Co-evolution of strain design methods based on flux balance and elementary mode analysis.
Metab Eng Commun 2015;
2:85-92. [PMID:
34150512 PMCID:
PMC8193246 DOI:
10.1016/j.meteno.2015.04.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
More than a decade ago, the first genome-scale metabolic models for two of the most relevant microbes for biotechnology applications, Escherichia coli and Saccaromyces cerevisiae, were published. Shortly after followed the publication of OptKnock, the first strain design method using bilevel optimization to couple cellular growth with the production of a target product. This initiated the development of a family of strain design methods based on the concept of flux balance analysis. Another family of strain design methods, based on the concept of elementary mode analysis, has also been growing. Although the computation of elementary modes is hindered by computational complexity, recent breakthroughs have allowed applying elementary mode analysis at the genome scale. Here we review and compare strain design methods and look back at the last 10 years of in silico strain design with constraint-based models. We highlight some features of the different approaches and discuss the utilization of these methods in successful in vivo metabolic engineering applications.
Computational strain design methods are divided into two main families.
We trace the evolutionary history of these two families.
Surveyed successful cases of model-guided strain design for industrial applications.
Most proposed methods have not yet been tested in real applications.
Agreement between in silico and in vivo results shows potential of tested methods.
Collapse