process according to the MRC-model, without short cuts. Further, it has to be discussed if a generic instrument can be valid and useful. Regarding the TPB a publication bias regarding the theory’s applicability might have to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Kramer
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Hirsch
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany
| | - Annette Becker
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ostroff JS, Li Y, Shelley DR. Dentists United to Extinguish Tobacco (DUET): a study protocol for a cluster randomized, controlled trial for enhancing implementation of clinical practice guidelines for treating tobacco dependence in dental care settings. Implement Sci 2014; 9:25. [PMID: 24559178 PMCID: PMC3936874 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 02/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although dental care settings provide an exceptional opportunity to reach smokers and provide brief cessation advice and treatment to reduce oral and other tobacco-related health conditions, dental care providers demonstrate limited adherence to evidence-based guidelines for treatment of tobacco use and dependence. METHODS/DESIGN Guided by a multi-level, conceptual framework that emphasizes changes in provider beliefs and organizational characteristics as drivers of improvement in tobacco treatment delivery, the current protocol will use a cluster, randomized design and multiple data sources (patient exit interviews, provider surveys, site observations, chart audits, and semi-structured provider interviews) to study the process of implementing clinical practice guidelines for treating tobacco dependence in 18 public dental care clinics in New York City. The specific aims of this comparative-effectiveness research trial are to: compare the effectiveness of three promising strategies for implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines-staff training and current best practices (CBP), CBP + provider performance feedback (PF), and CBP + PF + provider reimbursement for delivery of tobacco cessation treatment (pay-for-performance, or P4P); examine potential theory-driven mechanisms hypothesized to explain the comparative effectiveness of three strategies for implementation; and identify baseline organizational factors that influence the implementation of evidence-based tobacco use treatment practices in dental clinics. The primary outcome is change in providers' tobacco treatment practices and the secondary outcomes are cost per quit, use of tobacco cessation treatments, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence. DISCUSSION We hypothesize that the value of these promising implementation strategies is additive and that incorporating all three strategies (CBP, PF, and P4P) will be superior to CBP alone and CBP + PF in improving delivery of cessation assistance to smokers. The findings will improve knowledge pertinent to the implementation, dissemination, and sustained utilization of evidence-based tobacco use treatment in dental practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01615237.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie S Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10022, USA
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10022, USA
| | - Donna R Shelley
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, 7th floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shelley D, Tseng TY, Pham H, Nguyen L, Keithly S, Stillman F, Nguyen N. Factors influencing tobacco use treatment patterns among Vietnamese health care providers working in community health centers. BMC Public Health 2014; 14:68. [PMID: 24450865 PMCID: PMC3902028 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Almost half of adult men in Viet Nam are current smokers, a smoking prevalence that is the second highest among South East Asian countries (SEAC). Although Viet Nam has a strong public health delivery system, according to the 2010 Global Adult Tobacco Survey, services to treat tobacco dependence are not readily available to smokers. The purpose of this study was to characterize current tobacco use treatment patterns among Vietnamese health care providers and factors influencing adherence to guideline recommended tobacco use screening and cessation interventions. Methods A cross sectional survey of 134 health care providers including physicians, nurses, midwives, physician assistants and pharmacists working in 23 community health centers in Viet Nam. Results 23% of providers reported screening patients for tobacco use, 33% offered advice to quit and less than 10% offered assistance to half or more of their patients in the past three months. Older age, attitudes, self-efficacy and normative beliefs were associated with screening for tobacco use. Normative beliefs were associated with offering advice to quit. However in the logistic regression analysis only normative beliefs remained significant for both screening and offering advice to quit. Over 90% of providers reported having never received training related to tobacco use treatment. Major barriers to treating tobacco use included lack of training, lack of referral resources and staff to support counseling, and lack of patient interest. Conclusions Despite ratifying the FCTC, Viet Nam has not made progress in implementing policies and systems to ensure that smokers are receiving evidence-based treatment. This study suggests a need to change organizational norms through changes in national policies, training and local system-level changes that facilitate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Shelley
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ 2013; 92:20-8. [PMID: 24391297 DOI: 10.2471/blt.12.116806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Revised: 07/23/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and implement a method for the evaluation of "evidence briefs" and "deliberative dialogues" that could be applied to comparative studies of similar strategies used in the support of evidence-informed policy-making. METHODS Participants who read evidence briefs and attended deliberative dialogues in Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia were surveyed before the start of the dialogues - to collect their views on pre-circulated evidence briefs - and at the end of the dialogues - to collect their views on the dialogues. The respondents' assessments of the briefs and dialogues and the respondents' intentions to act on what they had learned were then investigated in descriptive statistical analyses and regression models. FINDINGS Of the 530 individuals who read the evidence briefs and attended dialogues, 304 (57%) and 303 (57%) completed questionnaires about the briefs and dialogues, respectively. Respondents viewed the evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues - as well as each of their key features - very favourably, regardless of the country, issue or group involved. Overall, "not concluding with recommendations" and "not aiming for a consensus" were identified as the least helpful features of the briefs and dialogues, respectively. Respondents generally reported strong intentions to act on what they had learnt. CONCLUSION Although some aspects of their design may need to be improved or, at least, explained and justified to policy-makers and stakeholders, evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues appear to be highly regarded and to lead to intentions to act.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaelan A Moat
- Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - John N Lavis
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada
| | - Sarah J Clancy
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tomas Pantoja
- Departamento Medicina Familiar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Curran JA, Brehaut J, Patey AM, Osmond M, Stiell I, Grimshaw JM. Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation. Implement Sci 2013; 8:25. [PMID: 23433082 PMCID: PMC3585785 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2012] [Accepted: 01/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Canadian CT Head Rule was prospectively derived and validated to assist clinicians with diagnostic decision-making regarding the use of computed tomography (CT) in adult patients with minor head injury. A recent intervention trial failed to demonstrate a decrease in the rate of head CTs following implementation of the rule in Canadian emergency departments. Yet, the same intervention, which included a one-hour educational session and reminders at the point of requisition, was successful in reducing cervical spine imaging rates in the same emergency departments. The reason for the varied effect of the intervention across these two behaviours is unclear. There is an increasing appreciation for the use of theory to conduct process evaluations to better understand how strategies are linked with outcomes in implementation trials. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) has been used to explore health professional behaviour and to design behaviour change interventions but, to date, has not been used to guide a theory-based process evaluation. In this proof of concept study, we explored whether the TDF could be used to guide a retrospective process evaluation to better understand emergency physicians' responses to the interventions employed in the Canadian CT Head Rule trial. METHODS A semi-structured interview guide, based on the 12 domains from the TDF, was used to conduct telephone interviews with project leads and physician participants from the intervention sites in the Canadian CT Head Rule trial. Two reviewers independently coded the anonymised interview transcripts using the TDF as a coding framework. Relevant domains were identified by: the presence of conflicting beliefs within a domain; the frequency of beliefs; and the likely strength of the impact of a belief on the behaviour. RESULTS Eight physicians from four of the intervention sites in the Canadian CT Head Rule trial participated in the interviews. Barriers likely to assist with understanding physicians' responses to the intervention in the trial were identified in six of the theoretical domains: beliefs about consequences; beliefs about capabilities; behavioural regulation; memory, attention and decision processes; environmental context and resources; and social influences. Despite knowledge that the Canadian CT Head Rule was highly sensitive and reliable for identifying clinically important brain injuries and strong beliefs about the benefits for using the rule, a number of barriers were identified that may have prevented physicians from consistently applying the rule. CONCLUSION This proof of concept study demonstrates the use of the TDF as a guiding framework to design a retrospective theory-based process evaluation. There is a need for further development and testing of methods for using the TDF to guide theory-based process evaluations running alongside behaviour change intervention trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Curran
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Civic Campus, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, Foy R, Guthrie B. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials 2013; 14:15. [PMID: 23311722 PMCID: PMC3600672 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 316] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2012] [Accepted: 12/18/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Process evaluations are recommended to open the 'black box' of complex interventions evaluated in trials, but there is limited guidance to help researchers design process evaluations. Much current literature on process evaluations of complex interventions focuses on qualitative methods, with less attention paid to quantitative methods. This discrepancy led us to develop our own framework for designing process evaluations of cluster-randomised controlled trials. METHODS We reviewed recent theoretical and methodological literature and selected published process evaluations; these publications identified a need for structure to help design process evaluations. We drew upon this literature to develop a framework through iterative exchanges, and tested this against published evaluations. RESULTS The developed framework presents a range of candidate approaches to understanding trial delivery, intervention implementation and the responses of targeted participants. We believe this framework will be useful to others designing process evaluations of complex intervention trials. We also propose key information that process evaluations could report to facilitate their identification and enhance their usefulness. CONCLUSION There is no single best way to design and carry out a process evaluation. Researchers will be faced with choices about what questions to focus on and which methods to use. The most appropriate design depends on the purpose of the process evaluation; the framework aims to help researchers make explicit their choices of research questions and methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01425502.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Grant
- Quality, Safety and Informatics Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, DD2 4BF, Dundee, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Quality, Safety and Informatics Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, DD2 4BF, Dundee, UK
| | - Tobias Dreischulte
