Heartburn or angina? Differentiating gastrointestinal disease in primary care patients presenting with chest pain: a cross sectional diagnostic study

Association between symptom characteristics and disease severity in patients suspected of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Discrepancies often exist between patient-reported symptoms and diagnostic test findings in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the association between patient-reported symptoms and the diagnosis of severe stenosis in patients with suspected obstructive CAD.

METHODS

Two large-scale cohorts of patients with new-onset symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD were evaluated. Chest discomfort was assessed by typicality, location, type, exertional/stress factors, and relief with rest/nitroglycerine. Patients underwent non-invasive diagnostic testing (coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) or functional testing), followed by test-result-driven invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Severe stenosis was defined as ≥70 ​% diameter stenosis on ICA. Sensitivity analyses included CCTA stenosis, functional abnormalities, and revascularization.

RESULTS

Of 14,410 patients, 2093 (14.5 ​%) were referred for ICA, and 765 (5.3 ​%) were diagnosed with severe stenosis. Patients with typical angina (n ​= ​224) had higher odds of being diagnosed with severe stenosis on ICA (OR and 95 ​% CIs: 2.84 [2.40-3.34]) than those with atypical or non-anginal symptoms. In patients diagnosed with severe stenosis on ICA, those with exertional/stress factors (n ​= ​418; OR [95 ​% CI]: 2.50 [2.16-2.90]) and relief with rest/nitroglycerine (n ​= ​318, 2.28; [1.96-2.65]) had higher odds compared to those without. Patients reporting pressure or burning pain had higher odds of severe stenosis. Associations were consistent across sex and age groups, and sensitivity references.

CONCLUSIONS

Exertional/stress-related chest discomfort and relief with rest/nitroglycerine increased the odds of severe stenosis in patients with suspected CAD undergoing test-result-driven ICA, while location and type of chest pain were less associated, with no differences across sex or age groups.

User initiated symptom assessment with an electronic symptom checker. Study protocol for mixed-methods validation. (Preprint)

BACKGROUND

The national Omaolo digital social welfare and health care service of Finland provides a symptom checker, Omaolo, which is a medical device (based on Duodecim Clinical Decision Support EBMEDS software) with a CE marking (risk class IIa), manufactured by the government-owned DigiFinland Oy. Users of this service can perform their triage by using the questions in the symptom checker. By completing the symptom checker, the user receives a recommendation for action and a service assessment with appropriate guidance regarding their health problems on the basis of a selected specific symptom in the symptom checker. This allows users to be provided with appropriate health care services, regardless of time and place.

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the protocol for the mixed methods validation process of the symptom checker available in Omaolo digital services.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods study using quantitative and qualitative methods, which will be part of the clinical validation process that takes place in primary health care centers in Finland. Each organization provides a space where the study and the nurse triage can be done in order to include an unscreened target population of users. The primary health care units provide walk-in model services, where no prior phone call or contact is required. For the validation of the Omaolo symptom checker, case vignettes will be incorporated to supplement the triage accuracy of rare and acute cases that cannot be tested extensively in real-life settings. Vignettes are produced from a variety of clinical sources, and they test the symptom checker in different triage levels by using 1 standardized patient case example.

RESULTS

This study plan underwent an ethics review by the regional permission, which was requested from each organization participating in the research, and an ethics committee statement was requested and granted from Pirkanmaa hospital district's ethics committee, which is in accordance with the University of Tampere's regulations. Of 964 clinical user-filled symptom checker assessments, 877 cases were fully completed with a triage result, and therefore, they met the requirements for clinical validation studies. The goal for sufficient data has been reached for most of the chief symptoms. Data collection was completed in September 2019, and the first feasibility and patient experience results were published by the end of 2020. Case vignettes have been identified and are to be completed before further testing the symptom checker. The analysis and reporting are estimated to be finalized in 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary goals of this multimethod electronic symptom checker study are to assess safety and to provide crucial information regarding the accuracy and usability of the Omaolo electronic symptom checker. To our knowledge, this will be the first study to include real-life clinical cases along with case vignettes.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/41423.

Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Persistent Reflux Symptoms Despite Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment

Despite the exceptional efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in healing reflux esophagitis complicating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), up to 40% of patients who take PPIs for GERD complain of persistent GERD symptoms. There is no clear consensus on the type, dosing, and duration of PPI therapy required to establish a diagnosis of PPI-refractory GERD symptoms, but most authorities do not consider patients "PPI-refractory" unless they have been on double-dose PPIs. This article discusses the mechanisms that might underlie heartburn that does not respond PPIs and an approach to the management of patients with PPI-refractory GERD symptoms.

Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Heartburn

This report discusses the potential mechanisms that might underlie refractory GERD and functional heartburn, and how to distinguish among those mechanisms using a systematic evaluation that includes careful medical history, endoscopy with esophageal biopsy, esophageal manometry, and esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. The report provides an approach to patient management that depends on the underlying mechanism identified by this systematic evaluation.

Troponin Testing in the Emergency Department: Real world experience

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine patterns of troponin testing in the emergency department of a large tertiary care hospital in Oman and to determine its effect on patient management, including length of hospital stay (LOS).

Methods

This retrospective study analysed the medical records of all adult patients undergoing troponin testing in the emergency department of the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman, during the month of July 2015. Patients who presented with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction were excluded.

