Personal experience with whole-body, low-dosage, digital X-ray scanning (LODOX-Statscan) in trauma

The hidden value of MRI: modifying treatment decisions in C-spine injuries

BACKGROUND DATA

Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard for cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerges due to its increasing availability and the lack of radiation exposure. However, MRI is costly and time-consuming, questioning its role in the emergency department (ED). This study investigates the added the value of an additional MRI for patients presenting with a c-spine injury in the ED.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocenter cohort study that included all patients with neck trauma presenting in the ED, who received imaging based on the NEXUS criteria. Spine surgeons performed a full-case review to classify each case into "c-spine injured" and "c-spine uninjured". Injuries were classified according to the AO Spine classification. We assessed patients with a c-spine injury detected by CT, who received a subsequent MRI. In this subset, injuries were classified separately in both imaging modalities. We monitored the treatment changes after the additional MRI to evaluate characteristics of this cohort and the impact of the AO Spine Neurology/Modifier modifiers.

RESULTS

We identified 4496 subjects, 2321 were eligible for inclusion and 186 were diagnosed with c-spine injuries in the retrospective case review. Fifty-six patients with a c-spine injury initially identified through CT received an additional MRI. The additional MRI significantly extended (geometric mean ratio 1.32, p < 0.001) the duration of the patients' stay in the ED. Of this cohort, 25% had a change in treatment strategy and among the patients with neurological symptoms (AON ≥ 1), 45.8% experienced a change in treatment. Patients that were N-positive, had a 12.4 (95% CI 2.7-90.7, p < 0.01) times higher odds of a treatment change after an additional MRI than neurologically intact patients.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our study suggests that patients with a c-spine injury and neurological symptoms benefit from an additional MRI. In neurologically intact patients, an additional MRI retains value only when carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

An investigation into the use of Full-body Low Dose X-rays Imaging system in South Africa: Radiographer's perspective

Introduction

A low dose x-rays alias Lodox© statscan was originally developed in South Africa to detect smuggled diamonds in the mines. Later, hospital trauma units began to use it as a screening tool for gross pathology on trauma patients. This imaging system became popular because of its use of low radiation doses and its ability to perform anterior posterior (head to toe image) image in under 13 seconds. Anecdotal evidence confirms that patients were referred for additional regional images on conventional x-ray systems after Lodox imaging. Thus, patients were subjected to additional ionising radiation, long waiting times as well as additional charges for secondary radiological examinations.

Objective

This research aimed at investigating the extent to which Lodox was used in trauma units (n=28) in South Africa.

Method

In this descriptive cross-sectional research. researcher invited one radiographer from each of the 28 hospitals in South Africa that were using Lodox.

Results

Out of twenty radiographers who responded, it was found that most hospitals were referring patients for additional conventional x-ray images (Figure 1); for example, for chest x-rays. This was done despite the patient having undergone radiological procedures and examinations by the Lodox imaging system that was similar to those performed by conventional x-ray systems.

Conclusion

Lodox was used for a successful diagnosis Thus, researcher recommends an imaging protocol for Lodox to be developed for guiding the referral of patients after the Lodox scanning has been performed.

Cervical spine trauma - Evaluating the diagnostic power of CT, MRI, X-Ray and LODOX

BACKGROUND

Traumatic cervical spine (c-spine) injuries account for 10% of all spinal injuries. The c-spine is prone to injury by blunt acceleration/deceleration traumas. The Canadian C-Spine rule and NEXUS criteria guide clinical decision-making but lack consensus on imaging modality when necessary. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CT, MRI, X-Ray, and, for the first time, LODOX-Statscan in identifying c-spine injuries in patients with blunt trauma and neck pain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocenter cohort study using patient data from the emergency department at Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland's largest level one trauma center. We identified patients presenting with trauma and neck pain during the recruitment period from 01.01.2012 to 31.12.2017. We included all patients that required a radiographic c-spine evaluation according to the NEXUS criteria. Certified spine surgeons reviewed each case, analyzed patient demographics, injury classification, trauma mechanism, and emergency management. The retrospective full case review was established as gold standard to decide whether the c-spine was injured. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for CT, MRI, LODOX, and X-Ray imaging methods.