- Medicines Management Unit, NHS Tayside, c/o University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, DD2 4BF, Dundee, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, LS2 9LJ, Leeds, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Quality, Safety and Informatics Research Group, Population Health Sciences, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, DD2 4BF, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Grant A, Dreischulte T, Treweek S, Guthrie B. Study protocol of a mixed-methods evaluation of a cluster randomized trial to improve the safety of NSAID and antiplatelet prescribing: data-driven quality improvement in primary care. Trials 2012; 13:154. [PMID: 22929598 PMCID: PMC3502604 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2012] [Accepted: 07/26/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials of complex interventions are criticized for being 'black box', so the UK Medical Research Council recommends carrying out a process evaluation to explain the trial findings. We believe it is good practice to pre-specify and publish process evaluation protocols to set standards and minimize bias. Unlike protocols for trials, little guidance or standards exist for the reporting of process evaluations. This paper presents the mixed-method process evaluation protocol of a cluster randomized trial, drawing on a framework designed by the authors. METHODS/DESIGN This mixed-method evaluation is based on four research questions and maps data collection to a logic model of how the data-driven quality improvement in primary care (DQIP) intervention is expected to work. Data collection will be predominately by qualitative case studies in eight to ten of the trial practices, focus groups with patients affected by the intervention and quantitative analysis of routine practice data, trial outcome and questionnaire data and data from the DQIP intervention. DISCUSSION We believe that pre-specifying the intentions of a process evaluation can help to minimize bias arising from potentially misleading post-hoc analysis. We recognize it is also important to retain flexibility to examine the unexpected and the unintended. From that perspective, a mixed-methods evaluation allows the combination of exploratory and flexible qualitative work, and more pre-specified quantitative analysis, with each method contributing to the design, implementation and interpretation of the other.As well as strengthening the study the authors hope to stimulate discussion among their academic colleagues about publishing protocols for evaluations of randomized trials of complex interventions. DATA-DRIVEN QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN PRIMARY CARE TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01425502.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Grant
- Quality, Safety and Informatics Research Group, Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, Dundee DD2 4BF, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Russo DA, Stochl J, Croudace TJ, Graffy JP, Youens J, Jones PB, Perez J. Use of the theory of planned behaviour to assess factors influencing the identification of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis in primary care. Early Interv Psychiatry 2012; 6:265-75. [PMID: 21910850 DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00296.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM To design and assess the psychometric properties of a questionnaire to identify and measure factors that influence the identification of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis in primary care. It will inform the subsequent design of educational interventions to help general practitioners (GPs; primary care physicians) detect these individuals. METHODS The questionnaire was developed using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). A semistructured discussion group elicited beliefs underlying GPs' motivations to detect these individuals and informed the construction of a preliminary 106-item questionnaire incorporating all constructs outlined in the TPB. A pilot phase followed, involving 79 GPs from 38 practices across 12 counties in England, to define the determinants of intention to identify these individuals. A psychometric model of item response theory was used to identify which items could be removed. RESULTS The final instrument comprised 73 items and showed acceptable reliability (α = 0.77-0.87) for all direct measures. Path analysis models revealed that all the TPB measures significantly predicted intention. Subjective norm, reflecting perceived professional influence, was the strongest predictor of intention. Collectively, the direct measures explained 35% of the variance of intention to identify individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, indicating a good fit with the TPB model. CONCLUSION The TPB can be used to identify and measure factors that influence identification of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra A Russo
- Cameo Early Intervention Services, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Utilisation of strategic communication to create willingness to change work practices among primary care staff: a long-term follow-up study. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2012; 13:130-41. [PMID: 22433269 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423611000624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the long-term utilisation of strategic communication as a factor of importance when changing work practices among primary care staff. BACKGROUND In many health care organisations, there is a gap between theory and practice. This gap hinders the provision of optimal evidence-based practice and, in the long term, is unfavourable for patient care. One way of overcoming this barrier is systematically structured communication between the scientific theoretical platform and clinical practice. METHODS This longitudinal evaluative study was conducted among a primary care staff cohort. Strategic communication was considered to be the intervention platform and included a network of ambassadors who acted as a component of the implementation. Measurements occurred 7 and 12 years after formation of the cohort. A questionnaire was used to obtain information from participants. In total, 846 employees (70%) agreed to take part in the study. After 12 years, the 352 individuals (60%) who had remained in the organisation were identified and followed up. Descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis were used to analyse the data. FINDINGS Continuous information contributed to significant improvements over time with respect to new ideas and the intention to change work practices. There was a statistically significant synergistic effect on the new way of thinking, that is, willingness to change work practices. During the final two years, the network of ambassadors had created a distinctive image for itself in the sense that primary care staff members were aware of it and its activities. This awareness was associated with a positive change with regard to new ways of thinking. More years of practice was inversely associated with willingness to change work practices. Strategic communication may lead to a scientific platform that promotes high-quality patient care by means of new methods and research findings.