Results

A total of 4,845 patients attended the emergency department during the study period; of these, troponin tests were ordered for 588 patients. The majority of the patients had negative troponin test results (81.3%). Chest pain, palpitations and breathlessness were the most common presenting complaints for those with positive troponin results. However, 41.8% of patients did not have any cardiac symptoms. Individuals with positive troponin tests had a significantly longer LOS compared to those with negative tests (mean: three versus one day; P = 0.001). In total, only 28.2% of those with positive troponin test results had final diagnoses associated with a cardiac condition, such as heart failure, an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), atrial fibrillation or other types of arrhythmia.

Conclusion

A positive troponin test was associated with increased LOS; however, only a small proportion of these patients had a final diagnosis associated with a cardiac condition. Guidelines should be provided to ensure that troponin testing is performed only in cases where an ACS is suspected.

Non-cardiac chest pain: a clinical assessment tool

A simple clinical approach to patients presenting with chest pain is outlined, which is easily taught and can be quickly applied. This approach was demonstrated in a large cohort of patients and this article discusses the characteristics of the various diagnostic sub-groups.

Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for chest wall syndrome in primary care

Background

Chest wall syndrome (CWS), the main cause of chest pain in primary care practice, is most often an exclusion diagnosis. We developed and evaluated a clinical prediction rule for CWS.

Methods

Data from a multicenter clinical cohort of consecutive primary care patients with chest pain were used (59 general practitioners, 672 patients). A final diagnosis was determined after 12 months of follow-up. We used the literature and bivariate analyses to identify candidate predictors, and multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a clinical prediction rule for CWS. We used data from a German cohort (n = 1212) for external validation.

Results

From bivariate analyses, we identified six variables characterizing CWS: thoracic pain (neither retrosternal nor oppressive), stabbing, well localized pain, no history of coronary heart disease, absence of general practitioner’s concern, and pain reproducible by palpation. This last variable accounted for 2 points in the clinical prediction rule, the others for 1 point each; the total score ranged from 0 to 7 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83) in the derivation cohort (specificity: 89%; sensitivity: 45%; cut-off set at 6 points). Among all patients presenting CWS (n = 284), 71% (n = 201) had a pain reproducible by palpation and 45% (n = 127) were correctly diagnosed. For a subset (n = 43) of these correctly classified CWS patients, 65 additional investigations (30 electrocardiograms, 16 thoracic radiographies, 10 laboratory tests, eight specialist referrals, one thoracic computed tomography) had been performed to achieve diagnosis. False positives (n = 41) included three patients with stable angina (1.8% of all positives). External validation revealed the ROC curve to be 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.79) with a sensitivity of 22% and a specificity of 93%.

Conclusions

This CWS score offers a useful complement to the usual CWS exclusion diagnosing process. Indeed, for the 127 patients presenting CWS and correctly classified by our clinical prediction rule, 65 additional tests and exams could have been avoided. However, the reproduction of chest pain by palpation, the most important characteristic to diagnose CWS, is not pathognomonic.

Involvement of the atrial natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular pathophysiology and its relationship with exercise

In this minireview we describe the involvement of the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in cardiovascular pathophysiology and exercise. The ANP has a broad homeostatic role and exerts complex effects on the cardio-circulatory hemodynamics, it is produced by the left atrium and has a key role in regulating sodium and water balance in mammals and humans. The dominant stimulus for its release is atrial wall tension, commonly caused by exercise. The ANP is involved in the process of lipolysis through a cGMP signaling pathway and, as a consequence, reducing blood pressure by decreasing the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle to the action of vasoconstrictors and regulate fluid balance. The increase of this hormone is associated with better survival in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). This minireview provides new evidence based on recent studies related to the beneficial effects of exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease, focusing on the ANP.

The diagnosis of coronary heart disease in a low-prevalence setting: follow-up data from patients whose CHD was misdiagnosed by their family doctors

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) is a challenge for primary care physicians (PCPs). We studied the further course of 57 patients who presented to their PCPs with chest pain and were initially misdiagnosed as not having CHD as the cause of chest pain.

METHODS

The 57 misdiagnosed patients were among 1,249 consecutive patients aged 35 and above who presented with chest pain to 74 different PCPs (35% of the 209 PCPs initially invited to participate in the study). For each patient, the PCPs recorded the initial history and physical findings and the course over the ensuing six months. An independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed all of the data and retrospectively determined each patient's most likely cause of chest pain at the time of inclusion in the study.

RESULTS

For 405 patients (32.4%), the PCPs rated the probability that CHD was the cause of chest pain at 0 to 5%. The reference panel retrospectively diagnosed CHD as the cause of chest pain in 180 patients. The PCPs correctly diagnosed CHD as the cause of chest pain in 123 (68.3%) of these patients and failed to diagnose CHD as the cause of chest pain in 57 of them (31.7%). 26 (45.6%) of the 57 misdiagnosed patients had a history of CHD. Even when the diagnosis of CHD as the cause of chest pain was missed, the PCPs often ordered an ECG (42 of 57 patients, or 73.7%) or referred the patient to a cardiologist or internist (20 of 57 patients, or 35.1%).

CONCLUSION

Primary care physicians diagnose CHD with moderate sensitivity. Even when they initially fail to make the diagnosis, they often order further tests and consultations that ultimately lead to a correct diagnosis of CHD.