RESULTS

We identified 4996 patients, of which 2321 met the inclusion criteria. 91.3% (n = 2120) patients received a CT scan, 8.9% (n = 206) a MRI, 9.3% (n = 215) an X-ray, and 21.5% (n = 498) a LODOX scan. By retrospective case review, 186 participants were classified as injured. The sensitivity of CT was 88.6% (specificity 99%), and 89.8% (specificity 99.2%) with orthopedic surgeon consultation. MRI had a sensitivity of 88.5% (specificity of 96.9%); highlighting 14 cases correctly diagnosed as injured by MRI and misdiagnosed by CT. Projection radiography (36.4% sensitivity, 95.1% specificity) and LODOX (5.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity) were unsuitable for ruling out spinal injury.

CONCLUSION

While CT offers high sensitivity for detecting traumatic c-spine injury, MRI holds clinical significance in revealing injuries not recognized by CT in symptomatic patients. LODOX and projection radiography are insufficient for accurately ruling out c-spine injury. For patients with neurological symptoms, we recommend extended MRI use when CT scans are negative.

Diagnostic accuracies of CTs, X-rays and Lodox to detect blunt force trauma in adults, using a pig model

The accurate radiological detection of skeletal trauma is crucial for the investigation of blunt force trauma (BFT) cases. The sensitivities of CTs, X-rays and Lodox in identifying BFT fractures and minimum number of impacts in pigs, used as proxies for adult humans, were assessed. Ten human sized pig carcasses were struck with a mallet and scanned, after which the number of fractures and minimum number of impacts detected radiologically were recorded. Pig carcasses were then macerated, and the defleshed, skeletonized remains were considered the gold standard as far as number and location of fractures were concerned. CTs were most sensitive in identifying fractures and impacts in all body regions, with overall sensitivities of 55.4% and 71.5% respectively, while X-rays and Lodox had sensitivities of 25.8% and 29.3% for fractures, and 43.5% and 41.1% for impacts, respectively. All modalities were highly specific for identifying fractures (CT: 99.1%; X-ray: 98.9%; Lodox: 99.4%). CTs should be used to analyze blunt force trauma when a radiological assessment is required, but an examination of the defleshed bones remains the gold standard for the deceased whenever feasible. X-rays and Lodox have limited diagnostic value in these cases and relying on them to detect fractures may compromise the accurate forensic investigation of blunt trauma victims. However, the use of Lodox for initial screening of major trauma is still of value. Sensitivities are generally higher for detecting fractures in pigs compared to piglets, indicating that increased diagnostic value is achieved when imaging pigs compared to piglets.

Identification of ureteral stones at reduced radiation exposure: a pilot study comparing conventional versus digital low-dosage linear slot scanning (Lodox®) radiography

PURPOSE

Digital low-dosage, linear slot scanning radiography (Lodox^®) is an imaging modality that can emit down to one-tenth the radiation of conventional X-ray systems. We prospectively evaluated Lodox^® as a diagnostic imaging modality in patients with ureterolithiasis.

METHODS

Conventional kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) X-ray and Lodox^® were performed in 41 patients presenting with acute flank pain due to unilateral ureteral stone confirmed by computed tomography. KUB X-ray and Lodox^® images were then reviewed by four blinded readers (urology expert/resident, radiology expert/resident). Identification rates were compared using Pearson's Chi square test. The impact of different parameters on stone identification by Lodox^® was evaluated using logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models. Inter-reader agreement was tested using Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Median stone size was 5 mm (range 2-12), median stone density was 800 HU (range 200-1500). The identification rates of the urology expert were 68% for KUB X-ray and 90% for Lodox^® (p = 0.014), and for all four readers 61% for KUB X-ray and 62% for Lodox^® (p = 0.8). Radiation exposure for KUB X-ray and Lodox^® was 0.45 mSv (SD ± 0.64) and 0.027 mSv (SD ± 0.038), respectively. Multivariable analyses showed an association between stone identification by Lodox^® and stone size (p < 0.001), stone density (p = 0.005), lower body mass index (p = 0.005), and reader (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high identification rates and low radiation doses of Lodox^® make it a promising imaging modality for the diagnosis of ureteral stones. Further validation in larger cohorts, including performance evaluation for renal stones, is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.controlled-trails.com/ISRCTN12915426.