Collapse
|
29
|
Morténius H, Marklund B, Palm L, Björkelund C, Baigi A. Implementation of innovative attitudes and behaviour in primary health care by means of strategic communication: a 7-year follow-up. J Eval Clin Pract 2012; 18:659-65. [PMID: 21410843 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01653.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To bridge the gap between theory and practice, methods are needed that promote a positive attitude to change among health care professionals and facilitate the incorporation of new research findings. In this context, communication plays a significant role. The aim of this study was to analyse primary care staff members' readiness to adopt new ways of thinking and willingness to change their work practices by means of strategic communication. METHOD An evaluative design was used to study a primary care staff cohort for 7 years. The study population comprised all primary care staff in a region of Sweden (n = 1206). The strategic communication encompassed managerial impact, planning and implementation of reflexive communication processes, in addition to activities in three established communication channels (oral, written and digital). A questionnaire was used, and bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 846 individuals participated in the evaluation (70%). Strategic communication had a significant effect on staff members' new way of thinking (61%) and willingness to change daily work practices (33%). The communication channels had a significant synergy effect on the adoption of new ideas and willingness to change attitudes. Oral and digital communication had a significant impact on staff members' readiness to change. CONCLUSIONS Strategic communication plays an important role in the process of creating innovative attitudes and behaviour among primary care professionals. The willingness to change attitudes enhances primary care staff's readiness to change everyday practices, thus facilitating the implementation of evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Morténius
- Department of Research and Development, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schellart AJM, Steenbeek R, Mulders HPG, Anema JR, Kroneman H, Besseling JJM. Can self-reported disability assessment behaviour of insurance physicians be explained? Applying the ASE model. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:576. [PMID: 21771326 PMCID: PMC3155499 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2010] [Accepted: 07/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Very little is known about the attitudes and views that might underlie and explain the variation in occupational disability assessment behaviour between insurance physicians. In an earlier study we presented an adjusted ASE model (Attitude, Social norm, Self-efficacy) to identify the determinants of the disability assessment behaviour among insurance physicians. The research question of this study is how Attitude, Social norm, Self-efficacy and Intention shape the behaviour that insurance physicians themselves report with regard to the process (Behaviour: process) and content of the assessment (Behaviour: assessment) while taking account of Knowledge and Barriers. Methods This study was based on 231 questionnaires filled in by insurance physicians, resulting into 48 scales and dimension scores. The number of variables was reduced by a separate estimation of each of the theoretical ASE constructs as a latent variable in a measurement model. The saved factor scores of these latent variables were treated as observed variables when we estimated a path model with Lisrel to confirm the ASE model. We estimated latent ASE constructs for most of the assigned scales and dimensions. All could be described and interpreted. We used these constructs to build a path model that showed a good fit. Results Contrary to our initial expectations, we did not find direct effects for Attitude on Intention and for Intention on self reported assessment behaviour in the model. This may well have been due to the operationalization of the concept of 'Intention'. We did, however, find that Attitude had a positive direct effect on Behaviour: process and Behaviour: Assessment and that Intention had a negative direct effect on Behaviour: process. Conclusion A path model pointed to the existence of relationships between Attitude on the one hand and self-reported behaviour by insurance physicians with regard to process and content of occupational disability assessments on the other hand. In addition, Intention was only related to the self reported behaviour with regard to the process of occupational disability assessments. These findings provide some evidence of the relevance of the ASE model in this setting. Further research is needed to determine whether the ASE variables measured for insurance physicians are related to the real practice outcomes of occupational disability assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonius J M Schellart
- VU University Medical Center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Presseau J, Francis JJ, Campbell NC, Sniehotta FF. Goal conflict, goal facilitation, and health professionals' provision of physical activity advice in primary care: an exploratory prospective study. Implement Sci 2011; 6:73. [PMID: 21762486 PMCID: PMC3224555 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2011] [Accepted: 07/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The theory of planned behaviour has well-evidenced utility in predicting health professional behaviour, but focuses on a single behaviour isolated from the numerous potentially conflicting and facilitating goal-directed behaviours performed alongside. Goal conflict and goal facilitation may influence whether health professionals engage in guideline-recommended behaviours, and may supplement the predictive power of the theory of planned behaviour. We hypothesised that goal facilitation and goal conflict contribute to predicting primary care health professionals' provision of physical activity advice to patients with hypertension, over and above predictors of behaviour from the theory of planned behaviour. Methods Using a prospective predictive design, at baseline we invited a random sample of 606 primary care health professionals from all primary care practices in NHS Grampian and NHS Tayside (Scotland) to complete postal questionnaires. Goal facilitation and goal conflict were measured alongside theory of planned behaviour constructs at baseline. At follow-up six months later, participants self-reported the number of patients, out of those seen in the preceding two weeks, to whom they provided physical activity advice. Results Forty-four primary care physicians and nurses completed measures at both time points (7.3% response rate). Goal facilitation and goal conflict improved the prediction of behaviour, accounting for substantial additional variance (5.8% and 8.4%, respectively) in behaviour over and above intention and perceived behavioural control. Conclusions Health professionals' provision of physical activity advice in primary care can be predicted by perceptions about how their conflicting and facilitating goal-directed behaviours help and hinder giving advice, over and above theory of planned behaviour constructs. Incorporating features of multiple goal pursuit into the theory of planned behaviour may help to better understand health professional behaviour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Presseau
- Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Dobbins M, Souza NM. Reliability of a tool for measuring theory of planned behaviour constructs for use in evaluating research use in policymaking. Health Res Policy Syst 2011; 9:29. [PMID: 21702956 PMCID: PMC3141789 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2010] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although measures of knowledge translation and exchange (KTE) effectiveness based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) have been used among patients and providers, no measure has been developed for use among health system policymakers and stakeholders. A tool that measures the intention to use research evidence in policymaking could assist researchers in evaluating the effectiveness of KTE strategies that aim to support evidence-informed health system decision-making. Therefore, we developed a 15-item tool to measure four TPB constructs (intention, attitude, subjective norm and perceived control) and assessed its face validity through key informant interviews. Methods We carried out a reliability study to assess the tool's internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Our study sample consisted of 62 policymakers and stakeholders that participated in deliberative dialogues. We assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and generalizability (G) coefficients, and we assessed test-retest reliability by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and G coefficients for each construct and the tool overall. Results The internal consistency of items within each construct was good with alpha ranging from 0.68 to alpha = 0.89. G-coefficients were lower for a single administration (G = 0.34 to G = 0.73) than for the average of two administrations (G = 0.79 to G = 0.89). Test-retest reliability coefficients for the constructs ranged from r = 0.26 to r = 0.77 and from G = 0.31 to G = 0.62 for a single administration, and from G = 0.47 to G = 0.86 for the average of two administrations. Test-retest reliability of the tool using G theory was moderate (G = 0.5) when we generalized across a single observation, but became strong (G = 0.9) when we averaged across both administrations. Conclusion This study provides preliminary evidence for the reliability of a tool that can be used to measure TPB constructs in relation to research use in policymaking. Our findings suggest that the tool should be administered on more than one occasion when the intervention promotes an initial 'spike' in enthusiasm for using research evidence (as it seemed to do in this case with deliberative dialogues). The findings from this study will be used to modify the tool and inform further psychometric testing following different KTE interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Boyko
- Health Research Methodology Program, McMaster University, 1280 Main St, West, CRL-209, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis JJ, Stamp E, Johnston M, Hawthorne G, Steen N, Grimshaw JM, Elovainio M, Presseau J, Hunter M. Instrument development, data collection, and characteristics of practices, staff, and measures in the Improving Quality of Care in Diabetes (iQuaD) Study. Implement Sci 2011; 6:61. [PMID: 21658211 PMCID: PMC3130687 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2011] [Accepted: 06/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Type 2 diabetes is an increasingly prevalent chronic illness and an important cause of avoidable mortality. Patients are managed by the integrated activities of clinical and non-clinical members of primary care teams. This study aimed to: investigate theoretically-based organisational, team, and individual factors determining the multiple behaviours needed to manage diabetes; and identify multilevel determinants of different diabetes management behaviours and potential interventions to improve them. This paper describes the instrument development, study recruitment, characteristics of the study participating practices and their constituent healthcare professionals and administrative staff and reports descriptive analyses of the data collected. Methods The study was a predictive study over a 12-month period. Practices (N = 99) were recruited from within the UK Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework. We identified six behaviours chosen to cover a range of clinical activities (prescribing, non-prescribing), reflect decisions that were not necessarily straightforward (controlling blood pressure that was above target despite other drug treatment), and reflect recommended best practice as described by national guidelines. Practice attributes and a wide range of individually reported measures were assessed at baseline; measures of clinical outcome were collected over the ensuing 12 months, and a number of proxy measures of behaviour were collected at baseline and at 12 months. Data were collected by telephone interview, postal questionnaire (organisational and clinical) to practice staff, postal questionnaire to patients, and by computer data extraction query. Results All 99 practices completed a telephone interview and responded to baseline questionnaires. The organisational questionnaire was completed by 931/1236 (75.3%) administrative staff, 423/529 (80.0%) primary care doctors, and 255/314 (81.2%) nurses. Clinical questionnaires were completed by 326/361 (90.3%) primary care doctors and 163/186 (87.6%) nurses. At a practice level, we achieved response rates of 100% from clinicians in 40 practices and > 80% from clinicians in 67 practices. All measures had satisfactory internal consistency (alpha coefficient range from 0.61 to 0.97; Pearson correlation coefficient (two item measures) 0.32 to 0.81); scores were generally consistent with good practice. Measures of behaviour showed relatively high rates of performance of the six behaviours, but with considerable variability within and across the behaviours and measures. Discussion We have assembled an unparalleled data set from clinicians reporting on their cognitions in relation to the performance of six clinical behaviours involved in the management of people with one chronic disease (diabetes mellitus), using a range of organisational and individual level measures as well as information on the structure of the practice teams and across a large number of UK primary care practices. We would welcome approaches from other researchers to collaborate on the analysis of this data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Eccles
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Lacasse A, Burgers J, Grol R. Target for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol). Implement Sci 2011; 6:45. [PMID: 21554691 PMCID: PMC3118228 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2011] [Accepted: 05/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public priorities for improvement often differ from those of clinicians and managers. Public involvement has been proposed as a way to bridge the gap between professional and public clinical care priorities but has not been studied in the context of quality-indicator choice. Our objective is to assess the feasibility and impact of public involvement on quality-indicator choice and agreement with public priorities. METHODS We will conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing quality-indicator prioritisation with and without public involvement. In preparation for the trial, we developed a 'menu' of quality indicators, based on a systematic review of existing validated indicator sets. Participants (public representatives, clinicians, and managers) will be recruited from six participating sites. In intervention sites, public representatives will be involved through direct participation (public representatives, clinicians, and managers will deliberate together to agree on quality-indicator choice and use) and consultation (individual public recommendations for improvement will be collected and presented to decision makers). In control sites, only clinicians and managers will take part in the prioritisation process. Data on quality-indicator choice and intended use will be collected. Our primary outcome will compare quality-indicator choice and agreement with public priorities between intervention and control groups. A process evaluation based on direct observation, videorecording, and participants' assessment will be conducted to help explain the study's results. The marginal cost of public involvement will also be assessed. DISCUSSION We identified 801 quality indicators that met our inclusion criteria. An expert panel agreed on a final set of 37 items containing validated quality indicators relevant for chronic disease prevention and management in primary care. We pilot tested our public-involvement intervention with 27 participants (11 public representatives and 16 clinicians and managers) and our study instruments with an additional 21 participants, which demonstrated the feasibility of the intervention and generated important insights and adaptations to engage public representatives more effectively. To our knowledge, this study is the first trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation, and its results could foster more effective upstream engagement of patients and the public in clinical practice improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR2496 (Netherlands National Trial Register, http://www.trialregister.nl).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Boivin
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
| | - Pascale Lehoux
- Department of Health Administration, Institute of Public Health Research of University of Montreal (IRSPUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Réal Lacombe
- Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
| | - Anaïs Lacasse
- Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
| | - Jako Burgers
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Grol
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Measuring beliefs about gluten free diet adherence in adult coeliac disease using the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 2011; 56:476-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2010] [Revised: 01/18/2011] [Accepted: 01/19/2011] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
36
|
Ramsay CR, Thomas RE, Croal BL, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies: A case study from UK primary care. Implement Sci 2010; 5:71. [PMID: 20920277 PMCID: PMC2959079 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2008] [Accepted: 09/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies for professional behaviour change can provide robust estimates of effectiveness, but offer little insight into the causal mechanisms by which any change is produced. To illustrate the applicability of causal methods within randomised trials, we undertook a theory-based process evaluation study within an implementation trial to explore whether the cognitions of primary care doctors' predicted their test requesting behaviours and, secondly, whether the trial results were mediated by the theoretical constructs. Methods The process evaluation comprised a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of a random 50% sample of the randomised groups of primary care practices in Grampian (NHS Grampian), UK, who took part in a trial of the effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminders on test requesting behaviour. The process evaluation was based upon the Theory of Planned Behaviour and focussed on three of the test requesting behaviours that were targeted in the trial -- ferritin, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and Helicobacter Pylori serology (HPS). Results The questionnaire was completed by 131 primary care doctors (56%) from 42 (98%) of the sampled practices. Behavioural intention, attitude, and subjective norm were highly correlated for all the tests. There was no evidence that perceived behavioural control was correlated with any of the other measures. Simple linear regression analysis of the rate of test requests on minimum behavioural intentions had R2 of 11.1%, 12.5%, and 0.1% for ferritin, FSH, and HPS requesting, respectively. Mediational analysis showed that the trial results for ferritin and FSH were partially mediated (between 23% and 78% mediation) through intentions. The HPS trial result was not mediated through intention. Conclusions This study demonstrated that a theory-based process evaluation can provide useful information on causal mechanisms that aid not only interpretation of the trial but also inform future evaluations and intervention development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig R Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Newton AS, Zou B, Hamm MP, Curran J, Gupta S, Dumonceaux C, Lewis M. Improving child protection in the emergency department: a systematic review of professional interventions for health care providers. Acad Emerg Med 2010; 17:117-25. [PMID: 20370740 DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00640.