An overview of the challenges facing death investigation systems in certain resource limited countries

A properly operated death investigation system (DIS) serves multiple stakeholders. Law enforcement, public health departments and members of the public, benefit in various ways from the information that it provides. This information must be collected systematically and efficiently. The system must also be flexible enough to respond to pressures on its resources such as occurs during mass disasters. These obligations on a DIS require an investment of public money. However even in affluent Western countries the recent world economic crisis has led to a cut in spending on public services that affect both the healthcare system and services associated with death investigation. Although pathologists and other stake holders (judiciary, police, families) would like to see death investigations conducted to international standards, the fact is that policy makers in resource limited countries face additional population health and sociopolitical pressures which generally result in very little funding for the service. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the challenges that impede the proper functioning of a death investigation system in resource limited countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean. Possible solutions are discussed.

Full-body x-ray imaging to facilitate triage: a potential aid in high-volume emergency departments

The levels of traumatic injury seen in South African emergency departments (EDs) are epidemic. This is coupled with a severe lack of resources and adequately trained emergency staff. The Lodox Statscan (LS) is an X-ray scanner capable of producing rapid, low-dose, and full-body X-ray images. In this paper, a new trauma protocol-the Johannesburg trauma protocol-that implements LS scanning on entry to the ED as a triage tool is reported. A case study illustrating the use of LS to triage 63 patients in a single Saturday shift at a level 1 Trauma Centre is also presented. Because of the ability to rapidly and safely provide X-ray imaging information to support clinical decision making, the LS could be a useful tool to aid in resource allocation to improve treatment of the high levels of trauma patients that present to South African EDs daily.

A review of full-body radiography in nontraumatic emergency medicine

This paper reports on the application of full-body radiography to nontraumatic emergency situations. The Lodox Statscan is an X-ray machine capable of imaging the entire body in 13 seconds using linear slit scanning radiography (LSSR). Nontraumatic emergency applications in ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt visualisation, emergency room arteriography (ERA), detection of foreign bodies, and paediatric emergency imaging are presented. Reports show that the fast, full-body, and low-dose scanning capabilities of the Lodox system make it well suited to these applications, with the same or better image quality, faster processing times, and lower dose to patients. In particular, the large format scans allowing visualisation of a greater area of anatomy make it well suited to VP shunt monitoring, ERA, and the detection of foreign bodies. Whilst more studies are required, it can be concluded that the Lodox Statscan has the potential for widespread use in these and other nontraumatic emergency radiology applications.

Full-body radiography (LODOX Statscan) in trauma and emergency medicine: a report from the first European installation site

Lodox Statscan is a whole-body, skeletal and soft-tissue, low-dose X-ray scanner with digital enhancement and enlargement capabilities. Ten years ago it was introduced as a screening device for the examination of trauma patients. Its incorporation into the Emergency Room enabled anterior-posterior and lateral thoraco-abdominal studies to be performed in 3—5 min with only about one-third of the radiation required for conventional radiography. Since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in the USA, several trauma centres have incorporated this technology into their Advanced Trauma Life Support protocols. This review provides an overview of the system, and reports on the authors’ own experience with the system and that of others over the past 10 years, based on a literature search for all review articles, original articles, conference proceedings, case reports and short reports related to the Lodox Statscan device.

Review of Lodox Statscan in the detection of peripheral skeletal fractures in multiple injury patients

INTRODUCTION

As part of the primary survey, polytrauma patients in our emergency department are examined using the new 'Lodox Statscan' (LS) digital low-radiation imaging device. The LS provides full-body anterior and lateral views based on enhanced linear slot-scanning technology, in accordance with the recommended Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Guidelines. This study's objectives were to establish whether LS appropriately rules out peripheral bone injuries and to examine whether LS imaging provides adequate information for the preoperative planning of such lesions.

METHODS

A total of 245 consecutive polytrauma patients aged 16 years or more undergoing LS imaging were included in this retrospective chart analysis. The results of the LS scans were reviewed and compared to additional plain radiographs or computed tomography scans, whenever further radiological imaging was required to determine consecutive therapy.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the LS scans were 73% and 100%, respectively, for peripheral skeletal injuries. Additional plain radiographs were performed in 50% of cases for (1) superior focussing and more precise resolution of the affected part of the body, (2) additional second or third plane, (3) additional information about fracture type and planning of the surgical approach and (4) for preoperative planning of implant size and positioning on calibrated digitised films, <1% because of the low quality of the LS scan and <1% because the fracture zone had not been fully captured.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that despite LS's high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of peripheral skeletal injuries, additional radiological imaging for diagnostic or preoperative reasons was required. Our results imply that LS, although efficient for patient screening in the emergency room, cannot always rule out peripheral skeletal injuries.