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of professional and organizational interventions aimed at improving medical processes, such as documentation or clinical assessments by health care providers, in the care of pediatric emergency department (ED) patients where abuse was suspected. METHODS A search of electronic databases, references, key journals, and conference proceedings was conducted and primary authors were contacted. Studies whose purpose was to evaluate a strategy aimed at improving ED clinical care of suspected abuse were included. Study methodologic quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. One reviewer extracted the data, and a second checked for completeness and accuracy. RESULTS Six studies met the inclusion criteria: one randomized controlled trial (RCT), one quasi-RCT, and four observational studies. Study quality ranged from modest (observational studies) to good (trials). Variation in study interventions and outcomes limited between-study comparisons. The quasi-RCT supported self-instructional education kits as a means to improve physician knowledge for both physical abuse (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] pretest score = 13.12 +/- 2.36; mean +/- SD posttest score = 18.16 +/- 1.64) and sexual abuse (mean +/- SD pretest score = 10.81 +/- 3.20; mean +/- SD posttest score = 18.45 +/- 1.79). Modest-quality observational studies evaluated reminder systems for physician documentation with similar results across studies. Compared to standard practice, chart checklists paired with an educational program increased physician consideration of nonaccidental burns in burn cases (59% increase), documentation of time of injury (36% increase), and documentation of consistency (53% increase) and compatibility (55% increase) of reported histories. Decisional flow charts for suspected physical abuse also increased documentation of nonaccidental physical injury (69.5% increase; p < 0.0001) and had a similar significant effect as checklists on increasing documentation of history consistency and compatibility (69.5 and 70.0% increases, respectively; p < 0.0001) when compared to standard practice. No improvements were noted in these studies for documentation of consultations or current status with child protective services. The introduction of a specialized team and crisis center to standardize practice had little effect on physician documentation, but did increase documentation of child protective services involvement (22.7% increase; p < 0.005) and discharge status (23.7% increase; p < 0.02). Referral to social services increased in one study following the introduction of a chart checklist (8.6% increase; p = 0.018). A recently conducted multisite RCT did not support observational findings, reporting no significant effect of educational sessions and/or a chart checklist on ED practices. CONCLUSIONS The small number of studies identified in this review highlights the need for future quality studies that address care of a vulnerable clinical population. While moderate-quality observational studies suggest that education and reminder systems increase clinical knowledge and documentation, these findings are not supported by a multisite randomized trial. The limited theoretical base for conceptualizing change in health care providers and the influence of the ED environment on clinical practice are limitations to this current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda S Newton
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Price DW, Miller EK, Rahm AK, Brace NE, Larson RS. Assessment of barriers to changing practice as CME outcomes. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2010; 30:237-245. [PMID: 21171029 DOI: 10.1002/chp.20088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Continuing medical education (CME) is meant to drive and support improvements in practice. To achieve this goal, CME activities must move beyond simply purveying knowledge, instead helping attendees to contextualize information and to develop strategies for implementing new learning. CME attendees face different barriers to implementing learning, depending on both personal and practice specific contexts. We sought to develop a framework, applicable across multiple CME activities, for categorizing barriers that learners anticipated encountering after CME activities. METHODS Building on previous work, qualitative research methods were used to develop an enhanced framework classifying attendee-perceived barriers to implementing CME learnings in practice. Three thousand one hundred thirty (3130) narrative responses on attendee-perceived barriers to implementing learnings were collected from 75 Kaiser Permanente Colorado live CME activities for family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and OB/GYN clinicians in 2008 and 2009. RESULTS Our CME Learning Transfer Barrier Framework contains 27 discrete barriers in 12 barrier categories (including "none"). The barrier framework was applicable across two years of live CME activities for different clinician target audiences. DISCUSSION Assessing, characterizing, and summarizing barriers to implementing learning during CME activities can provide valuable information to inform subsequent CME interventions, and provide feedback to organizational leaders to inform performance improvement efforts. The framework may be applicable to other CME formats and to CME activities for audiences in different practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Price
- Colorado Permanente Medical Group, Denver, Colorado, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Francis JJ, Tinmouth A, Stanworth SJ, Grimshaw JM, Johnston M, Hyde C, Stockton C, Brehaut JC, Fergusson D, Eccles MP. Using theories of behaviour to understand transfusion prescribing in three clinical contexts in two countries: development work for an implementation trial. Implement Sci 2009; 4:70. [PMID: 19852832 PMCID: PMC2777847 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-70] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2009] [Accepted: 10/24/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood transfusion is an essential part of healthcare and can improve patient outcomes. However, like most therapies, it is also associated with significant clinical risks. In addition, there is some evidence of overuse. Understanding the potential barriers and enablers to reduced prescribing of blood products will facilitate the selection of intervention components likely to be effective, thereby reducing the number of costly trials evaluating different implementation strategies. Using a theoretical basis to understand behaviours targeted for change will contribute to a 'basic science' relating to determinants of professional behaviour and how these inform the selection of techniques for changing behaviour. However, it is not clear which theories of behaviour are relevant to clinicians' transfusing behaviour. The aim of this study is to use a theoretical domains framework to identify relevant theories, and to use these theories to identify factors that predict the decision to transfuse. METHODS The study involves two steps: interview study and questionnaire study. Using a previously identified framework, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with clinicians to elicit their views about which factors are associated with waiting and further monitoring the patient rather than transfusing red blood cells. Interviews will cover the following theoretical domains: knowledge; skills; social/professional role and identity; beliefs about capabilities; beliefs about consequences; motivation and goals; memory, attention, and decision processes; environmental context and resources; social influences; emotion; behavioural regulation; nature of the behaviour. The interviews will take place independently in Canada and the UK and involve two groups of physicians in each country (UK: adult and neonatal intensive care physicians; Canada: intensive care physicians and orthopaedic surgeons). We will: analyse interview transcript content to select relevant theoretical domains; use consensus processes to map these domains on to theories of behaviour; develop questionnaires based on these theories; and mail them to each group of physicians in the two countries. From our previous work, it is likely that the theories will include: theory of planned behaviour, social cognitive theory and the evidence-based strategy, implementation intention. The questionnaire data will measure predictor variables (theoretical constructs) and outcome variables (intention and clinical decision), and will be analysed using multiple regression analysis. We aim to achieve 150 respondents in each of the four groups for each postal survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill J Francis
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alan Tinmouth
- Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
- Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Simon J Stanworth
- NHS Blood & Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Chris Hyde
- NHS Blood & Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - Charlotte Stockton
- Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Jamie C Brehaut
- Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dean Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Programme, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hrisos S, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, Bosch M, Dijkstra R, Johnston M, Grol R, Kaner EFS, Steen IN. Using psychological theory to understand the clinical management of type 2 diabetes in Primary Care: a comparison across two European countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9:140. [PMID: 19656372 PMCID: PMC2729744 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2008] [Accepted: 08/05/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long term management of patients with Type 2 diabetes is well established within Primary Care. However, despite extensive efforts to implement high quality care both service provision and patient health outcomes remain sub-optimal. Several recent studies suggest that psychological theories about individuals' behaviour can provide a valuable framework for understanding generalisable factors underlying health professionals' clinical behaviour. In the context of the team management of chronic disease such as diabetes, however, the application of such models is less well established. The aim of this study was to identify motivational factors underlying health professional teams' clinical management of diabetes using a psychological model of human behaviour. METHODS A predictive questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) investigated health professionals' (HPs') cognitions (e.g., beliefs, attitudes and intentions) about the provision of two aspects of care for patients with diabetes: prescribing statins and inspecting feet.General practitioners and practice nurses in England and the Netherlands completed parallel questionnaires, cross-validated for equivalence in English and Dutch. Behavioural data were practice-level patient-reported rates of foot examination and use of statin medication. Relationships between the cognitive antecedents of behaviour proposed by the TPB and healthcare teams' clinical behaviour were explored using multiple regression. RESULTS In both countries, attitude and subjective norm were important predictors of health professionals' intention to inspect feet (Attitude: beta = .40; Subjective Norm: beta = .28; Adjusted R2 = .34, p < 0.01), and their intention to prescribe statins (Attitude: beta = .44; Adjusted R2 = .40, p < 0.01). Individuals' self-reported intention did not predict practice-level performance of either clinical behaviour. CONCLUSION Using the TPB, we identified modifiable factors underlying health professionals' intentions to perform two clinical behaviours, providing a rationale for the development of targeted interventions. However, we did not observe a relationship between health professionals' intentions and our proxy measure of team behaviour. Significant methodological issues were highlighted concerning the use of models of individual behaviour to explain behaviours performed by teams. In order to investigate clinical behaviours performed by teams it may be necessary to develop measures that reflect the collective cognitions of the members of the team to facilitate the application of these theoretical models to team behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Hrisos
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Martin P Eccles
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jill J Francis
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Marije Bosch
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Dijkstra
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie Johnston
- Department of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Richard Grol
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eileen FS Kaner
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian N Steen
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|